Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies
Compare Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies
Internal conflict in lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies
When the boys landed on the island, they would initially strive to have fun and enjoy themselves due to a lack of authority curtailing their liberties, and with the sanguine hope of being rescued. However, due to their predicament, two leaders would emerge, Jack and Ralph, leading to conflicting leaderships that would eventually lead to tension between the two boys. Jack would have a penchant for flouting the orders of Ralph, the elected leader, especially when he and his hunters were ordered to watch the fire which was at that time, their only hope of being rescued. The fire, like many, would die down, and Jack would return with a slaughtered pig, with the knowledge that he disobeyed the orders assigned to him. Ralph would express this to him, but he would be,¨vaguely irritated by his irrelevance but too happy to let it worry him.¨ (Golding 63). …show more content…
In Jack’s mind, he would rather build his own society on the island than adhere to the morals and laws of Ralph. Even though this act of defiance was minor and trivial, this would strip Jack of some of his innocence, foreshadowing the conflicts with not only Ralph, but also himself, as he would break away from the inchoate government Ralph has instituted, and really submit himself to evil. As the grueling weeks and months elapsed on the island, attempts to ameliorate relations between Jack and Ralph would prove futile, even though it seemed to be improving at times. Several incidents between the two boys that would lead to inimical relations would occur, especially when Jack became obsessed with hunting the native pigs for sustenance, not to mention the “beastie”. It would be at one meeting that Jack would vilify Ralph and compare him someone who looked incompetent yet was really not. Someone who acted,‘“like
Ralph is the novel’s protagonist and tries to maintain the sense of civility and order as the boys run wild. Ralph represents the good in mankind by treating and caring for all equally, which is completely opposite of Jack’s savage nature. Jack is the antagonist in the novel and provokes the most internal evil of all the boys. Jack is seen at first as a great and innocent leader but he becomes t...
Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, has four very important dynamic characters. A dynamic character is a character that develops and grows during the course of the story. Ralph, Jack, Piggy, and Simon are four dynamic characters in Lord of the Flies that adapt to their new lifestyles in different ways. Jack is a very important dynamic character in Lord of the Flies because he goes through the most changes during the novel. While on the island, Jack has many life experiences that change him forever. Jack never thought he would live his life the way he is living his life in the island. Jack’s authoritative figure, savage-like/instinctual behavior, and violence are three qualities that make Jack a dynamic character.
The goal of any person stranded in an island is surviving. These boys are well aware of this goal and know they must stick with the leader that will help them survive the longest. The options these boys have for possible leaders are Ralph and Jack. On one hand, Ralph is focused on building a signal fire to be rescued. On the other hand, Jack focuses on settling on the island by providing food and protection.QUOTE OF BOYS NOT CARING FOR BEING RESCUED The biological factor that encourages these boys to follow the orders of Jack is the fact that the majority of the boys have little to no hope of being rescued. They probably believe that Jack can keep them alive for a long time on the island by providing protection against the beast everyone talks
However, as the plot progresses, Ralph faces both internal and external conflicts; from those conflicts he greatly matures. Ralph always has the strong belief that all the children will be saved from the island sooner or later; he is so sure that he even insists that they should have fire at all times to signal. However, when the boys abandon the fire which is symbolic of Ralph’s hope of getting saved, Ralph faces an internal conflict that makes him fear about their future; perhaps they will not be rescued at all. By insisting that the children should keep the fire going, he creates an external conflict with Jack whose values are different. Jack is enjoying life as a leader of the savages, and he fears that fire will possibly end his authoritarian rule over the savages. Both conflicts are resolved when Ralph finally meets the naval officer.
Upon the arrival of the boys to the island Jack immediately found himself in the center of a power struggle. Although the conflict was brief, there was still a very obvious confrontation between Jack and Ralph. Once the boys had assembled themselves there was an election to see who was to be chief. Despite the fact that Ralph was voted leader, the desire to be in command never left Jack. Jack already had some leadership skills, being head choirboy at his old school, and he continuously challenged Ralph. The greatest source of conflict between Jack and Ralph was the debate over the necessity of maintaining a fire. Ralph felt that it was necessary to keep it burning at all times while Jack believed that hunting pigs and getting meat was much more essential.
To begin, survival is the key in every ones mindset. You only live once as most people say. However, with Jack and Ralph and the rest of the boys, they all seemed that all hope was lost. They had been stranded in the island for months, hoping that one day, someone will find them and return them home. Ralph was the most panicked person in the group simply because he hadn’t cut his hair and it was growing. He also did not shower at all, and he did not shave or eat as much simply due to the lack of surviving. He had given up on the hope for rescue, until in chapter 12, he, along with Jack and the rest of the boys, were saved by an officer which saw the destruction and the vicious bodies of the ...
Ralph shows that he has a better understanding of the boys than Jack. He knows that the boys need some sort of order on the island in order for them to survive. He starts a simple form of government and sets a few rules for them. Even though they don’t last very long, the fact that he tried to help the group is what makes him a better leader. Ralph’s wisdom and ability to look toward the future also has an advantage over Jack. He has a sense to keep his focus on getting off the island. When the fire goes out, Ralph gets upset because the chance to be rescued was gone as well. Ralph enforces his role of leadership as he gives the boys a sense of stability of an authority figure. He keeps the boys in pretty good order at the meeting by making a rule that they can only speak if they have the conch. Ralph knows that the littleuns are afraid and they need shelter to feel more secure. They work together for a while, but as the time goes on the smaller boys want to go play. They slowly lose all their help until Simon and Ralph are the only ones left to work on them. Ralph knows that this is a necessity and keeps bringing it up at the meetings. Jack, on the other hand, is doing nothing but causing chaos.
At first, the boys how positive behavior; however once the boys became members of the hunters, they began behavior like barbaric animals with no values or rules. This is a perfect example of differential association how the boys associated themselves with the hunters began to show signs of deviant behaviors. Jack also illustrates a laisses-fair leader that doesn’t seem to care if crimes or committed due to the lack of authority figures on the island. This was a very interesting movie. Another interesting topic was how both groups believed what they needed to accomplish to survive was completed different. For example, Ralph’s group believed that establishing order, having a chain of command and following orders in a civilized way was the correct direction. However, Jack’s group felt completed different about how things should be ran. He believe that a dictatorship was the best method. Someone who makes all the decisions and has complete control over the entire group. These are perfect examples of culture goals and how they vary from person to person. This comes to show you that Ralph’s approach is much more civilized and create social order within the groups while Jack’s beliefs have no systemic value and would eventually crumple due to much power by one
At one point in the story Jack says “Conch! Conch! We don’t need the conch anymore, we know who ought to say things” This quote really tells us that Jack’s pride has overtaken him and the idea of the kids submitting to him and calling him “chief.” has gone to his head. Jack has become very popular by force and by the kids feeling peer pressured to join Jack’s tribe and be hunters, or else they might be killed by the rest of the tribe. Everyone on the tribe is scared to step up to Jack because the people on his tribe are beginning to get used to the violent acts savagery that have been committed on the island so far. The kids start to let the fear of man overtake them and give into the peer pressure of joining Jack’s tribe because there isn’t really another option. By the kids giving into the peer pressure to follow the “popular” leader, Jack, they are ultimately giving Jack more power so he can do whatever he wants with the support of others who agreed to be apart of the tribe. This theme reaches its climax at the end of the story when it is literally Jack’s whole tribe, which basically consists of all the kids on the island, against Ralph. In the end, Ralph was the only one who didn’t give into the peer pressure to join Jack’s tribe, and ultimately he was rewarded for it because he got what he wanted, to be rescued. Now just because he didn’t give into peer pressure doesn’t mean you automatically get rewarded. I feel that giving Ralph his desire was William Golding’s way of rewarding Ralph for not giving into being apart of Jack's
Contrasting Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies & nbsp;& nbsp; & nbsp; Ralph and Jack are both powerful and meaningful characters in William Golding's novel, Lord of the Flies. Ralph is an excellent leader; responsible, and stands for all that is good. Jack is a destructive hunter, selfish, and represents evil. These two main characters can be compared by the actions they take as leaders, their personalities, and what they symbolize in the story. & nbsp; Ralph first takes on the position as leader at the beginning of the story, when the rest of the boys vote him in as chief.&nbs Rules and standards are set when Ralph is the chief. He orders the group to build the basic necessities of civilization, shelters, and most importantly to keep the fire going, in hope that they will be rescued and return to humanity. " But I tell you that smoke is more important than the pig, however often you kill one" (Golding 75). Jack, on the other hand, takes on the idea of every man for himself. He does not care about making homes, only about hunting. When Jack is the leader, evil takes over and all good is destroyed. Under Jack's power both Simon and Piggy are killed. & nbsp; Not only do the two character's decisions clash so do their personalities. Ralph is caring and considerate, being kinder to Piggy, making friends with him and constantly confid Ralph represents law, order, organized society and moral integrity. Throughout the novel he is constantly making common-sense rules for the boys to follow. Unlike Ralph, Jack is unkind, caring about no one
Ralph and Jack’s image of what life on the island would be like and how they would go about it was very different in the beginning of the story to the end. Ralph begins saying ‘This is our island. It’s a good island. Until the grown ups come to fetch us we’ll have fun.’(p:45). It is ironic how this optimism is shattered by the end of the novel and events turned out so badly as though it were almost foolish to think they’d have fun from the start. Jack also makes a surprisingly ironic turn in the novel where his ideas appear civilized and orderly in the beginning, ‘We’ll have rules! Lots of rules!’(p:44) however he is the one who becomes the leader of the savages and provokes fear of the beast.
Throughout much of the book, Jack acted as an anti-Ralph, providing counter arguments to his attempts to get the boys off the island, promoting a more free-willed, fun-spirited take on their desertion. However, Jack splits from the group, taking with him a band of hunters who provide a feast for all of the remaining, civilized boys as an incentive for them to join his tribe. Once he does so, many of the boys who looked to Ralph as their leader joined Jack’s tribe, surrendering all power to him, and becoming savages that in the process. During his time ruling, Jack also is referred to as a chief, but in a much different view of the word as opposed to that designated for Ralph. Jack leads hunts while Ralph would appoint a leader, Jack commands the boys for the sake of his enjoyment and recreation, while Ralph worked his hardest to get the boys back to their houses. In the midst of this astounding shift in power, Ralph
In addition, Hobbes believes that when there is no government or rules, men would ultimately turn into a state of savagery and deteriorate to battle against each other to satisfy one’s need. Faced with this ferocity, the only thing left to do is retaliate. “ Then there was that indefinable connection between himself and Jack; who therefore would never let him alone; never” (Golding, 184). Before Jack and Ralph’s rivalry, there was a sense of alliance. However, when Ralph became chief, Jack was neglected. As a result, Jack seeks to support his dominance over Ralph by showing that he is the better chief and hunter. Now, Ralph believes the only way to maintain his leadership is to fight fire with fire.
Jack has done his best to manipulate the boys into acting like wild beasts. For example, today they got Ralph to go along with their pig hunting. He was acting like one of them. I wonder what they did to get him to act like this. I think he was just under a lot of pressure, and he finally cracked, but I know they won’t get me to act like that. Even Simon was acting a little different; he isn’t afraid anymore. He decided to go all alone across the island, just to tell Piggy what the littluns were doing. I think he went by himself so no one would find out about his spot, and so he could prove that he’s more tough than anyone thinks. That’s right Simon has a spot, a spot where he goes when he needs time to think. A spot where he can be alone and not get bothered by anyone. However, if I were him I would be terrified to go all the way across the island all by myself. After all I am only eight, so it’s pretty understandable that I would act like a little kid. On top of that, Ralph decided to go with Jack up a mountain in the dark. Why would he make a ridiculous choice like that? I think he wanted to prove himself to the littluns and try to get his reign back. But I could be wrong, maybe he just wanted to go on an adventure in the dark. Maybe they have a spot that no one else knows about, like Simon. These people are changing too much, too fast. I’m not even sure I like these new people with the
Golding shows throughout the book how people have different views within a civilization. In the book one of the boys, Jack was always very focused on hunting. When the boys were chasing a pig Jack starts a chant, “Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Bash her in” (Golding 76). This shows how focused Jack was on hunting. It also shows one of the boys views on what must happen on the island. He believed the boys should just eat meat and have fun. Another boy on the island and the chief of the island is Ralph. His sole focus is to escape the island. For this to...