Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of nature and nurture
What is the effect of nature and nurture
Effect of nature and nurture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of nature and nurture
To begin with, the study that was chosen for this assignment was the Harlow’s Monkey Experiment. The point of this experiment was to prove that love shapes our livelihood and can cause attachment issues starting from infant years. Harlow believed that the want of love can damage an infant’s life. This study demonstrated that we as humans feed off of love and attention from our caregivers. This experiment was interesting because it shows that our ability to love and become attached begin as an infant and can ultimately mold our future relationships. This study clearly demonstrates the importance of a healthy environment for an infant. There were some unethical facts about this study, however Harlow proved that love can be tested through science. …show more content…
Nature are the experiences and environment that shapes our behavior, yet nurture is the belief that one’s behavior is due to heredity. In this particular experiment, it is clear that nature outweighs nurture. The early stages of social environment has a major impact on one’s life and future relationships with others. For example, a child that grows up without the love and care of a mother will more than likely have attachment issues and will ultimately have problems forming close intimate relationships because they wasn’t shown love and isn’t sure how to give it to someone else. This ties in with nature, because their childhood experiences shaped their future. In Harlow’s experiment, the monkey showed attachment issues due to not having that caregiver in the early stages of his life. “Attachment is a deep and enduring emotional bond that connects one person to another across time and space” (McLeod, 2012, pg.1). In one experiment with the monkey, there were two “mothers” setup; one that provided food and the other that provided comfort. Ultimately the baby monkey chose the mother that provided comfort. This shows that love and attachment is deeper than substances. On the other hand, not having love and comfort can go from generation to generation if the deep rooted issue of attachment is not
During the twentieth century, Harry Harlow performed one of the most controversial experiments that led to a scientific breakthrough concerning the parent-child relationship. It paved the way for understanding terms such as secure, insecure, ambivalent, and disorganized relationships (Bernstein, 2014, 364). During the course of this study, Harlow separated baby monkeys from their birth mothers and isolated them in frightening environments. According to the video “H.H. Overview”, this proved the monkey’s preference for a comforting mother versus a nutritional one. However, this raises the question: can his experiments be deemed ethical, or did his scientific inquiry overstep boundaries?
Fox (1995) poses that it is possible that early childhood attachment does not influence adults’ minds relative to attachment. He also is hesitant to agree that parental sensitivity is a valuable aspect that is potentially “transmitted” to offspring.
Infant Children most always feels very secure with their mother or guardian. When carrying for a child you always have to give them their basic requirements, but you also have to show them love and affection. Love and affection can have more affect on a child than just giving them basic needs. In my psychology class, we talked about a psychologist named Harry F. Harlow. He performed an experiment at the University of Wisconsin which was on the mother/ child bond with monkeys. I will review some of that experiment and explain how this experiment was very true within my life.
The attachment theory, presented by Mary Ainsworth in 1969 and emerged by John Bowlby suggests that the human infant has a need for a relationship with an adult caregiver, and without a subsequent, development can be negatively impacted (Hammonds 2012). Ainsworth proposes that the type of relationship and “attachment” an infant has with the caregiver, can impact the social development of the infant. As stated by Hammonds (2012), attachment between a mother and a child can have a great impact on the child 's future mental
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
The nature vs. nurture debate: the nature side, are those such as biologists, psychologists and others in the natural sciences, argue that behavioral traits can be explained by genetics. Those taking the nurture side are sociologists and others in the social sciences, they argue that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction. This argument should be dismissed because you don’t have to look far to see that both genetics and our environment, plays a role in who we are and our behaviors. (Glass). The point is there is a complex relationship between nature and nurture, either one alone is insufficient to explain what makes us human. (Colt). Our heredity gives us a basic potential,...
The attachment process plays a crucial role in a child’s development and their future impact on society According to Dr Suzanne Zeedyk. Children can’t feel relaxed and safe with the adults & children in the nursery until they get to know them. If there’s a lack of affection towards a child they may be reluctant to take advantage of all the learning opportunities because of their anxiety. We now know that relationships literally shape the neural connections in young children’s brains. This means everything that happens or doesn’t happen for the child will leaves a physiological trace in their growing brain. According to Dr Suzanne
According to Kagan et al. (1978) attachment is defined as “An intense emotional relationship that is specific to two people, that endures over time, and in which prolonged separation from the partner is accompanied by stress and sorrow” the definition shows attachment is important in life, and is said that our first attachment is very crucial to our development towards other relationships, e.g. with other family members, friends, and romantic relationships. Bowlby (1973) presented that newly born humans are vulnerable and they are genetically programmed to behave in certain ways to ensure survival, and also states mothers inherit a ‘genetic blueprint’ to respond to the baby at all times. The child’s attachment to their mothers will determine how close they are, and how the child acts around strangers, usually giving off any social responses in reaction to being scared, ill or in unfamiliar...
In conclusion, mother-infant attachment paves the way for adult social relationships as supported by Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation experiment and its follow-up, Bowlby’s 44 Thieves study, and Henry Harlow’s classic experiment with the monkeys. Furthermore, strong secure attachments breed healthy social relationships, while insecure attachments lead to difficult social and emotional issues. The best way to prevent insecure attachments is by creating that strong mother-infant bond in the first year of life. It is crucial for potential parents to be prepared emotionally, economically, and socially for a new infant. As the acorn has the potential to become an oak with the right conditions and environment, an infant also has the potential to become a successful adult with a supportive, healthy, environment.
here is an age-old discussion regarding the dichotomy of nature and nurture and which impacts human behavior more. Nurture refers to the development of behavior through influences such as childhood experiences, social relationships, and surrounding culture. Nature refers to the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are. An excellent example to explore the role that this dichotomy plays in the development of the human mind is in the setting of isolated communities.
In 1874, Francis Galton said, “Nature is all that a man brings with him into the world; nurture is every influence that affects him after his birth”. The human body contains millions upon millions of cells and each of these cells contains hereditary information and DNA. However, there is no proof that the information carried in these genes predetermines the way in which we behave. I believe it is our life experiences and what we see and are told that shape the way in which we behave. Therefore, it appears to me that nurturing plays a far more governing and dominant role in a human being’s development rather than nature.
The study I chose to write about is “Harlow’s Monkey Experiments” (Baker, 2016) Harlow’s Monkey experiment reinforced the importance of mother-and-child bonding. He suggested that the same results apply to human infants – that the timing is critical when it comes to separating a child from his or her mother. Moreover, it was found that the establishment of a bond between the infant and his or her mother is not purely dependent on the satisfaction of one’s physiological needs such as warmth, safety, food, but also emotional acceptance, love, and affection.
In each person's life much of the joy and sorrow revolves around attachments or affectionate relationships -- making them, breaking them, preparing for them, and adjusting to their loss by death. Among all of these bonds as a special bond -- the type a mother or father forms with his or her newborn infant. Bonding does not refer to mutual affection between a baby and an adult, but to the phenomenon whereby adults become committed by a one-way flow of concern and affection to children for whom they have cared during the first months and years of life. According to J. Robertson in his book, A Baby in the Family Loving and being Loved, individuals may have from three hundred to four hundred acquaintances in there lifetimes, but at any one time there are only a small number of persons to whom they are closely attached. He explains that much of the richness and beauty of life is derived from these close relationships which each person has with a small number of individuals -- mother, father, brother, sister, husband, wife, son, daughter, and a small cadre of close friends (Robertson 1).
Throughout the history of human existence, there have always been questions that have plagued man for centuries. Some of these questions are “what is the meaning of life” and “which came first, the chicken or the egg”. Within the past 400 years a new question has surfaced which takes our minds to much further levels. The question asked is whether nature or nurture has more of an impact on the growing development of people. It is a fact that a combination of nature and nurture play important roles in how humans behave socially. However, I believe that nature has a more domineering role in the development of how people behave in society with regards to sexual orientation, crimes and violence and mental disorders.
Children are in need of affection coming from their parents in order to thrive and develop mentally, physically, and socially. It is a part of human nature to crave that connection to a person that is close to our hearts. It is shown that people who keep to themselves and do not seek a connection will be more susceptible to depression. No other theory can counter that of Harlow’s. His concrete evidence of the affection of a child to its mother is irrefutable.