Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on "is graffiti art?
Essays on "is graffiti art?
Graffiti vs vandalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on "is graffiti art?
Graffiti should it be considered vandalism or art? Does it matter where the graffiti is drawn or who by or, is it as simple as its on a public building and no matter how artistic it looks it's vandalism.
There are many views on whether graffiti should be considered art. Graffiti is becoming more acceptable in the modern day with over eighty percent of teenagers now thinking its a valid form of self expression. Furthermore there are amny people who belive that, " An artist that has made use of a rundown building to create their art is in fact using his/her enviroment to its full potential. It is giving the building of neglect a new purpose" said by Anon. Another online commentator suggested that : "Graffiti that is art, like well-drawn pictures that enhance a building's plain wall is acceptable. If it is used to disguise an ugly piece of architecture or an eyesore is certainly going to enchance the area" by Mikki T.
These views come from a wide selection of grown men and women and not your typical teenagers who vandlise public property. It shows how widely Graffiti affects people and ...
Webster defines graffiti as an inscription or drawing made on some public surface. Graffiti is often thought of as gang-related, because gangs have traditionally painted their identifying symbols in places to mark their turf.
Even though there is a fear of getting caught, this is what artist usually consider the very core of graffiti culture. Many critics have argued that graffiti is vandalism and should be removed. However, “someone painted over your house and, of course, you’re not too happy about it. No one has the right to do that without your permission and, without even looking at it, you can pronounce it vandalism. But would you feel the same way if you saw a really breathtaking piece of graffiti art on an otherwise dull wall in the city?” (Kordic). Yes, by definition, graffiti is “an action involving deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property”, And we can not really argue that graffiti often ends up someone’s walls, we do have to think about if it really is “destruction”, and if, perhaps, we have been asking the wrong question the whole
Within the last few years, graffiti has been deemed an acceptable and tasteful genre of art. Long gone are the days where the spray can belonged exclusively to the local delinquent. From the past to present, there has been a shift in how street art is recognized by the general public and the government. Laws and policies are being put into place that both defend and threaten the promulgation of this creative medium. By both protecting and prohibiting, the government displays an inconsistent and confusing relationship with street art. When art is so subjective, it can become challenging to delineate the fine line between vandalism and creativity. This essay will discuss the changing public perception of graffiti, the trademark and copyright battles between graffiti artists and property owners, the categorization of street art as an artform, and the beneficial aspects of commissioned street murals.
Looking into a piece of graffiti; is exactly like looking into the mind of the artist. There is reason and knowledge behind graffiti. It is an amazing art form; it creates a sense of belonging and a community. “This world is not meant for me, but I still want to exist so
Graffiti is a form of art that people use to express themselves and to convey various messages to people in a particular community. In the movie "Graffiti Verite':. One of the graffiti artist explained that his purpose in doing graffiti is that it allows him to "express his anger' on the wall. Another kid by the name of "Jipsie" said that graffiti is a "form of growth". There were several different explanations that artists shared as well as several different reasons why they like graffiti. The common theme among the graffiti artist and taggers was that graffiti is simply a form of self-expression (Bryan). At the end of the film one tagger made a comment and said, "graffiti is not vandalism, but it is a beautiful crime". This comment did not make sense to me. Committing a crime, a hideous act, is not a beautiful thing to do by any means. Graffiti does not mean people can go around and draw and spray paint on other peoples property. Regardless of what types of graffiti are being expressed by the tagger, this type of self expression is considered vandalism when people decide to draw, destroy, or violate any persons property without consent. As a result of taggers committing the crime of vandalism, property owners, concerned citizens, and law enforcement officers spend too much time, money, and energy trying to put an end to the unlawful act of vandalism.
Art is the expression or application of our thoughts, desires, emotions and feelings. Art helps us spread and share our thoughts with others. There are many different types of art and graffiti is one of them. Each person living in this world has their own definition of art. Some define graffiti as illegal because they believe that it abuses public property. Others believe that Graffiti should be legalized because they see it as not just another form of art but also as a useful form of political expression, a way to beautify scenery and as a potential source of income.
...ocieties and local governments agree that graffiti is not art because it is violating the law. And graffiti is vandalism because it destroys public area, and many people cannot accept graffiti as art.
At the end of the day, people should stop underestimating graffiti art. Banksy, in his book, “Banging Your Head Against A Brick Wall,” said “Graffiti is one of the few tools you have if you have almost nothing. And even if you don't come up with a picture to cure world poverty you can make someone smile while they're having a piss.” Graffiti work should be admired by everyone else because it holds so many significance whether it's only a phrase or a sketch. People shouldn't just absentmindedly assume it as the worst thing ever or as an awful thing. I agree that it can be vandalism to the public but graffiti can also be made in many other places legally so why think of it in the dark side? People should take care on how they are judging the striking art behind graffiti and criticizing it without really evaluating all the great meaning behind it.
When most people think of graffiti they think of kids tagging their street names on anything they can see, but what if it is art? legitimate art, a painting on a wall on an alleyway that tells a story or even if it is their names. Who gets the credit for the amazing piece they produce? No one. It just sits there until someone else tags over it. When in galleries artists are being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for a painting with a couple of paint splashes on it. Graffiti is on the streets, free for everyone to see, if everyone against graffiti realised that the streets is where these kids are born and raised and spent most of their time there and thats where you’ll find a lot of graffiti.
Mention the word graffiti and what typically comes to mind is something unpleasant and distasteful like indecent language scribbled on a wall of a store or crude pictures. Most graffiti is characterized as vandalism on property that does not belong to the culprit. Graffiti also displays negative graphics that promote some type of vulgar message such as violence, sex, drugs, gangs, and racism. On the other hand, when the terms “street” and “art” come together, a blast of colorful creations upon blank slates on the street comes to mind. Although street art is technically considered graffiti, it is a type of graffiti with positive qualities, but certain figures in society find street art to be, in some way, disruptive. If used properly, street art can be appreciated artistically and socially. Despite the negative stigma attached to graffiti, street art has emerged as a progressive valuable art form whose vast history, surge in popularity, and urge for social change warrant its classification as a fine art.
It is a ridiculous belief that just because graffiti is done somewhere without consent, it throws out the notion that it is still art. Sure, the piece of work was done illegally but why can’t the work still be appreciated and enjoyed. Art is art wherever it is found. The location of the piece does not change that. In fact, graffiti can kill two birds with one stone. First, at the foundation it is a form of art. Second, on top of that foundation a message can be erected and directed. But as the saying goes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Graffiti started in the 1920s when gangs would tag train cars and walls to mark territory mainly in New York City. Graffiti took a different turn in the 1970s when young adults decided to use street art as an outlet to express their political and social outrage. This movement had soon gained the attention of the “adult” world. Graffiti was known as “creation through destruction” and to this day is still considered illegal in most parts of the world. In modern street art the mediums used have evolved past spray paint and now artists are using different methods with spray paint to progress their works past crude tags. Common mediums used are stencils, prints, and murals. Graffiti is often considered to be art because of new artists, such as
Lots of people like to do graffiti, they use Graffiti in many different ways. They talk about having legal spots for graffiti but, people say it is not the same as regular graffiti. They say Graffiti is always about being a little naughty. Some people say that graffiti is good but, then there are people that say it is bad.
Graffiti fulfills a desire for people to enclose blank exteriors back into the public eye. Graffiti is often hurried yet, also mapped and calculated, it is muddled and polished, primitive and contemporary. It is art that can further deceive, isolate, blight, and sully a neighborhood. However, it also sometimes reveals a color saturated vibrant uneasiness that marks the city as the graffitists’ territory. Professor Michael DeNotto of the University of Illinois has researched on graffitists and their reason as to why graffitists profane the cities. Professor DeNotto believes “a cry for revolution, a way to create awareness of socio-political issues, an expression of hope for the future, an effort to reclaim public spaces, or an attempt to beautify the urban environment, among others” (208). Graffitists may not have the same social standards as artists in the galleries but they can have the same influence on
Many people hear the word “graffiti” think of gangs and the violence that results when gang’s territories begin to overlap. A lot of what they think is “graffiti” is nothing more than a few doodles that are put there to represent a gang or a group of random kids trying to make a name for themselves. Graffiti as an art form got it’s start in the late 1960's, and it has been evolving ever since. However, it is not widely recognized as being fine art, like those works that are found in a gallery or a museum. It is not exactly denied the status of genuine art because of a lack of form or other base artistic elements. Most of the time when people think of graffit...