Parties: Larketta Randolph, who purchased the mobile home and used Green Tree Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama to finance this home. Larketta Randolph was a petitioner who financed her Mobile home from defendant Green Tree Financial.
Facts:
During the purchase Green Tree Financial Corp mandate to buy Vendor's Single Interest insurance. It also mandated any legal situation under case law or statutory law, has to be resolved by binding arbitrator. Randolph sued Green Tree Financial Corp didn’t disclose hidden fess in terms of the finance charge the Vendor's Single Interest insurance will charge.
Lower Courts procedure: Randolph filed the suit against petitioner Green Tree Financial stating
Equuscorp launched proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria against each of the respondents. Equuscorp’s claims were for “loss and damage” for breach of the loan agreements and for money had and received. The trial judge dismissed Equuscorp’s contractual claim in all eight cases and upheld the restitution claim in two cases. The respondents appealed this decision in the Supreme Court of Victoria’s Court of Appeal. In this appeal, the majority held that the trial judge erred and that Equuscorp was not entitled to restitution. Equuscorp appealed against the decision of the Court of Appeal in relation to the three respondents. Its grounds for appeal included that the Court of Appeal erred in deciding: a) that Equuscorp was not entitled to restitution for the unenforceable loan agreements; b) that it was not unjust for the respondents to keep the amounts pursuant to the unenforceable loan agreements; and c) that restitution was not assigned as a right or remedy to recover the amounts under the unenforceable loan agreements.
Friganim Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp. Facts: Friganim Importing Company sued B.N.S. claiming that B.N.S. breached warranties in two contracts that they had entered into. In the first of the two contracts, Frigalimnet had agreed to sell 75,000 pounds of 2.5 to 3 pound chickens and 25,000 pounds of 1.5 to 2 pound chickens. The second contract consisted of 50,000 pounds of 2.5 to 3 pound chickens and 25,000 pounds of 1.5 to 2 pound chickens. (smaller chickens where priced slightly higher in this contract than the first agreement)
Wolford General Partnership (WGP) operates plumbing supply business which is also an exclusive supplier for certain stable construction firms. Because of its excellent reputations and services, WGP is able to an extremely profitable entity for the business. WGP uses an accrual method of accounting and has been using June 30 fiscal year for the tax report purpose after its election of §444 since its formation.
In the pleadings, a complaint needs to be filed by the plaintiff with the court and the defendants. In this case, the complaint was filed for wrongful death and injunctions. The complaint was given to both companies on May 14, 1982. Then, the defendants must answer within twenty-four hours of receiving the complaint to the summon or risk losing the case by default of the court. W.R. Grace denied the allegations against them. Also, their other defenses was that the complaint didn’t state any cause of action, in the complaint the company named was misnamed, the company followed the due of care at all times and acted in “good faith,” and the claims against them are barred. The next step is the methods of discovery.
Deere & Company (Deere) has been experiencing a decrease in its profit margins for one of its aftermarket resale products, specifically the gatherer chain, over the past couple of years. Currently, the cost-price ratio is at 80% compared to last year’s 50%. The purchase cost for the gatherer chain has been steadily increasing, while the aftermarket price has been decreasing. Deere has been budgeting its price to match that of a major competitor, which has been causing the decrease. The company’s main supplier of its gatherer chain is Saunders Manufacturing, with which Deere has established a long term relationship. The owner of Saunders has a reputation of being a tough negotiator, and is someone who is known for not willing to share financial information about the company. However, the U.S. Department of Commerce has provided financial estimates in Saunders’ industry as follows: material spend, 42%; direct labor, 16%; indirect labor, 6%; Overhead, 20%. These percentages are helpful to Deere because they can be used in the negotiation process with Sanders. Since Sanders will not share any specific cost information, Deere is able to use these estimates as a way to justify Sanders reducing its prices. Using these estimates during the negotiations might also incentivize Sanders to provide accurate numbers for its specific manufacturing costs.
General Electric Corporation is a multi-billion dollar conglomerate founded in 1892. The company was founded in Schenectady, New York to capitalize on the patents of Thomas Edison and the use of electric power through generation and distribution. Now a blue chip publicly traded company that has branched out beyond its core into arenas such as aircraft engineering, television, and home appliances to name a few. Over the years the corporation has been through different management models that have brought innovation in many forms that have allowed them to be envied by companies around the world. Despite great success since its conception, like many companies who can withstand the test of times, it’s natural for them to become self-absorbed, which can have a negative impact on the company structure as a whole. Coming across someone like Jack Welch who can think out of the box and in a manner that doesn’t strain the resources of the company but expands the thinking of the company as a collective unit is needed to continue the legacy of innovation in all aspects of business.
Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated June 26, 2015, in in litigation entitled Heather Hills Homeowners Ass’n. v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Dakota Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 19-HA-CV-15-1819.
In 1852, as a response to the California Gold Rush, Henry Wells and William Fargo created Wells Fargo & company. Initially, the purpose of the company was to provide express and banking services to California. Shortly thereafter, Wells Fargo experienced rapid growth and unpredictable changes. Today the company is viewed as a nationwide, diversified, community-based financial services company with over $1.8 trillion in assets. Wells Fargo provides banking, insurance, investments, mortgage, and consumer and commercial finance through 8,700 locations and 12,800 ATMs.
The following horror story is all over the Cole Irrevocable Trust. It was originally written in 1996 by both my parents and amended in 2005 by my father Don Cole, sister Kristen Cole and brother Rodney Cole after my mother's death. The attorney who amended it was Con Lynch. He named himself as trust protector in the trust. Richard Cole, Kelley Plueard, and myself were unaware we were named in the trust until our father's death in 2011.
The real estate broker was not aware of this sale. The children eventually sold their land to Lindholm for four hundred dollars an acre. When they realized that the adjacent land was bought for a larger amount of money than theirs, they sued the real estate broker for failure to disclose material information. The question is, Did Vail associates breach a fiduciary duty?
“A court may assert general jurisdiction over foreign (sister-state or foreign-country) corporations to hear any and all claims against them when [the corporation’s] affiliations with the [forum] State are so “continuous and systematic” as to render them essentially at home in the forum State.” Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) (Citing Int'l Shoe Co., 326 U.S.).
It has become apparent that there is a valid litigation that could be charged against your dealership in regards to possible non-disclosures as made to the said Haskell and the seller.
From Table 5, it is evident that finance and the lack of capital is common obstacle. As noted by Brandon Kane, “we are most vulnerable in our finances.”
Green Mountain management made a cautious decision to close its retail locations. Although sales were flat, retail locations can be used as a vehicle for customers to sample Green Mountain coffee. If customers are unfamiliar with the taste of Green Mountain coffee, they will not purchase Green Mountain coffee at supermarkets or other sale locations. Starbucks' success is due to its retail locations. Customers understand the reputation of Starbucks and are familiar to the expensive, social, great tasting coffee. Opening retail locations or advertising and familiarizing customers with the taste of Green Mountain coffee will benefit the supermarket market. The recommendations set forth will increase our potential market share and also improve sales. They will also give Green Mountain a familiar coffee taste to our customers.
supplied on the audit documents. The decision I chose may cost Baker Greenleaf to lose an