Hate Not Freedom

561 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Freedom of speech censorship and consequences

Hate Not Freedom The United States of America is routinely characterized as a “free country”. This portrayal originates from the 1st amendment within the U.S constitution which concerns freedom rights such as freedom of religious expression, freedom of the press, and freedom to assemble peacefully .The 1st amendment has overtime been taken under interpretation. “National surveys reveal notable difference in U.S. citizens attitudes towards freedom of expression, including freedom the press and speech.” (Zhang, Jinguang). The idea of freedom of speech using harmful connotation is no longer freedom of speech, however, this is defined as hate speech. Hate speech should not be considered freedom of speech. Freedom of speech should not be spiteful. …show more content…

This meaning freedom of speech should be intellectual. A person choosing to express his/her opinions about an issue should respect both sides of every argument even if the person does not agree. Valid reasoning should come into play as well. In order for freedom of speech to not be hate speech a reasonable amount of serious observation of the argument should occur. Hate speech is cowardice. Hate speech is when people express their opinion in an immature way. Using cruel words and harmful intentions people practicing hate speech hide behind words with the sole purpose of hurting others. An academic journal by a Harvard Law student states an event to which hate speech is visible, “ He states several aspects of hate speech, regulations controlling hate speeches for the protection of each member of society.” (Waldron,Jeremy). The idea of words making others seem superior is not freedom of speech. Many people believe because places such as the U.S. have laws supporting freedom of speech they can say whatever wanted even if offensive. People reinterpret the privilege as simply speaking their mind without consequence. A person with an expressive opinion may speak very publicly using reprehensive remarks and use freedom of speech as their only reason for doing so. This is not accurate because damaging a person or group with words or actions is a suitable action under freedom of …show more content…

Freedom of speech is considerate of others opinions and tends to not ever have a strong negative connotation. In order to stray from being accused of using hate speech a person must fully view their argument. Freedom of speech is a privilege to a plethora of places and should be respected and used appropriately following moral rights towards other people. Work Cited Parekh, Bhikhu. "Hate Speech." Public Policy Research, vol. 12, no. 4, Dec2005-Feb2006, pp. 213-223. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/j.1070-3535.2005.00405.x. Waldron, Jeremy. "Dignity and Defamation: The Visibility of Hate." Harvard Law Review, vol. 123, no. 7, May 2010, pp. 1597-1657. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=50507436&site=ehost-live.Zhang, Jinguang, et al. "Predicting Attitudes toward Press- and Speech Freedom across the U.S.A.: A Test of Climato-Economic, Parasite Stress, and Life History Theories." Plos ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, June 2015, pp. 1-16. EBSCOhost,

Show More
Related

  • We Are Free To Be You Me Stupid And Dead Summary

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    In contrast, some people say they that freedom of expression should not exist or be better controlled. Like everything else, freedom of expression often gets abused or taken advantage of. Some individuals do not know how to control what comes out of their mouths, so they will be ignorant or “jackasses, just because they can. By these people being ignorant, or “jackasses” if you will, it gives freedom of speech a bad reputation. Freedom of expression can

    Read More

  • The Right to Freedom of Expression: R. v. Keegstra

    2813 Words  | 6 Pages

    Entrenched within the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms lies the fundamental rights that Canadian citizens share. The primary freedoms recognized within Section 2 of the Charter, such as the freedom of speech and expression, are necessary for a free and democratic society. Yet, a crucial conflict of rights exists within the system when the freedom of expression is used to perpetuate willful hatred against a certain individual or group. Controversy arises from this conflict first and foremost because the freedom of expression is meant to secure each person the right to express ideas and opinions without governmental interference, irrespective of what that opinion may be. In this paper, I will discuss the conflicting views of restricting the freedom of expression when it is used to promote hatred. I refer to the insights offered by Joel Feinberg and Joseph Raz to advance the view that the “right” to freedom of expression is not final and absolute, as expressions of hated do in fact cause real harm to people, and there rights too must be taken into consideration. Fundamental rights should be viewed as a privilege, which includes a responsibility to respect and value the rights of others to provide for a truly liberal democracy. I will refer to the landmark judicial decision in the Canadian Supreme Court case of R. v. Keegstra to argue that the rights of individuals and groups to be afforded the right to respect and dignity outweigh any claim to freedom of expression.

    Read More

  • We are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead by Roger Rosenblatt

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”. Although this amendment gave people the right express thier opinions, it still rests in one’s own hands as how far they will go to exercise that right of freedom of speech.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Speech Should Be Protected

    2507 Words  | 6 Pages

    1. The measure of a great society is the ability of its citizens to tolerate the viewpoints of those with whom they disagree. As Voltaire once said, “I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” (Columbia). This right to express one's opinion can be characterized as “freedom of speech.” The concept of “freedom of speech” is a Constitutional right in the United States, guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution:

    Read More

  • Essay On What Does It Mean To Be An American

    761 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States of America is often known for having more freedom than anywhere else. As Gandhi said, “A ‘no’ uttered from the deepest conviction is better and greater than a ‘yes’ uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.” Freedom of speech is a big part of the American culture and citizens are encouraged to speak their minds and opinions openly. It is such an important aspect of each American individual that it is

    Read More

  • Freedom of Speech

    1581 Words  | 4 Pages

    Imagine a time when one could be fined, imprisoned and even killed for simply speaking one’s mind. Speech is the basic vehicle for communication of beliefs, thoughts and ideas. Without the right to speak one’s mind freely one would be forced to agree with everything society stated. With freedom of speech one’s own ideas can be expressed freely and the follower’s belief will be stronger. The words sound so simple, but without them the world would be a very different place.

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech: The Second Amendment To The First Amendment

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stanley Fish states in his essay “The Free-Speech Follies”, “The modern American version of crying wolf is crying First Amendment” (496). The First Amendment is made up of five basic freedoms given to the United States citizens that consist of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to hold a peaceful protest, freedom of press, and the right to protest. Within the Constitution there are no words that state the rights include for society to speak rudely to, or about, others. The article “Freedom of Speech” explains, “Slander consists of orally making and libel consists of publishing false statements that are damaging to the reputation of another” (1). People are allowed to have their own beliefs and opinions; however, they should not

    Read More

  • Hate Speech is the Price We Must Pay for Freedom of Speech

    2303 Words  | 5 Pages

    Living in the United States we enjoy many wonderful freedoms and liberties. Even though most of these freedoms seem innate to our lives, most have been earned though sacrifice and hard work. Out of all of our rights, freedom of speech is perhaps our most cherished, and one of the most controversial. Hate speech is one of the prices we all endure to ensure our speech stays free. But with hate speeches becoming increasingly common, many wonder if it is too great of a price to pay, or one that we should have to pay at all.

    Read More

  • Freedom in the United States

    2480 Words  | 5 Pages

    Freedom in the United States Essay submitted by Unknown No other democratic society in the world permits personal freedoms to the degree of the United States of America. Within the last sixty years, American courts, especially the Supreme Court, have developed a set of legal doctrines that thoroughly protect all forms of the freedom of expression. When it comes to evaluating the degree to which we take advantage of the opportunity to express our opinions, some members of society may be guilty of violating the bounds of the First Amendment by publicly offending others through obscenity or racism. Americans have developed a distinct disposition toward the freedom of expression throughout history. The First Amendment clearly voices a great American respect for the freedom of religion.

    Read More

  • Extra Penalties for Hate Crimes are Justified

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    Any crime motivated by a bias against a person or group based on their ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, religion or another characteristic is a hate crime. These crimes can either be committed against the people themselves or their property. When someone commits a hate crime they are targeting a group of people not just one individual. That’s why hate crimes have extra punishment. The punishment for hate crimes are very insignificant considering the deviant who committed a hate crime targeted an entire group of people. Hate crimes are very serious offensive but determining where to draw the line can be difficult. Hate crimes are very serious and can have lasting effects on victims.

    Read More

  • America's Decline of Freedom of Speech

    1492 Words  | 3 Pages

    Freedom of speech is the right of civilians to openly express their opinions without constant interference by the government. For the last few years, the limitations and regulations on freedom of speech have constantly increased. This right is limited by use of expression to provoke violence or illegal activities, libel and slander, obscene material, and proper setting. These limitations may appear to be justified, however who decides what is obscene and inappropriate or when it is the wrong time or place? To have so many limits and regulations on freedom of speech is somewhat unnecessary. It is understood that some things are not meant to be said in public due to terrorist attacks and other violent acts against our government, but everything should not be seen as a threat. Some people prefer to express themselves angrily or profanely, and as long as it causes no har...

    Read More

  • Why We Should Hate Speech Be Banned Essay

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    The First Amendment is known as the most protected civil liberty that protects our right to freedom of speech. There has been much controversy regarding hate speech and laws that prohibit it. These problems have risen from generation to generation and have been protested whether freedom of speech is guaranteed. According to our text book, By the People, hate speech is defined as “hostile statements based on someone’s personal characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.” Hate speech is a topic of issue for many people and their right’s, so the question is often proposed whether hate speech should be banned by government.

    Read More

  • Negative Essay: Why Censorship Is Harmful To Society

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    People can stop talking to someone who they consider offensive, they can walk away. Words don’t hurt people, despite the current popular opinion. Free speech should not be limited by anything it should just be free. Some people will say horrible things, but when they say such things to other people, people will think that they are horrible, and not listen to them anymore. Laws against saying certain thing don’t protect anyone, all they do is hide the true nature of people, until it is too late to do

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech Should be Limited

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    Freedom of speech has many positive things, one of which is the help it gives on decision-making. Thanks to freedom of speech it is possible to express personal ideas without fear or restraints; therefore, all the perspectives and options will be on the table, giving people more opportunities to choose from. Nevertheless, everything in life has a limit, and the limit of freedom of speech depends directly on the consideration of the rights of others. People is free of believing what they want, thinking what they want, and even saying what they want, everything as long as they do not intrude or violate anyone else's rights. Under certain circumstances freedom of speech should be limited, and this is more than just a political action, this acts represent the urge for tolerance and the need for respect.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    Freedom of speech has been the core principle we have fought long and hard for centuries to achieve. It is the fundamental reason why the founders seperated from England and started their own colonies on the idea of becoming free. In recent times the idea of freedom of speech has been put into question as there has been incidents for years of racism, religious differences and discriminatory abuse. What comes into question is what exactly is your freedom of speech rights and what should be and should not be said in the public eye. The problems that we see arising in today’s society is discrimination and abuse against one another for opposing views and what exactly should your freedom of speech rights entail to as many hate crimes have occurred

    Read More

More about Hate Not Freedom

Open Document