For the past 4-5 years, Syria has faced a tremendous amount of downfalls, trials, and tribulations. In the past they have lacked the necessary political guidance required to run a successful nation. As a result, groups within the country have taken it upon themselves to resume leadership. Competition for power has become so uncontrollable, that it has begun to result in violence. These violent occurrences have caused people too move and seek safer environments for their families. Where these immense groups of refugees flee, in the same direction, conflict follows. In an article of the New York Times titled “Migrants and Police Clash Over Border Crackdown by Hungary”, written by Rick Lyman and Helene Bienvenu, reports are speaking on the measures …show more content…
being taken by nations to stop migrants from moving through countries to freedom. Nations are beginning to exclude migrants from crossing through their countries, thus limiting the occurrence of diffusion. The only reason many of these migrants have yet to give up on their hope for freedom is because there are certain aspects and factors that attract them to a better life. The journey to a safer place has been anything but easy for the refugees. There are constant obstacles that have to be crossed before they reach lands of freedom. There are two types of barriers that are hindering the journey for the Syrian refugees into the borders of Hungary. The first barrier is physical. Border patrollers and officers have installed barbed wire along the perimeter of their lands in order to prevent the entry of unwelcomed immigrants. Other physical barriers include the tear gas and water canons used that are mentioned in the New York Times article. The second barrier is somewhat an emotional barrier that exemplifies fear. The reason that Hungary is so hesitant to allow more people onto their land is because they are afraid they wont be able to support them. Not only are all of these tactics being used to prohibit the admittance of unwanted migrants, but they are also prohibiting the opportunity of two cultures to interact with one another. The lack of this interaction limits both parties from experiencing an intercultural bond. According to the textbook, culture helps enhance diffusion. Without the intercultural bond being present, Hungary is also limiting itself as a nation. A nation cannot expect to evolve if it does not take risks and keep an open mind about what and who surrounds it. It is important to realize that success is granted to those who are open to try new things no matter what the outcome may be. In the article, migrants are faced with the choice to fight their way into Hungary, or to just give up and settle in Croatia.
There were two questions that resonated in my mind as I read this article: “Why are people risking their lives when they can take the easy why out?” and “Why are people so willing to quit when they have come so far from where they began?”. I ultimately wanted to know what the deciding factors were for these migrants at such a crucial time in their lives. The factor, referred to as the “push” factor, that caused many people to give up on Hungary was the physical and emotional response the nation gave toward the refugee presence. When they arrived at the border there were attacks placed on them by officials. The main factor, aka “pull” factor, which caused many to stay and fight for access into Hungary, was the access to cheap plentiful land. This land symbolized opportunity for those hopeful families. Push and Pull factors are very important when it comes to migrant families. The likability of a specific place is based solely on personal perception. The good thing about migration is that it forces one to become familiar to new places. In many cases that familiarity sparks interest in other places, and a pattern of migration begins. The more the migrants move the happier they become. In the article, the initial goal of the refugees was to get their families out of harms way and into a safer community. The more the families migrated the less they had to worry about that initial problem of protecting their loved ones. This process can be referred to as distance decay. When a family feels that they have put enough distance between themselves and their initial problematic location, they importance of that initial location begins to
dwindle. In conclusion, there are many aspects of a location that can influence the lives of people, specifically migrants. Although the Syrian refugees continue to face rejection and still have to deal with physical and emotional barriers, they keep an optimistic mindset that one-day they will reach a land to call home. The way a nation portrays itself to outsiders has a lot to do with decisions made by the outside party whether to take part in that nation or not. Some push and pull factors a location may not be able to control, but the ones they can control are what attract the attention of others in need of a community. Usually when a family reaches the process of distance decay, they have found that community upon which they feel safe enough that their old community decreases with importance. Ultimately, diffusion allows for opportunities to create new ideology, and without it there would be no diversity within the world.
Imagine one day your mother tells you that she is leaving and is not sure with she will see you again. Imagine growing up only occasionally speaking to your mother on the phone. Immigrants make the decision to leave behind their life and move to a new place mainly because they believe it will be better for them and for the people they care about. The Book of the Unknown Americans and Enrique’s Journey show the advantages and disadvantages of parents leaving their children behind or bringing their children along when they migrate. This decision causes harsh consequences that affect the family immediately and in the future.
First , when refugees flee their homes they are put on a boat to a different place . When Ha and her family got on the boat she said “ Everyone knows the ship could sink , unable to hold the piles of bodies that keep crawling on like raging ants from a disrupted nest “ . When Ha fled her home , she was upset she had to leave her things behind . Plus she had to leave some of her father’s things too , her mother said “ We cannot leave evidence of father’s life that might hurt him “ . It’s pretty hard for them to flee their homes because that was their home where they were born at , I know when i moved houses or states i’m sad . At least they find better homes now and they don’t have to deal with the wars .
BACKGROUND: In March of 2011, the unrest in Syria was just beginning, with protests g...
Change is depicted an as aspect of life which can propel us down unexpected paths, this can either be resisted or embraced by individuals. Peter Skrzynecki portrays these notions throughout his poems ‘Kornelia’ and ‘Migrant hostel’. The poems are supported by the stylistic devices used throughout his poems to further emphasise the meaning behind, often used are personification, symbolism and similes. The two texts chosen Joni Mitchell ‘Big yellow taxi’ Martin Luther king ‘I have a dream’ further contrast the notions of change that Peter speaks of in his poems, proclaiming change will modify the permanency in one’s livelihood, Change Is often unwanted but is necessary and to fully comprehend change one has to embrace it. These composers have
All around the world, people are being forced to leave their homes due to war, persecution, and unequal treatment; these people are called refugees. When they flee, refugees leave behind their homes, family, friends, and personal possessions. They make risky escapes and their lives could be easily taken from them. Refugees often become distant and depressed as they experience these traumatic events. In the novel Inside Out and Back Again by Thanhha Lai, ten year-old Hà and her family live in South Vietnam: a war torn country. Hà was like any ten year-old; she liked to stay close to her mother and got jealous when things didn’t go her way. She loves her home and wanted to stay, even when the war between the North and South got closer to home.
When thinking about a family member being removed from a country because that was not there place of origin, is a sickening thought. This thought crosses the minds of immigrant’s every day. Being an immigrant in the United States was supposed to be welcoming and an abundant of opportunity; now they receiver scrutiny and embarrassment from thousands of Americans, jobs are scarce, and when they do find jobs they receive low compensation. This country was fabricated from immigrants and people fleeing genocide; however, that time has changed and our borders are now closed. Taking a look in to the opposing side, there are many reasons why border control is imperative. Take into account that there
Immigrants are defined as people who permanently move to a forgiven country from their origin country. Immigrants can move for the purposes of seeking better living, better education, or in order to avoid any sort of issues in their origin country. Despite the reasoning behind the decision of the movement, an immigrant will be affected by the change of culture, way of life, social system and community. The process of the movement effects each individual differently depending on their, age, gender and their level of connection to their past culture. Having that said, the younger the age of the individual, the more venerable and easily they become to changing their way of life in order to feel a part of a community. Gender however is also related to the race of the person. To elaborate, females and black males are more open to the idea of changing any of their factors to adjust to their ‘new society’. An individual’s connection with their past culture, has a great impact on their personality and their standing and belief in their values, morals and culture. Therefore, the stronger and deeper the connection with their original culture and way of life, the more satisfied the individual becomes. Therefore, they don’t feel the urge to compete with another culture. Therefore, their current standing with their own culture has a strong impact on their future judgment on other culture. The weaker the connection the more prone they are to changing their current culture. Thus, an individual’s stability level towards their culture depends on other factors that are concerned with them. [Different age groups are faced with different situation that leads them to deal with different issues and therefore they are exposed to different kinds of expe...
Making the decision to leave your country for the better is a very difficult decision. This decision means leaving your family and friends, going somewhere that you have nothing, and possibly endangering your life. Mohsin Hamid describes the difficulties of migration through the novel Exit West. In this novel Hamid follows a young couple migrating out of their home town for safety and a better life. These reasons also apply to real life migration for why people are migrating. Hamid represents the traveling part of migration through these magical doors that leads to another country, depicts learning how to find your way in a new place, and presents the difficulties of countries not wanting migrants.
Refugees have two basic choices. They can return to their home country, or they can try to settle in another country. Most refugees, however, cannot return home because conditions in their native country have not changed sufficiently to eliminate the problems from whi...
Dating back to the Ottoman Empire, tensions between the Kurds and the state were apparent. As the Republic of Turkey developed, a strong sense of nationalism engulfed the country, which led to the oppression of many non-Turkish elements of society. Through this oppression we see attempts in the 1920’s and 1930’s at Kurdish autonomy with the eventual development of the PKK in 1978. With the first armed attack against Turkish soldiers in 1984 we see the issue gaining pace and becoming more severe. The Kurdish problem has claimed the lives of around 35,000 people, displaced even more, and has created economic and political problems not only domestically, but also internationally. Becoming one of Turkeys most important security issues, there have been attempts at peace on multiple occasions, but until now they were to no avail. This essay attempts to address various aspects of the Kurdish Problem; the domestic implications the Kurdish problem has created, such as the political disarray that develops when discussing the creation of pro-Kurdish parties, their opposition, and their inability to have any form of success within the government. The “terror problem.” The economic impact associated with regions most closely related to the Kurdish people. International implications dealing with Turkey, it’s neighbors, and the United States. Syria and Iraq are essential to discuss when dealing with the Kurdish problem because they add greater context to an issue that spans along the borders of multiple states. Furthermore, this essay will conclude with a discussion of the resolution attempts to the decades long dilemma such as recent developments, expectations by both sides, and prospects for the future.
Another casual night: the air is sticky, and the water is scarce, all throughout the country the sound of gunshots are ringing through the air. For most people, this “casual” night is beyond their wildest imagination, but for Syrians it is an ongoing nightmare. Faced with the trauma of a civil war, Syrian refugees seek protection and a more promising future than the life they currently live in their oppressive country. Many seek refuge in other Middle East countries like Turkey and Jordan, but others search for hope in the icon of freedom, the United States of America. However, in America, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not Syrian refugees should be accepted. America needs to accept the Syrian refugees because if they do not, the
As refugees continue to flee their countries, the surrounding countries struggle to cope with the influx of new people into their country. Camps for displaced people hoping to cross into and gain refugee status in neighboring countries can be seen from miles away, as white tents stretch into the distance.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Between January and November of this year, more than 750,000 migrants have been estimated crossing into the EU’s borders, compared to only 280,000 in the whole year during 2014 (www.bbc.com). This influx of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East has become a heavy burden on European Union policy makers. Many state leaders have opposing viewpoints and varying solutions to the crisis that is plaguing their region, and as a result there has been little to no action taken to solve this ever growing problem. This crisis should serve as a prime example of global cooperation, and it should highlight the ability to come together internationally and deal with important problems that affect all individuals. The solution to the refugee crisis will forever stand as a precedent for how the world deals with humanitarian issues in the future.
...lem facing Lebanon, and many different solutions exist to solve it. Securing the borders with Syria is one of the solutions proposed. It is a long and necessary process includes establishing a formal boundary separating the two states, building a wall, and improving the capabilities of border agents. Another solution to deal with illegal migrants issue is to revise the legal framework of migration. This is requires from the Lebanese Government improving the situation of refugees by acknowledging their status according to International law, and enacting laws that discourage employers from hiring illegal immigrants. Finally, Lebanon should also rely on partners having more experience and more assets in dealing with illegal migration issues. The EU is obviously the most reliable one. Moreover, bilateral agreements should not be neglected and can solve many problems.
Since 2011, Syrian refugees have been fleeing their country and looking for safety in places like Turkey. There is a great global debate on the solution to this refugee crisis involving as many as 20 independent countries plus the European Union. The United States is caught in a debate of its own on whether to take in Syrian refugees because of a conflict of domestic safety and global humanitarian obligation. By analyzing the historical background of the United States regarding Jewish, Hungarian, and Cuban refugees, there are distinct similarities and differences between the political decisions, domestic response, and overall effectiveness of refugee policy compared to the current Syrian Refugee