The Earth was created roughly four point six billion years ago and since modern technology, is thought to have a carrying capacity, a limit that shows how many organisms can thrive under selected conditions. It is obvious that resource use has rapidly increased over the past hundreds of years. Which led to the theory of sustainability, this involves the preservation of resources for future generations. Green living is similar to this as it promotes the conservation and wise use of natural resources. Based on this information, it is very crucial for different governments to be involved and responsible for fostering green practices and sustainable. In general, society today is very aware and knowledgeable about the effects of global warming, caused by the increased amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Thomas Friedman acknowledges this issue …show more content…
and criticizes the fact that “rapid population growth [has] converged in a way that could make our planet dangerously unstable” (Source C). The importance of population growth is that the more people on the surface of the Earth, the bigger the impact on global warming. A single government cannot minimize their ecological footprint (how much one contributes to global warming) by resisting the natural reproduction progress of its citizens. A much more efficient way would involve implementing laws and regulations that lower the usage of various resources that contribute to global warming. This way, future generations may have enough resources to continue their life towards a more balanced and efficient Earth. Through the discussion of global warming, the effects can be severely decreased by simple government actions. To continue, the various nations around the world do not promote green living equally as the developed nations of the United States and Japan. In a excerpted article by Magali Rheault, five major nations – United States, China, Russia, Japan, India- are all illustrated based on how their citizens attempt a life towards green living (Source E). The most important information extracted is that China, Russia, and India do not have many citizens that contribute to green living. These supply the Earth with billions of people that occupy vast amounts of land within their territorial boundaries. An obvious concern is, why don’t all these people who use large amounts of resources not strive to be energy efficient? An answer lies in their motivation. No part of the government is forcing their citizens to become more sustainable. It is necessary for the government leaders to pass a law that mandates the lowered use of natural resources. Therefore, the people would have a moral reason to become more conservative, which is ultimately better for the nation. Exemplified though the use of various countries, one can undermine the necessity for powerhouse nations to persuade their government to practice green living. Of course, energy is not one hundred percent efficient in terms of its transformation to different states of energy.
The law of thermodynamics states that energy is neither created nor destroyed, but it can transform to alternate states. A major amount of energy is lost as heat as it translates states. The United States Department of Energy published online that a “typical U.S. family spends about $1,900 a year on home utility bills… [Yet], a large portion of that energy is wasted” (Source F). if a family is going to spend that much money on utility, shouldn’t they receive all the energy they can? This is a major concern for environmentalist as they understand that even the most efficient power plants do not convert the available energy entirely, which is very difficult to do. The government can intervene, however, and offer recommendations to each household to save what they can. These small government recommendations can assure a more efficient nation when every family cooperates. Energy conversion is not one hundred percent efficient, therefore governments can mediate and solidify their nation towards living
green. Indeed, it is very crucial for governments to step in and take responsibility for attempting to practice green living. Many citizens around the world believe that their government is too rapacious to assist because it’s either too expensive or too difficult. However, the thought that saving energy becomes expensive is outrageous. Efficient energy simply allows someone to be able to purchase less energy and some money. It could be very difficult to move towards green living; however, little steps add up in terms of the environment. Ultimately, the purpose of green living is to sustain our resources for future generations, so that they can thrive as well.
Even tho the green revolution had stopped starvation in some of the world, it has also caused some. The green revolution was the use of new technology to grow food for the people of the world that started in the 1950’s. These new technology were such things as Gmo’s, pesticides, fertilizers. The main goal was to stop hunger and make second and third world countries better and not living in poverty. The green revolution Raised the amount of food in the world, made the world's population increase in a dangerous rate and harmed and damaged the earth and its people.
“All across the world, in every kind of environment and region known to man, increasingly dangerous weather patterns and devastating storms are abruptly putting an end to the long-running debate over whether or not climate change is real. Not only is it real, it's here, and its effects are giving rise to a frighteningly new global phenomenon: the man-made natural disaster.” BARACK OBAMA, speech, Apr. 3, 2006. Climate change is not a theory contrary to what many individuals believe and is in fact confirmed by major scientific agencies such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the United States. Global Warming causes are mainly due to greenhouse gases that are trapped in the atmosphere and cause depletion of the earth’s ozone layer. Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas, and although it is a necessary component in our atmosphere as it helps plants perform photosynthesis, too much of it causes ozone depletion and therefore climate change. Carbon Dioxide levels in the atmosphere have increased tremendously after the industrial revolution, which indicates that the major cause of this issue is due to anthropogenic activities.
For quite some time, life on earth has been nothing but peaches and cream for several people and because of people who live a non-sustainable life, it has left others with an indistinct outlook on earth’s future. Sustainability to me is doing things that will help prevent harmful things from happening to the environment now and in the future. With the support of the sustainability and more quality ways of living, the Earth Charter is gradually introduced. Through key research I will explain what the Earth Charter is and why it was founded, describe one of its four parts along with the goals and overarching philosophy, and share the impact it has on my life now and in the future.
Background and Audience Relevance: There are always conversations about our planet. We see our earths glaciers melting, weather temperature rising, and pollution affecting our resources. But for some reasons we tend to look away. We should be more aware of this potential event and I’m here to inform everyone about what actually is global warming and the effects of it.
As a society, every human need to have the will and power to invest in advocates of society and nature. Now is the chance for the economy to put the cap on our money and do away with energy issues. Every individual needs to determine necessary steps to make green behavior a law in an effort to save energy, protect the environment, and improve the economy.
Green economy, green technologies, green TVET, green jobs have an important effect on a variety of social and ecological processes. In recent times sustainable development has been discussed as a concept for a future development in many different ways, and more people have come to recognize that we need to ensure that future generations are left no worse off than the current generation. Not only that but relating to the changing nature
There is no doubt that human activity is having a significant impact on our environment. These environmental impacts include depleting our natural resources, air and water pollution, climate change, destruction of habitats, and loss of biodiversity. Because of these growing concerns, we need to learn how to live sustainably. Living sustainably will allow us to conserve our limited resources more wisely so they will be available for future generations (Withgott & Brennan, 2011, Chapter 1).
Earth’s resources, for instance water, productive farming land and energy, outlines the basic foundations of our continued existence on earth. However, with the continued human activities, for example logging and charcoal burning, these resources are quickly being depleted. Human inhabitation and increased consumption of the natural resources is resulting in untold destruction. The climate change being experienced globally, the rapidly depleting freshwater catchments, the dwindling forest cover, the ever reducing fish ‘stash’ in our seas and oceans and farmland dereliction are some of the effects resulting from human occupation and activities. Poaching, another human activity, is resulting in the extinction of certain animal species thus leading to them being branded as endangered. For there to be a continuation of life on earth, man will have to learn how to make his way of life sustainable. Such a measure will go a long way in ensuring that the natural resources are protected and thus the delicate ecosystem will be balanced. It is very vital for world governments to start educating its citizens on the importance of conserving the ecosystem (Austria 3). This paper, from local to global levels, is aimed at analyzing the relationship between human activities, the earth’s resources and the use of energy recourses. The paper will also evaluate the interrelationships between humans and energy resources, for instance the sun.
Household energy conservation is a very practical and realistic approach to conserving energy within our society. US households consume a tremendous amount of natural gas as well as electric energy. It has been calculated that the amount of energy consumed within the US increased exponentially from about 1850 to 1975. If energy continued to increase at this rate, we would be experiencing severe energy shortages in our current society. Luckily, steps towards conservation, including various energy regulations, have curbed that growth somewhat, brining the predicted 160 Qbtu/yr for the year 2000 down to around 93.8 Qbtu/yr by the year 1996. However, household energy usage is still a major issue as households consume about 38% of the total consumed energy and contribute greatly to natural gas consumption and issues such as global warming. Therefore, it is important that people understand how we use energy in the household and what steps can be taken to conserve that energy.
The environment today is not in a good condition, Climate change is evident, and oceans are getting polluted. Rainforrest's are decreasing in size due to deforestation and illegal logging. Animals are getting extinct due to the destruction of their habitats. Natural resources are being consumed at very large amounts, and get wasted. There are different ways these problems can be addressed, one option is environmental management. Environmental management focuses on conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats, and impact of humans on the environment. Conservation of natural resources is the smart use of the world's resources by humans, through this waste production is limited, and there will be less garbage in the world. By conserving
...oes on, it is crucial that humans maintain sustainability. Resources will not last if they are not distributed correctly. Air, water, light and many other factors will not be clean if humans continue to pollute them. The problems that will arise, if earth is not protected, will be massive. As medicines and more cure to diseases are invented the population will not start to shrink. By the year 2050, the current population of 7 billion people will increase to 9 billion. Humans cannot continue to cut forests down, overuse water nor energy. Instead humans have to find a way for sustainability. To do this humans must ask two vital questions: How can earth sustain this growth? And what can we do to improve the living conditions of present and future generations? Only answering these two questions will
By showing the world the severity of our need for conservation, we will be able to save the earth and get the most out of our resources. We need to fix this problem before it becomes uncontrollable to the point of having no resources to supply our needs. By reducing our consumption of resources, we will be able to become closer to fixing the problem of global warming, high gasoline prices and pesticide filled meats. The outcome of respecting our world and “going green” will better how we live our lives, our communities and the environment. The concept of “going green” is a necessity for the future because “our children deserve cities as beautiful as they are.
Global warming has become the spotlight for both sides of the battle over sustainability in American politics. Supporters of legislation that limit green house gases believe, along with the vast majority of scientists, that humans are the cause of the accelerating temperature rise of our planet. Opponents of such legislation argue that the rise in annual global temperature is attributed to the Earth’s natural heating and cooling cycles. No matter which side is correct, it seems only reasonable to me to explore alterative energy sources because our planet has a limited supply of fossil fuels. “Repowering America” will not be an easy task but I believe it is essential for our country’s economic and national stability. So, what has kept America, or more specifically America’s politicians, from leading in what is possibly the most important dilemma facing our planet?
In a perfect ecosystem everything gives and takes equally, and the cycle of life is sustained perpetually. Our current lifestyle is not environmentally sustainable. We consume more and more of the earth's resources and give very little, if any, in return. The Brundtland Commission defines lifestyle sustainability as being development that "seeks to meet the needs and aspirations of the present without compromising the ability to meet those of the future." Many factors are contributing to how humankind uses the earth's resources and how humankind views the goal of sustainability. Public opinion, government intervention, and manufacturers seem to have the largest influence in determining how the earth's resources are used. In order to create a sustainable society, all of these factors must work in conjunction with one another in the utilization of technology and resources to insure that the same resources will be available to future generations. The Issue Mankind has always sought to control its environment. While most species must deal with the world as it is, man has the ability and the desire to change and adapt the environment to suit its needs. If it's too hot, then a way must be found to be cool. If there isn't enough shelter, it must be built. If there isn't enough food, it is produced. If there are other creatures that are regarded as pests, they are eliminated. Many of the efforts to control these environmental factors are made at the expense of destroying the biosphere upon which mankind depends. Every person on earth puts a strain on the biosphere and the earth's population is increasing exponentially. Scientists predict that by the year 2050 mankind will top 10 Billion peop...
The moment I chose to major in Environmental Engineering, a thought flew to the front of my mind: “I should probably start living more green life if I want to study this subject.” Since that moment two years ago, I have attempted to move my life towards a more environmentally friendly alternative. If there is one thing this shift has taught me, it is that living green is not easy.