Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personality theories with analysis
Personality theories with analysis
Personality theories with analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personality theories with analysis
Summary Annotation Hans J. Eysenck developed personality descriptions based on what he saw as physiological causes of personality to behavioral effects. He developed questionnaires that incorporated the concept of extraversion-introversion, neuroticism and psychoticism to develop his 3-factor model. This model is known as the PEN model. A five-factor model is an approach that was created based off of factors that many personality researchers have found within their own studies. Costa and McCrae are very well known for the OCEAN model. OCEAN is an acronym for openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. "Personality structure among prisoners: How valid is the five-factor model, and can it offer support for Eysenck 's theory of criminality?" is a study that was created as a result of another study done before it. The previous study was based on research of offenders being done with the use of a …show more content…
In comparing the two models there was hope "to validate a general personality structure within an offender sample to determine if there are any required adaptations of the FFM, and to ascertain if the FFM can offer some validation of Eysenck 's personality theory." With this study, the researchers had a few predictions that they hoped to prove. Researchers predicted that participants would show high levels of extraversion in their personalities and low levels of emotional stability in their scores which would prove high levels of neuroticism according to the PEN model. They also predicted that participants who had experienced a lot of time in prison would show low levels of extraversion. They predicted that younger prisoners would report higher levels of extraversion than the older prisoners and lastly they predicted that the FFM fits the data better than a three-factor PEN
Over several decades, independent streams of systematic research into personality traits have converged on the same general conclusion: the domain of personality attributes can be described by five superordinate constructs (Digman, 1990). These five general, robust factors of personality are now called the “Big Five” and subsume as well as abstract, more specific personal attributes, dispositions, habits and behaviours as a framework (cf. Digman, 1990; MCRae and Costa, 1989; Wiggins and Pincus, 1992). The five global traits in this frame work are: (1) Extraversion, described by a need for stimulation, activity, assertiveness, and quantity and intensity of interpersonal interaction; (2) Agreeableness, represented
... middle of paper ... ... Understanding psychological theories helps criminologists to design appropriate correctional strategies to mitigate crime. Works Cited Eysenck, H.J., & Gudjonsson, G.H. d. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a The causes and cures of criminality.
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2009). Theories of personality. New York:
Lewis Goldberg - this psychologist is credited with having created the Big 5 Personality Traits: Open to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreebleness, and Neuroticism, (acronym OCEAN). The NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI) is a psychological tool that emerged from this approach. This measure of assessment is still used today, (Cervone & Pervin, 2010; Davis & Palladino,
five factor theory is a fairly recent proposal and has its basis in earlier work,
In the late 1970’s Hans Eysenck modified his two dimensional model of personality to allow for a third trait known as Psychoticism. This trait, now a part of Eysenck’s Psychoticism-Extraversion-Neuroticism model of psychology, is a pattern located in personality that Eysenck found and defined as the aggressive part of personality. It is from psychoticism that Eysenck believed all hostility in humans derived from. From Eysenck’s studies in the development of psychosis he began to form a theory that there was a correlation between high levels of this particular trait and the development of mental problems such as schizophrenia. He also believed that psychoticism was grounded into genetic biology. He studied whether directly related individuals shared high levels of psychoticism and, if this formed a true correlation, that he could then find the element of the genetic structure of human beings that housed psychoticism. Over time Eysenck began to see similarities to other factor models of personality such as the three-factor model developed by Auke Tellegen. This was seen by Eysenck in the fact that psychoticism can be further broken down into smaller traits such as impulsiveness through the use of factor analysis. From this point impulsiveness may be dismantled even further by dividing it into pieces such as rick-taking for example. It is from this point that Eysenck’s critics have found that they believe the trait by itself is too broad to be defined as a single trait. Most critics of Eysenck’s theory of psychoticism as a facet of personality agree that the large amount of correlation to other, further defined models means that psychoticism requires more factor analysis to adequately describe personalit...
Schultz, D.P. & Schultz, S.E. (2009). Theories of Personality, Ninth Edition. US: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Personality is massive part of an individual’s identity. Our personalities dictate our patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting. An individual’s personality exposes them to predispositions and habits that influence their actions and lives. Early on, personality assessments consisted of physical features ranging from head shape and facial characteristics to body type. In today’s world, personality assessments are mainly based around traits. Traits are simply descriptions of one’s habitual patterns of behavior, thought and emotion. The most popular personality assessment is the Five-Factor Model, also known as The Big Five. This model allows us to describe people based on the five main traits/dimensions. These traits are extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. Each of these five traits measures a different aspect of one’s personality. Extraversion is based on one’s level of engagement with the world,
Magnavita, J. J. (2002). Theories of personality: Contemporary approaches to the science of personality. New York: Wiley.
Criminal Thinking Patterns is a theory that proposed that criminals engage in a different thinking pattern then those who are noncriminal. This theories downfall is that it was not researched in a systematic way and there were not a wide enough study done. Due to this we can not actually say how well it applies to the population of offenders. Glenn Walters created the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles which measures thinking styles presumed to reinforce, support, and maintain a criminal lifestyle. This study was done in a more systematic and scientifically valid approach to investigating the way offenders think. Measure of Offending Thinking Styles-Revised was developed to examine the structure of dysfunctional thinking exhibited by criminal offenders. It supports the three factor model of criminal thinking. The three factors are
The five-factor model includes five broad domains or dimensions of personality that are used to describe human personality. The five factors are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. While these five traits should be sufficient on their own to describe all facets of a personality, there also should be no correlation between the main factors. The Five Factor Model is now perhaps the most widely use trait theory of personality and has achieved the closest thing to a consensus in personality research. The advantage of this theory is that there have been multiple research studies conducted on this theory. Results suggest that this theory is effective in describing and determining personality. However, this theory is very categorical and does not allow for much flexibility. It also looks at the person personality at that time and now how it developed.
The second major theory is called the trait or five-factor model. Often referred to as the "Big 5". The five personality traits described by the theory are extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness and neuroticism. Beneath each proposed global factor, a number of correlated and more specific primary factors are claimed. One strength of the trait perspectives is their ability to categorize observable behaviors. In other words, observing the behaviors of an individual over time and in varying circumstances provides evidence for the personality traits categorized in trait theories. Another strength is that trait theories use
The Five-Factor Model of Personality gives an insight to psychologists when dealing with patients and test subjects. Due to this theory, research psychologist are able to research personality more accurately and uphold a better understanding when discussing the reasoning behind certain pre-disposed tendencies. Also, counselors which practice different types of therapy are enabled to learn details concerning their patient that can assist in the treatment of that specific patient. There have been multiple disputes in regards to the validity of the Five-Factor Model of Personality theory. Many skeptics believe that there are too many variations that come into play when dealing with personality in order to accurately depict and diagnose a 100% accurate declaration of ones’ characteristics (McCrae, 1991). The issue with relying on the model in order to declare one’s characteristics is that there is often overlap between the degrees of high and low (Popkins, 1998). Although this is a valid statement, the model is a significant role in sorting through the variations to achieve a probable consensus. Therefore, the model cannot achieve a result without any probable cause for doubt but generally will provide a clear depiction of ones’ traits and
Friedman, H. S. & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research, 5th Ed. Allyn & Bacon: Heights, MA
Understanding Psychology and Crime; Perspectives on Theory and Action, New York. PENNINGTON, D ( 2002) , Introducing Psychology: Approaches, Topics and Methods, London, Hodder Arnold TANNENBAUN, B, (2007),Profs link criminal behaviour to genetics [online] , Available at: http://thedp.com/index.php/article/2007/11/profs_link_criminal_behavior_to_genetics [accessed 16th October 2011]. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/41182390/Explanations-of-Criminal-behaviour