Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Anti intellectualism
Anti-intellectual trends in america hofstader
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Anti intellectualism
Barrack Obama and Henry Gates both say that “anti-intellectualism” is not limited to a particular community, but Americans in general suffer from it. I agree with this position because it seems like many Americans see intellect as knowing the basic facts of life. People also suffer from anti-intellectualism when they try to help society all by themselves, but fail repeatedly. Lastly, many Americans don’t even try to learn more about their society, even if they have the ability to do so.
Many people in America see themselves as intellectual because they may possibly know the basic facts of life. I do not see this as intellect that they have. I see it as common knowledge. In order to be intellectual, one must “engage in critical study, thought,
…show more content…
As Gates and Obama stated, anti-intellectualism isn’t limited to a particular community. Anyone who has the willingness to learn more about a different culture and gain knowledge and experience within the culture can be counted as intellectual.
If someone does not want to learn anything, and does not try, this can be counted as anti-intellectualism. Many Americans suffer from this because many of them think they already know what they need to know. Things that they “need” to know can include common knowledge about sports teams and/or who won or lost last week. Others may also think that intellect can be counted as knowing what they need to do the following day. This is actually just common knowledge and anticipation, not intellectualism.
Many intellectuals try to help people within a society by correcting wrongdoings in which they do not know about. This could include economic mess-ups, social arguments with no resolution in the current state, or even natural disasters. Many people try to solve a problem by themselves, but will not let anyone or anything help them. This would be an example of an
In the world we live in today is mostly criticizing not really your in different parts of something in school , but its mostly about you have to criticize someone over what they look like or how they dress or where they get there clothes from. All mostly what people think are "intellectual" are the smart ones , critics , and imaginative creators. I think Captain Beatty is trying to get Montag
To be intelligent means to be able to apply what we learned in school and use what we learned in our everyday life to achieve a goals that is sit or one that we are accomplishing without knowing. Many people think that a person is intelligent because they went to a university, got a degree, and have a good paying job, so they must be smart and know everything however thats not always true. If we would ask a teacher or professor the chances of them knowing how to fix a car are slim. So why do we think teachers are so intelligent? We think teachers are intelligent because they know everything about their subjects, know how to teach it and know how to apply their knowledge to their everyday lives.
School is a frightening place. It is broken down into multiple social ranks, and many children find themselves at the bottom. With children trying to work their way to the top of the food chain, the actual learning portion is either set aside or forgotten altogether. In Grant Penrod’s essay, Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids, he explains how modern children are growing to dislike intellectual children. The varying social ranks teach children to ignore low grades and try to be popular in school. Anti-Intellectualism is a trend which is becoming increasingly popular throughout the world. People who only strive to be popular tend to tease intellectuals, but this is not half of the story. If the only goal children have in school
In “Hidden Intellectualism,” Gerald Graff pens an impressive argument wrought from personal experience, wisdom and heart. In his essay, Graff argues that street smarts have intellectual potential. A simple gem of wisdom, yet one that remains hidden beneath a sea of academic tradition. However, Graff navigates the reader through this ponderous sea with near perfection.
I’d like to start answering this question with Kellner’s definition of Intellectual because it helped me to better understand the rest of the article and I think it might help others too. We all know what “intellectual” means but here is Kellner’s definition of intellectual from his article “Techno-Politics, New Technologies, and New Public Spheres”; “The concept of the intellectual traditionally involved workers in the sphere of mental labor, who produced ideas, wrote text, and developed and transmitted intellectual abilities as opposed to manual workers who produced good and worked with their hand in the realms of manufacture, heavy industry, agriculture and other field that primarily depended on manual labor”.
American culture has evolved, and Society tends to ostracize people for their intelligence, and our culture has been giving these intellectuals derogatory names like nerd and geek. Leonid Fridman believes that these anti- intellectual values that pervade our society must be fought and should stop for the sake of America. The author supports this position in the passage “America Needs It’s Nerds” through the use of rhetoric by giving definitions of terms such as geek, offering comparisons through juxtaposition, adding a tone shift, and posing rhetorical questions to the reader.
Intellectuals are philosophers, are writers, are artists. They are all those people who work with their minds by questioning the events that touch them and that are touched by them. To recall a Plato's famous allegory, we can say that intellectuals are those who are able to look beyond the shadows and never take concepts for granted. However, some questions as what their role is and, more specifically, whether they should be engaged in politics are still unanswerable. Over the years answers and behaviors towards the engaged culture have been various and we can assume that the intellectuals who cannot separate the two live their lives actively for they want to be part of the events that surround them and let awareness win over apathy. On the contrary, we can assume that those who let apathy win are the intellectuals that look at politics and culture as two different and specific concepts and live a solitary life far from society. However, this is not an appropriate judgment because it would be difficult to consider to which extent solitude can be regarded as cowardliness and to which extent action can be regarded as consciousness.
These people have talent beyond words-- literally and figuratively. They have the ability to express emotions in more than one way; the ability to comprehend conversation and contribute to an idea in different languages. How can you negate something that you do not have insight on and call it unintelligent because you do not have enough understanding to voice an efficient idea that contributes to society's understanding and growth? I grown to understand that ignorance is more acceptable in numbers.
Why street smart students are considered anti intellectual in academic area? In the article “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, he accounts the idea that street smart students are way more smarted than book smarts. He explains that street smart student will be able to solve an issue much faster than book smart because of his/her previous experience. According to author, the problems with considering street smarts as anti intellectual are they are actually much smarter that book smart students, they don’t equal opportunity , and schools along with colleges never challenge their mind get them to succeed in academic work.
In a society that likes to put people into categories based on certain defining characteristics, Leonid Fridman highlights how “nerds” and “geeks” receive unfair treatment for being smart. In his argument, Fridman goes to highlight how our culture, especially in the United States, looks down upon people who are “intellectually curious and academically serious.” Leonid Fridman is able to construct a compelling argument by illustrating how children are dissuaded from being smart and hardworking at an early age, depicting intellectuals as the damsel in distress, and by illuminating the ostracization of intellectuals in the U.S. specifically.
To opinionate or to be opinionated as defined by Webster means to have an unduly adhering to one's own opinion or to preconceived notions. In “laymen’s terms“ basically it is to strongly stick to one’s own point of view. If education is so vast than how can someone be “well” at it? ~Kohn reveals that his wife who is a physician is hesitant at times reciting multiplication. This does not mean she is uneducated when indeed she may be responsible for saving someone’s life. Yet because she cannot teach a math class or write the President’s inauguration speech it portrays as if she is not “erudite” Contrarily speaking does the fact that she is a Physician depicts as her being smarter than someone who works performs “blue collar” work? Does some levels of education coexist with one’s occupation?
...hey were taught and treated by the people who is supposed to educate them and that “the race is to the cunning and often, alas, to the unprincipled.” (Baker,76). In conclusion, Russell Baker looked and scrutinized the formation of knowledge and learning of an individual in American society and how perfect it looks and sounds like but always been imperfect all along.
Would you say that majority of the American population believe that people who grew up and were raised in a less than desirable setting are less educated and least likely to succeed in life? Or would you say that these same people are more likely to succeed in life because of there ability to adapt and utilize not only their educational background but also their mental routine. To often has society posed to be bias and has delivered judgment without truly knowing the true definition of the word intelligence.
In order to properly understand the struggle of the intellectually excellent, it is first important to understand what makes one intellectually excellent. According to John Newman, intellectual excellence is achieved through Liberal Education (Newman 58). This intellectual excellence is not what brings around merit or righteousness. Having this knowledge is what can make a man more able to learn. It is not the rudder of a man’s inner self. Newman says this about pursuing intellectual excellence: “Intellect too, I repeat, has its beauty, and it has those who aim at it” (Newman 59). In the preceding passage, John Newman discusses that every object has beauty, but there is an example of every type of object that is the most perfect. The same can apply for knowledge. Intellectual excellence is that perfection of knowledge. While it is technically unreachable, as no man can harness all of the universe’s knowledge, those who strive for the beauty of knowledge are reaching for intellectual excellence. Those with intellectual excellence can be students, whether in middle school or college, or instructors. It is relative to the learner itself as well. In a college setting, those who are achieving intellectual excellence are those who, most often, are in liberal arts educational pathways. Those who are business majors, for example, are confined to only their field of education. They do not need to know about Vivaldi, Michelangelo, and other classic artists. They only strive to learn that which they need to, simply because there is no benefit in other knowledge. Those in liberal arts majors, however, are more likely to achieve this excellence. Menand states that “liberal-arts students are more likely to take courses with substantial amounts ...
When we ask people what characters that are made up of an educated person, we often receive many of contrastive notion and views from the respondents. Even though there are many different opinions about the description, but we are all agree that knowledge is a one of the requirements in which people seem likely concur. It’s truly important that education is an essential factor to be consider as an educated person. In fact, there are many people that haven’t got into college, yet their knowledge deserved our admiration. Therefore, an educated person is the correlation between a tremendous knowledge and the ability to apply these information in life.