Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Beowulf, one of the greatest heroic tales, opens with a historical account of the Danes, followed by the introduction of its first monster, Grendel. This section of verse, from lines 88-144, acquaint us with the demon and his first series of attacks on Heorot. The passage of Grendel’s introduction works within Beowulf by introducing complex themes and a complex antagonist. Other facets of this passage such as context, versification, point of view, figurative language, character, and theme are all important to consider when assessing the purpose of the passage within the poem as a whole. The content and context of this passage...
Grendel’s introduction is the second main passage in the poem. Right after Beowulf opens with a historical account
…show more content…
of the Danes, we are acquainted with the demon and his first series of attacks on Heorot. We learn about Grendel’s character, his ancestry, and his grievances against Heorot. Heorot’s response to Grendel’s attacks is also lightly touched upon in this passage. This depiction of Grendel’s character is sandwiched between the introduction of Hrothgar and the introduction of Beowulf. In this way, Grendel’s opening scene serves to introduce us to the poem’s first antagonist and to establish the conflict at Heorot. While serving its own individual purpose, this passage conforms to the structure and genre of the whole Old English poem. Grendel’s introductory passage observes the rules and patterns of traditional Anglo Saxon verse.
The passage’s versification includes components such as the caesura, alliteration, and a prominent stress pattern, all of which are consistent throughout the whole of the poem. Each line of verse within Beowulf contains a slight pause about halfway through the line, known as a caesura. This pause splits the line into two parts, each of which contains two stresses. Thus, the poem follows a pattern of four total stresses per line of verse; this pattern is known as tetrameter. Another notable feature of Old English verse, observed in Beowulf, is the use of alliteration. This feature is so prominent that another common name for Old English verse is “alliterative verse.” Usually, the poet repeats a sound in the beginning of words or within the stressed syllable of words. The repetition of this sound traditionally carries over the caesura. For example, when Grendel attacks Heorot for the first time he is “greedy and grim, he grabbed thirty men” (122). Here, the caesura is marked with a comma and the repetition of the hard ‘G’ sound continues over the halfway point of the line. Using this same line, the tetrameter stress pattern is apparent. A stress occurs on the words greedy, grim, grabbed, and men—this places two stresses on each side of the caesura. While these features of versification can be employed to emphasize lines or maintain a certain tone, their impact on the meaning of
the text itself is limited. The poet’s use of narrator and figurative language enhances the story and meaning in Beowulf. is more impacted by the poem’s use of narrator and figurative language Point of Views Figurative language As the passage reveals more about Grendel’s nasty character, evidence points both towards his being purely and unreasonably evil and towards his feeling emotions that cause him to retaliate. Grendel is first described as a “powerful demon” and “a fiend out of hell” (86, 100). These descriptions point towards his inherent malevolence. The poet gives account of Grendel’s evil heritage—he is a “God-cursed” descendant from Cain (121). In this case, Grendel is not only acting evilly, but his entire essence is sinister. He is “malignant by nature” and epitomizes evil itself (137). At the same time, the poet almost sympathetically suggests that Grendel is greatly distressed by the loud activities taking place at Heorot, and “it harrowed him / to hear the din of the loud banquet” (87-88). Grendel also seems to experience a deep loneliness and resents his exclusion from the merry-making civilization. In this way, Grendel is not purely evil or malignant without pretext. Instead, Grendel experiences human emotions like jealousy, loneliness, and anxiety. His violent attacks are not unfounded, but full of resentment and and vengeance. As this passage introduces Grendel’s character, full of ambiguity and duality, to its readers, it also introduces these themes to the entire poem. While Beowulf explores many themes such as the heroic code, pride, and revenge, Grendel’s introductory passage establishes two themes, both of which are fairly complex. The first theme that emerges is an incredibly Christianized battle between good and evil. Complexity arises through observation of Beowulf’s origins, which have been the focus of many literary scholars’ debates. At the time of its creation, Beowulf, was heavily influenced by Paganism. Yet, as the poem was passed down through oral tradition, the age of Christianity had a residual effect on the story and its themes.
Rudd cites various sections of the poem, describing Grendel as a “night-monster of the border lands” (Rudd 3), and the translation of the poem says that Grendel was, “...Conceived by a pair of those monsters born Of Cain, murderous creatures banished By God…” (Raffel 42). Rudd also gives evidence for Grendel being seen as demonic, and reasons that Grendel attacks the Danes out of “...not mere thirst for gore, as we might suspect… but rather… envy of the Danes’ happiness- and envy was a chief characteristic of the medieval devil.” (Ruud 5). He then ties this devilish persona to Grendel’s humanistic aspects, stating Grendel has a heathen soul, and therefore he must be human. Ruud also notes, however, that there are critics who question the validity of portraying Grendel as this three-sided figure, asking questions such as, “How can Grendel be a devil when he has a physical body? How can he be a man when he is so manifestly bestial?” (Ruud 7). Ruud believes that the original poet of Beowulf is doing this for effect rather than consistency, but a more reasonable explanation that encompasses all three characteristics is that Grendel represents the evil in
The first battle in the poem occurs between Beowulf and Grendel because these characters best embody the Anglo-Saxon value of courage. Beowulf is the perfect representation of this value because he is reckless and says, “No weapons, therefore,/ for either this night: unarmed he shall face me” (Heaney 683-84). Thus when Beowulf proclaims that he is not using weapons he displays both honor and courage since it takes guts to go against a monster without an advantage. This quality was respected in his culture and the Anglo-Saxons made sure to make their epic hero a perfect fit for this trait. Grendel however, is the complete opposite
Grendel, written by John Gardner, is a novel based off the early epic poem, Beowulf. Gardner tells the tale in the perspective of the monster, Grendel, who is struggling to understand the purpose of life and his place in the world. In Gardner’s novel, Grendel terrorizes the kingdom of Hrothgar for 12 years, killing men in the night relentlessly. With the descriptions of battles and heroic deeds, Gardener conveys to the reader, the ideals of Anglo-Saxon heroes as courageous, self-righteous, humble, and loyal beings that are humanly flawless. The book Grendel tears down all these fundamental ideologies of Anglo-Saxon heroism by giving Grendel the monster a nihilist perspective that makes heroism sound stupid and meaningless.
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
In times before printed books were common, stories and poems were passed from generation to generation by word of mouth. From such oral traditions come great epics such as England’s heroic epic, Beowulf. In Beowulf, the monster Grendel serves as the evil character acting against the poem’s hero, as shown by his unnatural strength, beast-like qualities, and alienation from society.
No one knows who wrote Beowulf but we do know who wrote Grendel. John Gardner took the epic Beowulf and added more to the brilliant story. Grendel takes on the same story as Beowulf but from the perspective of Grendel, the beast in Beowulf. The story of Grendel is very interesting because from reading Beowulf it is completely uninspected. In Beowulf Grendel is said to be a disgusting monster that’s only job is to kill. In Grendel we really see him as very nice but turns to be evil because he is pushed into that direction.
While the classic battle between good and evil forces is a major theme of the medieval epic Beowulf, one may question whether these good and evil forces are as black and white as they appear. Scholars such as Herbert G. Wright claim that “the dragon, like the giant Grendel, is an enemy of mankind, and the audience of Beowulf can have entertained no sympathy for either the one or the other” (Wright, 4). However, other scholars such as Andy Orchard disagree with this claim, and believe that there is “something deeply human about the ‘monsters’” (Orchard, 29). While Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon are indeed portrayed as evil and violent foes, there are parts within Beowulf that can also lead a reader to believe that the “monsters” may not be so monstrous after all. In fact, the author of Beowulf represents the “monsters” within the poem with a degree of moral ambivalence. This ambivalence ultimately evokes traces of sympathy in the reader for the plight of these “monster” figures, and blurs the fine line between good and evil within the poem.
...slaying Grendel’s family and a dragon. Needed by the Geats and the Danes, Beowulf is central to the poem, however it is impossible for him not to be an outsider when he is superior to every single character in every single aspect.
Beowulf outlines turmoil between three opponents: Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the Dragon. These separate discords each serve to fulfill different metaphoric purposes. Grendel’s character epitomizes the adverse persona of how an Anglo-Saxon warrior should not be. His mother represents everything that a woman during the time era should seldom be. Lastly, the Dragon embodies all the values that an Anglo-Saxon king should not dare retain. Without a doubt, the symbolic implications of the monsters in Beowulf bring the context to a new level of understanding.
The author creates a realistic picture during the battle between Beowulf and Grendel. Throughout the scene, light and dark portray events according to their corresponding characters. Beowulf, the hero, symbolizes light and goodness while Grendel symbolizes darkness and wickedness. The poem describes him as demonic, “While a baleful light, flame more than light, flared from his eyes” (726-27). Beowulf continues to represent
John Gardner’s Grendel is the retelling of the heroic epic poem Beowulf; however, the viewpoint has shifted. Grendel is told from the viewpoint of one of Beowulf’s antagonists and the titular character of Gardner’s work—Grendel. In Grendel, Gardner humanizes Grendel by emphasizing parallels between Grendel’s life and human life. Through Gardner’s reflection of human feelings, human development, and human flaws in Grendel, this seemingly antagonistic, monstrous character becomes understood and made “human.”
In this poem, Beowulf exhibits the trait of bravery by defeating the monster, Grendel. This monster was a very powerful monster that plagued the town of Herot. “He slipped through the door… Snatched up thirty men, smashed them/ Unknowing in their beds and ran out with their bodies/ The blood dripping behind him, back/ To his liar, delighted with his night’s slaughter. (11)”
In Part I of Beowulf the poet establishes Beowulf as an incomparable superman and celebrates his greatness. The occasion for this was the unfortunate situation which Grendel had created in the court of King Hrothgar, Heorot, where there was considerable sorrow due to the uncontrollable ravaging of the monster:
There are three prominent monsters in the Beowulf text, Grendel, his mother, and the dragon. While the dragon proves to be the most fatale of foes for Beowulf, Grendel and his mother do not simply pose physical threats to the Germanic society; their roles in Beowulf are manifold. They challenge the perceptions of heroism, a sense of unrivalled perfection and superiority. Moreover, they allow the reader to reconsider the gender constructs upheld within the text; one cannot help but feel that the threat that these monsters present is directed towards the prevalent flaws in Beowulf’s world. Moreover, what makes these monsters is not their physical appearance; it is what they embody. Both Grendel and his mother have humanlike qualities yet their monstrous appearance arises from what their features and mannerisms represent. The challenge they pose to societal paradigms makes them far more terrifying to our heroes than any scaled flesh or clawing hand. These monsters provide the ‘most authoritative general criticism […] of the structure and conduct of the poem’. Their presence provides contrast and criticism of the brave society (Heaney 103).
Beowulf, first and foremost, is a long narrative poem. It contains 3,182 lines and has been divided into forty-three sections. It has been written in a way that formulates a concentrated imaginative awareness of experience and arranged so that the language stimulates an emotional response, the basis of why a piece of writing would be considered a poem.