Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the impact of charlemagne
Essays on the impact of charlemagne
Essays on the impact of charlemagne
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the impact of charlemagne
Even though Charlemagne didn't write any of his own literary works, he greatly contributed to European society through the influences he imposed throughout his kingdom. Charlemagne stressed the importance of education, fine arts, and religion during his reign. Also, Charlemagne has been the basis for many popular poets during the 800's. Through all these ways, Charlemagne left a considerable impact on his people and future European culture.
Charlemagne was born in 742 AD. His mother made it a point to educate him in arithmetic, reading, and writing. He also took great interest in “expanding his knowledge of military tactics, he even accompanied his father on some of his military excursion”(BBC). He was a very social boy, and took great care in how well he was perceived by his
…show more content…
father's associates.
Due to all this preparation, when it was time for Charles to take the throne he was highly educated and well rounded both militarily and socially. His father's unfinished battles came a long with the throne, and Charlemagne was victory driven and would do anything to win. His vast knowledge of military strategy and first hand experience set him up to be a very successful war general. His persistence and loyalty motivated his men in ways that his father before him wasn't able to. This new spark in moral is what helped him defeat the Saxons and many more in battles to come.
Off the war front, Charles was determined to bring liveliness and culture back to his people. He searched for promising artists, writers, poets, and musicians throughout his kingdom that he could indorse to cultivate his lands once again. He invested money into the building of two palaces and the reconstruction of an infamous bridge to bring beauty to the kingdom. Charles also brought in art from Italy to decorate his home and had josters perform before meals for entertainment. Charlemagne set up a school that had a
planned curriculum of study based of Latin learning. He highly valued education because he believed an educated population was a more productive one. He made it a point to educated all of his people, so he not only set up schools for nobles but also for peasants. Charles also made it a point for religion to play a key role in the lives of his people. He was brought up a very religious man, and credited his successes to the Church. Charles truly believed that the only way to pureness and goodness was through religion. As emperor, he was very close with the Pope and often sought the Pope's advice. He also incorporated religion throughout the culture by including it in school's curriculums and working it into the arts. Charles even went as far as to bring in monks and scholars to read the Word to the people and his military regularly. However, his opinion on religion alone was enough to influence the people. Everybody admired Charlemagne for his great accomplishments and wanted to do everything they could to be like him. Due to this alone, people started taking greater interest in fine arts, education and religion. They knew how highly their ruler held these values, and so they figured they should, too. Charlemagne's great dedication to the Church earn him the title of the "First Holy Emperor"(web). He accepted this title and ruled under it with great honor and pristine. Charlemagne also did everything he could in order to better the conditions that his people lived in. Although he was a monarch, he injected himself into all areas of the government. He knew that some of the lords could be corrupt, so he held them accountable by taking note of everything they did and by making them work in groups. He did his very best to govern for the best of his people because he felt that the government was in place to help the people, not take advantage of them. He created ordinances that gave poorer farmers more land in order to increase their possible income. These little laws he put in place seemed fugal, but they benefited the people who needed it most and accomplished his goals of a fair ruler. The ideas of a people-serving government that started with Charlemagne would be passed on, and are still held highly in the minds of most people today. Charlemagne was a very well rounded, successful, and influential emperor. He encouraged people to live life, rather than just get by. The school systems he set up created a last influence on his people by making them more educated and aware of current events. He also influenced culture by making sure the public was well aware of fine arts. His publicizing of poetry, plays, and others arts created a lasting appreciation for the finer things in life. Even though he didn't write anything of his own, Charlemagne was a very big influence on early literature and was the center of many poems. Through all these ways, and many others, Charlemagne left a lasting impression on European culture and European literature.
The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the
Charlemagne is a known for his success to try to maintain his empire. This new empire will embrace the unity of Christian faith. Under Charlemagne, new lands are conquered and a Renaissance is embraced. He even tries to revive the Christian faith. Charlemagne is a man that hopes to be an inspiration to the next generation. These deeds of Charlemagne is seen in the Two Lives of Charlemagne. In the Two lives of Charlemagne, both Notker’s and Einhard’s goal is to portray Charlemagne as a man of good character, a man that accomplishes many deeds and a man that hopes to provide an outlet for the next generation.
Charlemagne is described by Janet Nelson as being a role model for Einhard. Einhard himself writes in the first paragraph of The Life of Charlemagne, “After I decided to write about the life, character and no small part of the accomplishments of my lord and foster father, Charles, that most excellent and deservedly famous king, I determined to do so with as much brevity as I could.” I feel that these are sincere words about the man who cared for Einhard. I feel that Einhard’s purpose for writing The Life of Charlemagne is to praise the works of his “foster-father” and create a historical document that would describe the great deeds of Charlemagne so that he would not be forgotten throughout time as a great leader and man.
The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.
Augustus Caesar’s had a huge impact on Western Civilization. He molded Rome into being a peaceful place. He changed Rome. He made it bigger and more glorious. He created things that we still use today like currency and the postal service. He was good to the people of Rome, and because of his kindness he was worshiped by most of the Roman’s and after his death considered a
Einhard, in his The Life of Charlemagne, makes clear the fundamental integration of politics and religion during the reign of his king. Throughout his life, Charles the Great endeavored to acquire and use religious power to his desired ends. But, if Charlemagne was the premiere monarch of the western world, why was religious sanction and influence necessary to achieve his goals? In an age when military power was the primary means of expanding one's empire, why did the most powerful military force in Europe go to such great lengths to ensure a benevolent relationship with the church? One possibility may be found in the tremendous social and political influence of Rome and her papacy upon the whole of the continent. Rather than a force to be opposed, Charlemagne viewed the church as a potential source of political power to be gained through negotiation and alliance. The relationship was one of great symbiosis, and both componants not only survived but prospered to eventually dominate western Europe. For the King of the Franks, the church provided the means to accomplish the expansion and reformation of his empire. For the Holy Roman Church, Charles provided protection from invaders and new possibilities for missionary work.
After reading two versions of “The Life of Charlemagne”, one written by a person who lived with Charlemagne, and one who didn’t, it is evident that Charlemagne is portrayed in a negative way by the author, the Monk of St. Gall, and in a positive way by Einhard. Einhard was very close to Charlemagne. He lived at the same time and with Charlemagne himself. His version of “The Life of Charlemagne” was writing right after his death. The Monk of St. Gall wrote his version more than 70 years after Charlemagne’s death. He did not live with or even at the same time as Charlemagne. This is probably one of the reasons the view on the ruler are completely different.
Writing history in the early Middle Ages "was not intended to be simply a matter of keeping a record for posterity." It was to help make the past more presentable and comprehensible to the present, "whether as support for contemporary political ideology or to explain God's purpose for humanity." Works that is widely read and follows these guidelines is writings Einhard and Notker did on Charlemagne. The writings of these two men can be looked at many different ways to decide how they wanted the history of Charlemagne to be perceived. "These histories can function both as a record of the past and as the exploitation of a different world in order to make particular political or polemical points."
...become great and victorious. There is the concept of how everything that Charlemagne did was for his enemies to be converted to Christianity and nothing else. Through the different interpretations, the argument for religious motives was the strongest. Charlemagne used military tactics in a misguided attempt to further the kingdom of God.
Throughout the Ages there have been many leaders who were known for their great rule. One of these great men during the 8th century was Charlemagne. The Life of Charlemagne was written by Einhard, a Frankish elite who had the privilege of working in the courts of Charlemagne. The book did not come out till after Charlemagne’s death but, it goes through his life in a thematic fashion. Einhard sets the book by first addressing deeds, habits, and then administration. This writing was one of the first of its kind. While there were many biographies written on the lives of saints known as hagiography, this was the first of its kind to be written about a secular ruler since the time of Antiquity. I will begin by talking about Charlemagne’s rise to power, then about his character and personality, and finally his relationship with his family.
“The apprenticeship of a King” describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is known of Charles’ boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of arms and ways of hunting. We may reasonably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a “man of letters” and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didn’t become interested in “letters” until later in life. Bullough explains a number of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The result was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.
Early Life Charlemagne was born in 742 A.D., to a very famous and well-known family. Charlemagne’s grandfather was Charles Martel, the man who was responsible for the defeat of the Saracens. Charlemagne was also the eldest son of Bertrade (also known as Bertha Greatfoot) and Pepin the Short, the first to become king of the Franks. With the almost full extinction of schools in the 8th century, many historians say that Charlemagne received very little education, but did learn the art of reading from Bertrade.
The coronation of Charlemagne is one of the most important events of its time and yet the events leading up to the crowning are scarcely mentioned in historical texts. Historians often disagree over the details of the coronation due to the lack of proper and sometimes contradictory historical documentation. This paper seeks to answer the questions surrounding the meaning and driving forces behind the coronation of a western emperor and expose the truth of what actually happened in the years leading up to the event. Many historical documents including the Lorsch Annals, Royal Frankish Annals, and letters provide the primary sources that are sifted by historians such as Alessandro Barbero, Paul Dutton, Neil Christie, and Rodger Collins in an effort to reveal the truth of Charlemagne's coronation.
Upon evaluating each empire, there are likings between both the Carolingian Empire and the Roman Empire, along with their leaders, Charlemagne and Augustus. Both leaders in their own veneration were experienced military men with dexterity in engaging in war to expand their sway and authority. Each had attained an abundance of land at the beginning of their sovereignty, and during their walk of life had exponentially accumulated an extensive empire. The crucial variance that permitted the Roman Empire to continue to withstand itself was the supervision of the
His belief in the need for education among the Frankish people was to bring about religious, political, and educational reforms that would change the way we live. history of Europe. Charlemagne was born in 742 at Aachen, the son of Pepin (or Pippin) the Short and grandson of Charles Martel. His grandfather, Charles, had begun the process of. unifying western Europe, in the belief that all people should be Christian.