Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious conversion experience
Theism and atheism compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious conversion experience
God’s Not Dead
Jasneet Kaur
1. How did the different characters in the film live out their various worldviews? In what ways were they living in a way that was inconsistent with their worldviews? Pick three people form the movie.
There are many different point-of-views of many individuals in the movie. These three characters live their lives in many different ways, and also relate with many people in our world. Firstly, Professor Jeffery Radisson is the main antagonist of the extremely despised character in the film “God Not Dead”. Radisson was one a very loving Christian boy happily living his life, when a catastrophic event had occurred in his life. At the age of 12, his mother was dying from cancer. Despite all his prayers, and faith in
…show more content…
God; he had lost his mother.
He had lost all faith in God, for taking his mother away from him. Therefore, he had become an atheist. As the movie progressed Professor Jeffery Radisson meets a student in his class named Josh Wheaton. Josh Wheaton is the protagonist. Professor Radisson forces his students to write God is dead with their signature on their paper. However, Josh was a Christian, and could not do it. It shows how an atheist, and theist perspective contradict. Furthermore, this movie also shows how converting into another religion affects ones surrounding. A Muslim student named Ayisha secretly converts to Christianity, and is disowned by her father when he finds out. Ayisha is a young girl who keeps her religions appearance for her father. After he drops her off at school, she removes her hijab. Ayisha is told by her father that nobody else on campus shares her views on god. At name, she listens to Sermons by Franklin Graham. In conclusion, shows how many different people have many different opinions about god. This movie portrayed that atheist, theist, and individuals who are unsure about their faith are not always accepted. It shows …show more content…
how the two strong believers contradict what they believed, and how positively, and negatively they are influenced by it. There past influences, their present and it demonstrates that the world has many different beliefs about god. 2. As the movie reached its climax at the end of the third debate, may of the students acknowledged that God was not dead. Did the students receive enough information in Josh`s presentations to come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ? Explain As the movie reached its climax at the end of the third debate, many of the students acknowledged that God was not dead.
Wheaton uses a quote from Lee Strobel about the evolution describing how the big bang corresponds to “let there be light” in Genesis 1:3, to prove god`s existence. He begins to prove his statement by agreeing to Atheists that say no one can prove the existence of God. He then stands up for his opinions, and says that no one can disprove that God exists. He proves his statement by explaining how people began to believe that the universe began 13.7 billon years ago, also known as the big bang. His second debate the professor’s previous challenge regarding the biological evolution. Wheaton uses a clock analogy to explain the existence of life on earth. He concluded his statement by suggesting that God guided the process. To support is perspective of god there are two statements he refers too. Firstly, he denies Darwinian evolution. The second argument explained the biological change that is controlled from start to finish. The final debate scene brings the climax of the film as Josh Wheaton confronts his professor with the presence of evil in the world. He explains how God is used as the standard of truth and good. He ended off his debate by referring to God’s truth because of its biblical reference, and effective argument. In conclusion, the students received enough information in Josh`s presentation to come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ, because of
his big bang , the biological evolution, and the problem of evil arguments he had demonstrated with Professor Jeffery Radisson, and his class mates. 3. Why do so many people have such a hard time believing that God is good when we live in a world that is filled with so many evils and hardship? Many people have a hard time believing that god is good when we live in world that is filled with so many evils, and hardships, because many people have different aspects of life, and view god differently. Someone who has lost one, or something in life lose belief in god, because of its failure. Those who have a hard time believing god existence are those who lack belief, who do not know if god exists, who doubt that god exists, and those who believe god does not exist. Furthermore, god states that evil is here and it is real, it is also temporary. Evil will eventually be destroyed. Therefore, we strive for the hope that a believer demonstrates. Although, in the Bible god informs us how and why evil comes, but it does not tell us why God allowed it to happen. However, if we believe good because him being the most wise, and knowing he has reasons for allowing things to happen that beyond on what we think. In conclusion, having faith is a source of guidance in the suture. It helps motivates oneself and their feelings. Although there is a lot of evil in our world we god believes there is a reasoning of everything that is done in our life. Not only does it gives a reason to life, but also helps us learn from our past mistakes or evil things that many of us have done to learn from. God is forgiving and always teaches, and gives multiple opportunity in life for us to experience many little things.
For the long time, human are curious about the relationship between science and religious. They are only represent personal thinking and do not exist contradictions. When Bellhop asks Goodall about her new ideas, she talks her new thinking about evolution God creates human beings. She tells the story that “ the biblical description of God creating the world in seven days might well have been an attempt to explain evolution in a parable”(Goodall 150). Goodall is a zoologist and a scientist. All she depends is according the data and the formal information which shows up on books of Internet. She supposed to think and observe logically and sanely. However, she believes in God and finds her own “outsight” through the forest which the data can not provide her. In addition, not only Goodall, but also many scientists are Christian and they all believe God creates people. God is their spiritual sustenance to express their emotion. However, they still do the the most rigorous job and contribute to the society. Goodall uses her own experience to prove that science and religious are “mutually exclusive”. Indeed, the coexistence of science and religion could help the society developed. In Goodall’s opinion, she also thinks that “ it honestly didn’t matter how we humans got to be the way we are, whether evolution or special creation was responsible. What mattered and
2) What is the main conflict in the book? Is it external or internal? How is this conflict resolved throughout the course of the book?
Throughout the movie the director breaks down the message in clever ways and makes the message very precise and clear. In the movie the director was attempting to teach the viewers a life lesson. In order to have peace of mind and continue to actually “live” it is important that you don’t hold grudges, believe, have faith, and no matter the situation don’t ignore signs due to your stubbornness or convincing yourself otherwise when you know the truth.
In week one, I immediately found myself interested and alert as I tried to absorb as much as possible from Examined Life. It was difficult to find a balance between taking as many good notes as possible, and making sure not to miss anything these eight philosophers had to say. I took to heart many of the thoughts and ideas that were shared throughout the film. The first thing that struck a cord with me was that it is not necessary to find meaning. At first that sounds contrary to philosophy at its core, because I find that is usually what we ponder; the meaning of whatever it is we are thinking, doing, or discussing.
Dr. William Lane Craig supports the idea of existence of God. He gives six major arguments, in order to defend his position. The first argument is quite fare, Craig says that God is the best reason of existence of everything. He gives the idea, that the debates between all the people, cannot reach the compromise, because the best explanation of the reasons of existence of everything is God, and nothing can be explained without taking Him into consideration. The second argument of Craig is from a cosmological point of view: he says that the existence of the universe is the best proof of the existence of God. Because, the process of the creation of the universe is so ideally harmonious, that it seems impossible to appear accidentally. The third argument is about the fine tuning of the universe. The universe is designed in such a way that people always have aim of life, and the life of people and the nature are interconnected. The fourth argument of Dr. Craig is about the morality: God is the best explanation of the existence of the morality and moral values in people’s lives. The...
In today’s culture, the idea of there is perfect and divine designer that made the earth and everything that entails with it, really pushes people away. Not only has this idea been conflicted about in today’s culture. It has been especially trivial in past decades, an example of this is seen by H.J. McCloskey. McCloskey wrote an article about it called “On Being an Atheist”, which attempts to defeat the notion that there is a God. McCloskey first addresses the reader of the article and says these arguments he is about to address are only “proofs”, which should not be trusted by any theist. He then goes and unpacks the two arguments that he believes can actually be addressed, the cosmological and teleological argument. McCloskey also addresses the problem of evil, free will, and why atheism is more comforting than theism.
Köstenberger says that “Instead of various accounts of Scripture revealing a lack of unity in the overall message, their individual works actually weave a tapestry that’s much more compelling and less monochromatic than some one-note, robotic printout or press release” (Köstenberger 73). Therefore, he argues that the different accounts from the disciples for the events that occur in the Bible do not contradict anything; rather, it strengthens the Bible as a valid source. On the other hand, Wheaton discusses Darwin’s theory of evolution. Although Darwin claims that nature does not jump, Wheaton states that “if you can picture the entire 3.8 billion years that scientists say life has been around as one 24-hour day, in the space of just about 90 seconds most major animal groups suddenly appear in the forms in which they currently hold, not slowly and steadily as Darwin predicted, but in evolutionary terms almost instantly” (Cronk, God’s Not
In the movie, The Human Experience, Abraham Maslow’s and James Fowler’s beliefs play a major role in describing the three experiences that the characters chose to live out. The characters Cliff, Jeff, Michael, and Matthew join each other on three different encounters to experience life in other people’s shoes. The encounters were homelessness, caring for physically and mentally handicapped children, and visited Ghanaians with HIV AIDS and leprosy. Each character learned lessons and were humbled immensely by their experiences.
The essence of the book is about perspectives. one of the most common ideologies about perspective is how one views a glass of liquid is it half full or half empty. This is supposed to speak volumes about how one sees life. of course there is more to perspective than how one sees a glass of liquid but it is one of the easiest ways to put perspective into
Although there were many concepts that were present within the movie, I choose to focus on two that I thought to be most important. The first is the realistic conflict theory. Our textbook defines this as, “the view that prejudice...
The clash between evolutionists and creationists seems to be far from its finale. Both sides come up with potent arguments in favor of their positions. Evolutionists stress the absence of factual evidence in favor of God’s existence, point to fossils as a proof of the evolutionary process, and name the Big Bang as the reason of the universe’s appearance and further development. Creationists, in their turn, stress that there are no intermediate links between species in found fossils, consider complexity and diversity of nature to be an indirect evidence of God’s existence, and refer to the second law of thermodynamics to argue against the Big Bang theory. However, none of the sides seem to see that both points of view can not only co-exist, but be successfully combined. Such a combination could explain everything at once.
In 1859, Charles Darwin published his groundbreaking Origin of Species, which would introduce the seminal theory of evolution to the scientific community. Over 150 years later, the majority of scientists have come to a consensus in agreement with this theory, citing evidence in newer scientific research. In an average high school biology classroom, one may imagine an instructor that has devoted much of his life to science and a predominantly Christian class of about twenty-five students. On the topic of evolution, one of the students might ask, “Why would God have taken the long route by creating us through billion years of evolution?” while another student may claim “The Book of Genesis clearly says that the earth along with all living creatures was created in just six days, and Biblical dating has proven that the earth is only 6000 years old.” Finally a third student interjects with the remark “maybe the Bible really is just a book, and besides, science has basically already proven that evolution happened, and is continuing to happen as we speak.”
In today’s society, many topics create a very substantial amount of controversy between different groups of people. From abortion to the healthcare reform, there are countless topics of discussion. One of the major and ongoing controversial topics in the religious society is the Big Bang theory versus Creation. One side of the controversy is, predominately, the scientific community, with the other end obviously being the religious community.
“God is dead. God remains dead, and we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become Gods simply to appear worthy of it?” (2). This quote was said by one of the greatest philosophers to have lived; Friedrich Nietzsche. Although Friedrich Nietzsche is not as well known as some of the philosophers that we’ve discussed in class; such as Plato, Descartes, or Socrates, he and his ideas have influenced the views of modern philosophy today. Friedrich Nietzsche is a german philosopher that was born October 15, 1844 and died at the ago of 55 on August 25th, 1900. Although Friedrich Nietzsche died at a fairly young age it doesn't mean that he didn't leave us with anything to remember him by. A few of his greatest works were; “The Will to Power, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Beyond Good and Evil, Antichrist and, The Gay Science” (6). The last of which I will be talking about in this essay because it contains Nietzsche’s; “God is Dead” pronouncement, which is what this paper will pertain to.