Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Biblical theology and inerrancy of scripture
Biblical theology and inerrancy of scripture
Thesis statement on biblical inerrancy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Biblical theology and inerrancy of scripture
Satan’s accusatory conclusion in Genesis 3:4 has been levied countless times by the serpent of old and his minions, and is feasibly the most common belief about God’s word; especially these days. Satan’s indictment of God was a subtle, clever and ingenious two-prong attack; God’s word isn’t accurate, but not all of God’s word is inaccurate. It’s a popular indictment, because it gives God credit for some accuracy while denying the inerrancy of God’s word at the same time. It’s a clandestine way of having your cake and eating it at the same time. So, was the old, red dragon right, and is it really necessary for all of God’s word to be one hundred percent correct, or is there some wiggle room for inaccuracies? How do Christians defend against the accusation, “Are there any errors in the Bible?”
The unembellished definition of inerrancy is that every word of the Bible is true. The Bible isn’t inerrant, because it records every fact about any one subject, rather, it’s inerrant, because every fact that it records is true and accurate.
Moreover, the Bible can be inerrant and still use the common language, euphemisms, metaphors, etc. that were common to the people of the day. The Bible can speak, for example, of the sun rising and setting (Psalm 113:3), from the perspective of someone standing on the surface of the earth, even though we know that the sun neither rises nor sets. The Bible is absolutely truthful even though it often uses common language to describe natural phenomena or approximations, etc. Language can be true and still offer imprecise statements. “I live a little more than a mile from my office,” for example, is an imprecise statement that conveys the near proximity of my home to my office. ...
... middle of paper ...
... in the manuscripts, we recognize that these mistakes originated in the hand of man and not God. Moreover, there exists the theoretical possibility of copying errors in the manuscripts, but the errors are not universal. Consider, for example, that a copyist from Rome made a mistake in copying Paul’s letter to the Romans. This error would stand out when compared to the other known copies of Paul’s letter, and the variants are minor, and they do not alter the primary message of Paul’s letter. We are blessed with more than 5000 copies of the New Testament, used by textual variant scholars that assure us of the accuracy of the New Testament.
Satan is the author of lies (John 8:44), and his indictment of God’s word is therefore false. The inherent definition of God is that He cannot lie (Titus 1:2), meaning that every word He records for man is true.
The Bible is read and interpreted by many people all over the world. Regardless, no one knows the absolute truth behind scripture. Walter Brueggemann, professor of Old Testament, wrote “Biblical Authority” to help people understand what he describes as six different parts that make up the foundation to ones understanding of scripture. He defines these six features as being: inherency, interpretation, imagination, ideology, inspiration, and importance. As Brueggemann explains each individual part, it is easy to see that they are all interconnected because no one can practice one facet without involuntarily practicing at least one other part.
How can we be expected to trust a God who Himself has gone against the morals that He teaches? In Elizabeth Anderson’s article “If God Is Dead, Is Everything Permitted” Anderson brings up many arguments as to why the moral understanding of the bible and religious scripture brings up multiple examples of unreliability. Both in the writings and of God Himself. Throughout the article Anderson mentions the inconsistencies and inaccuracies within the bible and other religious writings, and how their moral teachings which were considered right are now considered wrong in the present day. The religious stories from all sorts of different religions have been shown to cause countless events that have made a number of people suffer, and these were seen
The reasons for it being human is like Kuhn states in his title “The Bible as Conversation”, to have conversation there is a human component. Also there are human authors to the Bible, and each one puts forth the type of story they wanted to communicate. There is also divine intention, God has intentions for us to be his people, but as Kuhn emphasizes, “Divine intention is reversed by human intercession.” This meaning, God’s divine intention can be changed or intersected by human conversation. As in Exodus 33.17, “The Lord said to Moses, “I will do the very thing that you have asked; for you have found favor in my sight, and I know you by name.” This was after the Israelites had gone against God’s command about not setting other gods before him and not making an idol for themselves. And then, Moses had gone before God to stand up for the Israelites, to have God show his mercy on them. Conversely, an example of the Bible as divine would be 2 Peter 1:20-21, “First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation, because no prophecy ever came by human will, but men and women moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.” Here what the Bible is mainly saying is we are to read the scriptures as God wrote them, and that it is all “God breathed.” I feel Kuhn has it right though, because to have divine intention by God there must also be a human component. This being,
In the first book and chapter of the Bible, Genesis 1, gives an account of a literal twenty four-hour, six-day view of Creation. It states that God forged the Heavens and the Earth ex nihilo, which means "out of nothing", in a six-day allotment. He then rested on the seventh day. However, a question lingers, is the Word of God inerrant? Archaeological digs have proved that the Bible is reliable. These digs have uncovered evidence that has been pre-recorded in the Bible. For example: the Bible said that Noah's Ark rested on top of Mt. Ararat; with this in mind, archeologists recently found the Ark on top of the same mountain. With regards to this evidence, Paul, an apostle of God, wrote Romans 1:20 which states, "For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse." This verse says that God's divine qualities have been seen. Those with a nonpartisan perspective know that the creation of the world is too intricate for chance to have created everything. The chances of just ...
The book entitled Canon Revisited: Establishing the Origins and Authority of the New Testament Books written by Michael J. Kruger explains the canonical model by which the books of the New Testament were selected as the right word of God. The correctness of the canon has always troubled Christians; they have always wanted to know that the twenty-seven books of the New Testament are the rights ones. In his book, Kruger answers many typical questions asked by people in relation to the New Testament, its structure and its authenticity as God’s word. For example, he shows what all of the selected books have in common and why any of the existing apocryphal books is not in the Bible. The book Canon Revisited is for Christians who want to know what the canon is, what defines the canon, how its model is applicable to the New Testament books and in what way believers can be sure that the New Testament books are inspired by God Himself and are not the product of the human mind.
God tells us not to lie in the bible, but is it possible to justify lying by the situation. Think as if you were hiding Jews in your house in World War 2. Nazis bang on your door and ask if you are hiding Jews in your home. You reply with no despite the fact that you have five Jews hiding in your house. Was this lie justified by the fact that you save lives from evil. I believe that there are times, in the face of evil, when it is acceptable to break God’s laws.
Even though humans wrote the text, translating it and passing it down from generations to generations, God’s truth is unchanging. Debates of the inerrancy of the bible cannot usurp God as the King of grace. Instead of focusing on the inerrancy of the Bible, individuals who wish to seek a life of faith should focus on the inspiration God is showing them in his word. These revelations should move them into applicable, daily life changing implications from what they have learned. God shows revelations of himself through the Bible, and his character is revealed time and time again throughout scripture. Any faulty facts or discrepancies in grammar or data, should not take away from the value that scripture holds. When we read scripture we bring new meaning of interpretations of the truths God shows us, since new eras and environmental factors will be influential on how we process information. The bible is not just a fact book, telling humans stories of the past, but instead the bible is inspired instructions for how we can deal with spiritual and ethical encounters we
Seemingly, there are folks who read the Bible for no purpose other than to search for flaws. Of course, there are no mistakes in God’s Word; nonetheless, there are those who have attempted to discredit the Bible’s message and they have used these verses, concerning the number of days, to support of their claim of a discrepancy.
The bible is one of the most will known books in the world (manly because there are a lot of cristons that fell it is necessary to tell as many people as possible). The bible has been translated and printed then and re-translated and re-printed for centuries {from [original langue]}. The bible was all so written about 40 years after the events that it describes. The ferst part of the bible was written by “James, half brother of Jesus” (http://www.carm.org/bible/biblewhen.htm) wrote it in the “40's or 50's” (http://www.carm.org/bible/biblewhen.htm) or Galatians written by Paul in the year 49. With all this it is very likely that something got mixed up in the translation. The bible has mixed signs and inconsistent that proves Satan was the god that was referd to in the bible. Satan set about to deceive everyone and lure them in to sin buy offering false redemptions.
When a person hears Satan, a streak of fear, and the thought of evil, arises. People fear Satan, and think of him as evil, but in John Milton’s Paradise Lost, he displays a thought of the Father being the evil being, and Satan a tragic hero. In Paradise Lost, Book 1 and 2, the minor areas where God is shown, He is displayed as hypocritical. He contradicts himself by creating the humans to be of free will, but when Satan displays free will, he is shunned. Satan can be described in many terms, and by many people, but all can be disputed.
The historical reliability of the Bible is the first matter that needs to be discussed. There are three criteria that the military historian C. Sanders lists as principles for documentary historical proof: the bibliographical test, internal evidence test, and the external evidence test (McDowell 43). The bibliographical test is the examination of text from the documents that have reached us. The reliability of the copies of the New Testament is tested by the number of manuscripts (MSS) and the time intervals between the time in which the piece of literature was written and our earliest copy. There are more than 5,300 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and 10,000 Latin vulgate manuscripts, not to mention the other various translations.
- Brown, R. E., An Introduction to The New Testament (New York: Doubleday, 1997), p. 177
... for personal reasons you to are using exegetical approaches to the scriptures. We do this every time we read something or hear it spoken. The Bible is no different besides that you have to decipher it correctly. By reading other commentaries on that book or verse you can form your own exegetical hypothesis, but make sure it is a biblical one.
Men spoke from God as they were carried along by the “Holy Spirit” (21b), this means that scripture did not come from creative work of the prophets’ or their own invention or interpretation. God inspired the writers, so their message would be authentic and reliable. God used the talents, education, and culture background of each writer. God cooperated with the writers in such a way to ensure that the message he intended was faithfully communicated in the very words they wrote. “All scripture is breathed out by God for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training the righteousness” (2 Tim 3:16). “Brothers, the Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to who arrested Jesus” (Acts 1:16).
the Bible were “God - breathed” making each a Word from God and not the words of the