Head Heart Analysis

1173 Words3 Pages

Head, Heart is a piece of literature that a reader could instantly connect with beginning straightaway in the title. The universal struggle between our ‘head’ and ‘heart’ creates an immediate need for understanding of ourselves. After all, mankind have spent their lives wagering whether the personified logic or emotion wins. Children learn to use these terms to understand themselves, dividing largely significant parts of who they are into two neatly separate categories. We justify an illogical action by saying we were “following our heart” or a heartless decision with we were “using our head.” The head is given a persona as straightforward, strong, resourceful, and mature. The heart is likewise given a persona that is opposite entirely- pondering, …show more content…

Thought is provoked by creating a dynamic between two parts of one’s self that is a parent and a child in conversation rather than equals arguing about each’s significance. The repetition of H’s throughout the piece indicated that the writer not only intended for harmonious sounds, but for Head and Heart to sound like the two were on the same team for once. Head, Heart illustrates how our emotional side interacts with our logical side in a relatable way. It allows the reader to sympathize with Head and Heart as they both struggle to stabilize Heart. The attachment the reader feels to words such as “ears,” “earth,” and “someday create a more intimate tone that opens way for emotions to be felt. Emotionally charged words such as “weep,” “love,” “feels,” and “want” appear in every line, securing the writer’s endeavor to provoke sympathy and grief for both Heart and Head, mainly centering compassion around Heart. The abundance of loaded words plays a significance in defining this work as a drama. The attachment the reader feels to words such as “ears” and “earth” create a more intimate tone that opens way for emotions to be felt. Beyond the significance of diction, syntax provides a better understanding of how the conversation between the two characters is spoken. The simple, and occasionally fragmented lines involving Heart such as “Heart weeps,” “Heart feels better,” “Help, Head. Help Heart,” …show more content…

The emphasized conflict between figurative characters and provoked thought and emotion indicates this work to be a drama, while the abstract text structure and interpretive quality proves the work to be a poem. Head, Heart is abstract, interpretive, and relatable in the way it uses terms in which we are familiar and fond. This work uses a relationship all people have among themselves, challenges that the Head must face with the Heart. Though being mostly opposite, and in some cases against, one another, this work puts the Heart in the Head’s care to guide its understanding so that it might heal. It is a unique approach that the reader can imagine as a conflict inside themselves, or in other people. After all, we all have the Head and the Heart within

Open Document