Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Paul contribution to christianity
Ministry and life of Paul
The work of Paul
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Paul contribution to christianity
Romans 8:31-39 is Paul’s grand celebration of the triumph of God’s elect over all possible opposition, a song for certain victory in and through Jesus Christ. Of particular interest in it are Paul’s use of courtroom imagery and the Hebrew scriptures, his Christology, his examples of opposition, and his setting of the passage in space and time. In this paper we consider the text’s structure, its context in Romans, its message to his audience, and its theological significance. Quotations are taken from the NRSV or my attempt at a more literal translation. Biblical citations without book refer implicitly to Romans; verse citations given without chapter refer to Rom 8.
Paul’s opening question sounds like the introduction to a response to earlier material: “31What then will we say to these things?” Who are ‘we,’ what are ‘these things,’ and what will Paul say? Though the fact that Paul is introducing his own text may lead one to view the ‘we’ as papal (i.e., self-referential), Paul uses ‘we’ earlier in Rom (e.g., 5:1) to refer to all people God has justified, Jew and Gentile. I think this latter antecedent is preferable, especially considering that in the rest of the text he asks several questions; the response he elicits from his audience can then be part of ‘what we will say to these things.’
‘Tauta,’ however, is ambiguous: In “28We know that all things work together for good for those who love God, who are called according to his purpose,” ‘all things’ may mean simply ‘everything’ or “18the sufferings of this present time.” The ‘things’ can also refer to the subject matter of 8:28-30, 8:18-30, ch. 8, chs. 5-8, or chs. 1-8:
• 8:28-30 immediately precedes 31. “28Work together for good” relates with God and Christ wor...
... middle of paper ...
...r Paul to direct his attention specifically to the Jews, as he does in the next section, chs. 9-11.
Rom 8:31-39 is an exuberant hymn in which Paul, steadily growing in enthusiasm, weaves together the major themes of chs. 1-8 in an almost musical, question-and-[implied ]answer sequence: God the judge is just, faithful, and loving, and has a plan for our salvation. Jesus Christ died and rose for us all and intercedes for us. We are justified, free for life in the Spirit, a life of union with Christ, sharing in his riches; this is our hope in the face of all opposition. With joy, together with Paul we look back to God’s work in Christ and ahead to its eschatological fulfillment, we see the present in the context of all space and time as under the Christ’s lordship, and we know with assurance that “nothing can separate us from the love of” the God who is “for us.”
The historical cultural situation of the writer and his audience is that in this time Paul is preaching to Ephesus, and that the audience are mostly gentiles. Pauls original name was Saul, and he was an apostle who spoke the Gospel of God, to the 1st century audience/world. The author is much undeinfed, but most have found that it can be paul, and little say it was a follower of paul. His background was personally chosen by God. Gods best messeng...
We assume that Paul had not been in Rome until after the epistle had been written. This is why an introduction was probably formulated; in the first seven verses Paul describes his relationship to the gospel of Jesus Christ and in 8-15 he persisted in his relationship with the Romans to whom his epistle was written. Paul was the harbinger of the theme of Romans, the object of the Gospel was Jesus Christ; Gods revelation of His righteousness (Galatians 1:15). The gamut of Paul’s message was universal. The epistle was written to the believers in Rome (Romans 1:13) and to the saints; this was not a one way street for Paul would also be blessed.
N.T Wright (2008) stated that “When we read the scriptures as Christians, we read it precisely as people of the new covenant and of the new creation” (p.281). In this statement, the author reveals a paradigm of scriptural interpretation that exists for him as a Christian, theologian, and profession and Bishop. When one surveys the entirety of modern Christendom, one finds a variety of methods and perspectives on biblical interpretation, and indeed on the how one defines the meaning in the parables of Jesus. Capon (2002) and Snodgrass (2008) offer differing perspectives on how one should approach the scriptures and how the true sense of meaning should be extracted. This paper will serve as a brief examination of the methodologies presented by these two authors. Let us begin, with an
According to the passage 1st, I observed that the people in power were the Romans who were polytheistic. They completely rejected the idea on only one God or Christianity. The people who didn’t follow the beliefs of the Romans were usually poor and had no use for when they lived in the middle east according to the passage. Paul would preach to the poor about the savior Jesus Christ (according to the passage) .
Within the passage verses 14 and 17 are directly correlated, in that, 14 addresses the fact that we are blessed in our persecution and verse 17 is stating why it is a blessing to suffer. In verse 17 when it is written “if God wills it” that is a reference to verse 14 and the Greek construction implies that suffering for doing good was not what God normally willed, even though it could happen and possibly had already happened to some readers (4:4,12-19) The connection between 14-16 and Isaiah 8:12-13 is almost a direct quotation. It is related in the sense of syntax, obviously, but also in the historical context and setting. The hope that Peter refers to in verse 15 relates back to the “living hope” that he introduces in 1:3. Additionally, this section of Peter is related closely to what Christ said in Mathew 5:11 when He said, “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.” Each verse of this section relates to some statement made by Jesus in Matthew
Psalm 89 of the Book of Psalms, advocates the message of consequentialism, foreground by man’s relationship with God, with direct lin...
The Bible shows God constantly pursuing His people and man rejecting him over and over again. This passage displays this ongoing struggle by showing all Jesus did for us and how the people still shunned and rejected him. However, this passage also gives reassurance that it is never too late to repent and accept the Lord. This passage displays some important themes of the Bible: man’s redemption, God’s forgiveness and grace, and the blessing of a relationship with God. This passage is essentially the message of the Bible in one small
New Revised Standard Version. New York: American Bible Society, 1989. Print. The. Russell, Eddie.
In the days of Christ’s life on this earth, believers did not have access to the Bible in its entirety as we know and are familiar with today. Believers in this ancient time period only had access to the Old Testament. However, through their access to the Old Testament, believers were provided a foundation for New Testament times. This foundation provided New Testament believers with the Lord’s established principles of right and wrong they were expected to follow. In addition, the Old Testament is overflowing with accounts of people whose lives exemplified the future life of Christ on this earth. These pictures allowed the Israelite nation to begin to have an understanding of why Christ needed to come as their Messiah and the work He needed to do on earth. Finally, there are common themes that are interwoven throughout the entire Old Testament. Three of these themes: transgression, redemption, and consummation point to the purpose of Christ’s atoning death on the cross. These themes portray God’s work both in the lives of Old Testament believers, but they also foreshadow God’s desire and plan for believers in New Testament times and beyond.
In The Letter of Paul to the Galatians, Paul addresses the conflict of Gentile Christians’ unclear relationship towards Judaism by urging both Jewish and Gentile believers to reexamine the Mosaic Law. This letter by the apostle is a defense of his mission of converting the churches of Galatia towards Christianity. During the early Christian movement, there was controversy surrounding the degree to which Gentile Christians should adhere to Jewish law, with Paul moving them to disregard it and follow a different path towards Christianity. Paul describes in his gospel a way in which faith in Jesus Christ frees his followers from traditional laws, and urges the Galatians to heed him instead of his opposition among the Jewish church. Paul effectively persuades his audience to abandon unnecessary laws of Moses to achieve an understanding of the importance of faith in Christ through an appeal to ethos and logos, and through allegories that introduces a reinterpretation of scripture and a new interpretation of God’s role in Christianity.
...pse." In Current Issues in New Testament Interpretation, edited by W. Klaasen and G.F. Snyder, 23-37. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1962.
The law was central to God’s old covenant with the people of Israel, and many Jews in Paul’s day still saw it as critical to how God’s people lived. Therefore, in Romans, Paul frequently deals with questions about the law. The pinnacle of his treatment comes in Rom 7, where Paul powerfully argues that the Law of Moses, rather than having a positive effect on people’s lives, stimulated sin and brought death. The law does not and cannot bring victory over sin and death since sin is defined and even promoted through the law. But those who have died with Christ are set free from sin and the law.
Swindoll, Charles R. Swindoll’s New Testament Insights: Insights on Romans. Grand Rapides, MI: Zondervan, 2010.
Answering these questions is the purpose of this essay. I begin by arguing that the Bible cannot be adequately understood independent of its historical context. I concede later that historical context alone however is insufficient, for the Bible is a living-breathing document as relevant to us today as it was the day it was scribed. I conclude we need both testimonies of God at work to fully appreciate how the Bible speaks to us.