Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Calvinism vs arminianism thesis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Calvinism vs arminianism thesis
Grace, Faith, Freewill is a book that was written by Robert E. Picirilli. In the forward, he expresses that his purpose, in composing this book, was to explain Calvinism and Arminianism, and their positions in order, “to help readers intelligently decide for themselves”, which one is correct (i). As a result, the author writes thirteen chapters, which are divided into five sections dealing with the matter of Calvinism and Arminianism.
The first section, of this book, is labeled the historical setting, which contains only the first chapter. The author states that chapter one is “a ‘historical theology’ treatment of the issues that divide Calvinists and Arminians” (3). The author summarizes the life of Arminius, which includes his childhood, education, occupations, and death (4-17). The author also gives explicated details surrounding Arminius objection to the doctrine of Calvinism (6-15).
The book’s second section is labeled the plan of salvation, and it contains chapters two through four. Section two deals with the decrees of God, which is the decisions God made before creation concerning salvation (19). In chapter two, the author expounds on the Calvinistic view, which dealt with the concept of God, man, and salvation (21-23). The author also defines predestination in the positive, which is the “election to salvation”, and the negative, which is the “by- passing of regenerating” (27-31).
The third chapter, the author explains the doctrines that Calvinism and Arminianism agrees on, and disagrees on (35-43). The author then defines that the elect are people who believe in Christ, and that the reprobation consists of people who have chosen not to believe (48). He states that the differences between Calvinism and Arminianism...
... middle of paper ...
...to write about apostasy, but with the goal of using Hebrews and Second Peter to prove the correctness of the doctrine of apostasy (211). Therefore, the author states the context, theme, and structure of Hebrews, with the goal of discovering the meaning of Hebrews 6:4-6. (211). He concludes his study of Hebrews; by stating, “personal apostasy from a truly regenerate condition really is possible and recovery from it impossible” (228). He then reveals after presenting information about Second Peter, that Peter also believed in apostasy (229-232).
In the conclusion of this book, the author restates in simply words what Calvinism and Arminianism believe. In his words, he states that Calvinism, “sees salvation by election without regard to any decision by man” and Arminianism views salvation through God’s grace, which enables man to put his faith in Him (235).
Calvinism taught the doctrine of determinism — that God holds absolute sovereignty over passive men; in contrast, Arminianism rejected this and presented a doctrine of free will that gave the individual personal responsibility for his or her salvation. People believed that sin was voluntary and could be rooted out of society, once acknowledged; as a result, people began to take personal responsibility for their actions and recognize their responsibility to improve society. Desire for personal redemption from sin arose from Arminianism, which taught that moral depravity was the choice of
With this in mind, the objective of this essay is to focus on the main ideas of each theologian, and discuss how each theologian’s ideas are compensatory to the other. This is important because even though each theologian’s writings were inspired by the harsh realities of the societies, and also by the effect each writer experienced in their moment in history, their critiques specifically of Christian institutions remain a consistent amongst all three writings. Furthermore, not only are their critiques consistent, but their goals for providing new frameworks for the future of the Church and Christian discipleship are consistent as well.
This paper will outline specific points in Saint Augustine’s Confessions that highlight religious views following the fall of Rome. Though Augustines views on religion may not reflect that of most people in his time period, it still gives valuable insight into how many, namely Neoplatonists,, viewed God and his teachings.
In I.17.1 of John Calvin’s work, Calvin argues that people do not need to worry about anything they do not understand because God takes care of everything. It is important to understand that this is not the beginning of Calvin’s Institutes of Christian Religion, because his points in chapter sixteen set the basis for his argument in this next section. Chapter sixteen on providence gives the foundation of
The revivalist contradicted Calvinism to encourage people who listens to investigate the evangelical preaching which the behavior would help the God’s saving grace. Evangelical preaching experiences a petitioner through a despair to understand the divine of grace. People had to fake their sense of security in a good behavior to recognize the helplessness without God. The radicals thought that the churches brought heaven to earth while dissolving the sense of all social distinctions and the moderates hadn’t bargain an unleashed poor educated prisoner to find out their own radical churches while the radical guarded the revivals as their incredible work of God but they regretted their incidental side effects. The radical appeal to free choices of separations and itinerants they were miles away from celebrating individualism.
In our reading on Discourse of Free Will, we get a good idea of the opinions both Erasmus and Luther had on the topic of free will and the how it correlates with God’s grace. Once we look beyond the back and forth debate of this text, we will begin to look at their theological opinions on free will separately to find a better understanding and formulate our own opinions on this commonly debated topic.
A Christian apologetic method is a verbal defense of the biblical worldview. A proof is giving a reason for why we believe. This paper will address the philosophical question of God’s existence from the moral argument. The presuppositional apologetic method of Reformed thinkers Cornelius Van Til and John Frame will be the framework. Topics covered here could undoubtedly be developed in more depth, but that would be getting ahead, here is the big picture.
As part of revivals in Christian faith during 18th century onward three practices evolved into their own interpretation on the place and authority of Scripture in the Christian faith. The first of these were the Liberals who “viewed themselves as the saviors of a defunct out of date Christianity” (Bingham 149). Their founder, Friedrich Schleiermacher an 18th century pastor, “did not view traditional, authoritative doctrines, creeds and biblical texts as the preeminent sources in theology (150). Instead the Liberal perspective of Christianity put more emphasis on the doctrines of sin and grace and less attention on the holiness of the trinity (Kerr 213). Jesus was viewed as a historical figure that we can learn from spiritually and the Bible is used as a source of knowledge on Christian history (Bingham 152, 153). In this theological movement being a Christian is considered “nothing but feeling and experience” (Lane 238).
John Hus’s humble beginnings hardly reflect the impact that he would later have on modern day Christianity and the reformation process that would occur within the Church. Yet, his upbringing and early career are an essential part of his legacy, and provide indications of what was to come. John Hus was born in Bohemia, which is located in what is now the Czech Republic. His family was not wealthy but Hus was known for being virtuous, and having a strong set of morals instilled within him, so his decision to study Religion at the University of Prague did not come as a surprise. He received his ...
The Christian religion means salvation to some and to others it is only something that only resides in the thoughts of the people of that society. A Marxist would tell you that true salvation could only be achieved here on earth by working. Salvation is something that all would hope would be in the future for themselves. In this paper we have examined two differing opinions on how salvation can be achieved one was through religion and the other was the socialist way of life. The argument between societies about religion will not be settled here on earth. Who is right and who is wrong in the argument about religion? Is religion just a figment of our imagination, is it something humans made up to make us feel good about the future and our salvation. Or are the Marxists wrong, could religion be everything it is meant to be in the Christian religion. Could religion be the real salvation? These are great questions to ponder and talk about.
Much like many of the other reformers, his beliefs coexisted with Martin Luther’s. Lutheranism began to lose its momentum and Calvin kept the reformation alive through his new doctrines. God has eternal selection, which is where predestination and the elect come from. It tries to justify why some people are good and others bad, that not every soul can be saved. “By predestination we mean the eternal degree of God . . . all are not created on equal terms . . . some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation . . . predestinated to life or to death . . .” (Calvin). This gives God a new authority and keeps the reformation alive for Protestantism to
Pope John Paul II once said, “Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth; and God has placed in the human heart a desire to know the truth – in a word, to know himself – so that, by knowing and loving God, men and women may also come to the fullness of truth about themselves.” (Fallible Blogma) Based on this significant and powerful quote, one can infer that faith and reason are directly associated and related. It can also be implied that the combination of faith and reason allows one to seek information and knowledge about truth and God; based on various class discussions and past academic teachings, it is understood that both faith and reason are the instruments that diverse parties are supposed to use on this search for truth and God. There are many stances and viewpoints on the issues of faith and reason. Some believe that both of these ideas cannot and should not be combined; these parties deem that faith and reason must be taken as merely separate entities. However, this writer does not understand why both entities cannot be combined; both terms are so closely compatible that it would make sense to combine the two for a common task. Based on various class discussions and readings, there are many philosophers and theologians who have certain opinions regarding faith, reason and their compatibility; these philosophers include Hildegard of Bingen, Ibn Rushd, Moses Maimonides, and St. Thomas Aquinas. The following essay will examine each of the previously stated philosopher’s viewpoints on faith and reason, and will essentially try to determine whether or not faith and reason are ultimately one in the same.
The central assertion of Calvinism canons is that God is able to save from the tyranny of sin, from guilt and the fear of death, every one of those upon whom he is willing to have mercy. God is not frustrated by the unrighteousness or the inability of men because it is the unrighteous and the helpless that he intends to save. In Calvinism man, in his state of innocency, had freedom and power to will and to do that, which is good and well pleasing to God; but yet mutably, so that he might fall from it. This concept of free choice makes Calvinism to stand supreme among all the religious systems of the world. The great men of our country often were members of Calvinist Church. We had the number of Presbyterian presidents, legislators, jurists, authors, editors, teachers and businessmen. The revolutionary principles of republican liberty and self-government, taught and embodied in ...
The doctrine of salvation contains various aspects. The intent of this research paper is to provide a general overview of salvation from the angle of justification, propitiation, grace, redemption, and sanctification.
This ideology greatly differs from Luther, Carlstadt, and Zwingli, as their beliefs were that by faith alone salvation could be obtained, where no mention of predestination is referred. However, though Calvin’s predestination theory was widely dissimilar than Luther, Carlstadt, and Zwingli, his view of people not being able gain salvation by deeds done in the temporal world are reaffirmed in his writings are reform doctrine (The European Sourcebook, 165-167). Calvin’s goal was in efforts to control the morals normed by scripture and to condemn anything remotely considered blasphemy or Catholic in their origin. Calvinism has been considered closely related to Puritanism given that Calvin ideology was to repress lewd or indecent human behavior inevitably calling for proper less freeing behavior. Despite Calvin’s strict regulations of social and behavioral norm accepted Calvin appealed to helping people socially that later would equate to a Godly