Homeless By Anna Quindlen Summary

964 Words2 Pages

A Response to Anna Quindlen’s “Homeless” In the article “Homeless” Anna Quindlen states that people without homes are being discriminated and stereotyped as the homeless. She uses personal knowledge and examples to build her argument. Anna Quindlen states that people in America think that they know that a shelter is best for them, but emotional and physical issues can make the homeless not want to go to these shelters. I always used to think that they should be in a shelter, too, but like most Americans I never really thought about what is preventing them from going. I agree with Quindlen’s points that people should not judge others, the homeless are individuals not issues, and name calling is dehumanizing. To begin, I support the author’s argument that people think they know what’s best for the homeless when they …show more content…

Even the homeless had a home before that they grew up and raised in. This is evident because on page 191 when Quindlen states, “she had a house, or at least once upon a time had had one.” Every child has had a place where they grew up in. even if it wasn’t a house with four walls, they still grew up there. Furthermore, Home is wherever you make it, so it is impossible to be the homeless. Even if these people do not have homes right now. So the relevancy of calling these people the homeless should be less known. They shouldn’t be the homeless, but the people without homes. All people deserve to be treated equally, even if they have different lifestyles. Also, people without homes are humans too. Since they had a home before, the name homeless shouldn’t be a word. I think that the name homeless is extremely irrelevant, especially since most people do not even know the situation that they are living in. even though they aren’t the homeless, they will always be looked at like it. Society has a cruel and unfair way of describing people’s

More about Homeless By Anna Quindlen Summary

Open Document