Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this paper, I will critique Kantian ethic’s failure to defend beings disputably labeled “irrational.” The concept of a rational being is a common motif throughout Immanuel Kant’s “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.” These beings comprise the foundation of his entire argument. Therefore, for the purpose of this essay, it is crucial to further examine what is meant by “rational.” Kant offers three essential requirements that separate rational beings from their irrational counterparts; the ability to reason, a moral will, and autonomy (53, 49, 41.) Rational beings are those included in his ideal “kingdom of ends” (39.) He defines this kingdom as “a systematic union of rational beings through common objective law” (39.) Since Kant’s code of ethics only applies to those deemed rational, some fundamental questions remain ambiguous. Firstly, in what manner should Kant’s higher capacity beings interact with those “incapable” of reason? Could those who fail to meet the three requirements be abused or exploited? Would this be justified? Some may conclude that Kant has evaded these inquiries altogether. Kant offers little direction in “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals” …show more content…
This forces the definition of rational beings to be extremely significant. For instance, some animals could be easily disputed as rational, and a case could also be made for the mentally handicapped. Since Kant’s guidelines for rationality are reason, will, and autonomy, it is quite clear that many lives will not suffice, regardless of how ambiguous the requirements are for a given species. This exclusion creates some worrying interpretations of how, or whether Kantian ethics defends any outliers from exploitation. If Kant had intended for their protection, he would have mentioned such. Therefore, it must be concluded that Kantian ethics fails to protect animal rights or impaired
At first glance, Ed seems very protective of Christopher, claiming to his son, “I did it for your own good, Christopher. Honestly I did. I never meant to lie. I just thought . . . I just thought it was better if you didn’t know” (Haddon 114). Ed doesn’t want his son to have to live with the feeling of his mother leaving him; he doesn’t want his son to feel like it is his fault. Furthermore, Ed is trying to protect his son from the negative influence of Christopher’s mother. In the letters to Christopher, Judy confesses that “I’m not like your father. Your father is a much more pacient [sic] person. He just gets on with things and if things upset him he doesn’t let it show. But that’s not the way I am and there's nothing I can do to change that” (Haddon 106). Because of his autism, Christopher needs to be treated the best he can be. However, Judy admits that she cannot handle troublesome situations as well as Ed. Therefore, it is best for Christopher if he is shielded from his mother's hurtful behaviors, showing the positive motivation. By first accepting that the action is based on good intentions, it allows Ed’s lie to be seen as morally
Readers first discover Christopher’s lack of understanding at the beginning of the novel, when he is told by his father to “stay out of other people’s business.” Christopher then states, “I don’t know what father means when he says, ‘stay out of other people’s business’ because I do not know what he means by ‘other people’s business’
“[Kant] fails… to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur.”
In the beginning of the story, Christopher listens to what his father tells him to do. He never questions him, but rather he listens and abides to his father orders him to do. His father scolds him and orders him to stop uncovering the mystery.“The next day at school I told Siobhan that Father had told I couldn’t do any more detecting which meant that the book was finished.” (page 52) Christopher does not ask his father any questions to why he can not continue his book, but he just listens and stops immediately. However, he becomes more independent when he makes the decision to rebel and continue investigating. He talks to Mrs. Alexander, his neighbor, asking about Mr. Shears hoping that it would lead him closer to finding out the murderer of Wellington. He lets his friend, Siobhan read his book, after he writes this encounter with her, and she asks, “‘Have you told your father about this?’ And I replied, ‘No.’ And she said, “Are you going to tell your father about this?’ And I replied, ‘No.’” (page 75) Christopher now holds his detective work secret, apart from his dad knowing that he would get in a lot of trouble if his dad finds out. He rebels against his father secretly, still trying to uncover the truth even though his father warns him not to. Christopher also grows in his independence when he goes to his mother, and travels long distance all by himself without his father’s help. He is in control of his own life, and his father no longer guides him, but he monitors his own decisions. By defying his father’s commands, he ultimately unlocks the mystery of his Wellington’s death and he is more confident as an individual. He says, “...I will become a scientist. And I know I can do this because I went to London on my own, and because I solved the mystery of Who Killed Wellington? and I found my mother and I was brave and I wrote a book and that means I can do anything.”
kids more than it affects adults. In the novel “The Curious Incident of The Dog in the Night Time” by Mark Haddon, we follow the life of Christopher Boone a 15 year old boy with autism living with his father. We see a lot of the challenges that Christopher goes through with having autism like how he deals with strangers etc.Although we see a lot of Christopher’s struggles throughout the novel, the novel also shows the struggles that his parents go through having a son with a disability.
...derstanding of social integration. Although many of his decisions lead to immature actions that take away from his understanding of social integration, in the end, Christopher is able to reach a mature understanding of social integration through his influences and traits. Christopher achieves understanding of autism when directed by traits and influences, leading him to solve the mysteries that surround his life in Swindon, and get to his mother’s place and back through a more mature understanding of social integration. In life, all of us need to understand that everyone is unique, and we cannot go into our everyday interaction with a strict mindset of opinions, therefore, remain open to multiple possibilities and be able to adapt to unfamiliar emotional and physical situations.
Her love for Christopher was overshadowed by Roger and his dislike, disdain for Christopher. Roger refused to let her go see Christopher and if he would’ve seen the letters she had sent I believe he’d have hit her. From the little bit we see of Roger he is mean and didn’t truly care for Mother from the night Christopher gets there and Roger and Mother are arguing in the street violently and how she hints at it in her words. She tries so hard to make him happy with her but when mother and Christopher leave and she says, “... someone was going to get hurt. And I don’t necessarily mean you,” (209). This leads you to see that Mr. Shears has beaten her before, yet she is still with him but she fears him and you can see that through her actions. Mother struggles when she discovers Christopher’s dad told him that she had died from a heartattack and that’s why Christopher never wrote back. When she discovers this and hasn’t seen her son in years she’s overcome with anger and grief that she missed so much of Christopher’s
before the incident with his father, Christopher was doing some investigating around his neighborhood to try and gather enough Clues to solve who was a dog murderer. He talked to several people who included Mrs. Shears, their neighbor, and Mrs. Alexander, the one who revealed the secret affair to Christopher. He wrote it all down in his mystery book and accidentally left it on the kitchen table. When is Father read it and found out what Christopher was doing behind his back when he was told not to do so, he was infuriated. Quotations is that true? Did you talk to Mrs. Alexander? He said this very quietly...I still didn't realize that he was angry quotations. The father when asked not to go investigate. he became very scared and confused because his father was usually a controlled person. He got even more surprised when his father suddenly grabbed his arm. Christopher doesn't like being touched or surprised so in response he started hitting his father and it turned into a huge fight between them causing them both to get hurt. In the end, disobeying a parent when **** told not to make frequent the conflicts between family
Kant’s moral philosophy is built around the formal principles of ethics rather than substantive human goods. He begins by outlining the principles of reasoning that can be equally expected of all rational persons regardless of their individual desires or partial interests. It creates an ideal universal community of rational individuals who can collectively agree on the moral principles for guiding equality and autonomy. This is what forms the basis for contemporary human rig...
Through his discussion of morals in the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant explores the question of whether a human being is capable of acting solely out of pure duty and if our actions hold true moral value. In passage 407, page 19, Kant proposes that if one were to look at past experiences, one cannot be certain that his or her rationalization for performing an action that conforms with duty could rest solely on moral grounds. In order to fully explain the core principle of moral theory, Kant distinguishes between key notions such as a priori and a posteriori, and hypothetical imperative vs. categorical imperative, in order to argue whether the actions of rational beings are actually moral or if they are only moral because of one’s hidden inclinations.
Christopher begins to take on the persona of an investigator throughout the book. He starts searching for clues to find who killed the dog and what their motives are. By pursuing this line of inquiry Christopher finds out an immense amount of information kept secret from him by his father. While investigating the murder it is uncovered that Christopher’s mother, Judy, is not dead like his father had said. In reality his mother ran away with their neighbor Mr. Shears and began a new life in London. His mother wrote to him constantly and the secretive nature of his father causes distress. After the discovery of his mother’s continual existence Christopher’s father quickly becomes the antagonist of the book. From there on out Christopher sees him as a villain
The. Print. The. O’Neill, Onora. “Kantian Ethics.” A Companion to Ethics.
An individual never knows the full background of another until they interaction or create dialogue. Therefore, society, including myself, needs to be less judgemental. “Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time” by Mark Haddon keeps a reader intrigued by the intricate rambles and thoughts of the autistic child named Christopher. Haddon uses his book to make the public understand the struggles and daily life of a child consumed by his own brain.
First of all, Christopher is a boy who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome which hinders him from being able to do regular boy activities and fit in socially. Nevertheless, he is exemplary at mathematics and has an inferno of a desire to solve mysteries. The story introduces Christopher gripping a murdered dog in his arms with fierce melancholy as he did not commit the gruesome act of its murder. This crucial incident is illustrated as mentioned, “ I pulled the fork out of the dog and lifted into my arms and hugged him. He was leaking blood from the fork holes.” (3) This is the alpha of the quest Chris is to embark to discern the murder, and perhaps uncover insight about his life along with the murderer. Chris craves to embark on this enigmatic mystery with the desire to solve it, yet he is very timid to explore areas other than his dwelling due to his angst of leaving his comfort zone. His dad also objectifies his decision to take on the murder case, as he proclaims, “ [In] the middle of the road and he shouted, I said leave it, for God’s sake.” (21) One may conclude this decision as his dad being
“The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime” by Mark Haddon a book based on a young boy diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder, which is a developmental disorder of ongoing social communication and interacting with others. Symptoms are on a scale spectrum with different ratings. That allows a person to determine whether they have a difficult time with communicating skills, noticing someone’s emotions and or lack of social interactions. Building relationships with your child or loved one is important as it a learning experience to trust and be comfortable around others. New experiences are always a bit scary however with the right motivation you are capable to do anything, all it really takes is patience and strength.