Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Conscription Crisis of WWI
Conscription in canada 1944 short essay
Conscription in canada 1944 short essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Conscription Crisis of WWI
Sir Wilfrid Laurier declared “I oppose conscription because in it has the seeds of discord and disunion” (Newman, 94). Conscription is compulsory military service. It caused hatred, riots and protests that divided Canada severely. It was the cause that tore the delicate balance between the French and English Canadian relationship. The conservative party, who had first introduced conscription, still find it difficult to receive votes from Quebec, even after 50 years. (CBC, 14) Conscription was not justified as it negatively impacted not just Canadian society, it created political problems and caused a severe division between Canada’s two linguistic groups. Conscription negatively impacted Canadian society. This bill stripped away the freedom from Canadian citizens, leaving them bitter and divided amongst themselves (Newman, 96). Sir Wilfrid Laurier warned that “If this military bill is passed, we will face a cleavage which may rend and tear this Canada of ours down to the roots” (Newman, 94). Conscription had surely made an enormous dent in society. Riots occurred in Quebec because of this single issue. The Quebec citizens were absolutely outraged that they were forced to fight for “les Anglais”. Feeling little attachment to both France and Britain, many did not want to participate in the war. They raided army registration offices and shattered the windows of English-run shops. These protestors were met with armed police officers (CBC,12). On Easter weekend, 4 unarmed civilians were killed and dozens injured because of the arrest of Joseph Mercier, a young French Canadian citizen that was found without conscription papers. Adding to the negativity that conscription brought on society, an additional lo... ... middle of paper ... ...nadian society, from creating political problems, from tearing apart the French and English Canadians, it was not right. Although conscription was made to solve the problem of military personnel shortages, it created many more. The issue unleashed a terrible storm upon Canadians. Only 24,000 conscripts saw action overseas. Some wonder if conscription was worth the costly price – national discord. Works Cited Baldwin, Doug; Mahoney, Rick; Reed, Kevin; Quinlan, Don. The Canadian Challenge. Canada: Oxford-University Press, 2008. Aitken, Bob; Eaton, Diane; Holland, Dick; Montgomery, John; Newman, Garfield; Riddoch, Sonia. Canada, A Nation Unfolding. Canada; Ryerson Limited, 2000. “The Conscription Crisis” 2001. History CBC. 15 Dec 2009. http://history.cbc.ca/history/?MIval=EpisContent.html&series_id=1&episode_id=12&chapter_id=2&page_id=3&langE
...e to power in Quebec. This indicates that Quebecers supported non-violent methods in order to achieve independence for Quebec, rather than the violent methods of the FLQ, also indicating that the efforts of the FLQ would have been subdued by the Parti Quebecois. The death of Pierre Laporte was another unfortunate occurrence as a result of the War Measures Act which could have been avoided, yet some still believe his death is not related to the invocation of the War Measures Act. Justification is required for all actions which spark debate, and in events where the justification is provided under false pretences, someone must be held responsible. In this case it remains the Trudeau government. Trudeau may have had an admirable political career in which he made many wise decisions, however, the invocation of the War Measures Act in October 1970 was not one of them.
To answer this, one must address the severity of the crisis, as well as the degree to which the War Measures Act would alleviate the situation. This proves to be an unexpectedly difficult task, as it is impossible to accurately capture the zeitgeist of such a turbulent time period without being subject to bias. However from a purely objective standpoint, the evidence clearly identifies that there was no insurrection, nor was one likely to take place. Trudeau relied heavily on galvanizing the risk that the FLQ posed to the Canadian public. However, this came to be a detriment to his case when the supposed danger was discredited. According to most authorities, the FLQ “was a collection of scattered, radical grouplets who communicated amongst themselves with great difficulty and apprehension”(Conrad et al). It is of course, rather difficult to carry out widespread insurrection without a cohesive unit to do so. Trudeau’s speech relied heavily on the notion that the FLQ posed a greater threat than they realistically did, and by the end of the crisis it was clear that his claims were null. However, Trudeau did not operate alone in his endeavors. The crisis was rapidly escalated in scale by local and national media alike. The media “Fed the notion of a hydra head conspiracy, unknown, unknowable, but of course infinitely dangerous”, an error that almost did more to aid in the FLQ’s influence over the country, than it did to call in any sort of justifiable action (Bothwell, 447-50). This combined with rumors of Quebec dissolving their government due to the “severity” of the situation, a rumor that was initially reported to be started by Trudeau (although it was enforced by numerous parties”) in order to gain the support of the public for the actions he was preparing to take (Clement). It is generally agreed upon that War
Canada experienced the revolution of changing politics and new ideologies, it was a necessary wave
middle of paper ... ... As well as during the October Crisis, even though the kidnapping originated in Quebec, the whole country was put in a state of alert and many hundreds of innocent people were arrested without charge. By doing so, the government degraded the nation and took away people’s rights and freedoms for no decent causes in addition, they also blew the problem out of proportion. By taking away people's freedoms and rights as well as being allowed to take exaggerated action, the War Measures Act is not effective, fair or useful.
The Quebec referendum that was held in 1995 was a second round of vote that was meant to give the residents of the Quebec province in Canada the chance to determine whether they wanted to secede from Canada and thus establish Quebec as a sovereign state. Quebec has had a long history of wanting to secede from Canada, considering that it is the Canadian providence that is predominantly inhabited by the French-speaking people, whose political relationship with the rest of the Canadian provinces, mostly inhabited by the English-speaking people has been characterized by conflicting ideologies . Thus, the 1995 referendum was not the first political attempt to have Quebec gain its own independence. The discussion holds that the Quebec 1995 referendum would have had both positive and negative implications. Therefore, this discussion seeks to analyze the political consequences that would have f...
serve, were arrested. The draft would lead to protests and riots due to its faults.2
Tensions were already high between English- and French-Canadians, especially after Ontario had stopped teaching French in Catholic Schools, and the conscription crisis only served to increase them.
“Canada emerged from the First World War a proud, victorious nation with newfound standing in the world. It also emerged grieving and divided [and] forever changed by the war’s unprecedented exertions and horrific costs.” Some of the social impacts of World War I on Canada include the fact that during the war as mentioned above, the status of women improved and resistance by men against acknowledging the abilities of women were gradually set aside. Also during the war women participated in many activities that promoted their cause for social, economic and politic equality, such as suffrage. Moreover, political impacts of the First World War on Canada involved, the suffrage political goal finally being won in 1919 when women got the right
The introduction of conscription into Australia during the Vietnam War, caused much outrage in the Australian public. Vietnam was the first war ever to be properly televised, the public saw for the first time the true brutality of war. The public started to question Australia’s involvement in the war. Moratoriums were held around Australia in protest against conscription and Australia’s involvement in the war. Much of the protesting was done by students and the younger generations, there was still support for the war effort. This was reflected in the November 1966 elections, when there was a landslide victory for the Liberals. Conscription did have an effect on the Liberal governments popularity, a few months after a complete troop withdrawal in 1972 from Vietnam, the Whitlam Labour government replaced the McMahon Liberal government. Historically, one of the influencing factors of the Liberal’s election loss was the Governments choice to get involved in a war that had little to do with Australia.
During the majority of the war, men were guided into civilian and military positions through a policy that the Selective Service Director Lewis B. Hershey called "channeling." The draft system used induction as a threat to "channel" people into more desirable pursuits that were in the interests of the nation. For instance, an engineer earned a deferment from the war because he was needed at home while a person who did not have a deferment could be inducted into the army. For every solider in combat, there were many other positions that needed to be filled...
Canada is known by outsiders to be a very peaceful country. But if you ask any Canadian they well tell you that is unfortunately not the case. For there is a large ongoing conflict between Canadians. The conflict is between the French and the English, or more specifically between Quebec and the rest of Canada. As a result of this conflict, along with some wrongdoing and propaganda. Quebec has considered and has gone as far to hold referendums over Separatism (Surette,2014). Separatism is that the province of Quebec separates from the rest of Canada to form its own country. Which would have immense effects on indubitably Quebec but also the rest of Canada (Martin, 2014). This report will focus on the root causes and origin of Quebec Separatism, the current state of Quebec Separatism and finally how we as a society can act towards Quebec Separatism.
The Conscription Act delivered the final straw in the long list of discrepancies, the catalyst that turned that small forest fire into a raging inferno of hate and fear. The white working class (mostly Irish immigrants) were infuriated, they couldn’t understand how they, white, hard-working voters were being punished. The government was forcing them to fight a war they didn’t support and the only way they could avoid it was to pay 300 dollars (a years wages for most), yet they would pay African Americans 1,000 dollars for volunteering. The new federal draft conditions also expanded to include a wider age range of men it would take. “The conscription law targeted men between the ages of 20 and 35, and all unmarried men up to age 45.” Adding to the already high tensions of laborers, since the enactment of the Emancipation Proclamation they ...
The World War I conscription crisis worsened the pre-existing tension between Quebec and the rest of Canada by creating a feeling of isolation from Quebec to Canada, the government, and Britain causing the want to be separated (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). The French-Canadians thought they had no business in the war like as if they were forced to take part in something that has nothing to do with them (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). They felt “little to no allegiance with the rest of Canada, viewing the army solely as an English-Canadian entity (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). The Québécois also felt detached from the government in this way (Gale Canada in Context, 2011). Due to Regulation 17 (the debate of the French language being taught
I disagree with the use of conscription during WW 1 for many reasons. Conscription means compulsory enlistment for state service, typically into the armed forces.Since Prime Minister Borden had promised that conscription would not be used, going against his word caused many citizens to get angry. Borden introduced the Military Service Bill into the House of Commons on June 11, 1917, delivering a speech strongly denying the involvement or pressure of the British. These comments were directed to the French-Canadians members of the House of Commons. When this Bill was issued, many Canadiens were furious, since they did not feel a patriotic connection to either French or Britain, therefore feeling like they were forced to fight a war that wasn’t
Le sujet de "conscription" était un decision tres important durant la première guerre mondiale. La definition de conscription est un loi qui oblige chaque homme qui peut battre dans le guerre, de battre. Après la bataille de la somme, le Canada a perdu beaucoup d'hommes et ont a besoin beaucoup plus de soldats . Le nombre de volontaires a devenu de plus en plus petit. Alors, le conscription serait un facon eficase et facile d'obtenir plus d'hoomes. Tous les peuple de Québec étaient contre la conscription, et battre dans le guerre car ils pensaient qu'ils n'avaient pas de fidélité au Grande Bretagne ou la France. Essentielement, ils ne supporter pas notre contribution au guerre en general. Même si 35 000 Canadiens Français ont contribues à la guerre ils n'avaient jamais les même idéologies sur l'effort...