Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Neo nazis in america
Neo nazis in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Neo nazis in america
Introduction In September, a state used legal force to silence the nation's third most popular political party. Five democratically elected officials were arrested, including the party’s leader. The next week, fifteen more party officials were arrested along with thirty five party members, making it the largest persecution of a political party since 1964. As the public officials were handcuffed, they implored reporters to heed the political motivations behind their arrest, and encouraged the public to support their “moral and just struggle against the corrupt system”. Later, the party released a statement on their website "ideas cannot be prosecuted", and the government does not have the power to silence a political party (Reuters). Traditionally, this narrative reads as a gross violation of freedom of speech and an unjust trumping of opposition; however, the party in question is Greece’s Golden Dawn Party, a popular neo-nazi gang often described as a cross between Hezbollah and the Tea Party (Kakissis). In their manifesto, they claim all immigrants, especially those that aren’t caucasian, are illegal, and that “Greece should be for the Greeks”. The party strives for a Greece that acknowledges "the spiritual, ethnic and racial inequality of humans" and often resorts to violent tactics achieve these ends. Since the Greek constitution does not allow the government to silence political parties, the only way the government can rein in the party is through criminal prosecution. Unfortunately, the Golden Dawn (GD) reflects a lager trend of European Populism Extremist Parties (PEPs) that have slowly gained influence in Europe since the 1990s. Significant literature covers these parties, and evidence has been gathered on how to be... ... middle of paper ... ...y gaining more support, and are not naturally withering away. Political Scientist have proven that excluding these extremist parties from the political sphere not only reduces violence and dramatically reduces their political power, but also forces the parties to take on a less ideologically extreme position. There is a clear problem, a clear pattern for the problem, and clear proof that the problem is not solving itself. Excluding extreme parties form the political sphere not only limits there influence, but forces them to adapt less extreme positions. Given these facts, the recent arrest of Gold Dawn officials is not a narrative of a state exerting unnecessary force, but rather the long overdue action of a government to quell violence, promote democracy and exert necessary force to ensure that every Greek citizen feels safe and secure within the nation’s borders.
The last two decades of the twentieth century gave rise to turbulent times for constituent republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, eventually leading them to split apart. There were a number of damaging aspects of past history and of the political and economic circumstances that contributed to the breakup and eventually caused the situation to snowball into a deadly series of inter-ethnic conflicts. Yugoslavia was reunified at the end of the war when the communist forces of Josip Broz Tito liberated the country. Under Tito, Yugoslavia adopted a relatively liberal form of government in comparison to other East European communist states at the time and experienced a period of relative economic and political stability until Tito’s death in 1980. In addition to internal power struggles following the loss of their longtime leader, Yugoslavia faced an unprecedented economic crisis in the 1980’s. As other communist states began to fall in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, some former Communist leaders abandoned communism and founded or supported ethno-national parties, blaming the economic suffering on the flaws of communism and other ethnic groups. The ethnic violence that followed would not have been possible without the willingness of politicians from every side to promote ethno-nationalist symbols and myths through media blitzes, which were especially effective due to low levels of education in the former Yugoslavia. Shadows of the events of World War II gave these politicians, especially the Serbs, an opportunity to encourage the discussion and exaggeration of past atrocities later in the century. The ethnic violence in the former Yugoslavia can be traced back to a series of linked damaging factors such as the de...
The censorship of ideas is seen, not only on American soil, but in other countries, both now and in history. In a world where governments are to be respected, to think in a contradictory manner is anything but safe. All throughout history, ideological governmen...
Historically, citizens of many countries sacrifice their personal liberties for a sense of security masked as a governmental attempt for pushing their views onto the citizens. A historical example of this scenario is the passing and enforcement of the Es...
With an official statement, issued on 7 September 1955, the Menderes government expressed its deepest sorrow for the losses suffered by Greek minority in Istanbul. The Turkish Prime Minister blamed the riots on communists, underlining its commitment to the exemplary punishment of the perpetrators (Xristidis 2000). The interpretation of the pogrom as a conspiracy of international communism was repeated during the extraordinary meeting of the Grand National Assembly, which took place on September 12, 1955. However, under the force of circumstances, Adnan Menderes admitted that the government knew about the demonstration on September 6th, in advance. Also, the Turkish Prime Minister argued that, the riot was a spontaneous expression of national sentiment of the Turkish people who was stimulated by the news about the imminent massacre of Turkish Cypriots on 28 August. Moreover, he stated that the hysteria that gripped the crowd was so strong that immobilized the police forces, which found themselves between their quest to restore order and their commitment to the homeland, thus leaving full freedom of movement to the protesters. The claim of the Turkish government that the country suffered a severe blow because of the Communists was met with scepticism by foreign observers (Guven 2006). First of all, the number of Communists in Turkey was small and secondly, their activities were under the watchful eyes of the Turkish Intelligence Services (MIT). It seems that, only a small percentage of people who were arrested immediately after the episodes were communists. The arrest of those who had communist beliefs, such as the well-known Turkish writer Aziz Nessin, was totally unjustified, since there was no evidence for their participation i...
Several philosophers have provided individual theories on different forms of government as well as how societies prefer to live. Researching the observations different philosophers created is quite interesting. Recognizing that many of the views philosophers had has now shown to be true regarding contemporary issues. The contemporary issue this paper will examine will be the violent acts law enforcement displayed towards their citizens during the G20. This paper will also discuss how John Mills in On Liberty and Rousseau in Discourse would have viewed this issue as well as personal opinions to both Rousseau and Mills ideologies. Through this paper insight on these philosophers views as well as the violence during the G20 will be displayed.
Nowadays, and since the 1980s, far-right parties seem to gain more and more influence all over Europe. Each country has its own or even several: the British National Party and UK Independence Party in Britain, the National Front in France, the Golden Dawn in Greece, the Northern League in Italy or the Vlaams Belang in Belgium are examples amongst many others. This rise of such extreme right-wing parties is worrisome since they all praise for often highly controversial values and are considered by many as a threat for the democracy. Also, it is interesting to notes that the breakthrough of these parties has been important in among the states members of the European Union, and that furthermore they are all in favour of a return to a more conventional sovereignty. This would be achieved by ending the European Union and more broadly by restraining globalization. These aims may appear like a regress in view of all it has been accomplished over the last few years. In this way it would be interesting to answer to the following research question: what common characteristics do the supporters of far-right parties in Europe have? In order to offer an answer few theories will be introduced and analysed to determine the degree of their accuracy.
...estructive but the threat of violence can lead to prosperity. In countries where stability is rare, the future is always tentative. Survival demands that people remain risk averse in these environments. It is only when the symbols of tamed power reemerge and hope of lasting peace returns that people begin to strategize for the future again
...itism and attempting to appeal to ultra-nationalist sensibilities there is a definite racist element to their discourse. Such racism is evident in the National Front’s stance against immigration where they argue that Arab Islamic immigrants are unlikely to assimilate on the basis of the alien nature of their culture and in the idea that immigration should be banned and the rights of French citizens be made a national priority. Whilst attempts have been made to make this stance appear more moderate and in line with popular discourse in recent years, such as by aligning anti-immigration with cultural incompatibility these arguments simply attempt to mask the true nature of the National Front’s policies. Despite attempts to focus on other elements of party policy it is clear that underneath the rhetoric of Marine Le Pen the National Front is inherently a racist party.
These horrors caused by nationalism seem to be at the opposite end of the spectrum from the promising ideal of democracy. As Ghia Nodia pointed out, many analysts view nationalism as “fundamentally antidemocratic” (3). What these anti-nationalists fail to realize is that nationalism has also called force heroism and even sacrifice throughout history. Numerous people have risked their lives to restore democracy and civil rights in their nations, when they could easily have chosen comfortable exile elsewhere. Indeed, nationalism is the very basis of democratic government because it unites the citizens as “we the people”, supports the common political destiny, and nurtures trust toward the government.
Farber, H. S., & Gowa, J. (1997). Common Interests or Common Politics? Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace. Journal of Politics 59 (2): 393-417.
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
Grant, W. (2004) „Pressure Politics: The Changing World of Pressure Groups‟, Parliamentary Affairs, 57(2): 408-419
The Chief Minister’s flip-flopping aside, his party’s increasingly anarchist actions are extremely worrisome. It is indeed one such incident that has led to the Chief Minster, his cabinet and MLAs protesting on the streets, govern...
Does the context in which non-state armed groups form influence their power-seeking behavior? Can these groups translate social support into effective forms of local governance? Where does group criminality cross the line to become a legitimate security threat? Can military force effectively mitigate these groups’ effects and, if so, when? Events I witnessed lead me to believe that these groups have larger economic, social, political, and military consequences than researchers or national leaders
...ell as laws are strained through anti-terrorism regulation because it is not possible to differentiate amongst criminality and offence and deeds of violence and the second means namely downstream because of the not possibility to discriminate amongst criminality and slight turbulences of community. Equivalence is confronted for the reason that the states not able to treat minorities who belongs from any other states or neighboring states as well as from any other beliefs equally like they treat their own citizens while Efficacy is challenged by costs a huge amount of capital for safeguarding the inhabitant as well as for their security for securing from imminent violence deprived of flawless the information around the effectiveness of these type of actions. So these all are the haubrich point of view that how the core values of democratic states affect by terrorism.