More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women in ancient Egyptian society
The role of women in ancient Egyptian society
The role of women in ancient Egyptian society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Assignment 3.1 I have chosen 5 books that will help with my research about Hatshepsut’s Mortuary Temple. The books are “Valley of the Kings” by John Romer, “Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs” by Time-Life Books, “Hatshepsut from Queen to Pharaoh” by Catharine H. Roehrig, Renée Dreyfus and Cathleen A. Keller, the next book is “Chronicle of the Queens of Egypt, from Early Dynastic Times to the Death of Cleopatra” by Joyce Tyldesley, last but not least “The Temple of Hatshepsut” by Besty M. Bryan. Those 5 books I borrowed from San Francisco’s Public Library and Academy of Art’s Library. “Valley of the Kings” wrote by John Romer, who is a British archeologist and an Egyptologist. He is the creator of the tv series “Romer's Egypt, Ancient Lives, Testament, The Seven Wonders of the World, Byzantium: The Lost Empire and Great Excavations: The Story of Archaeology”. This book contains two main subject of discussion, the first is the history of the travelers and scholars …show more content…
Although her tomb was build in the XVIIIth dynasty, Hatshepsut’s mortuary temple was designed old fashioned and unlikely any other, “Hatshepsut’s mortuary cult chapel did not occupy the central axis of the temple, a location that was reserved for the cult of Amun” (Roehrig, 138). This book also shows most of the items and relics she left on the tomb, which would magically appear on the afterlife when she reincarnates, most of them are jewelry and utensils. In the book “The Temple of Hatshepsut”, it shows most of the paintings remaining from her tomb. Most of the paintings were the only story remained from conquests she had when she ruled. “On the south side was a text citing Hatshepsut’s victories against the Nubians and next to this four register showing land and water processions leading up to dedication by the queen to the god Amen-Ra” (Bryan,
These two statues are famous to the Egyptian art era. They represent the woman’s position and the man’s position at that day and age. Traditionally, the rulers of Egypt were male. So, when Hatshepsut, Dynasty 18, ca. 1473-1458 B.C., assumed the titles and functions of king she was portrayed in royal male costumes. Such representations were more for a political statement, rather than a reflection of the way she actually looked. In this sculpture, she sits upon a throne and wears the royal kilt and the striped nemes (NEM-iss) headdress with the uraeus (cobra) and is bare chested like a man. However, she does not wear the royal beard, and the proportions of her body are delicate and feminine.
Hatshepsut, declared herself king during the reign of her stepson and nephew, Thutmose III. She adopted the full titulary of a pharaoh, and since this was traditionally a man’s role, she wore the nemes-headcloth, the shendyt-kilt and a fake beard as part of the ceremonial attire of the Egyptian king. This is portrayed in her life-size statue “White Hatshepsut” at the MET.
Hatshepsut’s reign especially leaves much to the scholar’s speculation and interpretation since little evidence is left. The reader must acknowledge how an author’s views may be construed by sexism and other concepts prevalent in their time. What these five authors imply about Hatshepsut’s personality and attitude concerning her political ascent, her usage of propaganda, and her achievements during that time all differ from each other, some more drastically than others. This certainly shows that when one reads of history, their research should span as far as possible in order to most accurately inform themselves of what truly happened; it is from there that they can formulate the best
Gates, Charles. Ancient Cities: The Archaeology of Urban Life in the Ancient Near East and Egypt, Greece, and Rome. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.
Before Hatshepsut, there were other woman who attempted to rule over Egypt. Every time a woman came to power, there was some sort of problem that was left for them to solve. Unlike Hatshepsut, the other woman did not have any confidence to name themselves pharaoh and they did not grow up in the royal family like Hatshepsut did. In paragraph 13, it states, “A few women had tried to rule Egypt before, but never would search valid claim to the throne,” and, “These women had not ruled long or well and neither had had the audacity to proclaim herself pharaoh.” These quotes explain that Hatshepsut was recognized for taking power at a good time and not stepping
In today’s society technology is everywhere, whether it be in a car, on a billboard, a laptop, or even on one’s phone. However, is all this technology a bad thing or is it truly a worldwide phenomenon. Even back during 1992, author Neil Postman wrote about how technology is both a blessing and a burden. Many people believe Postman’s views are arrogant or far-fetched, but there are also those who agree with him about the dangers of technology.
Robins, Gay. "The Names of Hatshepsut as King." Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 85 (1999): 103-12. Jstore. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. .
The Funerary Temple of Queen Hatshepsut and the Parthenon were very similar in most cases but at the same time, there were also very different. In this essay, I will compare and contrast these two renowned temples. I am going to focus on the context, subject and style of each Temple. Firstly, let us examine Funerary Temple of Queen Hatshepsut. According to Hill (2010) the Temple of Hatshepsut is one of the most beautiful temples in ancient Egypt and it is located at Deir el-Bahri. It was built by an architect named Senemut. Moreover, this temple was very significant in Egypt because that is where the body of Queen Hatshepsut was buried, and she was said to be the first woman ruler in history. On the other hand, according to Beard
Ancient Egypt is home to one of the greatest female pharaoh. Queen Hatshepsut. She was the first female pharaoh and did great things.
An essential characteristic for being a great leader, consistent within many, is confidence. A person may have ideas, but for them to be carried out takes confidence in themselves to bring those ideas to reality. Hatshepsut portrayed herself as a very confident woman by taking the initiative to do things that only Pharaoh’s would commonly do, such as performing certain religious rituals, making offerings directly to the gods, and commissioning various building projects. These actions made it evident that she saw herself as important and powerful, and others soon believed this as well; she was considered as God’s wife of Amen and became a priestess in temple rituals. Hatshepsut also depicted herself as a male—she dressed in a kilt, crown, and wore an artificial beard. This clearly shows that she had great ambition to be King, as she took on the daring task of creating a false persona just so that she could reach her goal. Despite the typical male dominating society, Hatshepsut displayed confidence in herself that she could become ...
Was she the archetypal wicked stepmother, an unnatural and scheming woman ?of the most virile character who would deliberately abuse a position of trust to steal the throne from a defenceless child? (Gardiner, 1961:184)? Or was she ?an experienced and well-meaning woman who ruled amicably alongside her stepson, steering her country through twenty peaceful, prosperous years who deserves to be commemorated among the great monarchs of Egypt? (Budge, 1902:I)? According to biographer and historian Joyce Tyldesley, Queen or as she would prefer to be remembered, King Hatchepsut became the female embodiment of a male role, whose reign was a carefully balanced period of internal peace, foreign exploration and monument building (Tyldesley, 1996:1). This study will show that it was Hatshepsut the Pharaoh?s devotion to the god Amen and her protection of the maat of 18th Dynasty Egypt that allowed her to forge her successful New Kingdom regime.
It doesn’t go into specifics details on tomb paintings in Egypt. There is a great deal focused on the temple and the burials during that civilization. The book explains how the temples are built and the symbolism behind them. The Egyptian art that is discussed is pottery vessels, Narmer Palette, tombs and temples. The Narmer palette has animal, ruler, and weapons and color on the palette similar to tomb paintings. The palette symbolizes the upper and lower Egypt the necks of the animals twisting around each other (Scarre and Fagan 2008, 117). All of Egyptian pieces of art each had specific meaning behind it. This one of the reasons why Egyptian art is so special. A tomb painting that had an imaged in the textbook is from Deir el Medina, Thebes (Scarre and Fagan 2008, 143). It told us the importance and meaning of the tombs during that time. Tomb painting were very useful for find out information on the
Hatshepsut: From Queen to Pharaoh. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005. Tyldesley, Joyce. A. Hatchepsut - The Female Pharaoh.
Damrosch, David, and David Pike. The Longman Anthology of World Literature. The Ancient World. Volume A. Second Edition. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2009. Pgs. .656-691. Print.
The mausoleum at Halicarnassus was the very great mausoleum tombstone of one Maussollos, the ruler of Caria, one of the provinces of the vast Persian Empire, who also served as a Governor or Satrap of the King of the Persian Empire between 377 and 353 BC (Peter and Mark, 1988). This great tomb monument was so gigantic in size going by the ancient building standards and extremely lavish were the various sculptured adornments or decorations that in next to no time the building was being recognised in the Ancient World as one of the Seven Wonders of these Ancient times (Peter and Mark, 1988). Ever since the Roman times the word mausoleum, has always been a generic term used in reference to any vast or gigantic tomb monument (Juan, 2005). In today’s world this is what most people would consider as a large-scale house built of marble meant to house a deceased person’s remains (Juan, 2005).