Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Globalization in the usa
Globalization in the usa
Globalization in the usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Globalization in the usa
“A court may assert general jurisdiction over foreign (sister-state or foreign-country) corporations to hear any and all claims against them when [the corporation’s] affiliations with the [forum] State are so “continuous and systematic” as to render them essentially at home in the forum State.” Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) (Citing Int'l Shoe Co., 326 U.S.). In Goodyear, the court held that Goodyear was not subject to general jurisdiction in North Carolina simply for placing their tires into the “stream of commerce” of North Carolina. Goodyear, 564 U.S. at 927. Two North Carolinian boys were killed while vacationing in France when the bus they were on crashed. Goodyear, 564 U.S. at 918. The
At approximately 0230 hours on February 16, 2016, a male subject was struck on the left side of his face by a pistol. Rashaun Grant, victim of the assault, was struck by the suspect, Rashaun Grant, after an argument occurred. Rashaun was transported to Hampton Regional Medical Center by his mother. The suspect fled the scene before Law Enforcement arrival.
In the case of Affleck and Damon v. Booth the primary nature of the case was in regards to their fourth amendment rights being broken; no probable cause for Booth and others to search and maintain their assets in the state of Georgia. In the District court, the ruling past onto both parties was that the case was dismissed due to Booth having no personal jurisdiction in the state of Nevada. This therefore was passed up to the Circuit court of Appeals whom overturned the lower courts decision based on the factors of the case encompassed more than the initial seizure. As both parties are not in agreement with where the trial shall be held the Supreme Court now will make a final decision based on issues to be ruled upon, material facts, and legal principles in practice.
UST Inc. is a dominant player in the smokeless tobacco industry. We have been tasked with weighing the cost and benefits of having leverage in their capital structure and to advise the CEO whether or not to go ahead with the recapitalization. After solving for UST’s credit ratings and value given three different stock buyback scenarios, $700 million, $1 billion, and $1.5 billion, we would suggest that UST move forward with the recap at $1 billion.
"Ford v. Wainwright." LII / Legal Information Institute. Legal Information Institute, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.
a. but most admiralty cases can be brought in state courts unless qualify under diversity.
Q1 THE COURT/S IN WHICH THE CASE WAS HEARD (OUTLINE THE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT)
A group of investors (Arundel group) is looking into the idea of purchasing the sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major movie studios. Movie rights are to be purchased prior to films being made. Arundel wants to come up with a decision to either purchase all the sequel rights for a studio's entire production during a specified period of time or purchase a specified number of major films. Arundel's profitability is dependent upon the price it pays for a portfolio of sequel rights. Our analysis of Arundel's proposal includes a net present value calculation of each movie production company. In order to decide whether Arundel can make money buying movie sequel rights depends on whether the net present value of the production company's movies is higher than the estimated 2M per film required to purchase the rights.
On May 14th, 1988 a group of children and adults from the First Assembly of God Church in Radcliff, Kentucky got aboard a Ford built 1977 Superior B-700 school bus and headed to King’s Island amusement park. King’s Island is located about 170 miles from Radcliff where the church is located. After spending the whole day at the amusement park, the group got on the bus and began traveling on Interstate seventy-one in northern Kentucky back to Radcliff. At about 10:45 P.M. while heading south on Interstate 71 just outside of Carrollton, Kentucky, the bus collided with a black pickup truck driven by Larry W. Mahoney.
Larketta Randolph, who purchased the mobile home and used Green Tree Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama to finance this home. Larketta Randolph was a petitioner who financed her Mobile home from defendant Green Tree Financial.
CarMax faces challenges from several fronts that could threaten to disrupt their growth plans and their position as a disruptor in the used car market. The biggest challenge they face is being able to continuously secure a study supply of high quality used cars, due to the extremely competitive nature of the used car market. CarMax offers cutting edge technology to help the company identify buying trends, pricing trends, and consumer preferences down to the zip code that gave them a large competitive advantage, as “data mining” has matured and competitors have developed their own software tools, eroding the competitive advantage to CarMax.
The Body Shop International case is an interesting case study into the miscommunication of owners and stockholder interests with regard to financial conditions. Anita Roddick, the founder of The Body Shop had no financial experience and thought that all she needed to do was expand her business and the financing would take shape as she developed her business. While Anita’s product concept of a natural skin-care line was good; her lack of experience in financial matters took its toll on her business.
By the early 1940s unions were eventually beginning to be acknowledged in Sudbury, which lead to the arrival of the United Steelworkers of America at Inco. This organization fought passionately for the mining workers, and were liable for resolving the health and safety disputes. Accordingly in 1941, unions had to provoke workers from striking due to the growing demand of nickel that arisen from the Second World War. This dissatisfaction ensued from a wage freeze by the national government, in addition to working extensive hours. Moreover, injury rates during the 1960s peaked with an annual rate of 13 casualties out of every 100 workers. Thus, Inco took acceptance and imposed better regulations to bring this rate down to only 4 casualties out
The presumption is that a state jurisdiction is territorial and if each State has jurisdiction over its own territory, consequently, other States do not have jurisdiction over those affairs in line with the international law principles of non-intervention and sovereign equality of States . In fact, territorial jurisdiction is universally recognized. However, as Ryngaert points out, jurisdiction is not only linked with sovereign and is no exclusively of domestic concern (Ryngaert, p. 7), making reference to the “extra-territorial
Also, in the 1950’s a separate second business, Burger King of Florida (Inc.) was established. They choose to seek a trademark for their name under the Federal Trade Mark Act. Both businesses were growing but Burger King of Florida of Florida grew faster. When they began to add locations in Illinois to locations near Mattoon the Hoots decided to bring suit against Burger King of Florida. Obviously with both having valid trademarks how could the courts make a binding