INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Redwood Falls (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Housing Authority Property Insurance (“Defendant”) participated in an appraisal hearing to resolve their dispute regarding the scope and value of a fire loss that damaged Plaintiff’s insureds buildings. The appraisal panel considered evidence and testimony presented by both parties, determined the value of the loss, and issued an appraisal award in the amount of $3,097,512.80. Plaintiff now respectfully asks the Court to: (1) award it pre-award interest on the award pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.09; and (2) award it costs and disbursements pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 549.02 and .04. DOCUMENTS COMPRISING THE RECORD I. Affidavit of Jerri …show more content…
2 Appraisal Award; Ex. 3 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest, dated January 17, 2013 in litigation entitled Charleswood Ass’n v. Harleysville Ins. Co., Dakota Dist. Ct., No. 19HA-CV-10-7373; Ex. 4 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest, dated October 10, 2013 in litigation entitled Timberton Condominium Ass’n v. Mid-Century Ins. Co., a subsidiary of Farmers Ins. Group, Henn. Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 27-CV-11-24814; Ex. 5 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated March 12, 2014 in litigation entitled Southcross Village Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Dakota Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 19HA-CV-13-4822; Ex. 6 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest, dated April 29, 2014 in litigation entitled Cottage Heights Ass’n v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Stearns Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 73-CV-14-1150; Ex. 7 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated July 11, 2014 in litigation entitled John A. Stauber and Kelly Leustek v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., St. Louis Cty. Dist. Ct., No. …show more content…
8 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated October 15, 2014 in litigation entitled Townhomes of Kensington Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Dakota Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 19HA-CV-14-1883; Ex. 9 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated Jan. 8, 2015, in litigation entitled Halla Nursery, Inc. v. United Fire and Cas. Co., Carver Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 10-CV-13-59; Ex. 10 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated February 27, 2015, in litigation entitled Featherstone Ridge Townhome Ass’n v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Dakota Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 19HA-CV-14-2480; Ex. 11 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest dated June 26, 2015, in in litigation entitled Heather Hills Homeowners Ass’n. v. Amer. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Dakota Cty. Dist. Ct., No. 19-HA-CV-15-1819. Ex. 12 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest, dated March 20, 2015, in litigation entitled James Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Henn. Ct. Dist. Ct., No. 27-CV-14-18651; Ex. 13 Order Confirming Appraisal Award and Granting Preaward Interest, dated August 17, 2015 in litigation entitled JIMOE, Inc., d/b/a Autorama Auto Sales and James R. Moe v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Pope Ct. Dist. Ct., No.
Richard Romano is one of the three principals at Cruickshank, Gath, & Romano. With eight years of experience and recognized by industry insiders as one of Canada's leading real estate experts, Richard wants to complete the appraisal according to his best estimate of the pro...
Doris Reed bought a house for $76,000.00 from Robert King. Mr. King and his real estate agent failed to disclose to Mrs. Reed that a murder had taken place in the home ten years ago. Neighbors told Mrs. Reed about the murders and the stigma associated with the house after she moved in. The property appraised in the amount of $65,000.00 with reference to the history of the house. Reed sued King on allegations of misrepresentation for the purchase of the home seeking rescission and damages to terminate the contact.
The facts surrounding this case were obtained from both Reilly, and Zisko. It should be noted that Reilly failed to explain in his complaint how he was connected to the probate matter for which Zisko subpoenaed his employment records. The underlying matter that this complaint is related to is the “post-divorce case Elaine C. Menice vs. Jeffrey L. Menice, Plymouth Probate & Family Court Docket No. PL11D2044JP.”
Recommendations: It is recommended that our law office regretfully deny service to Ms. Carry based upon the precedent in Kentucky. Based upon the analysis the issue, it is apparent that Ms. Carry would not receive a promising conclusion to her situation. Due to the facts involved and the cases discussed (which are somewhat on point) Ms. Carry does not make a claim in which relief can be granted.
In the pleadings, a complaint needs to be filed by the plaintiff with the court and the defendants. In this case, the complaint was filed for wrongful death and injunctions. The complaint was given to both companies on May 14, 1982. Then, the defendants must answer within twenty-four hours of receiving the complaint to the summon or risk losing the case by default of the court. W.R. Grace denied the allegations against them. Also, their other defenses was that the complaint didn’t state any cause of action, in the complaint the company named was misnamed, the company followed the due of care at all times and acted in “good faith,” and the claims against them are barred. The next step is the methods of discovery.
Archives of Ontario, RG-22-392, Attorney General of Ontario, Criminal Indictment Files, York County, 1875, R. vs. Davis. "Inquiry"
On Thursday, August 3,2017 at about 0900 hours, I was present at Kings County Criminal Court, Part AP1F for SPAA Tammie Croswell's scheduled court appearance. SPAA Croswell pled guilty to a violation (P.L 240.20). She was ordered to make restitution in the amount of $4,200.00 plus a surcharge of 5% ($210.00). A payment of $1,500.00 was ordered to be made today (08/03/17) and she has until 03/05/18 to pay the remaining balance. The next court date has been scheduled for 03/05/18 by Honorable Judge M. Dougherty in order to verify that all fees were paid in
found in Taylor v. Caldwell (1863) 3 B. & S. 826 where a contract for
Mr. and Mrs. Ricardo owns a vacation home in Cape Cod. They used this vacation home during the summer and rent the property to a family friend for 10 days out of the year. They purchased it 20 years ago for $250,000, spend $100,000 in renovation, and wants to exchange this property for a different vacation home in Miami Beach. This vacation home have been appraised for $850,000.
Notice is hereby given that Noel Nonesuch hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Middle Circuit from the final judgment entered in this action on the 2nd day of January, 2014.
The appellant filed based on fair market value, submitting a letter intended to show the subject’s subdivision is overvalued based on the higher Assessment to Sales Ratio (ASR). The appellant noted that the subject’s subdivision was assessed at higher ASR (111.6%) compared to the Ayr Hill subdivision which was valued at lower ASR of 89.6%. Moreover, the appellant argued, while homes in the subject’s subdivision are assessed on average at $298 per sq. ft., homes in the Avis Court development are assessed at a lower rate of $262 per sq. ft.
Litigation seeking judgment has started against the borrowers and the guarantors. All corporate entities were served on 1/13/2017, and
MacHenry, Kelly. "Arizona Civil Verdicts 2011." SWLAW. SWLAW, June 2012. Web. 24 Apr. 2014. .
ix Beit v. Probate and Family Court Department, 434 N.E.2d 642 (1982), at 643, citing The Trial at 290.