Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Refugee overview essay
Adapting to a different culture
Refugee overview essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Refugee overview essay
“Successful adaptation can bring with it the opportunity for growth” (Marie, Colak). Like all refugees Ha’s adaptation to Alabama was difficult, so this lead to frustration and slower growth. Losing precious things and what you keep from your previous home determines your adaptation. Accepting what you loss and cherishing what you kept from your old home helps you move on and persevere. Losing things aren’t bad, cherishing what you still have and to move on helps you stabilize. Refugees lose things that are important to them, although always have things that are special that they cherish to move on, just like Ha in Thanhha Lai’s Inside Out and Back Again. Refugees all have a push and pull factor that affects them because of being forced
Refugees share similar experiences and emotions when they move to a new country. The book Inside Out and Back Again splits these feelings into two categories, “inside out” and “back again”. Refugees from around the world experience these feelings. For instance, it is easy for a refugee to feel “inside out” when learning a new language, or they can feel “back again” when they find a familiar object that reminds them of their past. Many refugees mainly struggle with learning a new language, but to make them feel more comfortable, they can find satisfaction in items from their home land.
Refugees are people that flee from home because of a disastrous event that has happened in their home land to neighboring countries. In this story, “Inside Out and Back Again” by Thanhha Lai, Ha, the main character that is ten years-old, lives with her mother in Vietnam during the time of the Vietnam War in the year of 1975. Because Ha has to live without her father, not only Ha has to deals with internal issues but also she and her family has to move on with their life. Refugees deal with losing a loved one just like how Ha has to. Refugees turn “Inside out” when they lose a loved one. They can turn “back again” when they get used to their new lifestyle in the new country. Ha is an example of this because Ha lost her father, he was captured
The title “Inside Out and Back Again”relates to the universal refugee experience of fleeing and finding home for both Ha and the many refugees around the world who had their lives turned “inside out” as they fled, but then came “back again” as they found a new
Progress and individualism are very much celebrated in American culture. Many people migrate to urban cities in the search of economic prosperity and to achieve the elusive “American Dream.” City life can often come as a shock to individuals not accustomed to a fast-paced lifestyle; conversely it can change a person. Such change can transform a person to lose the values and beliefs they were raised with which consequently attribute to losing the bonds that they once held with their families. This is not the case with the families portrayed in Carol Stack’s ethnography Call to Home. The book depicts Southern African-American families living in rural, North and South Carolina’s towns – which migrate to northern urban cities for economic opportunities – known as the Great Migration, and ultimately decide to return home. This essay explores the motives that caused Reverse Migration which include kin ties, structural and environmental violence endured, the role of the children, and the novel philosophies the diaspora brings with them upon returning home.
The push and pull factor was a huge part of immigration. Many ethnic groups had similar push and pull factors. One example of the push factors was with the Japanese and the Irish, both were suffering due to agriculture. The Japanese
Refugees are likely to develop high rates of depression and anxiety. Although refugees are fleeing to a safe and new
Change is a common and necessary part of life, however it does not always take the form of a choice. Many times throughout history, people have been pushed from their homes and communities through the threats of warfare and tyrannical rulers, forcing them to start a new life in a land very much foreign to them. Among these many souls who have been displaced, sit the Hmong, who within their culture have had a multitude of families immigrated to America, including the families of Sou Hang and Paja Thao.
There were two questions that resonated in my mind as I read this article: “Why are people risking their lives when they can take the easy why out?” and “Why are people so willing to quit when they have come so far from where they began?”. I ultimately wanted to know what the deciding factors were for these migrants at such a crucial time in their lives. The factor, referred to as the “push” factor, that caused many people to give up on Hungary was the physical and emotional response the nation gave toward the refugee presence. When they arrived at the border there were attacks placed on them by officials. The main factor, aka “pull” factor, which caused many to stay and fight for access into Hungary, was the access to cheap plentiful land. This land symbolized opportunity for those hopeful families. Push and Pull factors are very important when it comes to migrant families. The likability of a specific place is based solely on personal perception. The good thing about migration is that it forces one to become familiar to new places. In many cases that familiarity sparks interest in other places, and a pattern of migration begins. The more the migrants move the happier they become. In the article, the initial goal of the refugees was to get their families out of harms way and into a safer community. The more the families migrated the less they had to worry about that initial problem of protecting their loved ones. This process can be referred to as distance decay. When a family feels that they have put enough distance between themselves and their initial problematic location, they importance of that initial location begins to
... their studies, or remain in Sweden and try to start a new life. The push factor plays a big role in this process of decision making; and this is because many African students that are leaving politically unstable countries or low economic countries, are often captured by the opportunities that they hope to achieve here in Sweden, rather than returning to Africa were the hope of having such opportunities are often very low. Furthermore, The push factor can also be considered as playing a larger role on why these students have decided to leave their country in exchange for a life in Sweden because many of them actually did not know much about Sweden before coming; but they just had the notion that the life in Europe would be far-more better than the one they had back in Africa, and the opportunities they stand to gain here is Sweden would be more than that in Africa.
The immigrants believe that by migrating to a different country they have a better chance to succeed I life, they want to better themselves and their families. The three theories of why people migrate are great explanations to the situation. But, I think the theory that makes the most sense is the push pull theory. The push pull theory is the main idea of the other two theories; it seems to have information about the other theories. It provides an overall picture of why people migrate from their home. The push pull theory provides explanations of the factors that contribute to a person migrating to a different country. They all have their own situations that they are going through and their own motivates for wanting a better life. In the end, I think that’s what everybody wants, to just have a place you can call home and where you do not have to worry about not having bread on the table. That’s all they want to do. They want to provide them a better opportunity for a better
Zavis, Alexandra. “Refugees find the American dream down on the farm.” Los Angeles Times, 26 Aug.
Most refugees take some time to find themself after moving, as all the new things confuse them, but they figure it out and can end up doing amazing
About more than a million immigrates live in United State, but why? The Push-Pull Factor is when people migrate since something pushes them away from their native country or pulls them toward a new place. Such as my parents, Herminia, my mother was “pull” towards America because she was convinced that California was the state to have varied employment opportunities. Meanwhile Efrain, my father was “push” to America, because his community had ecological problem. Even though my parents had immigrated to California, they differently learned about loss of innocence, injustice, and both learned about companionship as a salvation.
As a concept that is becoming commonplace in mainstream society the concept or status or refugee is a concept of high importance in the anthropological study of conflict within and across borders as well as the impact this has on host societies. Refugee is officially defined by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) as a person “who has been forced to flee his or her country because of persecution, war, or violence. A refugee has a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group.” (UNHCR, 2016). Whilst this definition may initially come across as straight forward the concept of refugee is multifaceted and complicated as it often gets mixed
It is not the city of Beirut specifically that holds the greater meaning for these individuals, but instead the concept of a temporary home in the face of exile. While these refugees hold ties to their native countries, they have come together under the umbrella of a foreign land and form a newly established union. Darwish finds comfort and asserts this idea of a cohesive refugee population that is established when people are expelled from their homelands and desperately seek acceptance in a new location. The narrator explains, “I don’t know Beirut, and I don’t know if I love or don’t love it. For the political refugee, there is a chair that can’t be changed or replaced” (92). Darwish interchangeably uses the pronoun “I” and the vague “the political refugee”, thus integrating himself with this larger population of refugees. This refugee population is ambivalent about Beirut itself, as they still maintain ties to their home countries and where they move is merely a temporary refuge. Despite this, the necessity of rooting oneself geographically after exile and the difficulties that accompany this process are principle concerns for all refugees alike, regardless of identity, which creates a shared struggle and story amongst this collective