Holden Caulfield Morality

778 Words2 Pages

In a society where wealth and status are often tied to personal worth, the correlation between affluence and moral character should be questioned. The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger explores this question from the perspective of the protagonist, Holden Caulfield. The book is set in the 1950s, and follows Holden’s retelling of his wild two-day adventure that takes place after he was expelled from prep school. Through Holden’s ambivalent attitude towards materialism and social status, Salinger suggests that good moral character and integrity is not directly proportional to wealth. During Holden’s negative encounters with the wealthy, Salinger reveals that riches alone do not create good character. When Holden asks his old friend Sally Hayes …show more content…

My aunt's pretty charitable--she does a lot of Red Cross work and all--but she's very well-dressed and all, and when she does anything charitable she's always very well-dressed and has lipstick on and all that crap. And old Sally Hayes's mother. Jesus Christ. The Lord Jesus Christ. The only way she could go around with a basket collecting dough would be if everybody kissed her ass for her when they made a contribution” (114). Other than his mother, Holden has a hard time picturing his aunt and Sally’s mother doing charitable acts out of the bottom of their hearts. Holden believes that his aunt would only do charitable things if she could keep her image. She’s not being good because she believes that it is the right thing, but she does it to keep her image as someone with a high social status. Her wealth does not make her a better person, just like Sally’s mother. None of them are morally good people because of their wealth, they simply enjoy their social status and showing off their wealth. It is the same with Holden’s roommate Stradlater: “He was at least a pretty friendly guy, Stradlater. It was partly a phony kind of friendly, but at least he always said hello to Ackley and all”

Open Document