Gun-snob : A individual who associates a high price with quality, and has no other method of measuring quality.
The Gun-snob, We all know this individual. We've encountered him some where in the gun shop or at the range. I honestly believe that they are costing the industry sales because, Cheap guns are expensive and expensive guns are insane. You here it time and time again from These Gun-snobs "well maybe could have saved up a little more and got something better".Well "better" is like beauty its in the of the beholder and, The 2 problems with this as soon as it happens. The first problem is they feel that they've wasted their money. The second is they become embarrassed and often times won't shot at all or not as well as they could.
There have been several incidents where a child in the household has mistaken a gun for a toy and have mortally wounded himself and others with it. There have also been occasions where careless gun owners have left their guns loaded and have accidentally shot someone. Studies have shown that four people die each day due to accidental gun fire. Anti-gun users have pointed out that states that have relaxed their gun laws have had an increases in homicides. Also just because its anyone’s right to own a gun does not mean that they went through any sort of training to be able to use that gun. Most anti-gun users argue that most of these people who buy guns need to be properly trained before they can operate a gun, in order to prevent innocent and unnecessary harm or
Scott Kjar, financial aspects teacher at Baldwin-Wallace College, is on the ace gun side of the debate of gun control. He begins by discussing the shooting frenzy at Virginia Tech by a man named Cho. His entire defense is economists have a tendency to contradict gun control on the grounds that guns bring more income to the United States. Kjar contends Cho had an arrangement to kill quite a few people on the grounds that he had arranged it out prior. Cho would have killed the individuals with or without guns. Kjar says guns are by all account not the only type of weapons. Contrasted with different works like meeting from Democracy Now, Kjar gives the master gun perspective, while Goddard gives the contradicting perspective saying there ought to be harder gun laws.
Society’s Need for the Registration of Handguns Guns are an instrument that even the most careful of people could do harm with. Gun owners should attend firearm safety classes so they will be educated on proper handling and storage of the gun. While this should only be voluntary, something should be done to ensure that guns are only sold to people who have a safe background and are of age. Congress should mandate the registration of handguns in order to keep criminals from possessing guns, to cut back on violence in the home, and to avoid accidental or intentional violence among children. The Federal Government today is putting forth much effort in order to control the purchase and registration of handguns.
Most gun control interest groups argue that a gun is the only commercially available product solely designed to kill. They believe there should be a ‘cooling off’ period before people are allowed to purchase a gun from the time of application for a license.
Over the past year, the United States has been plagued with controversy in regards to gun control legislation. On January 24, 2013, Senator Feinstein introduced the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013. The Assault Weapons Ban was a bill written to stop the acts of sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of military styled weapons. The NRA-ILA website quotes an excerpt of Feinstein’s bill, which states, “Feinstein’s new bill are as follows: Reduces, from two to one, the number of permitted external features on various firearms. The 1994 ban permitted various firearms to be manufactured only if they were assembled with no more than one feature listed in the law. Feinstein’s new bill would prohibit the manufacture of the same firearms with even one of the features.” (NRA-ILA) Wayne Lapierre, Executive Vice President of the NRA, said in 2009, “There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the guns you want to ban and you don’t want to ban. You’re going to ban these semi-autos, and then it’s going to be handguns, and then it’s going to be pump shotguns.” Lapierre’s statement supports the fact that the recent gun ban legislation across the United States will not solve the problem of increased violence.
In the article, the author talks about Michael Bellesiles a historian who first wrote on gun ownership in America in 1996. Bellesiles was the first to find that gun ownership in early colonial times through the late 19th century was scarce. Up till this article many historians thought that gun were abundant. Bellesiles article to them was controversial. Most people, myself included, have always thought that guns were always of high abundance. This is what the media and history has always taught, to read this article and find that guns were “scarce” was unbelievable.
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence would ultimately fail given the previous experiments of gun control in England and in numerous states.
A few years ago they have settled a class action lawsuit concerning allegations of defective rifles. Also, they have been sued because of the mass shooting in 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut. Moreover, when the president Donald Trump was elected the sales of the guns has declined. However, when Barack Obama was president the sales of the gun surged to record levels in 2016 (Smith A, 2018, February 12).
1.Based on the Midgley and Social Welfare Concepts (power point) write a brief definition of social welfare policy that makes sense to you at this point. Distinguish between the Institutional and Residual Models, and universal and selective programs, providing definitions and examples of each.
...he common denominator in many of these mass shooting is someone who is a loner, dysfunctional and had some type of outside influence to do this, not honest gun owners.
A gun owner can be a responsible person but still anything can happen certain circumstances can come up where the gun can be used in a negative way. Nobody should be foolish enough to say that something bad could happen to them with a firearm. People saying that the answer is more guns less regulation isn’t the answer that obviously doesn’t work that would just lead to more chaos. Since 2009, three times as many pro-gun laws were passed in The United States as anti-gun measures this trend has only accelerated since then. A new demographic of people support the right to carry gun laws. Now more women support concealed weapon laws and now more women and moms are getting concealed weapon permits in states that allow them. Overall, 85 percent of Americans support the right to bear arms(Krieg,2016). Many americans believe that restricting gun rights anymore would be a complete violation of the constitution and would be severely fought by pro-gun activists if any sort of legislation was passed. Legislation has been passed in certain states to ban guns from certain areas like playgrounds and around schools if you are caught with guns anywhere around there stiff penalties will be put in place. In the late 1960s and into the early 70s, a gun control movement came about because
First, and foremost many handguns have claimed the lives of too many people. This is a very serious issue we must tackle globally not just in the United States. The same problem is killing our past, present, and future. Gun violence has claimed the lives of so many Americans that we are the leading country in crimes committed by guns. These guns are claiming the lives of people ranging from babies to adults to even the elderly. Handguns are just causing too many deaths.
Gun owners are the witch hunter of today because they are being blamed for all of the violence today. Firearm owners are accused of gun violence across the United States because Gun owners are receiving criticism and hatred because we have firearms, but that isn’t the case. In the Article, If You Think 'Guns Don't Kill People' You Are Missing The Point by the Huffington Post, “When shooting happen, there are many vendettas to blame and the effect is a mass shooting, these people that are shooting people have many Mental diseases. The motive of possible shootings is many of angered people. But the most common is someone is in a common angry state.” The United States places blame on Firearm respecters because of all of the accusations during the darkest time, like when there is a mental illness has taken out any entire school.
There are many cases where the gun users injure themselves or even end up dead while they are examining their guns. Last month, one of my neighbors passed away because he accidentally shot himself in the chest while he was trying to fix the gun. It was unknown whether or not he knew the gun was loaded, but this kind of incident can be prevented if guns are not so easily obtainable. Similarly, a man in San Francisco also shot himself to death by accident while he tried to take a picture with the gun. Assault weapon supporters believe that as long as the gun is not loaded, it will be safe. In fact, it does not matter how careful the users think they could be, there are still chances that they forget whether or not the gun is loaded like the two cases listed above. Once the gun goes wrong, it could lead to an irreversible
There is a myth surrounding gun manufacturers and a perception the industry is not held accountable for their actions. In fact they are held accountable