Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on control theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Control Theory Control theory was developed by Hirschi after examination of Merton’s Strain Theory and Durkheim 's Anomie Theory. It explains conformity through social bonds, which are attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief ( Zembroski, 2011). Attachment relates to family, schools, and peers. In poor disadvantaged neighborhoods, some parents have to deal with a lot of stress factors that causes their parenting to be very low in warmth. This causes the bond between parents to diminish, therefore their discipline and values are poor (Hoffmann, 2002). Same goes with schools and peers. In a poor neighborhood there is not enough financial support to have adequate schools, teachers, and activities. When school is inadequate then delinquency …show more content…
al, 2015; Hoffman, 2003). It suggests that interaction with others teaches individuals certain values and attitudes. Youth may encounter those that engage in problem behaviors, thus they have a greater risk to become involved in that same behavior because they have learned the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behaviors (Monahan, Rhew, Hawkins, & et. al, 2013). Peer groups are suppose to regulate peer group activity when there is a lack of community institutions. However, these peer groups could be quite negative to the individual. Like the theory states, those peers that involve themselves in criminal behavior will most likely cause the individual to follow in their footsteps. These types of peer groups are said to be found in high risk neighborhoods because there is a lack of surveillance and discipline due to financial instability. And peer groups tend to pressure other to join in on their delinquent behavior. No one wants to be the person left behind or made fun of for not being “man” enough to join them. So, unfortunately, individuals are forced into the situation that their peers involve themselves in, whether that be gang banging, selling drugs, or robbing a
Control theory states that all people are potential deviants and that social bonds determine the outcome. If the family has strong social bond, such as the Simpson’s, though they have problems they are able to overcome them remain a loving family. The strong bonded family keeps their bonds strong by a healthy mix of parenting, discipline, and time spent together. On the contrary the family that has weak social bonds, the submissive parent and son, often have deviant children who defy them. These weak social bonds accumulate through lack of parenting and not a lot of social interaction with each
This documentary Lockdown: Gang vs. Family by Gail Mitchell (2007) was a good way to prove the sociological theories that were mentioned in this paper. After reading more about the theories, I applied them to my life and my peer’s lives and it could be a proven fact for everyone and not just criminals. It is just more applicable
Wiatrowski, M.D., Griswold, D.B., & Roberts, M.K. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 525-541.
There are many theories that explain why people join gangs. There are also many contributing factors to include when explaining why people join gangs, especially adolescents. A few theories that support why adolescents join gangs are: the strain theory, the general strain theory, the social control theory, the differential association theory, the labeling theory, the rational choice theory, the social learning theory, and the routine activity theory. (Delinquency in Society)
In a book she wrote with Randall G. Shelden, Chesney-Lind and Shelden (2004) review the leading theories of criminology – basically the same theories presented in chapters six through nine in this book –and find them all wanting in terms of explaining the delinquency of girls. Chesney-Lind and Shelden state that virtually every sociological theory of delinquency causation was formulated by “ using the data on the delinquency of boys” (Chesney-Lind and Shelden, 2004, p. 106). Just one of several examples in their book has to do with control theory. They point out that Hirschi tested his control theory by doing a self-report survey of about 4,000 junior and senior high school boys. As these authors note, it is ironic that research concludes
the term is used by Edwin Sutherland in Hensli’s book to indicate that “people who associate with some groups learn an ‘’excess of definitions” of deviance, increasing the likelihood that they will become deviant”. This theory also implies the fact that individuals who commit deviant acts are influenced by primary groups (family’s members) and intimate social contacts (friends). An adolescent growing up in a family with racial issues and racial hatred (have racist behavior) or in family where they have illegal activities such as selling drugs or criminal activities will be much more influenced until becoming the final product (racist, criminal or drug dealer) of these families. Contrary to the previous situation of an adolescent, others adolescent may not be affected because they restrained their desire to take the bad path. According to Foucault, “instead individuals are controlled by institutions. Contemporary society is characterized by the lack of free will on the part of individuals because institutions of knowledge, norms, and values, are in place to categorize and control humans”. In this situation, the external control composed of police officers or authority figures have more affect and influence while responding to the adolescents who behave outside of the norm. If they need to be punished, then the actions should be taken.
Travis Hirschi presented a social bonding theory in 1969. The main idea of the social bonding theory is that each and every individual has a drive to act in selfish and even aggressive ways that might possibly lead to criminal behavior. Social bonding theory is somewhat have similarities with the Durkheim theory that “we are all animals, and thus naturally capable of committing criminal acts” (Tibbetts, 2012, p. 162). However, the stronger a person is bonded to the conventional society, for example, family, schools, communities, the less prone a person is to be involved in criminal activity. The great example of this would be the serial killer Nannie Doss. Since early age she did not have any bonds either to her family with an abusive father or to community she lived in. Most of the time during her childhood she was isolated from any social interactions with her schoolmates or friends.
First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered
(Bohm & Vogel, 2011) According to the integrated theory, people commit delinquency as a result of interplay from both opportunity and motivation, which involves both these characteristics amount of control exposed to and not exercised. Charles Tittle (1939), explains four factors of integrated theory, which included predisposition from person to person, provocation or the situational stimulant of verbal insults, challenges, or display of weakness of delinquent motivations, and opportunity and constraint that the likelihood of delinquent behavior will activate a restraining response by others. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) However, when these factors are combined delinquency is less likely to occur; therefore, if control is imbalance the greater delinquency and if control is balanced people
High crime rates are an ongoing issue through the United States, however the motivation and the cause of crime has yet to be entirely identified. Ronald Akers would say that criminality is a behavior that is learned based on what an individual sees and observes others doing. When an individual commits a crime, he or she is acting on impulse based on actions that they have seen others engage in. Initially during childhood, individuals learn actions and behavior by watching and listening to others, and out of impulse they mimic the behavior that is observed. Theorist Ronald Akers extended Sutherland’s differential association theory with a modern viewpoint known as the social learning theory. The social learning theory states that individuals commit crime through their association with or exposure to others. According to Akers, people learn how to be offenders based on their observations around them and their association with peers. Theorist Akers states that for one, “people can become involved in crime through imitation—that is by modeling criminal conduct. Second, and most significant, Akers contended that definition and imitation are most instrumental in determining initial forays into crime” (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 2011:57). Although Akers’ theory has been linked to juvenile delinquency in the past, it has also been tested as a possible cause of crime overall. Individuals learn from observation that criminal behavior is justifiable in certain circumstances. In connection with juvenile delinquency and crime, peers and intimate groups have the most effect on individuals when associated with criminal behavior. One is more likely to mimic the behavior of someone who they have close ties with, whether the behavior is justifiable or...
Rules are essential to order, but what are the reasons youth become delinquent and how can we identify the causes? Two theories that present strong cases towards why youth commit delinquency are the General Strain Theory and Social Disorganization Theory.
Akers and Sellers (2013) explain that Hirschi’s theory postulated a person’s delinquent behavior is the result of his weakened bonds to his community, school, and social groups. Consequently, if those bonds are not strong, the individual’s attachment to certain groups, that he interacts with, will cause him to be closer to those types of people, even if they cause him to commit criminal acts. According to Krohn and Massey (1980), Hirschi’s theory, like ot...
This could explain the effect of strains on crime by taken this theory into account. Once strain causes bonds to weaken amongst conventional groups and institutions such as family, school, and peer networks will open up doors to delinquent behaviors, because by being in these social roles causes the person to regulate by role expectations.
Social Control Theory presumes that people will naturally commit crime if there were left to their own devices (i.e. no laws in society) and people do not commit crimes because of certain controlling forces, such as social bonds that hold individuals back partaking on their anti social behavior (Bell, 2011). Examples of controlling forces are family, school, peers, and the law. Young people who are t... ... middle of paper ... ... nd delinquent are more likely to partake in committing criminal behavior (Shaefer and Haaland, 2011, p.155-156).
Agnew, R. (1985). Social Control Theory and Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test. Criminology Volume 23 , 47-59.