There are many controversies surrounding the first century of Islamic history. Historians often have trouble agreeing on whether or not it is reliable to use hadith literature as a source for the origins of Islam considering a large amount of hadiths surfaced well after the time of Muhammad. Many historians find issue with the isnad and matn of hadith. Historians argue that these can be easily forged given the nature of how hadith is transmitted by word of mouth. Another problem with using hadith as a historical source for the origins of Islam is that many hadith collections contain anachronisms, which, again raises questions about the reliability of such collections. Lastly, certain portions of hadith are interpreted from the Qur’an, which is problematic because many scholars can interpret the Qur’an differently, resulting in inconsistencies. Because many of these hadiths came from the 9th century but are making claims about much early times, they are more effective as sources for historians looking for information about the 9th century rather than as historical sources for the origins of Islam. Although hadith reports can be helpful to historians for information on the ninth century or later, they are unreliable as historical sources for information on the origins of Islam.
Many non-prophetic hadith reports surfaced in and around the ninth century. As a response to these reports that were unfocused on the prophet Muhammad, a man by the name of Al-Shafi’i began popularizing prophetic hadith reports. He believed that hadith should be about what Muhammad allegedly did or said. Up to the time of al-Shafi’i’s death, hadith specialists began to travel to major cities in search of prophetic hadith. These quests are known as Talab al-...
... middle of paper ...
...the accuracy of hadiths. Also given the nature of the varying interpretations of the Qur’an, it’s impossible for all scholars to come to the same conclusion for each sura. Despite how hadith is unreliable as a historical source for the origins of Islam, it can still be helpful to historians to learn about the culture of the people living in the 9th century.
Works Cited
Berg, Herbert. Method and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins. Leiden: Brill, 2003. Print.
Brown, Daniel W. A New Introduction to Islam. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2004. Print.
Brown, Jonathan A. C. "How We Know Early Hadīth Critics Did Matn Criticism And Why It'
So Hard To Find." Islamic Law & Society 15.2 (2008): 143-184. Academic Search
Premier. Web. 20 Mar. 2014.
Motzki, Harald. The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence: Meccan Fiqh before the Classical
Schools. Leiden: Brill, 2002. Print.
...y by compiling a summary of Islamic history, and, by doing so, creates a complete Islamic history that can go toe to toe with European history. As a result, his argument stands to be thorough, suggesting that Islamic history indeed plays a role in today’s international world
the Accuracy of the Chronicle of Al-Jabarti." Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. No. 2 (1970): 283-294. http://www.jstor.org/stable/613005 (accessed November 30, 2013).
Ibn Munqidh, Usama. "From Memoirs." McNeill, William and Marilyn Robinson Waldman. The Islamic World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 184-206.
He presents the themes and elements of the pre-Islamic society, including its tribal culture, economic culture, religious background, prominence of poetry (how the Qur’an situates itself in relation to the poetry of the “Jahileen”), and discusses gender issues (particularly infanticide of daughters). Moreover, he introduces the connection between Abraham and Muhammad which is identified as the “cornerstone to the Islamic tradition” (84), situating it relative to other monotheistic religions. Through these elements Safi notes that pre-Islamic Arabia shaped the ways in which “Islamic discourses and practices expressed themselves” (53) thus providing the “the context of Islamic practices”
Print. Doak, Robin. Empire of the Islamic World. Rev. ed.
The Islamic Empire explored natural philosophy and employed these understandings in instrumentality. They accumulated the natural philosophy of other cultures and expanded on their ideas in accordance with practicality. The Islamic Empire was the most advanced scientific nation for 500 years but declined because there was not much need for improvement in functioning. Career scientist only existed amongst the rich. The Islamic Empire is focused on the instrumentality of science, but even with the pronounced focus of instrumentality, the Islamic Empire experienced a dynamic between the dichotomy of instrumentality and natural philosophy, each seemingly distinct branch of science ebbing and flowing with the support and advancement of one another.
Fakhry, M. 1997. Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Mysticism: A Short Introdu ction. Oxford: One World Publications.
People who practice the Abrahamic faiths of Judaism, Christianity and Islam collectively comprise over one half of the world’s population, and while disparities between these three religions are widely spread and politicized, the similarities between their religious texts outweigh their differences. A crucial similarity between these three religions is their view on Abraham as their spiritual patriarch (lecture). The Koran makes use of both the Tanakh and the New Testament, and while minor differences exist between these texts, the perspectives they share are far more significant. The Koran retains many of the core ideas found in the Tanakh and the New Testament, specifically in regards to the perception of Abraham, the status of God, and the role of women. Any religious text can be interpreted in any number of ways, and while it is easy to pull apart texts of different faiths and dissect the differences, finding common ground and similarities is arguably more important.
Ibn Khaldun. “Il Muqaddimah.” Ed. Paul Davis. Gary Harrison. David M. Johnson. John F. Crawford. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2009. Page Range:1732-1739. Print.
Hourani, Albert. A History of the Arab Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 1991. Print.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam & Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: U of Chicago, 1982. Print.
Renard, John. Islam and Christianity: theological themes in comparative perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. Print.
Rippin A. 1990, Muslims, Their Religious Beliefs and Practices Volume 1: The Formative Period, Routledge, London and New York.
G. Esposito, John L (2002) Islam; What Everyone Should Know. New York. Oxford University Press Inc.
Kenneth Jost. 2005. “Understanding Islam.” Annual Editions: Anthropology 11/12, 34th Edition. Elvio Angeloni. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.