II. Important Information:
1. The main idea is not only that owning stuff is not the key to happiness, it’s also that consumers today own more than they need to thrive which directly impacts the environment. Hill illustrates the environmental impact by showing statistics of global warming today versus the past century, and how consumerism is leading to a hotter climate. Hill debunks claims of buying happiness by discussing a study where stress hormones spike to their highest when people are managing their personal belongings. Hill’s most prominent example that consumerism is not the answer is himself, as he discusses some of the most stressful times of his life being right after coming into a large sum of money and buying whatever he fancied. When Hill concludes his article, he states that “I have less—and enjoy more. My space is small. My life is big” (213).
2. The intended audience is college-educated consumers. Hill
…show more content…
Summary: Graham Hill, an entrepreneur that values environmental sustainability, narrates his negative experiences with consumerism after selling an internet consultant company, for so much money that it made his head spin, in “Living With Less. A Lot Less.” He begins by talking about his current minimalist lifestyle, and then jumps back in time to the late ‘90s, right after he sold his business. He claims that the stuff he bought with his newfound wealth seemed to be controlling his life, and that he became more stressed out as time went on.
True to his claim, Hill continuously bought anything he wanted. At first, he bought a second house, and recruited more roommates to fill the empty extra rooms. Then, he hired a personal shopper to go to stores and buy things for him. Soon after, he found himself with new products that caused him no joy to unwrap, too many roommates to manage, and enough chores around the house to require several helpers to complete. He takes a pause from his narrative to discuss the ways that consumerism is
In his work, “Overselling capitalism,” Benjamin Barber speaks on capitalism’s shift from filling the needs of the consumer, to creating needs. He tells how it has become easier for people to borrow money, so that they no longer get as much satisfaction from affording necessities. He says capitalism can be good when both sides benefit, but it has overgrown and must continue creating needs, even though the only people who can afford these needs don’t have any. According to Barber, people are still working hard, but them and their children are becoming seduced by unneeded shopping. He states that people are becoming more needy, and losing discipline in their lifestyle. Additionally capitalism must encourage easy and addicting shopping to
“I rather would be blind than then see this world in yellow, and bought and sold by kings that hammer roses into gold.” (King Midas Pg.462 Para.10) Many think that if they got what they wanted they would be happy, but if the world was all based on malterlistic things and everyone got what they wanted there would be chaos and no feelings just want and people would do crazy things to get what they want. Now a day’s people mistake malterlistic things for happiness. “The necklace”, “Ads may spur unhappy kids to embrace materialism”, And “Thrill of the chase” illustrates examples of materialism and show some base their happiness on it.
My house and my things were my new employers for a job I had never applied for”. With too much materialism, your life will be unnecessary complicated and you will not get time to do your favorite things so therefore buying less you will have time to go out and enjoy, instead of being worried about things that needs to be done. I am not saying that you should isolate yourself from materials. Without materials, people will not have jobs for example, in the above quote lawns to mow, roommates.
The realm of higher education is in a state of constant evolution, which can be witnessed on as small of a time scale as a year-to-year basis; however, the more drastic changes are most notable in larger scales, such as five years, ten years, and so on. One of the main forces for change is the student body and their parents, to some extent. Mark Edmundson, a professor of English at the University of Virginia, wrote his essay On the Uses of a Liberal Education: As Lite Entertainment for Bored College Students about the more recent changes of not only universities, but of the student body as well. He laments how consumerism has transformed these institutes of learning into, basically, glorified daycares, and he does make a rather compelling argument by drawing upon his personal experiences as a teacher.
In the article “My Year of No Shopping,” critically-acclaimed American author and bookstore co-owner, Ann Patchett (2017), analyzes how a ‘no-shopping-year’ makes one observant about poverty and grateful of the things he/she has. She wants people to take some time off showing and differentiate between their wants and needs. Patchett began by casually following the rule of no-shopping until New Year’s Eve when she decided to stop buying anything personal; clothes, shoes, bags and jewelry. However, she continued to shop for things related to her career like books and bookstore supplies and grocery items. During the first months of this oath she realized she had more than enough self-care and personal products. Overtime,
On a sunny Saturday morning with beautiful blue skies, and birds chirping, James Hamblin was in his balcony with a cup of coffee on his desk eager to write his short argumentative essay titled “Buy Experiences, Not Things”. In this short essay, Hamblin wanted to depict the fact that happiness in individuals, is mainly due to experiential purchases than to material purchases. One of the things he said to prove that point was “waiting for an experience elicits more happiness and excitement than waiting for a material good’ (Hamblin, 2014). He also stated that “a mind should remain in one place, and a mind that wanders too much is a sign of lack of happiness” (Hamblin, 2014). Instead of buying the latest iPhone, or Samsung galaxy, we should spend
lives (Miles 5). Wherever we go and whatever we do, consumerism is praised as the
Humanity is an intriguing race indeed in the world. We can be careless when we purchase things. We tend to buy things with no awareness of the insane, expensive prices and end up purchasing things to fulfill our desires in fancy malls and stores. Anyways, there are many situations that of course happen within society today with unnecessary purchases.
We’re moving from a conspicuous consumption — which is ‘buy without regard’ — to a calculated consumption -These are the words of analyst Marshal Cohen. What Marshal Cohen is saying in this statement that buying cool, expensive, classier stuff for personal or for house does not make us happy. This kind of stuff that impresses other people or looks cool or posher may give temporary or momentarily happiness but at the end it may end up as wasteful junk or silly purchases. And even someday we may regret for these purchases.
Rhetorical questions are exploited throughout the text to engage the reader to think about the key points that the author is explain, “How would it soothe those wounds of feeling unloved, unappreciated and unhappy? How you had to have it”. Deveny is asking the reader how spending money and buying unnecessary things is going to make you feel better or happier. “Does anyone else want to slap half the people around you and say…” this shows the impact that something that may seem small can have on daily lives. Personal anecdotes are put to use in the text in order to give a personal effect to the reader something that they can relate to the author with, “Someone handed me $300...” “10 times as much sitting in my bank account.” “Because I could see it, feel it, smell it.” These examples connect with the reader more they are only creating a bigger problem because greed is destructive not productive. By employing the conventions rhetorical questions and personal anecdote the author has provided evidence and strong reasoning behind why consumerism is destructive to our
Materialistic people, whether wealthy or not, can never have enough material belongings to fill avoid within themselves. And yet, they waste much of what they purchase and do not see wastefulness as a problem. Today the purchase of unnecessary material goods has increased and wastefulness has also increased. Dumpsters are full of consumer’s unwanted possessions that will eventually be replaced with more binge purchases. Do these things really make consumers happy and if so, at what price; their health and happiness. Consumers could be happier if they stay focused on the most important items needed to survive in their day-to-day lives.
There is enough food for every person on earth to consume 2500 calories a day, not including fruit or roots. It is odd that despite this fact there is still an overwhelming level of poverty in the world. The wealthiest 20% of the world receive most of the food in the world and spend huge amounts of money to purchase all this food. In order for the elite to live at the standard it does, the majority of the world must go without. Millions starve because the elite prefer death of the hungry to their own inconvenience. This situation is not easily remedied. First, people must begin to understand that they must eat only as much food as they need. Many would argue that they never have any leftovers and that all the food in their house gets eaten with little thrown away. This is good in the sense that food itself is not being wasted, but every American doesn’t need to eat as much food as they do. When a high percentage of people in this country are overweight and most people in third world countries are ghastly underweight and undernourished, then it is apparent that the citizens of this country must consume much less food. After understanding the issue at hand, Americans must then stop eating three to four meals a day and stop stuffing themselves at every meal. This would be hard to accomplish because this would mean making a sacrifice, which the rich already have big problems with, but also because the food-producing corporations would do everything in their power to stop this from happening. There is no market for these corporations in small third-world countries where they may have to sell their products at lower prices and no longer make astronomical profits.
The home is the outermost layer of a person’s skin. It breathes, absorbs, settles and changes just as the people that dwell inside of it do. Inside this slowly commercialized dwelling often resides incomplete individuals who attempt to fill this incompleteness; usually with materialistic vices. The biggest of these perpetrators are “name-brand” overpriced fashion labels whose only use is to deplete the individual’s wealth and morals. People ...
This is a thought-provoking book about the pursuit of material goods. Kasser is not a preacher, but a scientist. He presents his evidence carefully, and concludes that materialism is a game not worth playing even on its own terms of promoting human happiness.
Acquiring things like houses and cars only has a transient effect on happiness. People’s desires for material possessions crank up at the same, or greater rate, than their salaries. Again, this means that despite considerably more luxurious possessions, people end up no happier. There’s even evidence that materialism makes us less happy. People don’t shift to enjoyable activities when they are rich.... ...