Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methods of survival in concentration camps
Methods of survival in concentration camps
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What does it mean to survive? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines survival as being able “to remain alive or in existence: [to] live on.” However, to survive the horrors of the concentration camps in the Holocaust was more than just existing, more than just having a heartbeat. Survival in a concentration camp does not only entail the physical ability to remain alive, but the ability to survive mentally and emotionally as well. In Primo Levi’s, Survival In Auschwitz, survival is a major theme throughout the book as he displays what it took to survive in the camp of Auschwitz.
Primo Levi’s struggle to survive is a constant battle. Levi depicts one of his struggles to survive physically when he makes the decision to go to the infirmary, which
…show more content…
he refers to as the Ka-Be. He decides to because the back of his foot is slashed open by a load of iron. He decides to take the risk of going to the Ka-Be because he is incapable of working with an injured foot. Levi explains, “those who show signs of improvement are cured in Ka-Be, those who seem to get worse are sent from Ka-Be to the gas chambers.” He has to make a choice: go to the Ka-Be and risk being killed, or stay working and risk worsening the infection and possible death. His choice to go to the Ka-Be proves to be the correct one and it saves his life. To physically survive in Auschwitz, one must also survive mentally.
This can be a daunting task as one must keep hope and remember one’s dignity and humanity which the Nazis successfully wrenched from millions of Jews. Primo Levi nearly becomes one of the victims, at one point even admitting that he found no use in wasting energy on cleaning himself: “Would I live a day, an hour longer? I would probably live a shorter time because to wash is an effort, a waste of energy and warmth… we will all die.” These pessimistic thoughts that Levi has are potentially as deadly as a gas chamber. Without the will to want to live, one will die. Fortunately, one day while in the latrine he realizes this: “...even in this place one can survive and therefore one must want to survive… We must polish our shoes, not because the regulation states it, but for dignity and propriety. We must walk erect, without dragging our feet, not in homage to Prussian discipline but to remain alive, not to begin to …show more content…
die.” His mental strength and ability to stay sharp continues to be proven throughout the book. He explains the many strategies he uses to have the greatest chance of survival. He quickly learns that even simple pieces of knowledge are necessary to survive in Auschwitz. He eats his food in a purposeful way to ensure he eats every last crumb, and he knows where to stand in line when meals are served in order to get the most nutritious part of the soup. Additionally, he takes every opportunity to make his situation a little better. For instance, he ingeniously uses rags he finds to cushion his uncomfortable wooden shoes. Furthermore, Primo Levi explains how he could find use in any material at his disposal to help his survival: “the wire to tie up our shoes, the rags to wrap around our feet, waste paper to (illegally) pad out our jacket against the cold.” These lessons Levi learns serves useful and help his mind stay lively as he actively sought ways to use everyday material to his advantage. Another key factor to survive in Auschwitz is maintaining one’s emotional health and stability.
Levi is fortunate to be able to maintain his emotional health through his friendship with Alberto, who is introduced once Levi is released from the infirmary. Levi describes his best friend as optimistic, “uscathed and uncorrupted” by the circumstances of the horrid situation. Levi goes on about Alberto, “he fights for his life but still remains everybody’s friend… I always saw, and still see in him, the rare figure of the strong yet peace-loving man against whom the weapons of the night are blunted.” Alberto was Levi’s savior, inspiring Levi to stay optimistic. He is Levi’s outlet to confide to and he is Levi’s uplifter. Together they also manage to devise plans to get more rations of bread and improve popularity within the black market and within their block. The reader truly sees the depth of this friendship on Alberto’s last day: As the healthy prisoners were instructed to evacuate, Alberto risks his life by stopping by the Ka-Be to say goodbye to Primo Levi. Levi speaks of Alberto on the last time he saw him, “we were inseparable:... For six months we had shared a bunk and every scrap of food ‘organized’ in excess of the ration.” Levi makes it clear that without this companionship and emotional support to keep him alive, Primo Levi would not have survived the
camp. In his book, Survival in Auschwitz, Primo Levi defines what survival is to him. Levi shows the reader that to survive, one needs more than to just have a heartbeat. To survive, one needs a sharp mind and the mentality to want to survive. One needs an optimistic and hopeful attitude even in the most demanding of times. Most importantly, one needs to feel the love and warmth of a true friend. In Auschwitz, these three aspects seem nearly impossible to hold with oneself throughout the years, however those who could were those who lived on, to tell their story of survival.
The Silber Medal winning biography, “Surviving Hitler," written by Andrea Warren paints picture of life for teenagers during the Holocaust, mainly by telling the story of Jack Mandelbaum. Avoiding the use of historical analysis, Warren, along with Mandelbaum’s experiences, explains how Jack, along with a few other Jewish and non-Jewish people survived.
It is almost unimaginable the difficulties victims of the holocaust faced in concentration camps. For starters they were abducted from their homes and shipped to concentration camps in tightly packed cattle cars. Once they made it to a camp, a selection process occurred. The males were separated from the females. Then those who were too young or too old to work were sent to the showers. Once the showers were tightly packed, the Nazi’s would turn on the water and drop in canisters of chemicals that would react with the water and release a deadly gas. Within minutes, everyone in the shower would be dead. The bodies would be hauled out and burned. Those who were not selected to die didn’t fair much better. Terrible living conditions, forced labor, malnourishment, and physical abuse were just a few of the things they had to endure. It was such a dark time. So many invaluable lessons can be learned from the holocaust and from those who survived it. One theme present in Elie Wiesel’s novel Night and Robert Benigni’s film Life is Beautiful is that family can strengthen or hinder one during adversity.
It can perhaps be inferred from the title that Freud’s work will have a languished tone. When describing the workings of civilization, Freud chooses words with negative connotations, such as “restriction” and “perversion” (Freud 49, 59). He ends the work by bleakly asking “may we not be justified that under the influence of cultural urges…possibly the whole of mankind—have become neurotic?” (Freud 110). He sees no feasible solution to the conflicts between human tendencies and civilization. In Survival in Auschwitz, Primo Levi outlook is despondent and fatalistic. His anecdotes focus solely on the horrible experiences he and his fellow prisoners must endure at the work camp. This tone changes, however, once he begins to form relationships with other men in the camp; he becomes focused on survival and abandons the forlorn tone to focus on survival. As Auschwitz is abandoned and the prisoners left are striving to survive, he recounts that he gave everyone nasal drops of camphorated oil “for pure propaganda purposes…I assured Sertelet that they would help him; I even tried to convince myself” (Levi 168). Instead of wallowing in their state as Sigmund Freud does, Primo Levi looks for ways to be optimistic and instill hope in his
Primo Levi’s tales of his labors in “Survival in Auschwitz” connected Marx’s ideas with work under extreme and unique circumstances. In the Lager, workers suffered extreme working conditions, were deskilled in labor, became one with the masses, and were dehumanized. Through Marx’s four estrangements (estrangement of man from the product of his labor, estrangement of man from the act of labor, estrangement of man from humanity, and the estrangement of man from man), it became evident the ways in which the Holocaust is a product of a heightened version of capitalist modernity.
Between Night and The Hiding Place, comradeship, faith, strength, and people of visions are clearly proved to be essential in order to survive in these death camps. Corrie, Elie, and other victims of these harsh brutalities who did survive had a rare quality that six million others unfortunately did not.
Primo Levi was taken from Italy to Monowitz, also known as Auschwitz 3, in the early spring of 1944 at the age of twenty-four. Unlike Eliezer Primo Levi had a vague idea of what transportation meant for those captured by the Germans, “Only a minority of ingenuous and deluded souls continued to hope; we others had often spoken with the Polish and Croat refugees and we knew what departure meant.” (Levi, 3) A reason for why Eliezer had not known what was occurring in the war before his transportation can be attributed to his young age and of the adults wanting to keep him unaware of the tragedies taking place. The rounding up of the prisoners within the camp of where Primo Levi stayed in Italy was also done in a very organized manner, “With the absurd precision to which we later had to accustom ourselves, the Germans held the roll- call.” (Levi, 4) Once the night had given way for dawn the horrors of what were to come in the concentration camp had already begun in the ways of roll call and being packed upon the train cattle transportation cars. Another resemblance of the opening chapters of the two memoirs is the fact that once again no one knew any information about what occurred at the camp they were headed to. As mentioned in Primo Levi’s memoir, “Auschwitz: a name without significance for us at the time, but it at least implied some place on this earth.” (6) The events leading up to the entry of Primo Levi and Elie Wiesel to Auschwitz were very parallel experiences with the main difference being in their backgrounds. Once they were within those barbed wire gates their lives would never be the same after witnessing the atrocities of what was to be known of
Life in Auschwitz was definitely not what many people think it was. Life was hard, housing was rough, the guards were mean and brutal and the different things that could happen to you were terrifying. One day in there would have killed most people and they lived like that for years. Every day was a constant battle for their lives and they never got a break. So many people died from getting sick or from the things the guards would do and no one could save them. The food was bad and they had to hurt each other to get more food so that they wouldn’t starve. They were forced to turn against each other to survive when they never should have had to. Life was never the same for those who went to Auschwitz and survived. As for those who didn’t survive; they never saw a better day.
Concentration camps, such as the one in which Levi lived, were tools of national socialist ideology. It further empowered the Nazi?s to treat the Jews as subhuman (an ?inferior race?). Within in a short time after arriving at the camp, men were stripped of everything they had known throughout life. Families were immediately separated after the transport trains were unloaded, dividing the ?healthy? from the ?ill?. Levi learns that he is now called a ?Haftling? and is given a number (174517), which is tattooed on his forearm, replacing his actual name. ?The whole process of introduction to what was f...
...s advised early on that incurable illness lead to one’s downfall (Levi). When Levi contracts scarlet fever, he knows what is to come of him. Either he will die from the disease or will be put to death due to his inability to work (Levi). Luckily, the Soviet army pushes its forces closer and closer to the camp, leaving the chances of liberation possible (Levi). The Nazis lead an evacuation of the entire camp, except for those in the Ka-Be (Levi). Some believe that staying behind will only lead to their execution and decide to participate in the evacuation. Nonetheless, the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz several days later to liberate the camp (Levi).
...lyzes man’s internal and external issues which conveys mankind’s human condition. Survival in Auschwitz conclusively depicts how mankind reacts to the deepest and most torturous oppression within our past. He proves undoubtedly that the majority of man will fall to corruption or fail completely and give up hope altogether in the struggle for survival. His rather alluring account on how to truly survive in the camp and “documentation...of certain aspects of the human mind” relay the process of their dehumanization (Survival 9). Levi ultimately deems man’s reaction to oppression and the backlash of their means.
The inmates usually lived in overcrowded barracks and slept in bunk “beds”. In the forced labour camps, for instance, the inmates usually worked 12 hours a day with hard physical work, clothed in rags, eating too little and always living under the risk of corporal punishment” (Holocaust | Concentration Camps). Only 7,000 emaciated survivors of a Nazi extermination process that killed an estimated six million Jews were found at Auschwitz” (Rice, Earle). Most of these deaths occurred towards the end of the war; however, there were still a lot of lives that had been miraculously spared. “According to SS reports, there were more than 700,000 prisoners left in the camps in January 1945.
Who survived the holocaust? What are their lives like today? What has been the government's response towards those who survived after World War II? Have the survivors kept their faith? How has the survivors next generation been affected? The survivors of the holocaust were deeply effected by the trauma they encountered. This unforgettable experience influenced their lives, those around them, and even their descendants.
Primo Levi: Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996) [first published as If This Is a Man], p. 86.
For most people, survival is just a matter of putting food on the table, making sure that the house payment is in on time, and remembering to put on that big winter coat. Prisoners in the holocaust did not have to worry about such things. Their food, cloths, and shelter were all provided for them. Unfortunately, there was never enough food, never sufficient shelter, and the cloths were never good enough. The methods of survival portrayed in the novels Maus by Art Spieglmen and Night by Elie Wiesel are distinctly different, but undeniably similar.
Primo Levi was an Italian Jewish Anti-fascist who was arrested in 1943, during the Second World War. The memoir, “If this is a Man”, written immediately after Levi’s release from the Auschwitz concentration camp, not only provides the readers with Levi’s personal testimony of his experience in Auschwitz, but also invites the readers to consider the implications of life in the concentration camp for our understanding of human identity. In Levi’s own words, the memoir was written to provide “documentation for a quiet study of certain aspects of the human mind”. The lack of emotive words and the use of distant tone in Levi’s first person narration enable the readers to visualize the cold, harsh reality in Auschwitz without taking away the historical credibility. Levi’s use of poetic and literary devices such as listing, repetition, and symbolism in the removal of one’s personal identification; the use of rhetorical questions and the inclusion of foreign languages in the denial of basic human rights; the use of bestial metaphors and choice of vocabulary which directly compares the prisoner of Auschwitz to animals; and the use of extended metaphor and symbolism in the character Null Achtzehn all reveal the concept of dehumanization that was acted upon Jews and other minorities.