Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Part 1 historical development of welfare
Essay on history of welfare
Essay on history of welfare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Government welfare was created to help people who were struggling get back on their feet again. People now abuse this privilege that was meant for good. People expect the government to give them food stamps, free health care, and other necessities of life. By doing this, tax dollars of the working class are taking care of people who will not work. To solve this problem, welfare should be temporary not permanent, prove you are looking for a job, have random drug screenings, and work in community service in exchange for welfare. Although government welfare can be a great resource to those in need, there needs to be restrictions and limits put on it so it will not be abused.
It is believed that welfare began after the Great Depression. During
…show more content…
this time, poverty was at an extreme low. As a result, President Franklin D. Roosevelt put in place an act that is now known as social security, and from there the welfare system began to expand with different programs. (“Welfare”) As you may see, welfare was meant for people in poverty or hard times to have the opportunity to get back on their feet again, but now it is being abused. The federal government is the one who supplies the funds for welfare programs. According to this article, welfare is given to families who live in poverty or make around 10,000 dollars a year. Food stamps, Medicaid, and direct cash payments are the most common welfare programs. These programs are all provided by the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). (“Welfare”) Welfare can be one of America’s greatest failures if we allow it to be. “It replaces the natural, productive change of labor and ideas with an artificial system of resource distribution.” This has made people lazy and taught them you do not have to contribute to society. “People have little reason to work for things they get for free, so an endless supply of free things will perpetually prevent people from realizing their ability to improve their lives through the work of their own hands.” This makes sense because, it is human nature to take the easy way out of problems. “Society as a whole is robbed of the accomplishments that are never accomplished by the men and women of absolute destitution.” “And sadly, American society as a whole is generally inclined to accept this preposterous thought as well.” (“Welfare Can Not End Cycle Of Poverty In U.S.”) To end the abuse of welfare, people should have to pass a drug test. As of now, welfare recipients do not have to pass a drug test to receive help. West Virginia delegate, Craig Blair, says that all welfare recipients should have to take drug test to receive any help and if they continue to test positive after two months, they should lose any help their receiving. Mele Carrol, from Hawaii, said that drug testing would make families more accountable. (“States Consider Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients”) Another solution to cut back on the abuse of welfare is to prove you are trying to find a job and to make it temporary instead of permanent.
A very good program that supports this is called the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families or TANF. The primary goal of TANF is to create employment opportunities for parents of needy children, so that these families will no longer be dependent on federal assistance. TANF also helps people find work. “It promotes job opportunities through skill assessment programs, employment training programs, and assistance with job placement.” TANF not only focuses on finding jobs, it helps recipients with marriage and pregnancy issues and focuses on maintaining a secure family life. TANF has certain limits of assistance that an individual or a family can receive. The TANF requires recipients to find work as soon as possible. “If a TANF recipient has not found a job within two years of first qualifying for assistance, their benefits are terminated.” “That said, TANF recipients are eligible to receive additional assistance in the event they become unemployed again, although the maximum lifetime duration of benefits is five years per family.” (“Temporary Assistance to Needy …show more content…
Families”) As you may see, there are many ways to cut back on the abuse of welfare, but it is up to the people to take a stand.
Welfare was meant for good, to help individuals and families who are less fortunate than most get back on their feet so they may have a prosperous future. Our society has strayed away from these principles. Welfare has turned into a necessity for most. It is used as an easy way out and allows people to lose the initiative to work because they know the government will take care of them. If we continue to let this go on, the minority will be taking care of the majority and our great country, which was built on the principle of hard work, will economically fall. It is up to the American people if welfare destroys our country.
“States Consider Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients.” Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly 21.8 (2009): 4-6 Academic Search Premir. Web. 28 Sept. 2015
“Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.” Everyday Finance: Economics, Personal money management, and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 2. Detroit: Gale 2008. 514-516. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 28 Sept. 2015
“Welfare.” Everyday Finance: Economics, Personal money management, and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 1 Detroit; Gale, 2008. 263-265, Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 24 Sept. 2015
“Welfare Can Not End Cycle Of Poverty In U.S.” UWIRE Text 13 Nov. 2014: 1. General Onefile. Web. 25 Sept.
2015
Another resource that has had a positive impact was the daycare. Adrielys was able to take her son to a daycare for just $5 a week. That helped her get a job and support her family in
O?Beirne, Kate. ?The State of Welfare: An old and tricky question resurfaces.? National Review 54.2 (February 11, 2002): 1--2. Online. Information Access Expanded
One of the most prominent concerns of Evicted is the issue of inescapable financial instability as it relates to eviction. In the very first few pages of the book, Desmond reveals that the majority of poor renting families in America spend over 50% of their income on housing, with an even more astonishing one in four spending over 70% of their income on it (4). When families are spending the majority of their already meager income on housing alone, it is no surprise that they have little money left for savings or self-betterment programs such as a college education. Compounded with this is the fact that some welfare systems are constructed in a way that discourages long-term financial responsibility. For example, Supplemental Security Income, a program that provides monthly stipends for low-income elderly or disabled individuals, is revoked if individuals have too much money in their bank account (217). For
"States Consider drug testing for Welfare recipients." Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Weekly 21.8 (2009): 4-6. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 04 Feb. 2011
, implying that because they are poor, they must be drug addicts. However, individuals that support the law, express that the plan being put in effect is to ensure that tax payer’s money isn’t being thrown away on people who only plan to abuse this assistance. Out of the fifty states, only nine have proceeded with the drug testing of candidates. The drug testing has proven to be quite expensive. Consequently, some of the states only test subjects with whom they find suspicion, or that have admitted to drug use in the past. Though the proposal of drug testing Welfare applicants appears to be a good idea to weed out spongers from getting assistance, it seems that more money may be wasted on the testing itself, which would be imprudent in proving this law worthwhile.
There has been many cases of fraud that people have lied about housing and unemployment. This leads to questionable debate whether recipients should be drug tested or not. In North Carolina a law has been passes for all of the recipients getting assistance must be drug tested. (Parker 1) “For example, according to The Associated Press, Utah saved $350,000 in its first year of drug-screening welfare applicants, though it found only about 12 people who tested positive” (Parker 1). Many states have questioned this new law to be passed or not because it may save the government money in the long run.
In today’s America, there are many people who would either be disgusted at the very mention of Welfare or be highly grateful for its existence. I believe that in order for welfare to be more effective in America, there must be reform. From the time of its inceptions in 1935, welfare has lent a helping hand to many in crisis (Constitution Rights Foundation). However, at present many programs within the system are being abused and the people who are in real need are being cheated out of assistance. The year after the creation of welfare unemployment was just about twenty percent (Unemployment Statistics). The need for basic resources to survive was unparallel. Today, many people face the same needs as many did during the 30s. Some issues with
Should Welfare Recipients Be Tested for Drugs? U.S News & World Report. 2014: Pgs 1-2.
There is an ongoing debate over whether or not welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive the benefits. Both sides of the argument have merit. Those who oppose the idea of drug testing say that it is unconstitutional and violates the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, they claim that this law stereotypes and discriminates against those from low socioeconomic demographics, implying that because they are poor, they must be drug addicts. However, those who support the law note that its intended purpose is to ensure that taxpayer money is not being squandered on people who only plan to abuse this assistance. Only nine states so far have instituted drug testing of candidates for welfare assistance. This drug testing has proven to be prohibitively expensive in many cases. Consequently, some states only test subjects with whom they find suspicion, or who have admitted to past drug use. Though proposed drug testing of welfare applicants initially appears to be a good idea to eliminate potential abusers of the system from receiving assistance, it appears that even more money may be wasted on the testing process, which negates the savings that are the primary objective of the law.
The United States is sometimes described as a “reluctant welfare state.” I agree with this statement. Too often there are programs created by our government that, although may be lined with good intentions, end up failing in their main purpose. The government may, and hopefully does, seek to help its citizens. However, by applying unreasonable qualifying or maintenance criteria, or too many restrictions that bar people from even receiving aid at all, they end up with many more problems than solutions.
Issitt, Micah L., and Flynn, Dr. “Welfare: An Overview.” Points of View Reference Center. Great Neck Publishing, 2013. Web. 6 Feb. 2014. .
"Preface to 'What Are Some Alternatives and Improvements to the Welfare System?'." Welfare. Ed. Margaret Haerens. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.
Welfare is purely used just to help people get back on their feet until they can find a stable job that will help them provide for themselves and their family. People never use it to just feed off of government money so they do not have to work or try to find a jobs. This is never a cop out for not getting a college education. Because of welfare, America has no need to look for other ways to help the unemployed. It is completely unreasonable to think of programs that include job training for people who did not go to college or maybe never graduated from college but still have families that they need to provide for. That could maybe be a great solution; or it could go terribly wrong because nothing could ever replace how perfectly welfare works. Welfare is also pretty much ethically perfect, right? We give money to the people who can not get it for themselves. But, what if we taught them how to make money for themselves so they could be self-sufficient? No that’s a terrible idea, job training would never
Imagine yourself living on $14,000 each year under the poverty line. One might have trouble paying for child care, medical assistance, or even feeding their own children. One might struggle in finding a stable job or have a difficult time paying for social security income. The following paper will discuss, how welfare and poverty have affected the United States, what type of people are affected in the process, and how one can help provide cash payments for needy families who are under the given poverty line.