Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inventions during world war 2
Inventions during world war 2
Inventions during world war 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Inventions during world war 2
Heinz Guderian
Heinz Guderian was the father of a world changing military strategy that used rapid advancing armored units in World War II. He pushed hard for the idea that tanks should not only be used to support infantry but should be the “speerspitze” or spearhead of the German armed forces (Alexander pg 31). This strategy named Blitzkrieg or “lightening war” in English was the complete reverse of traditional military thinking in the first part of the 20th century. His military strategy would to lead the German army into stunning victory and would cause the allies reeling to catch up. Heinz Guderian’s blitzkrieg was almost lost in pages of history do to the extreme disapproval in the German high command, only his resolve and complete dedication to this revolutionary idea would keep it alive.
Heinz Guderian was a German general in the Second World War, but the seeds of his idea were planted a decade earlier. Guderian in 1931 was promoted in rank and become the inspector of the Motorized troops in the German Army. It was here that he began his studies of the tank and its potential on the battlefield. He gained confidence in his idea with the readings of English military strategist like Basil Liddell Hart and John Fuller. These men viewed tanks much like Napoleon Bonaparte’s use of his Calvary; these fast moving men on horseback would work their way into the rear of the enemy causing the line to decay and fail. This concept was applied to the tank and Guderian saw the future of warfare as fast paced decisive combat. He saw that advancements in technology since World War I enabled the ability for fast moving armored units to be supported from the air and thus giving them the scope, and range to move deep into enemy territory(Ail...
... middle of paper ...
...plans and tactics were used was from is utmost dedication and resolve in the face of adversity.
Works Cited
Ailsby, Christopher. The Third Reich Day by Day. St. Paul, MN: Zenith Press, 2001. Print.
Alexander, Bevin. Inside the Nazi War Machine: How Three Generals Unleashed Hitler's Blitzkrieg upon the World. NAL Caliber, 2010. Print.
Boot, Max. War Made New: Weapons, Warriors, and the Making of the Modern World. Gotham, 2007. Print.
Foley, Robert T. World Wars: Blitzkrieg. Web. Feb. & March 2014. .
Jackson, Julian. THE FALL OF FRANCE the Nazi Invasion of 1940. Oxford University, 2003. Print.
Shaw, Antony. World War II Day by Day. Paul, MN: Zenith Press, 2000. Print.
2014: History Channel, Blitzkrieg- World War II. Web. Feb. & March 2014.
.
This art analysis will define the theme of the universality of 20th century modern warfare in the context of modern works of art by David Levinthal and Roger de la Fresnaye. David Levinthal’s “Untitled” (1972) is commentary on the mass killing of modern warfare in the 20th century, which killed many millions of men during Hitler’s invasion of Europe. Levinthal’s childhood imagery of tanks, soldiers, and homes visualize the mass killing of war as a “universal” concept in the depiction of the modern psyche. Roger de la Fresnaye’s “Artillery” (1911) is also a commentary on cubist imagery that projects a military
Koch, H. The Hitler Youth: Origins and Development 1922-1945. New York: Cooper Square Press, 1975. Print.
In order to receive a victory in the Battle of the Bulge, General Patton used Mission Command Analysis in order to understand how he can be successful for this mission. The first thing of understanding t...
Cameron, R. S. (2003). The army vision: The 4th AD in world war II. Military Review, 83(6), 59-68
The First World War witnessed an appalling number of casualties. Due partly to this fact, some historians, developed the perception that commanders on both sides depended on only one disastrous approach to breaking the stalemate. These historians attributed the loss of life to the reliance on soldiers charging across no-man’s land only to be mowed down by enemy machineguns. The accuracy of this, however, is fallacious because both the German’s and Allies developed and used a variety of tactics during the war. The main reason for battlefield success and eventual victory by the Allies came from the transformation of battlefield tactics; nevertheless, moral played a major role by greatly affecting the development of new tactics and the final outcome of the war.
Keegan chooses the three well documented campaigns of Agincourt in 1415, Waterloo in 1815, and Somme in 1916 to answer the question of his thesis: To find out how men who are faced with the threat of single-missile and multiple-missile weapons control their fears, fix their wounds, and face their death. In his words he is seeking “to catch a glimpse of the face of battle.”
Johnson, David E. Fast Tanks and Heavy Bombers: Innovation in the U.S. Army, 1917-1945. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1998. Print.
Koehn, Ilse. Mischling, Second Degree: My Childhood in Nazi Germany. New York: Greenwillow Books, 1977.
Furthermore the development of tactics such as the introduction of creeping barrages, in-depth defence, tanks and gas complimented the home front campaign creating a 'war of attrition'. General Sixt von Armin acknowledges the impact of attrition into the development of in-depth tactics to create limit losses and aid the firepower.
Blitzkrieg used speed and surprise along with highly concentrated tank corps, supported by mechanized infantry and airplanes. Warfare is in a state of transition. Older commanders and generals in the French and British militaries were very cavalry and infantry focused. These commanders believed that cavalry, infantry, and artillery would assure victory in any circumstance, against any foe. They clung to the static tactics of the bygone World War I era.
The GI Offensive in Europe by Peter Mansoor is a fresh examination of the United States’ infantry divisions who served in the European Theatre of Operations during WWII. Mansoor’s approach is aggressive and direct as he challenges the time honored and accepted assertions of S.L.A. Marshall, Martin Van Crevald, Russell Weighley and Trevor Dupuy in that the Allies were victorious merely because of the overwhelmingly vast amount of materials thrust at the Germans by soldiers of inferior training. While his writing is geared towards those with at least basic military knowledge, it is still engaging to the average lay person. He provides a new conclusion on how and why the American combat forces were successful in defeating the Germans in Europe. He accomplishes this through extensive self conducted research backed by his own personal experiences as a military commander.
Robert Citino’swork, The German Way of War, offers an insightful analysis of what the author describes as the German way of war. Operational maneuver is used by Citino to describe the approach taken by the Germans in war. The author manages to trace the German approach to war to historical events and eras. Frederick William I’s 17th century engagements, the Great Elector, Hohenzollern Dynasty, and World War II are all incorporated in an attempt to understand the German way of war.
Zink, Harold. (1957) The United States in Germany, 1944-1955 [online]. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand [cited 12th September 2011]. Available from:
Gascoigne, Bamber. "World War II - The Blitz." History World. (2001): n. page. Web. 29 Sep. 2011. .
Rosenbaum, Ron. Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil. New York: Random House, 1998. Print.