The Fighting on the Western Front as a War of Attrition

768 Words2 Pages

The Fighting on the Western Front as a War of Attrition The strategy and tactics that were employed on the Western Front are often describe as, 'attrition'; the need to put one's whole human and mechanical resources to wear down the enemy. The Fighting on the western front consisted of advanced technological warfare that relied heavily upon artillery, machine guns, tanks and gas, which characterises a 'war of attrition'. Source 19.J indicates the importance of firepower in winning battles whilst source 19.K further compliments the idea of a 'war of attrition' by depicting the emphasis placed upon tanks despite their apparent initial failure. The western front was too represented by the common held and often out-dated belief that numerical manpower would prove to be the determining factor in victory. Both source 19.L and source 19.K explore the perceptible need of numbers initiated by officers clearly evident by the persistent of sending troops in 'line by line' at the Somme in 1916, during the peak of the 'war of attrition' in the belief that the sheer mass of resources would destroy the enemy. The tactics, which developed directly from trench warfare and the desperate attempt to break the stalemate, culminated into a 'war of attrition'. The introduction of 1916 saw the instatement of Sir Douglas Haig who was committed to destroying the German line by sheer strength in numbers and power. Both sides quickly utilised the benefits of the rifle, machine gun and artillery action, which eventually attested to being advantageous for defence as complete slaughters of armies were experienced. The dominance of artillery fire is allite... ... middle of paper ... ...al means particularly enforced by government regulations in order to benefit the front with material assets that could be inturn utilised in the war of attrition. The fighting consisted of an abundance of shells and ammunitions where, "more shells were fired one day at the Somme than over the whole Franco-Prussian War. The only means for this was through the coordination of an intense home campaign in the munitions industry allowing the nature of the fighting to resemble a 'war of attrition'. Furthermore the development of tactics such as the introduction of creeping barrages, in-depth defence, tanks and gas complimented the home front campaign creating a 'war of attrition'. General Sixt von Armin acknowledges the impact of attrition into the development of in-depth tactics to create limit losses and aid the firepower.

Open Document