Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of the government in the economy
Role of the government in the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of the government in the economy
The ability for a country to stabilize an economy is important for a country to survive. The economy of a country is either in an expansionary period or a contractual period or recession. Hall, R & Taylor, J (1993, p.257) identify two ways that the government can regulate the economy by either a monetary policy, adjusting the supply of money, or a fiscal policy. A fiscal policy is the policy of the government to control either government spending or taxation. Government spending includes changes in government purchases or transfer payments. Mansfield, E (1992) describes transfer payments as non-productive transaction in that the payment is made with no contribution by receiver. The ability to raise or lower taxes will affect the amount …show more content…
In order to accomplish this the government could slow down government purchases as well as decrease transfer payments. A decrease in government spending would have a decrease in the GDP. Rittenberg, L. & Tregarthen, T. teaches us that Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is equal to consumption + investment + government purchases + net exports. With a decrease in transfer payments such as unemployment or welfare would also lead to a decrease in available money for consumption. With the period of expansion, we are experiencing in America the need for government transferees of unemployment pay have decreased with the increase in employment. Some transfer payments, such as unemployment pay, are automatic adjusters that kick in if unemployment rises. The government could decide to extend benefits to help spur the economy. When America needs to slow down inflation a decrease in transfer payments will lead to a reduction in spending. Consumer spending, or consumption is the first factor of calculating GDP. A decrease in consumption causes a decrease of GDP reducing the …show more content…
During a period of expansion, like the one we are going through, businesses and individuals are enjoying the benefits of tax breaks and lower taxes. In order to slow down an inflation the government could reduce or eliminate tax breaks to businesses. This move would cost private business more money reducing the money that have available for investments. A reduction in investments would cause a decrease in the GDP. Another side effect of businesses having to pay more in taxes may reduce production. If products produced were exports this could also affect net exports. Just as tax breaks help to cause in inflation in the economy a reduction in the tax breaks will cause a deflation in the economy. Similar to business taxes changes in income taxes has an effect on the economy. During our period of expansion in America we have enjoyed lower income taxes creating more income for consumers. To slow an expansion the government can increase the taxes on individuals and consumers. The increase in taxes will create less income for consumption, less consumption would cause the GDP to decrease slowing the economy. The old saying “it’s time to pay the fiddler” characterizes the enjoyment of expansion and government spending. The money the government spends on government purchases and transfer payments will need to be paid back. One way to pay
Throughout Eveline Adomait and Richard Maranta’s Dinner Party Economics there is continuous discussion surrounding the problems that economies face around the world and the various methods that can be used to alter the state of the current economic conditions. Changes in consumer spending patterns can become a problem for the economy as a whole, potentially resulting in over-inflation or recession. Implementing discretionary policies such as monetary policy through changing interest rates, and fiscal policy through taxation and government spending, makes it possible to fix these economic problems.
In Keynesianism, government uses fiscal policy, which is a list of policies that government spending and taxing can be used to improve the performance of an economy. The government produces stabilization by taxing and spending yearly plans. Taxing can occur when inflation is high, and lowering taxes tends to occur during a high percentage of unemployment. By lowering taxes, it increases disposable income or the amount of income that goes to financial responsibilities. When people have more money, they are able to spend more, which in return goes into jump starting the economy.
The government’s revenue comes from taxes. When the economy is doing well, the money keeps moving within the economy. The more transactions within the economy, the more revenue the government can make. This is the case with sales taxes and other trade and commerce related taxes. The government also takes in much of its revenue from property taxes. If the economy is doing well it is likely that more citizens will own property instead of rent. When the economy is not doing well, the money stops moving and the government may not collect as many taxes.
Our Preamble lists five main goals that are required to help create a strong and stable society within our country. However, money is required in order to achieve these goals. We get this money from the Federal Budget which is the yearly amount we receive in order to better our country. The question here is, are we slicing the pie correctly in relation to the federal budget? In each of three budget clusters, the U.S Government should make adjustments in the way it is distributing money by making changes involving the Big Five, the Middle Five, and the Little Guys.
While this would normally pose a problem to the federal budget, it will not due to current conditions. The amount of money formerly spent on national security, meaning military and defense spending has been severely reduced (Albertson, 139). This frees up a large amount of money to be used for other goals. These goals should be those of improving the standard of living for each and every American and not the immediate reduction of taxes, a goal which many members of the Republican party would like to see pursued. The programs initiated under the policies of the New Deal and Fair Deal should not simply be maintained, instead they should be expanded upon.
Yes, it will increase inflation but create more job opportunities and unemployment will decrease if government intervention occurs. Yes in the long run this might be bad but people care about tomorrow more than they care about 3 or 4 years from now or even more. As Lord Keynes once said “in the long run we are all dead”.
This essay seeks to explain what are monetary and fiscal policy and their roles and contribution to the economy. This includes the role of the government in regulating the economical performance of a country. It also explains the different features and tools of monetary and fiscal policy and their performance when applied to the third world countries with a huge informal sector.
The term Monetary policy refers to the method through which a country’s monetary authority, such as the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England control money supply for the aim of promoting economic stability and growth and is primarily achieved by the targeting of various interest rates. Monetary policy may be either contractionary or expansionary whereby a contractionary policy reduces the money supply, reduces the rate at which money is supplied or sets about an increase in interest rates. Expansionary policies on the other hand increase the supply of money or lower the interest rates. Interest rates may also be referred to as tight if their aim is to reduce inflation; neutral, if their aim is neither inflation reduction nor growth stimulation; or, accommodative, if aimed at stimulating growth. Monetary policies have a great impact on the economic stability of a country and if not well formulated, may lead to economic calamities (Reinhart & Rogoff, 2013). The current monetary policy of the United States Federal Reserve while being accommodative and expansionary so as to stimulate growth after the 2008 recession, will lead to an economic pitfall if maintained in its current state. This paper will examine this current policy, its strengths and weaknesses as well as recommendations that will ensure economic stability.
The use of taxes is one of the government's favorite ways to make its presence known in the economy. While this method seems blatantly obvious, many of the ways the government uses the money collected by taxation is not. Some of the money it takes is used to fund other programs designed to "protect" consumers and to "create" jobs. Be...
The cost of living rises with rising taxes, which might push more people into poverty, defeating the original purpose of raising taxes. Then in addition to increased poverty, this can result in high unemployment rates as well . With higher taxes, the economy slows down as consumers spend less because they have less disposable income. This is particularly true in the case of so-called "luxury" goods, such as high-priced cars, jewelry, and other such goods.
...the recipients of these tax cuts may not spend the money. The tax cut may though increase the wealth of recipients but they may not spend money due to low marginal propensity to consume. The recipient of the tax cut may decide to save the extra amount of money rather than spending it. Without the expenditure there will be no income generated so this may not simulate the growth of entire economy.
Some people assume obtaining decreased taxes will conceive more mid and high paying jobs and that cutting taxes could cause an escalation for the government's revenue. This way of thinking is understandable because having an expansion of revenue for the government can go towards the national debt or public services. However, in order to accomplish these tax cuts there will be enormous spending cuts and can result in a worse situation. In 1981 and 2001 both Reagan and Bush, former presidents, passed tremendous tax cuts which resulted in extra deficits and higher debt (Winegarden). There is no evidence that tax cuts spur growth in our economy according to a new study by the Congressional Research Service, but there is evidence throughout the years of tax cuts damaging the growth (Blodget). Tax cuts can create extra jobs, but corporations will experience spending cuts throughout their company and
The appropriate role of government in the economy consists of six major functions of interventions in the markets economy. Governments provide the legal and social framework, maintain competition, provide public goods and services, national defense, income and social welfare, correct for externalities, and stabilize the economy. The government also provides polices that help support the functioning of markets and policies to correct situations when the market fails. As well as, guiding the overall pace of economic activity, attempting to maintain steady growth, high levels of employment, and price stability. By applying the fiscal policy which adjusts spending and tax rates or monetary policy which manage the money supply and control the use of credit, it can slow down or speed up the economy's rate of growth in the process, affecting the level of prices and employment to increase or decrease.
While the Classical model stresses that markets will always perfectly clear and government should do nothing more than safeguard the functioning of these market processes Keynes argues that markets need to helped with a combination of monetary and fiscal policies. The question remains, how effective is government spending in curbing periods of disequilibrium in the economy? References Monetary Neutrality, “Economics A-Z.” Retrieved from The Economist database on 13/01/2008 at Mundell, R. “International Economics.” New York: Macmillan, 1968. Shaw, G., McCrostie, J. & Greenway, D. “Macroeconomics: Theory and Policy in the UK.”
If taxes are raised strong businesses will leave the country and find a place where the taxes are less. They would not find it fair that they have to pay more because of their hard work. Then if they do not pay it there will be issues with the government and things can get out of hand. Other places would get credit for their smart inventions and those places would make more money. There is no point to raise taxes and have smart people or big business leave to be successful somewhere else.