Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stereotypes in entertainment media
Stereotypes in entertainment media
The main characteristics of a comedy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stereotypes in entertainment media
The production of Honky is a satirical comedy, following the lives of five people and the language of racism. While it focuses on the plot of 5 characters, the storyline was well thought out and intriguing. One actor in specific, Gerard Joseph, who played Thomas, did an exceptionally well job at conveying emotion and projecting to the audience, in my opinion. The overall directing, from the actors to the soundtrack and lightning, seem to be presented with excellent detail. Overall, this production was well done. Gerard Joseph, or better known as Thomas in the production, acted with extreme poise and tonal regard, considering the unique racial role in which he was cast. Joseph’s character was a black shoe designer, that dealt with an inner conflict on whether or not he himself is be considered “black enough” due to his privileged upbringing, in an affluent white neighborhood. While he exhumes a sense of proudness for his primary sales target (young black males), he still deals with the inner conflict of him feeling too white. Even though that was the character’s persona, I felt Joseph’s facial expressions, attitude, and prominent voice effectively brought this character to life. Joseph also obtained the dry sense of humor that dealt with race such as “You should have seen his face. I don’t think he could get any whiter” and “Its ok I can say that, I’m African American”. He knew his lines of dialogue and effectively portrayed the emotion and facial …show more content…
expressions that accompanied each line, which allowed the audience to have a clear understanding of the scene. He and the majority of the other actors could clearly be heard and had successful enunciation for this production of Honky. One actress however, that I didn’t feel was effective in portraying her role, was Jacque Wilke as Andie. The majority of the time I felt her laugh and voice was rather forced more than sincere. I especially felt uncomfortable when watching the exchange between her and Joseph, when they met at the bar and were both imitating each other. While I still loved Joseph’s performance in this scene, Wilke’s body language, facial expressions, and tone made me cringe. The directing style of Sam Woodhouse was very detailed oriented.
While I watched this production from my laptop on PBS, I felt the blocking from the chairs and the characters was effective in showcasing their facials expressions. I never felt that an actor was blocking another. Furthermore, the director and playwright were exceptional in telling the story, because it ditched political correctness and created an opportunity to showcase racism from a marketing standpoint instead, all based off of a pair of basketball
shoes. While it was hard for me to criticize the lighting and sound of a theatre production made for TV, I felt a better point to analyze was the costumes, by Valerie Henderson. Overall, I personally do not have too many criticisms for the set and design, as it was successful from what I could tell and grasp from a television screen. Nonetheless, I felt that the director’s casting choices, set design, and lighting for the most part, truly fit the play and the direction he wanted it to be seen. Overall, I did enjoy Woodhouse’s concept and the course in which he took this show, as it could have been distastefully done considering the racial conflict that ensued. While I wasn’t impressed by every actor and actress that came across the stage, I still felt that the powerful characters such as Joseph, made up for the weaker ones.
In the Lilies of the Field by William E. Barrett, Homer and Mother Maria both display straightforward, hardworking, and stubborn character traits. Firstly, Homer and Mother Maria both display a straightforward personality by being brutally honest about their opinions. For example, when Mother Maria asks Homer to build a chapel, Homer speaks his mind by telling her he does not want to build it. Mother Maria shows her straightforward behavior during Homer’s stay at the convent. One morning, when Homer sleeps in late, Mother to becomes extremely upset and is not afraid to show how she feels about him. Secondly, both Homer and Mother Maria display a hardworking spirit. Homer is a hardworking man because after finally agreeing to build the chapel,
Not knowing what this play was about, I went to go see it Wednesday after noon at Holyoke Community College in the Leslie Phillips Theater. I had many mixed emotions about this play. I thought some parts were very funny, but others were a little uncomfortable because of some racia...
Hope and joy can be hard to find especially when times are tough. This is a situation in Out of the Dust by Karen Hesse , the character Billy Jo and her family are living in the time of the Dust Bowl and are struggling financially . Her father is a farmer in a time where nothing grows and after an accident Billy Jo’s mother passes away. This is a big part of Billy Jo is effected emotionally and shows seems very sad. Billy Jo has to move and has to move on and find joy and hope even in tough times.
People have goals everyday, believe it or not some people think that dreams aren't worth it. I believe that it is worth it to dream because it gives a person a goal, it makes them feel good, and it makes them stronger. I know this from The Pearl, A Cubs video, the Susan Boyle video, and We Beat the streets.
The production had many elements which for the most part formed a coalition to further the plot. The characters, the three part scenery and costumes represented well the period of time these people were going through. As far as the performers entering and exiting the stage, it could have been more organized. There were a few times when the performers exited at the wrong times or it seemed so due to the echo of the music. At certain moments the music was slightly loud and drowned the performers. Many of the songs dragged on, so the pacing could have been more effectively executed. Though the music was off at times, the director's decision to have most of the songs performed center sage was a wise one. Also the implementation of actual white characters that were competent in their roles came as a great surprise to the audience and heightened the realism.
I thought this play was very tacky in a sense. There were only three actors in the play. Seth Reichgott one the actors played 13 different characters. James Goode plated up to 16 different characters.
In conclusion, this production was one of my favorites that I had ever seen. The storyline was interesting and intense throughout. The designers and actors brought the message across perfectly, which made the play a great success. There were a lot of messages portrayed in this play; however, I believe the most important would be the need for justice. It is important to give the people a fair trial and that it is dangerous to be stereotypical in life.
I think this play is a lot about what does race mean, and to what extent do we perform race either onstage or in life:
I liked the play, however, I thought that the plot could have been a little stronger. Compared to the entertainment today, which display deep, intense stories that give the need to keep watching to see how it ends. They are not always fast paced or overly exci...
I feel the University of Illinois Department of Theatre choose this play because it was a great play to surprise you on how much you may like theatre. Personally, I really enjoyed the play because all of the assignments I have completed I saw put into work. It made me think about things I could’ve done to be more creative with my treatments, which made me appreciative of the play. For example, the thunderstorm added sound effects, a background, and water dropping to enhanced the experience of the audience. Another example would be how all the actor were on point at all points of the play. I thought to myself if you are not one of the main people talking at the moment, you would be talking about random things or doing nothing, but this was not the case. I looked around at all the actors and they all played their roles and took even their smaller roles
It truly made the play come alive and it made the audience seem that they could just join in if they wanted to. The relationships seemed authentic and exactly the way I would have imagined them in real life. The actors spoke loud so everyone could hear well and nothing seemed
Whether they were a drunk or a punctual control freak, each actor clearly put a lot of thought into their work. Each actor was fully committed to every action they made and they moved with a definite purpose. Despite the definite movements and the definite character choices made by the actors, there still appeared to be a sense of forced emotion in their words. For example, the man acting as the drunkard overplayed the alcoholic, hung over, and stereotypical wobbly walk. He made a few obvious mistakes, like flubbing up lines and other things to that effect, and it appeared to be because he was trying so hard to look and act drunk that he forgot to act. The woman playing Daisy was, in fact, one of the best. She had few mistakes and played her role the most realistically out of all the actors. The blocking of the play allowed for a few characters to upstage themselves and others, which made it hard to hear some words and conversations, but besides that, the technical aspects of it were good.
No other play can make you think as hard like this play. The play was well put together from the scenery, actors, lighting, and sound. Being part of the audience we was not expecting to laugh as much as we did. Throughout the beginning of the play many people wondered how it connected with the Black Lives Matter, but as the play came to an end the spectators were able to put the pieces together. The audience was able to get the message from the play that justice will never prevail, just as Godot never comes and they have to do it all over the next day. Overall the play connected at the end and made sense, the audience had to make their own connection for them to understand. It was a great way to keep the audience mind open and
Along with having no plot, the play had no characters as well. The guest performers along with the fourth-year actors were not “playing characters” they were acting as themselves; it worked though. The night I watched the show there were four indigenous guest performers and they brought so much forth by being themselves. It was important to have them there because the audience should hear things from an indigenous perspective. After all, they are the reason we are here and we cannot be a post national country without them. It goes beyond just having them here, people need to treat them with the respect and the dignity they deserve. It was an effective choice to have random people come and answer questions that do not have an define answer and
Overall, I really enjoyed this play and I would say it is the best play I have seen in my Academic career. Along with the great editing and direction of the play, the production team did a great job which was quite prevalent since the vibe of the play seemed very realistic and relevant to the