In today’s world, prejudice and discrimination are words that are becoming more and more common to hear again. However, it is unlikely that the world will ever again know prejudice or discrimination like it did in the mid-1900s. Through the films, “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” (1967) and “Do the Right Thing” (1989), the audience observes prejudice and discrimination in action. Almost every character in the two films exhibits some sort of racism through their thoughts or actions, white and black characters alike.
The film “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, follows an eventful evening in the Drayton household as their white daughter, Joanna, comes home early from her trip to Hawaii to inform her parents that she has met someone and plans to be
…show more content…
married to him sooner than later. This would not be a problem if it were not for the fact that the man, Dr. Prentice, is black. In this time period, interracial marriage was extremely frowned upon, but the two had fallen in love regardless of their knowledge of the current world view on their situation. Their parents, however, are not impressed with their proclamations of love for one another. While the mothers eventually come around, the fathers are not so easy to sway. Also not easy to sway, the maid of the Drayton’s, Tillie is openly disapproving of the relationship. Throughout the evening, conversations take place debating the appropriateness of the relationship because Dr. Prentice has stated that he will not marry Joanna without her parents’ approval. Eventually, Mr. Drayton, Joanna’s father, realizes that Dr. Prentice is feeling for his daughter what he felt for his wife so many years ago. This realization opens his eyes to the most important fact of the matter: the two are in love regardless of the consequences that will come of it. With this realization, he tells the couple that not only does he approve of them getting married, but they should get married if they feel so strongly for one another. In the second movie, “Do the Right Thing”, the audience primarily follows a young black man named Mookie.
Mookie works for an Italian man named Sal at his famous pizzeria with his two grown sons, Pino and Vito. The pizzeria is located in a neighborhood that is primarily black and Puerto Rican, with the only two local businesses being Sal’s pizzeria and a Korean market across the street. On the hottest day of the summer, tensions in the neighborhood rise and customers flow in and out of Sal’s shop. One customer in particular really sparked a fire in the tension, Buggin’ Out. When Buggin’ Out came in to get his pizza, he noticed that on Sal’s “Wall of Fame”, he only had photos of Italian actors, which Buggin’ Out considered to be unfair and demanded that Sal hang photos of black actors as well. When Sal expressed to him that in his shop, he would hang what he wanted, Buggin’ Out took off to start a boycott of Sal’s. At first, no one was in agreeance with Buggin’ Out, until Radio Raheem, who always carried around his boom box blaring rap music, went into Sal’s for a slice and was denied service until he turned off his music. At this point, both Buggin’ Out and Radio Raheem are angry with Sal and are wanting to cause trouble. They enter into Sal’s at the time of closing, with Raheem’s boom box blaring. The two begin to yell and cause a scene, driving Sal to the point of destroying the boom box with a baseball bat. At this point Radio Raheem becomes enraged and tackles Sal to …show more content…
the ground. The fight grows and moves outside as the entire neighborhood comes to attention. When the police arrive, Radio Raheem was ripped off of Sal and placed in a choke hold until he was killed. The neighborhood, in an outrage, trashes and burns Sal’s pizzeria to the ground, at which point, Sal lost the business that he spent 25 years building and working in. The film ends with two quotes from Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968), and Malcom X (1925-1965), which explain the dichotomy of the film’s theme. Prejudice is seen as commonplace in most of the characters in both films.
There are only a few exceptions to the fact that all characters in both movies have their prejudices. In “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” two very obviously prejudice characters are the fathers of the two lovers, Mr. Drayton and Mr. Prentice. They show their prejudices in their reservations about the marriage of their children. Tillie also shows quite a bit of prejudice through her attitude towards Dr. Prentice and his relationship with Joanna. She does not welcome him into the home and she also tells Joanna, “I don’t care to see a member of my own race getting above himself.” The mothers in the film also have some prejudices, but seem to get over that for the good of their children for the most of the film. In “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, there is not a ton of actual discrimination like there is in “Do the Right Thing.” Tillie discriminates Dr. Prentice because she treats him a great deal differently than she would any white man that Joanna brought home. Discrimination is more discussed than seen in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” as the characters often discuss the discrimination and prejudices that the couple and any future children they may have will face if they proceed with their current
plans. In “Do the Right Thing”, prejudice is seen in almost every single character. From Mookie, who acts as if he is neutral, to Buggin’ Out, who is very openly racist. While Mookie keeps himself neutral for the majority of the film, the viewer observes a few of his own prejudices like his demand that his son not speak English and his expression of dislike toward his son having a Hispanic name. Buggin’ Out and Radio Raheem express their prejudices very openly as Buggin’ Out organizes a boycott of Sal’s pizzeria based on racial issues and Radio Raheem walks around constantly listening to a song that addresses such issues. Sal, while he treats everyone equally, also has his own prejudices in his thoughts that the people in the neighborhood can be more trouble. Pino, his oldest son, on the other hand, very openly expresses his view that he does not like black people. He expresses it privately with his family and publicly to the whole neighborhood as well. As far as active discrimination is concerned, the authorities seem to be the biggest culprit. Their murder of Radio Raheem proved their discriminatory actions. Pino also discriminates against the black people of the neighborhood, while his brother and father steer clear of such actions. Also, Buggin’ Out and Radio Raheem discriminated very actively at the end of the film towards Sal and the rest of the crew at the pizzeria. They treat him differently and poorly for no other reason than his race and the prejudices that they think they have received from him. In “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, Tillie seems to be prejudice against her own race. Through the information that she told Joanna and the way that she treated Dr. Prentice, it appears that she views white people as superior to black people. She acts as though Dr. Prentice, as a black man, is not good enough to marry a white woman and as if he is only trying to marry her for monetary reasons. Also, the rest of the world is racist according to the feelings of the fathers. They worry that their children will experience great pain due to the racism of the world. Nevertheless, the fathers are slightly racist themselves because of their reservations about the marriage of their children. Neither seems to believe that the other is good enough for their own child, which would not be the case if they were not of different races. In “Do the Right Thing”, there are many more racist characters. One being Pino, Sal’s oldest son. Several times throughout the film, he expresses his dislike for black people, giving no reason except for the color of their skin. Buggin’ Out is also racist because he started the trouble with Sal and turned it into an issue of race.
To conclude, “The Offensive Movie Cliché That Won’t Die” by Matt Zoller Seitz, and “Race Relations Light Years from the Earth” by Mitu Sengupta, both identify and elaborate on the racism and stereotypical views throughout the stories by using nonfiction elements --authors purpose and main idea --to effectively support and explain how theme was distributed.
To conclude, “The Offensive Movie Cliché That Won’t Die” by Matt Zoller Seitz, and “Race Relations Light Years from the Earth” by Mitu Sengupta, both identify and elaborate on the racism and stereotypical views throughout the stories by using nonfiction elements --authors purpose and main idea --to effectively support and explain how theme was distributed.
Racial relations vary across culture and time, even after the decision that deemed anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional, it took more time for everyone to come to the same agreement. Not to mention, the conditions that black people lived under due to the negative connotations that the term “black” held – evil, dirty, and impure. Towards the end of the 1960’s, the American industry utilized many different tactics to portray the lack of hope, income inequality, segregation, and change that was an attempt to make a difference during this time. The film, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967) was a direct effort to view the polarity of race in the 1960’s through the lens of
Police brutality. Along with Mookie stands against police brutality Mookie also did the right thing because of Sal’s racism towards Mookie and his customers. Furthermore, Mookie did the right thing because Sal’s racism towards his customers. He is racist towards everyone except Jane, Mookie’s sister who Sal is interested in. The only reason why Sal is in the ghetto because he makes a lot of money in that area. Sal only tolerates his customers because he knows if he does something wrong, then he could lose all of his customers. One situation where Sal is racist towards his customer is when Buggin Out asks Sal why he doesn’t have any brothers on the wall, then Sal tells him if he wants brothers on the wall then he can get his own place.Buggin Out asks, “ Yo Mookie, why are there no brothers on the wall?” Mookie says, “I don’t know, ask Sal.” Then Sal says, “You want brothers on the wall get your own place. Do what you want to do...but this is my pizzeria. American Italians on my wall only.” Buggin Out retaliates and says, “Well you own this and rarely do I ever see American Italians eating in here. All I see is black folks, and since we spend much money here, I do have some say.” Sal has had it at this point and asks Buggin Out
The first social issue portrayed through the film is racial inequality. The audience witnesses the inequality in the film when justice is not properly served to the police officer who executed Oscar Grant. As shown through the film, the ind...
The film is about a young man Mookie, played by Spike Lee himself, who lives in the hoods of Brooklyn, works at a local pizzeria owned by an Italian named Sal. One day when another young man named Buggin walks into the pizza shop and demands that Sal hangs up pictures of black legends such as Martin Luther king on his wall of fame since his shop is located in an African American neighborhood, Sal denies the request and is entitled to hang up pictures of whomever he pleases. Buggin and his friend Raheem later plan a heist to attack Sal and make him replace the pictures. They put the radio on high volume playing Fight the Power which is symbolic because it explains how Radio Raheem feels every time he passes someone and they automatically categorize him as a criminal. Sal then breaks ...
For many year humans have been trying to fight against discrimination in their communities, but it's an uphill battle that doesn’t seem like it’s been fully wiped out yet in our society. Discrimination and Prejudice has been a key issue that has affected many people around the world. In the movie that we saw in class, “My Cousin Vinny” (1992) it focused on these key issues of prejudice, discrimination, stereotypes and even eye witness testimonies. In the movie it focuses on these key issues while bringing a little humor to the viewers. In this paper I will be going into more detail of how this movie really brought to light these key issues.
The film observes and analyzes the origins and consequences of more than one-hundred years of bigotry upon the ex-slaved society in the U.S. Even though so many years have passed since the end of slavery, emancipation, reconstruction and the civil rights movement, some of the choice terms prejudiced still engraved in the U.S society. When I see such images on the movie screen, it is still hard, even f...
The scene starts with Buggin’ Out complaining that there isn’t enough cheese on his slice of pizza. Here we can start developing a sense of perspective, and empathize with Buggin’ Out, whose simple request is more cheese on his pizza. To most people, this seems a reasonable request, and we can easily relate. However, Sal’s response is to tell him extra cheese is two dollars, more than doubling the price of the pizza slice. By this point the viewer has developed a connection with Buggin’ Out, who is, in our perspective, the victim in this situation. Later, as Buggin’ Out sits down, he realizes there are no people of color on Sal’s “Wall of Fame,” and is greatly offended. The camera establishes a pattern, of at first cutting between Buggin’ Out and pictures on the wall, until the progression becomes more rapid and of just the pictures. We are again able to sympathise with Buggin’ Out as he asks first his friend Mookie, and then Sal why there are no colored people on the wall. Again, Sal’s response is automatically defensive, and this time racist. Instead of taking a suggestion from his customer, he takes a firm stance that if Buggin’ Out has a problem with it he should find a new establishment. At this point Buggin’ out is furious, and begins to demand that all the black folk in the restaurant boycott it. This further establishes our connection with him as the victim of the racial discrimination he is facing by Sal, and Italian-American. Despite his mostly peaceful protests, he is kicked out of the restaurant for simply asking for Sal to have more representation on his Wall of
What is the setting of this movie? What was the time in a American History for this movie? The year it took place in the civil rights where blacks wer’e still fighting to become equals and people did not believe in interracical couples and their values. A whole lot of turmoil when it came to whites dating blacks.
In “Citizens: An American Lyric” by Claudia Rankine the audience is placed in a world where racism strongly affects the daily American cultural and social life. In this world we are put as the eyewitnesses and victims, the bystanders and the participants of racial encounters that happen in our daily lives and in the media, yet we have managed to ignore them for the mere fact that we are accustomed to them. Some of these encounters may be accidental slips, things that we didn’t intend to say and that we didn’t mean yet they’ve managed to make it to the surface. On the other hand we have the encounters that are intentionally offensive, things said that are
While writing the screenplay for Guess Who's Coming To Dinner, the writer William Rose knew that the theme and characters would test race boundaries in this country. He cleverly established Matt and Christina Drayton as two wealthy and cultured San Franciscans who considered themselves liberal and unbigoted people. When their naïve 23 yr. old daughter Joanna brings home her 37 yr. old Negro fiancé Dr. John Prentiss, the Drayton’s are astonished and aghast, not just by John being black, but because they’re forced to reexamine their personal beliefs regarding racism. Joanna’s character was portrayed as a gorgeous and vibrant bottle of sprite with a big heart, groomed by her parents to have a modern and unbias...
Our main character is Mooky, a black teenager, who works in Sal’s famous pizzeria. Mooky is the pizza parlor delivery boy and he is the only one of his friends to have a job. Sal and his two sons run the pizzeria. Sal is one of the very few white Italian business owners remaining in this predominately black neighborhood. Despite obvious tensions, Sal holds his ground in the neighborhood and remains proud of the fact that these people, meaning the kids of Bed-Stuy, have grown up on his pizza. Along the way we meet other characters such as Radio Raheem who is a neighborhood kid who walks the street with an oversize radio and decorates his fingers with the symbolic ‘love’ and ‘hate’ rings. Smile, a mentally disabled individual who runs around the streets selling the one existing photograph of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Then there is Mooky’s Puerto Rican girlfriend, who is raising their son and constantly nagging Mooky for being a deadbeat father. We also meet The Mayor, an alcoholic, elderly man who wanders the street looking for any type of chores to do in exchange for a small about of money. Lee’s choice of characters and actors seems noticeably ideal. Each character is full of life and more importantly each is an individual. Each character is created to retell a part of our society that we sometimes over look. This obviously makes Spike Lee a...
The 1967 motion picture “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” written by William Rose was a controversial film that touched on the subject of interracial marriage between two lovers, John Prentice a successful upper-class black man and Joanna Drayton an upper-class white woman in the 1960’s, the message depicted was that love conquers all as shown through the characters, John and Joanna, the setting in upper-class San Francisco, CA, and the theme of man v. society.
The 32nd President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, once said, “Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough.” This has stood true for thousands of years. Though humans have not always been the most kind and accepting creatures. Humans have discriminated against those different than themselves and their perception of normal countless times. The antipathy people of color and women were regarded with before the huge Civil Rights Movement that began in 1955 is a problem still being avidly discussed currently. This research paper will discuss the changes that occurred between 1935 and 1985 that affected the jury selection in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, which takes place in the 1930’s and John Grisham’s A Time to Kill, which takes place in the 1980’s.