Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The qualities that make a hero
Characteristics that make a person a hero
The qualities that make a hero
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The qualities that make a hero
“Don’t be so humble—you are not that great”: an iconic line from one of the pioneering women in 20th-century politics, Golda Meir. As one of Israel’s leading founders and its “Iron Lady”, Meir was an exceptional woman who, despite her faltering health, intently led her country through struggles and discord. Since adolescence, she had been involved in Zionist movement groups, and throughout her career, she played a major role in the creation of the country we now know as Israel. In 1969, after retreating into retirement twice, Meir took charge as Israel’s first female Prime Minister. Her leadership throughout her four-year term illustrated her dedication to her country and prowess in political and social activism. Golda Meir, who took it upon …show more content…
herself to create and unite her country, embodied all the characteristics of a hero. She risked her life many times to bring success to Israel, leading the state through countless uncompromising political strains, and was dedicated to helping her people. The tireless attitude she bore aided her in the difficult journey, for no matter what others thought, Meir stood by her actions and waved away the scathing eyes of society to build her own story and legacy, one which lives on to this day. Golda Meir exemplified a true hero; she was strictly dedicated to her ambitions, tireless when it came to aiding others, and always obstinate in her choices. Meir continuously utilized her drive and dedication to realize her dreams, but still faced many social handicaps throughout her career. When she became more involved in her career, she felt guilty for not being the ideal wife and mother, often worrying that “she had not done enough for her children.” However, she noted that “there is a type of woman who cannot let her husband and children narrow her horizons” (Pogrebin) and realized she was one of those women. Accepting this, she quickly moved up the ranks and eventually became an executive member of the council. Though both her husband and society pushed for her to be the picture-perfect wife, Meir broke past the boundaries of the stereotype, refusing to let anyone “narrow her horizons”, and remained devoted to her career. She pursued her goals with the utmost diligence and eventually created a name for herself in the world of politics; defying imposed stereotypes to chase her dreams and focus on her own passions illustrated her firm dedication. Additionally, in her autobiography, Meir expressed her love for retirement, stating that “for the first time in years, [she] was free—to do [her] own shopping, to use public transportation… most of all, to call [her] time [her] own” (Meir, 350). She was content with her simple and quiet lifestyle after retirement, even commenting that she felt like “a prisoner released from jail” (Meir, 350). Regardless of her pleasure and satisfaction, Meir rose from her peaceful retirement to answer her country’s call for guidance, illustrating her resolve and passion for her people. Giving up her “newfound tranquility” (Meir, 350) for the sake of her country paints her in a heroic light, and her unwavering commitment stands tall as one of her many heroic qualities. Meir was also an indefatigable character with a spirited persona; in fact, even in the face of old age, she continued to direct her country through struggles and conflicts.
In 1966, she relinquished her title as the Minister of Foreign Affairs, as she was “tired and ill... However, soon after, she agreed to take over the leadership of Israel's Labor party [and] succeeded in the next two years” (Golda). She went into retirement for the second time in August 1968, but soon after, in March 1969, she assumed the post of Israel's Prime Minister. Meir stepped up from retirement to guide and unite her country, doing so through hard work and determination. Out of her love for the country, she led Israel through political strains and an unforgiving war, all as a 70-year-old woman in deteriorating health. This leadership demonstrated an indefatigable persona not often found in many people. Evidently, her persistence and actions embody the quality of a true hero: tireless determination. In addition, after “half a century of toil,” Meir also brought about “a glorious system of labor legislation in the spheres of social security, vocational training, protection of working women and children, days of rest, and other workers' benefits” (Medzini). Though watched by scornful eyes, Meir worked tirelessly throughout her entire career. She labored with the utmost determination, eventually bringing about a wave of changes to Israel. In her half a century of labor, Meir displayed a dynamic persona that helped develop and strengthen her country. She worked tenaciously to unite the labor forces of the country, her unshakable resilience exemplifying an admirable character—a true
hero. With an adamant attitude and a strong mindset, Meir was also an obstinate woman who never let her dissenters drag her down; likewise, she refused to let her parents impede her path to her goals. Despite her father’s protests, Meir enrolled in high school, responsibly taking on jobs to pay her expenses. However, her father still disapproved, so she “ran away to live with her sister… where she attended school and spent her evenings listening to anarchists, Socialist Zionists, and Labor Zionists whose debates helped refine [her] political philosophy” (Pogrebin). In Meir’s time, marriage was often the priority for many families, but for her, this was not the case. Regardless of her father’s wish for her to marry, she was insistent on pursuing a higher education. She defied her father’s wishes and was stubborn in her ambitions, which ultimately led to her running away to pursue her goals. She yearned to be a teacher—intelligent, caring—and refused to let anyone sway her decision. Unyielding when it came to her dreams, Meir displayed a resolute attitude that paints her as an unwavering, headstrong figure, exemplifying the disposition of a hero. Furthermore, when the Jewish Agency leaders were interned, Meir was “appointed acting head of the Jewish Agency's political department [and] continued in this position until the proclamation of the independence of Israel on May 14, 1948, [when] she was among the signers of its declaration of independence” (Golda). Even without her seniors to guide her, Golda Meir remained committed to her mission and refused to let authorities stop her from completing her goals. She remained unyielding, stepping up to take on even more demanding roles to fulfill her duties, and maintained a stubborn fortitude that allowed her to push through the eyes of society. Golda Meir exhibited the qualities of a hero, whether it be through her personal struggles, political choices, or her love for her nation. Like any hero is, she was dedicated, tireless, and obstinate in her choices. Her rigorous work ethic illustrated how passionate she was about her purpose, and her leadership exemplified her indefatigability, no matter what obstacles she faced. As a politician, she was hard headed and meticulous in her work, and as a person, she was caring and persistent. She harbored an intense love for her people and, through labor and tenacity, was able to realize her dreams. Her actions illustrate that in addition to being a hero, Golda Meir was an admirable and altruistic character as well.
... fighting for a Jewish cause. This book carefully examines exactly how much Wald distanced herself from her Jewish heritage. Marjorie N. Feld did a wonderful job of portraying Wald as not only a strong, independent woman, but firm in her belief of universalism not particularism. Although the book is written in a highly academic format Feld was able to give the story of Lillian Wald in a matter that allows all who read it to appreciate and understand her work. Wald is the kind of woman all people should hope to meet in their life. After a few pages readers will find themselves intrigued at how well the book was written, Feld inserts quotations from Wald herself that quickly and concisely show the kind of woman she was. This book should be read by anyone who has an interest in the progressive era, women’s rights, or simply the rights of all the world’s diverse people.
In the “Declaration of Conscience,” Margaret Chase Smith addresses the American public and the United States Senate during a time of political unrest. Communist accusations and a “national feeling of fear” has brought upon this speech. Even with an upcoming election, the Republican Party decides a freshman woman senator would speak to the public, an uncommon practice at the time . In this paper, I will argue that Margaret Chase Smith’s “Declaration of Conscience” proves her credibility as a woman politician. Smith uses a masculine tone, simple diction, and repetition to prove to Americans and the Senate that she is a strong political figure.
I am choosing to write my essay focusing on Nancy Pelosi, arguably one of the most influential politicians of her time, and certainly one of the outstanding ladies of the political world. Not only was she the first woman to serve as Speaker of the House, she also was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame at Seneca Falls. She ranks with the most consequential speakers, certainly in the last 75 years.”(Burstyn) Nancy Pelosi was born on March 26th in 1940 and she has represented San Francisco for approximately 29 years. This however is not by far her most notable achievement, speaker of the house aside, under her guidance the 111th US Congress was said to be the most productive in the history of its conception. This means that she was able to oversee the 111th Congress in a manner that minimized the terrible three, collective action problems, commitment problems, and coordination problems. These problems all come down to the inability to make decisions, and are extremely ponderous to efficiency. She ran it as famously, even though the house was so divided when she took the pos...
Sorensen, Aja, Rosie the Riveter: Women Working during World War II. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/pwro/collection/website/rosie.htm, (n.d.)
To become the first to hold a position is a tremendous accomplishment; However, it is also something that may come with extra criticism and possibly scorn. Sandra Day O’Connor was the first woman to become a Supreme Court Justice. She was a remarkable person, born on March 26, 1930 in Texas. She began her education by attending Stanford and majoring in economics, then recognizing her interest in law, she returned to Stanford, and completed law school in two years as opposed to the standard three, finally graduating in 1952. After struggling to find work, O’Connor served as a civilian lawyer in the Quartermaster’s Corps in Germany, with her husband John Jay O’Connor. For six years following this, she worked as a stay at home mom raising her three sons, Scott, Brian and Jay. In 1969 she went back to work in politics, after being appointed to a vacant senate seat by Governor Jack Williams; Sandra was very successful, and was re-elected for this position twice. The year 1981, however, is when O’Connor earned what is likely to be considered her greatest achievement: she was appointed by Ronald Reagan to become the first ever woman Supreme Court Justice (biography.com 2012).
Today, nothing remains of the former social role of women. Nearly all professions are open to women. The numbers of women in the government and traditionally male-dominated fields have dramatically increased. More women than men earn bachelor’s degrees. Many women's groups still prevail and are major political forces. Although the two movements hoped to achieve different things and used different tactics, they still came together to gain women’s rights and have achieved more than anyone would have ever anticipated.
If one were to look back one hundred years in time, the world would look drastically different. In fact, the United States would be almost unrecognizable. Not only would clothing, transportation, and the price of milk look different, but men and women would not have equal rights, racial issues would be dangerously prominent in society, and an organization geared toward world peace would be nonexistent. One woman made a colossal effort during her lifetime to create change for the betterment of her country, and also, the world. Eleanor Roosevelt, often given the title of “First Lady of the World,” according to the article, “(Anna) Eleanor Roosevelt,” was the wife of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Many people admire and remember Eleanor Roosevelt for her unfailing dedication to her husband’s presidency; however, few realize that she was unlike any first lady before her, in that, Eleanor was independently involved in her own political platforms and beliefs.
The role of American women has changed significantly from the time the nation was born, to the modern era of the 1950s and 1960s. Many people, "... believed that women's talent and energies ... would be put to the better [use] in the new republic." (Clinton 3) Clearly showing that society has seen the importance of the women's talents and that their skills can be very useful, exploited this and thus, the change of the women's role was inevitable. Society has understood that the roles of women played an important role on all parts of life.
Israel was a very hard place to live when it first was established. We often found sickness, which caused many families to start over again. Because of this, there were many authors who expressed their feelings during this time. This can be seen this in the story Dr. Schmidt. In this story, it is clear that there are a lot of old and new Jews, topics relating to Zionism, and a gap between Ashkenazi Jews and Yemenite Jews. These topics have helped readers relate to these stories, and motivate them to live a better life. This is why the state of Israel has been so successful in its short life. The drive to succeed has shaped the State of Israel for the better.
It’s important to note that while she was the forerunner for the inclusion of women’s voice in history, she was also a forerunner as a female historian. She paved a trail for future historians in hope that there would be more contributions and revision into the historical research and historiography. If one was to research women in history, Lerner’s writings would be the first encounter only to realize how far the subject has gone. But the reader must also be aware of when these works were written. At the beginning, the height, and the depression of the women’s liberation movement and the past feminism of the 1970’s-1990’s, Lerner was present through the most radical and ultimate demise of second wave feminism; yet, while she was a female historian, she recognized issues second wave feminism created for future research. At its apex, the women’s rights movement stood only for a loose definition of feminism. Lerner needed to separate these constraints in order to continue to strive in research for women’s history. Thus what Lerner is concerned with is women’s emancipation, which is the “freedom from oppressive restrictions imposed by sex; self-determination; autonomy,” that long “predates the women’s rights movement.” Lerner found that through history, her works could help drive this emancipation. Her serious effort to define and explain the constructs that have done a disservice to the
Gloria Steinem’s “Living the Revolution” commencement speech highlights the hardships and stereotypes placed on women and men of all ethnicities in general society of the 1970’s decade, and suggests a necessary change is needed in the way we view people in general. Steinem goes on to support her ideas with numerous pieces of evidence. Foremost, she calls attention to the past and present stereotypes and prejudices and suggests that these ideas are “imbedded so deeply in our thinking” that we don’t often realize they are there (5). Secondly, she points out our society’s lack of female and African American role models and that the traditional white male leader is outdated and overdue for an upgrade (12-16). Steinem also puts for...
The ongoing and explosive Israeli-Palestinian conflict has its roots in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century when two major nationalist movements among the Jews and Arabs were born. Both of these groups’ movements were geared toward attaining sovereignty for their people in the Middle East, where they each had historical and religious ties to the land that lies between the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River. Toward the end of the 19th century, Southern Syria (Palestine) was divided into two regions, inhabited primarily by Arab Muslims, and ruled by the Turkish Ottoman Empire (BBC News). At this time, most of the Jews worldwide lived predominantly in eastern and central Europe. When the Zionist political movement was established in 1887 and began to fund land purchases in the Ottoman Empire controlled region of Palestine, tensions between the two groups arose. Since then, Israel and Palestine have been vying for control of this land that they both covet, and this conflict remains as one of the world’s major sources of instability today, involving many different players. One of these players who continues to halt the peace process, is a militant fundamentalist Islamic organization called Hamas. Hamas has intensified extreme opposition and bloodshed in the region, with the aim of destroying the state of Israel. However, few people know that starting in the mid 1970s, Israel secretly supported an organization that would later emerge as Hamas, even though both groups had competing future visions for the nation. Why did it choose to do this when it had so much at stake? This paper will address the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict leading up to the beginning of Israeli support of Hama...
Since the inception of an Israeli nation-state in 1948, violence and conflict has played a major role in Israel’s brief history. In the Sixty-One year’s Israel has been a recognized nation-state, they have fought in 6 interstate wars, 2 civil wars, and over 144 dyadic militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) with some display of military force against other states (Maoz 5). Israel has been involved in constant conflict throughout the past half century. Israel’s tension against other states within the Middle East has spurred vast economic, social, and political unity that has fostered a sense of nationalism and unity in Israel not seen in most other states. Over the next several pages I will try and dissect the reasons for why the nation state of Israel has been emerged in constant conflict and how this conflict has helped foster national unity and identity among the people of Israel.
Golda Meir is a woman with a lifelong commitment and an unfailing dedication in bringing her dream to a reality. Her dream was for Israel to be a safe homeland for the Jewish nation, including the Zionist Movement, which she wanted people to clearly understand. Zionism served as a strong belief that the Jews should gain their fatherland in Israel that they had lost to the Romans in 70 A.D. Golda Meir never lost sight of this goal, and did countless things for Israel. If only we could have her compassion, strength, courage and intelligence- then would we all be able to have such a perpetual effect on the world’s countries as she did? On May rd, 1888, Golda was born into a family in Kiev, Russia.
A women's role has changed tremendously and is making its greatest impact in our society today. Many years ago, women's contribution to society was limited and controlled by men. Women are standing tall and are playing a major role in many important areas. Women's role has changed at an accelerating rate and have part in areas such as Politics, Professional Training Jobs, Medicine,Business and Law. Formerly they were not part of any political matter, but they have advanced in many aspects. For example, women have attained power and have been growing in political office.