Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Orson welles citizen kane analysis
Citizen kane film analysis
Orson welles citizen kane analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Orson welles citizen kane analysis
Hello, My Name Is Orson Welles
Orson Welles liked to reuse certain elements throughout his films. He liked a good deep focus shot. He liked low key lighting. He liked the grotesque side of life, blocking actors in groups of three, low camera angles and especially pointy bras. He also liked to open his movies in a certain predictable way. In Citizen Kane, he used the announcer in "News on the March" to introduce the subject and main character, Charles Foster Kane. In The
Magnificent Ambersons, Welles himself dubs the voice-over which introduces the life and environment of the Amberson family. The Irish Welles serves as a story teller in the beginning of Lady from Shanghai, recalling the beginnings of his plight and giving insight into his character. Welles reads the enigmatic parable, serving as the basis of Kafka's work, The Trial.
However, in Touch of Evil, the viewer can not hear the booming instruction of an announcer, nor is the primary character revealed or the plot introduced by a Wellesian voice over. In Touch of Evil, Welles parts with his usual opening style in favor of a much more dramatic method of introduction; this creates a less obvious, yet more intimate initial interaction between the characters on the screen and the viewer in the seat.
Foremost, Welles's legendary long shot opens the film. These three minutes and twenty seconds have many effects upon the viewer in introducing this movie. The primary purpose of this shot is to slowly draw the viewer in to the story by limiting the viewer's role in the film; he doesn't allow the viewer to actively enter the world of the film. Rather, he constrains the viewer to simply observe the actions presented without allowing the viewer to get involved in the action. After the initial focus on the time bomb and its intrinsic importance to the plot, the camera moves away from the action. At the same point, Mancini's score begins, providing intrigue and promoting the viewer's interest in the scenes revealed while, through the rhythmic ticking of the bongos, also supplies a constant reminder of the ticking time-bomb waiting to explode. Stepping back, the camera reveals the wider picture of the town; just as an establishing shot serves to orient the viewer without displaying any intimate action, Welles's cam...
... middle of paper ...
...ross the border, the border guards reveal Linnaker's apparent status in the town.
Linnaker's reputation appears nearly as impressive as that of Vargas, to whom the guards also knew and also granted easy passage. In comparison, Zita appears not only dumb, but insane with her rantings of the ticking sound in her head.
This forbidden couple, flawed by this apparent personality and status clash, is doomed by a ticking time-bomb in the trunk; not only will this relationship not work, the viewer knows that it won't even matter as they're about to become
"strainable."
Rarely in a film does a director pack so much insight into his movie than
Orson Welles does in the beginning three shots of Touch of Evil. With minimal dialogue and mostly visual elements, he clues the viewer into so many aspects of the film. In a very unwellesian way, Welles manages to introduce the setting, the characters and some of the thematic elements which will later become apparent. However, although film critics may tag Welles's methods in the beginning of this movie as "unwellesian," it nevertheless awes the viewer with its splendor. And what is more "Wellesian" than awesome splendor?
In the film industry, there are directors who merely take someone else’s vision and express it in their own way on film, then there are those who take their own visions and use any means necessary to express their visions on film. The latter of these two types of directors are called auteurs. Not only do auteurs write the scripts from elements that they know and love in life, but they direct, produce, and sometimes act in their films as well. Three prime examples of these auteurs are: Kevin Smith, Spike Lee and Alfred Hitchcock.
the scene. Moving to the different shot types used in this ending scene, the recovery
to the film early on but makes the viewer want to make sense of what
effect due to the basis of the film. This is used as an opening sequence
Beginning roughly with the release of Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove: Or How I Stopped Worrying and Loved the Bomb in 1964, and continuing for about the next decade, the “Sixties” era of filmmaking made many lasting impressions on the motion picture industry. Although editing and pacing styles varied greatly from Martin Scorcesse’s hyperactive pace, to Kubrick’s slow methodical pace, there were many uniform contributions made by some of the era’s seminal directors. In particular, the “Sixties” saw the return of the auteur, as people like Francis Ford Coppola and Stanley Kubrick wrote and directed their own screenplays, while Woody Allen wrote, directed and starred in his own films. Kubrick, Coppola and Allen each experimented with characterization, narrative and editing techniques. By examining the major works of these important directors, their contributions become more apparent.
Many of the first film elements that can be found in this movie work as an introduction to the two main characters of the story. These elements are meant to force the spectator- even one who had never heard speak of, or seen the two Hollywood stars shown on screen- to focus their attention on them.
... tilted towards the violent sequences and the detailed birth of the child. A very memorable shot is the one taking place in the car where a camera was built in and moved around to shoot, moving the actors along to better view the shot. It's a film deserving of the awards it has received and is not one soon to be forgotten, as proven in it being one of my very favourite films.
Most of the film was shot with 50mm lenses on 35 mm cameras. This technique carefully lets the audience see the film as though watching a ‘live scene’. This has the effect of drawing the audience closer into the action.
Alfred Hitchcock’s unique sense of filmmaking and directing has allowed him to become a very famous and well known film maker of his time. He uses similar recurring themes, elements, and techniques in many of his films to engage the viewers in more than just the film, but the meaning and focus behind the story.
A set of practices concerning the narrative structure compose the classical Hollywood Paradigm. These conventions create a plot centering around a character who undergoes a journey in an attempt to achieve some type of goal (). By giving the central character more time on screen, the film helps the audience to not only understand the character’s motivation but also empathize with his/her emotional state. Additionally, some antagonistic force creates conflict with the main character, preventing immediate success(). Finally, after confronting the antagonist, the main character achieves his or her goal along with growing emotionally(). This proven structure creates a linear and relatively easily followed series of events encompassing the leading character and a goal.
Stanley Kubrick is a name that has remained relevant throughout the years. Movies like 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Shining, Full Metal Jacket, and many others have made an impact on how films are made, but more importantly, the thematic elements of Kubrick’s films is what translated so well to the screen. Kubrick developed stylistic innovations in his films such as one-point perspective, realistic lighting, and distinctive dialogue. All of these stylistic strategies served to amplify the common themes found in his films that dealt with enduring issues like war, which Kubrick argued is part of human nature. Not only was Kubrick a film director who made an impact on filmmaking history, but his innovative ideas have also made an impact on society
the scene with a long-shot of the city. He has chosen to use this in
Baz Luhrmann has done this film in a unique and brilliant way, with help of the above, and of course a great loved story as a base.
This film takes advantage of lots of short quick cuts in all of the action scene to keep the audience 's attention. The most used shot the tight shot to show character reactions and thought and decisions help convey a characters thoughts without having to state it outright. Most of the images on film are open, setting up the next shot for the camera to move next. They also use pan shots to show entrances and changes in location and create the illusion of motion in Matrix with it. The structural rhythm of the film is very quick helping with that action feeling. It play with the juxtaposition of the Matrix and real world. The film also frequently uses match cutting to drop in agents where people used to
In this scene, the camera does not follow the protagonist’s action as he runs in and out of the frame to demonstrate a sense of urgency, followed by the chasing of the antagonists. Moreover, instead of showing the facial expressions of actors, the camera zooms in whenever the protagonist needs to go over a physical obstacle and zooms out to show the action he takes to overcome the obstacle. Another this movie is different from other films is that it shoots the same action sequence in multiple angles. One part of the scene illustrates the agility of the protagonist by showing a front shot of him passing through a loop, followed by a side shot of the same action. Also, whenever the protagonist is performing a stunt, the editing slows the action down for the viewers to be amazed at the difficulty of the stunt. Hence, the speed of this scene could be inconsistent at