Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of managed care health services
Cost containment in health care, research
Cost containment efforts in the US healthcare delivery system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of managed care health services
This paper presents an interpretation of payment reimbursement systems in the health care industry. Managed care is a health care delivery system that is organized to manage quality and cost utilization. A comparative overview and description of payment compensation will be given in order to understand the flow of finances in the health care industry. The focus will be on the capitation and fee-for-service reimbursement systems. Readers will then be able to conclude that the appropriate reimbursement method is reliant on upon the amount of risk a party is able to assume.
Managed care in the hospital reimbursement is a system of healthcare delivery that aims to provide a generalized structure and focus managing the use access cost quality and
…show more content…
Reimbursement programs are a part of the United States health care system and they represent a financial tool for providing cash flow to service physicians and hospitals. Often times, the competency to provide quality health care is to be contingent on the payment for the services given by physicians and hospitals. Physicians that take part in the managed care systems are reimbursed by several different methods for their services. The two most common methods are Fee-For-Service or Capitation. Managed health care has grown considerably within the health care industry and Physicians have faced several challenges in establishing and financing payment systems for services. On the daily in the news you will see or hear about the financial savings resulting from managed health care as well as the restrictions on patient freedom. Insurance risk seems to be one of the less talked about concerns in the movement toward providing health care and professionals often ponder about who should bear the risk of insurance fees. For providers reimbursement is an essential portion of the managed care system. In order for them to receive their incentives to provide that efficient quality care they need to be reimbursed …show more content…
This is used in our office on patients that have had surgery, they are covered for 90days post op. unless their insurance says deems that they have a copay for x-rays.
Contact capitation- is similar to the capitation model, but has added structure where the physician is paid a set fee for initial visit and then they are responsible for follow up care for a period of 6-12 months. If they patient decides to go elsewhere for services then that provider will lose payment.
Physician DRG – this is a reimbursement method where the physician is paid on a diagnosis related group. Which is under development for many hospitals to be paid the same way. Hospitals receive the saving when they are able to make the hospital length of stay less, and the same goes for the physician, if they are able to provide more efficient care to the patient.
Fee incentive methodology- a flat fee method to set a change in the physician’s behaviors of treatment. This method urges physicians to work in a manner that is more for the patient and does not affect the
Abbey, D. C. (2010). Healthcare payment systems: Fee schedule payment systems. CRC Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=1uxIcqBAu_EC&dq=fee schedule payment system&source=gbs_navlinks_s
With the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has initiated reimbursement based off of patient satisfaction scores (Murphy, 2014). In fact, “CMS plans to base 30% of hospitals ' scores under the value-based purchasing initiative on patient responses to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, or HCAHPS, which measures patient satisfaction” (Daly, 2011, p. 30). Consequently, a hospital’s HCAHPS score could influence 1% of a Medicare’s hospital reimbursement, which could cost between $500,000 and $850,000, depending on the organization (Murphy, 2014).
The IPPS or the inpatient prospective payment system refers to a system of payment which includes the diagnosis-related groups’ cases as acute care hospital inpatients. This system is based on resources which are utilized when treating Medicare recipients belonging to these groups. Each diagnosis-related group (DRG) comprise of a payment weight. The IPPS serves an integral role when it comes to deciding the overall hospital costs of all the devices used to treat the patient in within a specific inpatient stay.
Managed care reimbursement models have contributed to risk avoidance by negotiating discounts, discouraging use, and denying payments for charges that appear to be false. Health care reform has increased awareness to the quality of care providers give, thus shifting the responsibility onto the provider to provide quality care or else be forced to receive reduced reimbursements (Buff & Terrell,
The chargemaster is an integral element of the revenue cycle. It is used in generating charges for services that are rendered to patients in real time, the absence of functioning chargemaster can result in potential collapse of the revenue cycle. Hence, the process to optimize revenue cycle must include optimizing the chargemaster and all services that is associated with it. The negative consequences of nonfunctioning chargemaster can include excessive payment/overcharging, inaccurate billing to patients; and can result in stiff penalties and fines (Bielby et al,
In Medicare's traditional fee-for-service payment system, doctors and hospitals generally are paid for each test and procedure. This drives up costs by rewarding providers for doing more, even when it’s not needed. ACOs continue to utilize fee for service by creating incentives to be more efficient by offering bonuses when providers keep ...
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the compensation representation that compensates healthcare contributors for accomplishing pre-authorized objectives for the delivery of quality health care assistance by economic incentives. P4P is increasingly put into practice in the healthcare structure to support quality enhancements in healthcare systems. Thus, pay-for-performance can be seen as a means of attaching financial incentives to the main objectives of clinical care. However, reimbursement is a managed care payment by a third party to a beneficiary, hospital or other health care providers for services rendered to an insured or beneficiary. This paper discusses how reimbursement can be affected by the pay-for-performance approach and how system cost reductions impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare. In addition, it also addresses how pay-for-performance affects different healthcare providers and their customers. Finally, there will also be a discussion on the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of healthcare.
In 1983, the Medicare prospective payment program was implemented, which allowed hospitals to be reimbursed a set payment based on the patient’s diagnosis, or Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG), regardless of what treatment was provided or how long the patient was hospitalized (Jacob & Cherry, 2007).... ... middle of paper ... ... Case Management Related to Other Nursing Care Delivery Models.
When one examines managed health care and the hospitals that provide the care, a degree of variation is found in the treatment and care of their patients. This variation can be between hospitals or even between physicians within a health care network. For managed care companies the variation may be beneficial. This may provide them with opportunities to save money when it comes to paying for their policy holder’s care, however this large variation may also be detrimental to the insurance company. This would fall into the category of management of utilization, if hospitals and managed care organizations can control treatment utilization, they can control premium costs for both themselves and their customers (Rodwin 1996). If health care organizations can implement prevention as a way to warrant good health with their consumers, insurance companies can also illuminate unnecessary health care. These are just a few examples of how the health care industry can help benefit their patients, but that does not mean every issue involving physician over utilization or quality of care is erased because there is a management mechanism set in place.
There are several factors that contribute to the complexity of the revenue cycle. Frequent changes in contracts with payers, legislative mandates, and managed care are just a few examples of reasons why revenue cycle in the healthcare industry is so complex. Furthermore, the problems that arise in the steps of the revenue cycle further complicate the whole process. For example, going through the steps of the revenue cycle efficiently is extremely difficult when it is managed by poorly trained personnel. Furthermore, if a healthcare provider does not have the proper information system to track patient records and billing, receiving reimbursement can become difficult. In addition, one of the main factors that delay payments is denial from the insurance companies. The reason for Denial includes incorrect coding, the certain sequence of care and medical necessity or even delay in submitting claims. Lastly, inefficient patient correspondence can not only hinder the process of revenue cycle but also result in many patient complaints (Wolper, 2004).
The current health care reimbursement system in the United State is not cost effective, and politicians, along with insurance companies, are searching for a new reimbursement model. A new health care arrangement, value based health care, seems to be gaining momentum with help from the biggest piece of health care legislation within the last decade; the Affordable Care Act is pushing the health care system to adopt this arrangement. However, the community of health care providers is attempting to slow the momentum of the value based health care, because they wish to maintain their autonomy under the current fee-for-service reimbursement system (FFS).
retrospect to its governing authority (Shi & Singh, 2012). However, private and public agencies are the controlling constituent in today’s business. Free markets allow patients to choose providers without the prior approval of insurance companies. The current system offers a proposed plan of limited physicians in exchange for payment of services. Because the potential has been given to the payers, they regulate the cost of services rendered through contractual
Hoffman, G., & Jones, D. (1993). Prebilling DRG training can increase hospital reimbursement. Healthcare Financial Management: Journal Of The Healthcare Financial Management Association, 47(9), 58.
doctors that are available to cover for each other. However, there are some negative aspects to
What is managed care? According to the Oxford English Dictionary, managed care is “a system of health care in which patients agree to visit only certain doctors and hospitals, and in which the cost of treatment is monitored by a managing company.” Managed care is a variety of techniques designed to reduce the cost of providing health benefits and advance the quality of care. In the United States alone, there are various managed care programs, that are ranged from more restrictive to less restrictive. As stated in the National Institutes of Health, the future of managed care is uncertain. It is enthralling to note that in spite of the advances in healthcare systems, such as our hospital’s ability to provide patients with lower cost, managed