Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on first nations in canada
The conflict between the first nation and Canadian society
Indigenous history in canada: essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on first nations in canada
The relationship between the government and its Indigenous charges had been wrought with violence, suppression, and exclusion prior to the BNA Act, this did not change once Confederation had been declared . The Gradual Civilization Act and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act, products of the British colonial era, were combined to create the Indian Act of 1876 (First Nations Studies Program , UBC, 2009). The Act outlines the role the federal government is to play in essentially every aspect of an Indian’s life, from who may have their name on the Indian Register to a ban on the hiring of legal council for the purpose of land claims, introduced in 1927 (Mathias & Yabsley, 1991). The residential schools that many indigenous children were forced to attend attempted to ensure that “they were made to feel shame for their indianness. They were forcefully encouraged to become white” (Mathias & Yabsley, 1991). This was not denied by …show more content…
In the early years of use children were rapidly dying of preventable diseases such as tuberculosis due to a lack of effective heating in schools and poor ventilation (Bryce, 1907). This was not unknown to the Canadian government: in 1907 the Bryce Report was given to Members of Parliament and the churches involved in the ‘care’ of the children attending their schools (Wattam, 2016). Dr. Peter Bryce, a Medical Inspector to the Department of the Interior and Indian Affairs had found in his investigation that “of one school with an absolutely accurate statement, 69 per cent of ex-pupils are dead, and that everywhere the almost invariable cause of death given is tuberculosis (Bryce, 1907, p.18). The report enacted little action on the part of the Department of Indian Affairs despite influential members of the public such as the Honorable Samuel Hugh Blake speaking out about the brutal conditions “The appalling number of deaths among the younger children appeals loudly to the guardians of our
Retrieved December 6, 2013, from http://www.fncfcs.com/sites/default/files/online-journal/vol3num1/Sinclair_pp65.pdf Smith, C. (2013, September 1). A Legacy of Canadian Child Care: Surviving the Sixties Scoop. Briarpatch Magazine, Part 1. Retrieved December 6, 2013, from http://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/a-legacy-of-canadian-child-care Steckley, J., & Cummins, B. D. (2008). Full Circle: Canada's First Nations (2nd ed.).
In this proposal our team seeks to explore the injustices within the Indian Act. To achieve this our proposed research will examine the target population being the aboriginal woman. The paper will further explore the oppressions faced by the aboriginal women within the Indian Act. In conclusion, this proposal will sum up the negative impact that the Indian Act had on aboriginal women and how it continues to oppress this population within the Canadian National discourse.
In regard to law, Deloria defines the relationship between the US Government and the Indians as paternalistic. The US Government treated and governed the Indians as a father would by providing basic needs but without given them rights. There has been some improvement with the Indian Reorganization Act in 1934. This act allowed the return to local self-government on a tribal level and restored the self management of their assets. By allowing the Indians to self govern it encouraged an economic foundation for the inhabitants of Indian reservations. Unfortunately only a few tribes have fully taken advantage of this act, while others continue to struggle for survival.
Canada likes to paint an image of peace, justice and equality for all, when, in reality, the treatment of Aboriginal peoples in our country has been anything but. Laden with incomprehensible assimilation and destruction, the history of Canada is a shameful story of dismantlement of Indian rights, of blatant lies and mistrust, and of complete lack of interest in the well-being of First Nations peoples. Though some breakthroughs were made over the years, the overall arching story fits into Cardinal’s description exactly. “Clearly something must be done,” states Murray Sinclair (p. 184, 1994). And that ‘something’ he refers to is drastic change. It is evident, therefore, that Harold Cardinal’s statement is an accurate summarization of the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationship in
The Indian Act is made up from the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act of 1869. The Gradual Civilization Act encouraged the Indian people to give up their status and become a Canadian citizen. The Gradual Enfranchisement Act gave the government full control over the Indian people. They were able to decide everything from who kept their status, received benefits, and even who were able to keep their children. In 1876, these acts together alongside with other rules and regulations formed the Indian Act. The government thought it was best to be able to control every aspect of the First Nations people’s lives. It was stated in annual report of the Department of the Interior Indian Affairs in 1876:
CBC (2014). A history of residential schools in Canada - Canada - CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/a-history-of-residential-schools-in-canada-1.702280
Residential schools were first established in the 1880's to solve Canada's “Indian Problem”. Settlers in Canada thought of the First Nations people as savages, and the goal of the residential schools was to civilize them and integrate them in to white Canadian society. The first operators of residential schools thought of their forced integration as a benefit to native peoples. One of the overseers of residential schools wrote to the Sisters in charge of St. Joseph's Mission at Williams Lake that “It now remains for ...
The Indian Residential schools and the assimilating of First Nations people are more than a dark spot in Canada’s history. It was a time of racist leaders, bigoted white men who saw no point in working towards a lasting relationship with ingenious people. Recognition of these past mistakes, denunciation, and prevention steps must be taking intensively. They must be held to the same standard that we hold our current government to today. Without that standard, there is no moving forward. There is no bright future for Canada if we allow these injustices to be swept aside, leaving room for similar mistakes to be made again. We must apply our standards whatever century it was, is, or will be to rebuild trust between peoples, to never allow the abuse to be repeated, and to become the great nation we dream ourselves to be,
The creation of the Residential Schools is now looked upon to be a regretful part of Canada’s past. The objective: to assimilate and to isolate First Nations and Aboriginal children so that they could be educated and integrated into Canadian society. However, under the image of morality, present day society views this assimilation as a deliberate form of cultural genocide. From the first school built in 1830 to the last one closed in 1996, Residential Schools were mandatory for First Nations or Aboriginal children and it was illegal for such children to attend any other educational institution. If there was any disobedience on the part of the parents, there would be monetary fines or in the worst case scenario, trouble with Indian Affairs.
Through legislature the people with the power, the British, would attempt to civilize First Nations. To assimilate the minority, because just by being so means your cultures and values are less than mine. In the 1820s the colonial administrations first attempt at assimilation took place at Lake Simcoe in Upper Canada. A group of Aboriginals were encouraged to colonial-style village where they’d be taught agriculture and advised to become Christians. Because of poor management, underfunding, a lack of understanding Aboriginals cultures and values, the experiment was a big failure. It most certainly did not stop there. In 1876 the Canadian government introduced the Indian Act. It is “…the principal statute through which the federal government administers Indian status, local First Nations governments and the management of reserve land and communal monies” (Parrot, 2006). The First Nations have to be given their Indian Status, a legal acknowledgment of a person’s First Nation heritage. That alone shows the difference between the government, and the Aboriginals living on reservations. The difference between First Nations and the Canadian government, in this case, quite aptly shows their relations of power. “Those in society with the most power – however defined- are in the strongest position to define the realities of difference and thereby create and recreate systems of dominance and power that determine where and how important resources like income, wealth, and access to education and health care are distributed” (Perry, 2011, p.24) Which means that the powerful Canadian government can oppress the minority Native Indians living on reserves through this very controlling legislature. Moreover, the language isn’t quite right either. To elaborate, the use of the word ‘Indian’ is commonly seen as derogatory. This may be obvious bigotry, which is “…the derogatory language that is
In the books, Contract and Conflict: Indian European Relations in British Columbia, 1774-1890, by Robin Fisher (1977) and First Nations Identity and Reserve Life The Mikmaq of Nova Scotia, by Simone Pollandri (2011) explains the struggles of Indigenous Peoples suffered through in Canada. To the settlers, they were considered a problem in society, an obstacle that requires immediate attention to change their cultures and views. Since the time of Confederation for Canada, much of Indigenous Peoples were forcefully pushed to live in reserves and their rights stripped from them. Both texts expresses the great struggles Indigenous Peoples still have towards living in such an environment. In Sean Carleton’s article, Colonizing Minds: Public Education,
The Indian Act is a combination of multiple legislations regarding the Aboriginal people who reside across Canada, such as the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act of 1869 (Hanson, n.p.). The Gradual Civilization Act was the Canadian government's attempt to assimilate the aboriginals into the Canadian society in a passive manner, through a method they encouraged called Enfranchisement. Enfranchisement is basically a legal process that allows aboriginals to give up their aboriginal status and accept a Canadian status (Crey, n.p.). This process, while under the Gradual Civilization Act, was still voluntary, but became a forced process when the Indian Act was consolidated in 1876 (Hanson, n.p.). The Gradual Enfranchisement Act introduced in 1869 was a major legislation that intruded with the private lives of the aboriginals. First, it established the “elective band council system” (Hanson, n.p.) that grants th...
Under no circumstances does Harper echo the justifications that his forefathers gave for the lack of humanity with which the native populations were treated. In fact, he outright addresses those who claimed the program to be of help by stating, “While some former students have spoken positively about their experiences…, these stories are far overshadowed by tragic accounts of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse”. Additionally, he utilizes negative language when referring to the past mistakes of Canada. He frequently compares the events that occurred as a “tragedy” and also takes the firm stance that the practices of his predecessors were inexcusable. He accomplishes this by recognizing that the “policy of assimilation was wrong, [had] caused great harm, and [had] no place in [their] country.” Moreover, Harper outlines the ways Canada is reforming and aiding the peoples who they previously harmed with the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission by “educating all Canadian on the Indian Residential Schools System” in an attempt to mend the broken relationship. Contrast this with the views of the previous Canadian government who Indian Reservations as “‘Joint-Ventures’ with Anglican, Catholic, Presbyterian, [and] United Churches”. This only serves to underscore the fact that Canadians viewed these people and their cultures as nothing more
The 1884 amendments to the Indian Act served as a particularly important impetus for growth. On the one hand, they made boarding school attendance mandatory for Native children less than 16 years of age. On the other hand, the revised Act gave authorities the power to arrest, transport and detain children at school, while parents who refused to cooperate faced fines and imprisonment (Claes and Clifton, 1998).
“If anything is to be done with the Indian, we must catch him very young. The children must be kept constantly within the circle of civilized conditions.” Nicholas Flood Davin,” From 1831 to 1969 more than 150,000 aboriginal children were forced into Indian Residential Schools. The government of Canada used this system to assimilate young aboriginal children. The government and many churches joined to run these schools. Indian Residential Schools were one of the biggest stains in Canadian history because they violated human rights, tried to eliminate aboriginal culture and created the lasting effects which are still felt today.