Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society's acceptance of gender roles
Gender roles in society
Society's acceptance of gender roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He’s Just Not That Into You is an advice book written by Greg Behrendt and Liz Tuccillo, whom are both writers for the television show Sex and the City. This advice book gives women tips on how to tell if the guy they are talking to just isn 't that into them. Each chapter of this book begins with the phrase, “He’s Just Not That Into You If…” For example, Chapter one, “He’s Just Not That Into You If He’s Not Asking You Out” (Behrendt & Tuccillo, p. 9), Chapter two, “He’s Just Not That Into You If He’s Not Calling You” (Behrendt & Tuccillo, p. 23), and my favorite chapter, chapter six, “He’s Just Not That Into You If He Only Wants to See You When He’s Drunk.” (Behrendt & Tuccillo, p. 70) Each chapter includes letters addressed to Greg from …show more content…
For a very long time, men always had a higher status than women. In marriages during the beginning of the 1900s, men were dominant over their wives. They were the providers and the leaders of their families.(Bernstein, 2011) For women, their main goal in life was to get married to a man that could provide for them financially. Women did not attend college or have careers, so having a man asking for their hand in marriage was a need and a privilege. Originally, marriage contracts stated that any property that the woman owned automatically became his once they were married. (Bernstein, 2011) Even though marriage contracts were changed so that women could own their own property and they gained the right to vote in 1920, women were still looked down upon. (Bernstein, 2011) Until the 1980s, rape within marriages was legal because technically it was the wife’s job to have sex with her husband. (Bernstein, 2011) Women literally only seen as something for men to marry so they had someone provide them with children and to take care of them …show more content…
These days, marriage contracts fortunately treat both men and women the same, and look at it as more of a partnership rather than a legal contract with economical advantages. (Bernstein, 2011) Today, women have more goals than getting married and having children, most want to go to college and having a successful career. It is normal for a woman to be completely successful all on her own without a husband. These days, a woman can be the bread winner of her family while her husband is a stay at home father. There are also several single working mothers and single working
Today, women and men have equal rights, however, not long ago men believed women were lower than them. During the late eighteenth century, men expected women to stay at home and raise children. Women were given very few opportunities to expand their education past high school because colleges and universities would not accept females. This was a loss for women everywhere because it took away positions of power for them. It was even frowned upon if a woman showed interest in medicine or law because that was a man’s place, not a woman’s, just like it was a man’s duty to vote and not a woman’s.
On a personal note, in researching a paper on marriage and divorce a few semesters ago, I found that in the early Victorian era (1935-1901), a woman entering marriage had almost no rights. All her property automatically became her husband's. Even if she had her own land, her husband received the income from it. A husband had the right to lock up his wife. If he beat her, she had no legal redress. The law mostly removed itself from marital relations. Married women were put into the same category as lunatics, idiots, outlaws and children, and treated as such.
Today, many women choose their own lifestyle and have more freedom. They can choose if they want to get married and have kids or not. Coontz said “what’s new is not that women make half their families living, but that for the first time they have substantial control over their own income, along with the social freedom to remain single or to leave an unsatisfactory marriage” (98). When women couldn’t work, they had no options but to stay with their husband for financial support. Working is a new way of freedom because they can choose to stay or leave their husband and make their own decisions.
Women were confronted by many social obligation in the late nineteenth century. Women were living lives that reflected their social rank. They were expected to be economically dependent and legally inferior. No matter what class women were in, men were seen as the ones who go to work and make the money. That way, the women would have to be dependent since they were not able to go to work and make a good salary. No matter what class a woman was in, she could own property in her own name. When a woman became married she " lost control of any property she owned, inherited, or earned" ( Kagan et al. 569). A woman's legal identity was given to her husband.
A woman’s place is in the home. She should have babies and raise them well. Her job is to keep the house clean and to take care of her husband. Although in today’s society this is no longer an acceptable classification, parts of it still exist within the minds of many. For example, the majority of men and women in the United States would say that they are against inequality between men and women; yet, the majority of women in America are living with their husband’s last name. This practice literally used to symbolize the ownership of the woman by the man, but people today fail to see the connection between this tradition and the past. This inability to see the connection creates a contradiction. It would seem logical that if America wants to affirm the value and equality of women, it would reject practices that keep an oppressive past alive in the present.
Warren Farrell is a well educated man who focuses his attention on gender. In his essay “Men as Success Objects,” he writes about gender roles in male-female relationships. He begins, “for thousands of years, marriages were about economic security and survival” (Farrell 185). The key word in that statement is were. This implies the fact that marriage has changed in the last century. He relates the fact that post 1950s, marriage was more about what the male and female were getting out of the relationship rather than just the security of being married. Divorce rates grew and added to the tension of which gender held the supremacy and which role the individuals were supposed to accept. “Inequality in the workplace” covered up all of the conflicts involved with the “inequality in the homeplace”(Farrell). Farrell brings to attention all ...
Throughout Western history it was known to have this Patriarchal system in which the men are the head of the family, and community, during which these spheres between the male and female were divided, each having their own set of roles: the male in the public view and the women in the private view. The men worry about what is going on outside the home like politics, money, control over property while the women take care of what happens on the inside of the home doing things like taking care of the children and doing the house work. With these roles set in place the women have had a hard time being respected because of this Patriarchy.
We, as Americans, have come towards the concept of equality in relationships. Male dominant relationships were common throughout the forties and fifties in the United States. Women were deemed as housewives, whose job was to clean and have dinner ready for their husband's return from work. Imagining women in that type of status is difficult to do in society. Families are not a place for tyranny.
As far back as the Paleolithic era, women had different rights then men. Some of the injustices women faced include, not having a right to vote, a voice in law, and women could not enter most occupations. Women were not even allowed to get a college education. Once a women was married she had no rights, or in the case that the women got divorced she had no legally could not have custody of her children. Many religious believed God created women to be inferior. It was considered a natural law that men were above women. When women started the fight for more rights, it started out as a political and legal fight and eventually turned into a social and economic fight as well. Many women who started the fight, died before they could see there work pay off, including Susan Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucy Stone. In the U.S, Abigail Adams and Mercy Otis Warren fought for the addition of women’s emancipation in the constitution. During the late 18th century, in the United States men had many rights while women had very few. Women also could not keep their own wages. One right woman maintained was the right to own property if their husband died.
Women were only second-class citizens. They were supposed to stay home cook, clean, achieve motherhood and please their husbands. The constitution did not allow women to vote until the 19th amendment in 1971 due to gender discrimination. Deeper in the chapter it discusses the glass ceiling. Women by law have equal opportunities, but most business owners, which are men, will not even take them serious. Women also encounter sexual harassment and some men expect them to do certain things in order for them to succeed in that particular workplace. The society did not allow women to pursue a real education or get a real job. Women have always been the submissive person by default, and men have always been the stronger one, and the protector. Since the dawn of time, the world has seen a woman as a trophy for a man’s arm and a sexual desire for a man’s
There was a time when women typically maintained the home and raised children while the husbands were the sole bread-winners for the family finances. However, times have changed and so have women’s rights and expectations for divorce, education, an...
society. Women’s rights and feminism did not exist. In the 1800s divorces were frowned upon and everything was given to the males.
Historically, women have been subordinate to the secondary roles behind men. In hunter gatherer societies, men hunted game whereas women performed less dangerous jobs, such as berry picking. Most societies were patriarchal, giving men almost supreme authority. Hence, once a woman was married, she was subservient to him onward. Although that period of history has passed and no longer are patriarchal societies as extreme as they once were, there are still problems in today’s society that subject women to conform to their male counterparts.
Historically women discrimination has been occurring for decades. It is not rare for women to have to deal with constant stereotypes circling in the air around them. However, many individuals do not believe that expecting married women to be housewives, who do all the cooking and cleaning, is a misconception or stereotype. In 1848 was the very first time women took a stand and decided to fight for their rights, yet it took 70 years for women to earn the right to vote. There were many changes occurring during that era, especially in the 19th century. However, society always imposed “golden rules” on women, which specified how they were supposed to live and work based on men’s needs. A so-called “golden rule” was motherhood; Married women did not have much of an option on being mothers it was a law of life. Psychology Doctor Sherrie Bourg Carter, in the online article Childless, Single, Married With Children: Stereotypes and Misconceptions Abound for Women, addresses the fact that women have always been inferior according to society by stating, “Women were property. They had one role and one role only-domestic”. Married women at the time were not equal to their husband they were below their husband and only there to please him and worry about the domestic needs. From a young age, men learned that in a marriage a woman's purpose was to serve them and obey them. Many individuals assume that men that portrayed this perspective were part of “a traditional family”, but society also had a huge part in this concept. From the start, society made sure individuals knew women were not equal to men by not giving everyone the same rights from the beginning. Doctor Carter also brings the point across in the online article that the reality for married women was that they were intended to have one job, which was domestic, “They were responsible for taking care of the home, taking care of their husbands, and bearing and
The first significant cause of recent rise in the rates of divorce is that women completely change in roles. In the past, men have to earn whole money to afford the expense of family, whereas woman only do housework, hence women have no money leading to depend on husbands’ money. Because of these situations, it is too difficult for most women to separate from their husbands. Nonetheless, these situations entirely change nowadays. The equality between men and women in roles are very clear at the moment, thus women can work outside to earn money, while men share the household tasks such as cooking, cleaning, washing as well as caring for children. It can be clearly seen that women are independent from money as they can earn money by themselves to support their living cost. Accordingly, the divorce rates recently rise.