Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in the 1960s
Gender roles in the 1960s
Gender roles in the 1960s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in the 1960s
Happily Ever After How important is the gender role in a happy marriage? Does the man have to be the bread winner and financial supporter? Does the woman have to keep the house and take care of the children for the marriage to succeed? Research has shown that “it is essential for both members of the couple to understand the gender role expectations of themselves and their partners throughout the course of the marriage” (Gender). This would indicate that even if the roles are not traditional, gender roles do play an important part in marriage. This might explain the fact that in the late 70‘s we experienced our highest percentage of divorce.(Hughes). At this time gender roles were changing at an unprecedented rate. Television plays a large part in how people identify with their own lives and what goes on in their households. Such shows as “The Adventures of Ozzie & Harriet” and “Leave it to Beaver” in the 1950‘s, portrayed the so called, perfect family structure. The upbeat husband, sitting down for a quick breakfast his wife just whipped up, then off to the office, while his dutiful wife stays home, gets the kids off to school, then settles in for a day full of housework, concluding the day with a full course dinner on the table by 5pm. Of course all this is done while in a form fitting dress and high heels. The 1950‘s was a time when gender roles were structured, men and women knew their position in the family or relationship and didn’t question it. Television in the 1950‘s said this is what made a happy home, and statistics show fewer divorces in that era. When gender roles in the 1950‘s were well defined, the divorce rate was a meager five per one thousand women as compared to the 1970’s peak of twenty-three div... ... middle of paper ... ...ships." MissouriFamilies.org. University of Missouri Extension, 20 Aug. 2008. Web. 07 Apr. 2010. Hurley/The New York Times, Dan. "Divorce Rate: It's Not as High as You Think." Smart Marriages Listserv. Divorce Statistics Collection, 19 Apr. 2005. Web. 11 Apr. 2010. United States. Census Bureau. Fertility and Family Branch. Table MS-2. Estimated Median Age at First Marriage, by Sex: 1890 to Present. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 15 Sept. 2004. Web. 11 Apr. 2010. . United States. National Center for Health Statistics. Health Research, Statistics, and Technology. Advance Report of Final Divorce Statistics, 1979. 2nd ed. Vol. 30. Supplement. NCHS Monthly Vital Statistics Report. National Center for Health Services, 29 May 1981. Web. b10 Apr. 2010. .
After viewing an episode of I Love Lucy, positive aspects of family and financial issues can be clearly seen in the 1950s. The Ricardo's are middle class, Ricky works as a club band leader and Lucy stays home and `poured all her energies into their nuclear family.' (37) This is a positive side of the 1950s because compared to a few decades before, `women quit their jobs as soon as they became pregnant,' (36) and concentrated more on raising children. These families were much more stable and made almost `60 percent of kids were born into male breadwinner-female homemaker families,' (37) which is a important factor for children to have a good childhood.
Throughout the evolution of television shows, one thing that is evident in them is that the families follow some sort of sociological theory. By observing these shows, it is easy to perceive what the struggles and achievements these families may experience. Specific examples of television families that display a sociological theory is: Switched at Birth showing conflict theory, Full House presenting symbolic interactionalism, and finally, The 100 which showcases feminist theory. In all of these shows, the families involved each go through their own issues with themselves and each other as well as barriers that may get in the way of their success. Analyzing families through the sociological perspectives open up opportunity for people to better
By leaping into the societal messages of the popular 1980s show, Full House, one is able to learn a great deal about what the cultural direction of society was like at that time. Full House was a kind of, makeshift sitcom because it expanded on the typical formula of the age-old conventional “nuclear” family and made room for the idea of a non-traditional family that revealed it’s unconventional nature. As viewership grew, so did the acceptance of such a family structure in American culture.
finally the opportune moment for individuals to build a stable family that previous decades of depression, war, and domestic conflicts had restricted. We see that this decade began with a considerable drop in divorce rates and rise in marriage rates, which is often assumed as the result of changed attitudes and values. However, this situation cannot be only just attributed to women’s
Americans love their television, and television loves the American family. Since the 1970’s, the depiction of the American family on television has gone through many changes. In the 70s, the Brady Bunch showed an all-white nuclear family. Today, Modern Family, shows a family of blended races, ages, and sexualities. For thirty years, the sitcom family has reflected the changing society of its time and there is no exception of this for the families in The Brady Bunch and Modern Family. The lifestyle, social aspects, and economics situations of the Bradys and the Pritchett-Dunphys are similar in their attempts to portray the lives of families of their time, but differ drastically in the types of families they represent. The characters in Modern
As mentioned before, sociologists Coontz and Hochschild further elaborate upon Parsons and Bales’ concepts of the American family, but they mostly critique the idea of the male-breadwinner family. One of the main arguments Coontz and Hochschild present is the decline of the male-breadwinner family due to the economic changes of the United States and the arising social norms of consumerism. Because Parsons and Bales never considered how the changes throughout society would affect family, they believed the male-breadwinner family would continue to be a functional type of family for everyone. However, within her text, “What We Really Miss about the 1950s,” Coontz specifically discusses the major expense of keeping mothers at home as consumption norms...
As gender roles were enhanced, the nuclear family was birthed. This ideal family, mainly portrayed in popular culture, had a working father, homemaking mother, and children. Television shows depicting this type of household, Leave it to Beaver, and I Love Lucy, were not representative of the reality of America. Not all of Americans were white, and not all women were happy living as housewives (Boyer 101). Although most did not fit the mold
These days, marriage contracts fortunately treat both men and women the same, and look at it as more of a partnership rather than a legal contract with economical advantages. (Bernstein, 2011) Today, women have more goals than getting married and having children, most want to go to college and having a successful career. It is normal for a woman to be completely successful all on her own without a husband. These days, a woman can be the bread winner of her family while her husband is a stay at home father. There are also several single working mothers and single working
The era of I love Lucy, Leave it to Beaver and Father knows Best, brought about a time where family values were necessary, family life was wonderful and no one was worrying about politics and the Cold War. These families had the molds of women constrained in the home, men bringing home the bacon and all in the homes of white middle class families. Women in the 1950s were often depicted as dependent on men and were encouraged to get married young. (Bloom and Breines, 6) It took large media input from movie stars like Marilyn Monroe, to influence many women to join the workforce and reject the “traditional feminine roles”. (Bloom and Breines 6) This mold would be challenged by the introduction of the Birth Control pill in 1954 and the growing unhappiness of women who would seek to break the walls that trapped their mothers. (Bloom and Breines, 5) More women would venture out of the homes and into the workplace between the two decades, “from 25 percent in 1950to 32 percent in 1960”. (Bloom and Breines, 5) The introduction of the Birth Control pill allowed for women to avoid unwanted pregnancies or even marriages and encouraged the sexual liberation that would be seen in the sixties.
Everyone can recognize what the typical 1950’s housewife looks like, cinema and television has brought this to life for us. As the draw of suburban living built momentum in its idealized location and lifestyle, television was also gaining significant popularity as a preferred
There was a time when women typically maintained the home and raised children while the husbands were the sole bread-winners for the family finances. However, times have changed and so have women’s rights and expectations for divorce, education, an...
"Marriage & Relationships." How Could Divorce Affect My Kids? N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
Arnold, Colleen. "Divorce Rates." Divorce Reform Page. Americans for Divorce Reform, Web. 21 Feb 2010. .
The first significant cause of recent rise in the rates of divorce is that women completely change in roles. In the past, men have to earn whole money to afford the expense of family, whereas woman only do housework, hence women have no money leading to depend on husbands’ money. Because of these situations, it is too difficult for most women to separate from their husbands. Nonetheless, these situations entirely change nowadays. The equality between men and women in roles are very clear at the moment, thus women can work outside to earn money, while men share the household tasks such as cooking, cleaning, washing as well as caring for children. It can be clearly seen that women are independent from money as they can earn money by themselves to support their living cost. Accordingly, the divorce rates recently rise.
What is that one heart break that changed you? What did it feel like? I have had a couple of relationships that changed me and for the better, too. Each new relationship brought on that wonderful high feeling of joy, happiness, love, pride, etc. Then the problems would start, and the ending would start closing in fast. The end always hurt at first. I felt as if karma was punishing me for some reason unknown and was just being plain out mean. As time went on, the heart ache lessened. I would see the relationship with a new perspective and would see the problems. I would get angry, grieve, and then move on. After the first love, I said I would never love again. But like a lot of us that have said that, I did love again. That love was worse than the first. It got me a hospital stay and almost killed me, but that is a story for another day.