Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gnosticism Christianity
Gnosticism Christianity
Essay on the term gnosticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gnosticism Christianity
Gnosticism was a prominent movement during the 2nd century that claimed that the demiurge was a lesser divinity held responsible for the creation of the universe. Gnostics taught and preached that matter is evil, and that salvation and return to the spiritual world can only be obtained through gnosis. Although the demiurge is linked to the material universe, which is evil, the demiurge itself is considered to be a consequence of something else. Sophia, or wisdom, an aeon of Christ Self-Originate, desired to create. The Secret Book according to John (BJn), written sometime before or around 180, describes John the Apostle gaining gnosis from Jesus. Formatted in the structure of a fairytale, the story of how Sophia disrupted harmony by engaging …show more content…
in creative activity without consent of the Spirit was told. Sophia sprouted the beginning of evil in Gnosticism––however, though her actions led to the origination of evil, her character can not be defined as immoral. In the BJn, inconceivable perfection is a way of expressing the divine principle. From this divine principle came a thought––Barbelo, who was feminine divine entity referred to as “she” but thought to represent both the father and mother. Barbelo and the Divine Principle brought forth Christ Self-Originate, who eventually created the last aeon, Sophia (wisdom). Sophia was the final and lowest emanation of God, and brought about instability in the Pleroma––she had a strong desire to create, but did not seek direction or consent from those above her: She wanted to show forth within herself an image, without the spirit’s [will]; and her consort did not consent. And (she wished to do so) without his pondering: for the person of her maleness did not join the consent. (BJn 35 Layton) As a result, she created Ialtabaoth, a “serpentine, with a lion’s face, and with its eyes gleaming like flashes of lightning…” (BJn 35 Layton). Sophia made a quick and thoughtless decision when deciding to create, and is responsible for the birth of the demiurge and the material world. Though Sophia is related to rationality, miscarriage, and an impulsive desire to procreate, none of these actions in itself are inherently considered evil.
When Sophia decides to produce, she does not have intentions to bring evil into the world. She simply wished to “externalize ‘a thought she conceived from herself and her rational consideration’” and as a result, miscarries (Pleše 114). Sophia is considered a heroine in Gnostic myth. Wisdom is a rational, knowledgeable part of the Invisible Spirit, the spirit who has no boundaries or limitations. Sophia is a part of the whole, but this concept is beyond Sophia’s knowledge. Therefore, the wisdom Sophia represents is incomplete. Because Sophia’s thought to recreate came solely from her own desires, and was not in conjunction with the Invisible Spirit, her wisdom was automatically flawed. The way in which Sophia’s creation, Ialtabaoth, was formed differed in primary texts. The two main texts that discussed these series of events was the BJn and The Reality of Rulers (RR). In BJn, Ialtabaoth was the imperfect product of Sophia: “And compared to the image of its mother, it was misshapen, having a different form” (BJn 35 Layton). When Sophia realized the consequences of her actions, her immediate response was to cast Ialtabaoth away. As a result, Ialtabaoth stole power from its mother, and created the materialistic
realm: This is the first ruler, and it took great power from its mother, retreated from her, and moved out of the place where it had been born. Taking possession (of another place), it made for itself other eternal realms (aeons) inside a luminous, fiery blaze, which still exists. And it become stupefied in its madness, which still is with it (BJn 36 Layton). In the RR, Elelēth tells the story of the fall of Sophia and discusses the unfolding of the spiritual and material realm. Like in BJn, Sophia wanted to create without her partner, and what she made was a “heavenly likeness” (RR 94 Layton). This “heavenly likeness” serves as a veil, which separates the world above from the aeons below: A veil exists between the superior realm and the inferior aeons. And shadow came into being beneath the veil, and that shadow became matter, and that shadow was cast apart…” (RR 74 Layton). In RR, the shadow that is reflected beneath the veil is matter, and what Sophia created became a part of the matter. In both primary texts, Sophia produces Ialtabaoth due to her incomprehensibility. However, in BJn, Ialtabaoth steals power from Sophia and creates his own realm in the image of the original and incorruptible realm. He is envious and arrogant and claims that “’there is no other god apart from me’” (BJn 38 Layton). In RR, light is not stolen from Sophia. Instead, Sophia shines line into matter by stretching out her finger (RR 94). Ialtabaoth then uses this power to create his own realm and produce offspring. Likewise, Ialtabaoth declares himself the only god of infinite matter. Gnostics believe that the physical is corrupt and a “less perfect” copy of the material realm, which is why Sophia is blamed for the origin of evil. The heinous creature that Sophia gave birth to, Ialtabaoth, is the creator––the demiurge––of the physical realm. Ialtabaoth is described to be ignorant with an egocentric nature who does not recognize the existence of the spiritual realm, from which he has been created. Ialtabaoth is ignorant, but not without power. He uses the power imparted to his mother to create. With help from his evil rulers, Ialtabaoth constructs a corrupt world with material bodies that enslave humanity. For example, Ialtabaoth created Adam as a means to enslave him in RR: The rulers laid plans and said, “Come, let us create a human being that will be soil from the earth.” …they took [some soil] from the earth and modeled [their human being] after their body and [after the image] of god that had been shown forth [to them] in the waters. They said, “[Come, let] us lay hold of it by means of our modeled form, [so that] it may see its male counterpart […] and we may seize it by means of our modeled form” (RR 69 Layton). However, Adam remained immobile after his creation, and Sophia used this to her advantage by tricking Ialtabaoth to breathing the power that he had stolen from her into Adam, which is how a portion of divinity spread throughout mankind. Sophia represents the princess in the fairytale structure of BJn. As a fairytale, there is initial order, and prohibition enforced by the king. However, the princess violates prohibition, and the villain commits a theft, resulting in a deficiency. The princess, with the help of a hero, go on a quest in an effort to reclaim what was rightfully theirs, and recover and restore order. Sophia violates prohibition by not seeking consort before spontaneously procreating. She recognizes her mistake as soon as Ialtabaoth had taken her power: “She knew about the lack when the radiation of her light diminished” (BJn 38 Layton). However, with the help of Barbelo, and others, she is able to regain the light that was taken from her, and restore order. A princess’s mistake does not strip her of her royalty. Though she is blamed for her rash decision and the “dark miscarriage”, many Gnostics credit Sophia’s actions to her femininity and her strong sexual cravings. When referring to Sophia, many know her as the “abortive mother” or “light that has been darkened”. Her miscarriage led her to fall to the material world, but Sophia repented and sought forgiveness. Sophia was restored to the Pleroma, but a portion of her divinity remained in the material world. The evil in Gnosticism is focused on the presence of matter––the material world is merely an imperfect copy of the spiritual realm. Though Sophia’s miscarriage led to the creation of the demiurge, which resulted in the construction of a corrupt physical realm, she remains a feminine hero in Gnostic myth.
In his book, An Imperfect God, Henry Wiencek argues in favor of Washington being the first true president to set the precedent for the emancipation of African-American slaves. Wiencek delves into the evil paradox of how a nation conceived on the principles of liberty and dedicated to the statement that all men are created equal was in a state that still preserved slavery for over seven decades following the construction of the nation. Washington’s grandeur estate at Mount Vernon at its peak had the upkeep of over 300 slaves 126 of which were owned by Washington. First, it must be understood that Washington was raised on slavery receiving ownership of 10 slaves at the age of 11 years old and that Washington was a man of his time. However, it must also be understood that Washington’s business with slavery was in the context of a constrained social and political environment. Weincek maintains that this does not exonerate the fact that Washington maintained slavery however; it does help to quantify the moral shortcoming by which Washington carried until his last year of life.
Part of the development of a human being involves acquiring the ability to classify good and evil as well as distinguishing right from wrong. It has become an inherent trait that is invariably used in our everyday lives. In John Gardner’s novel, Grendel, the main character, Grendel, seeks to find the meaning of life. Through his journey, a depiction of the forces of good and evil is revealed. Aside from being a novel about the search for the meaning of life, Grendel also suggest society’s good and evil have a meaningful and imbalanced relationship where good prevails evil yet facing evil is still critical.
Looking back through many historical time periods, people are able to observe the fact that women were generally discriminated against and oppressed in almost any society. However, these periods also came with women that defied the stereotype of their sex. They spoke out against this discrimination with a great amount of intelligence and strength with almost no fear of the harsh consequences that could be laid out by the men of their time. During the Medieval era, religion played a major role in the shaping of this pessimistic viewpoint about women. The common belief of the patriarchal-based society was that women were direct descendants of Eve from The Bible; therefore, they were responsible for the fall of mankind. All of Eve’s characteristics from the biblical story were believed to be the same traits of medieval women. Of course, this did not come without argument. Two medieval women worked to defy the female stereotype, the first being the fictional character called The Wife of Bath from Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. The second woman, named Margery Kempe, was a real human being with the first English autobiography written about her called The Book of Margery Kempe. In these two texts, The Wife of Bath and Margery Kempe choose to act uniquely compared to other Christians in the medieval time period because of the way religion is interpreted by them. As a result, the women view themselves as having power and qualities that normal women of their society did not.
Flannery O’Connor believed in the power of religion to give new purpose to life. She saw the fall of the old world, felt the force and presence of God, and her allegorical fictions often portray characters who discover themselves transforming to the Catholic mind. Though her literature does not preach, she uses subtle, thematic undertones and it is apparent that as her characters struggle through violence and pain, divine grace is thrown at them. In her story “Revelation,” the protagonist, Mrs. Turpin, acts sanctimoniously, but ironically the virtue that gives her eminence is what brings about her downfall. Mrs. Turpin’s veneer of so called good behavior fails to fill the void that would bring her to heaven. Grace hits her with force and their illusions, causing a traumatic collapse exposing the emptiness of her philosophy. As Flannery O’Connor said, “In Good Fiction, certain of the details will tend to accumulate meaning from the action of the story itself, and when this happens they become symbolic in the way they work.” (487). The significance is not in the plot or the actual events, but rather the meaning is between the lines.
One of the main themes in The Scarlet Letter is that of the secret. The plot of the book is centered on Hester Prynne’s secret sin of adultery. Nathaniel Hawthorne draws striking parallelism between secrets held and the physical and mental states of those who hold them. The Scarlet Letter demonstrates that a secret or feeling kept within slowly engulfs and destroys the soul such as Dimmesdale’s sin of hypocrisy and Chillingworth’s sin of vengeance, while a secret made public, such as Prynne’s adultery, can allow a soul to recover and even strengthen.
Gnostic Writings of Jesus Gnostic writings of Jesus portray him as a heavenly redeemer made less of flesh than of spirit. The emphasis of Jesus' importance is not on his physical humanness, but rather, on his ability to show people the way to the kingdom. Jesus put on flesh in order to give people gnosis and reveal to them where they come from and where they will eventually return. When it is time for Jesus to return to his heavenly home, he is crucified and resurrected before he finally ascends. His body's lack of importance in some Gnostic texts gives this series of events a different connotation than other versions of the story more common today.
Women have given birth to new generations for centuries and have the common stereotype of being caring and gentle. But in the creation myth, women were given to man as a punishment. In the book of collected Greek tales, " Mythology Timeless Tales of Gods and Heroes", by Edith Hamilton, women take up important roles that shape each story. Although women are usually characterized as being helpful and motherly, Greek mythology, on the other hand, portrays them to cause distress, fear, and anxiety to numerous men. Women’s actions are shown to be influenced with jealousy and vengeance which gives them an evil nature.
Why suffering, tragedies, misery, and many other things that relate exists has always been a question that mankind has been attempting to explain for years. Different regions from around the globe all referred to this dark side as evil. It is seen that in the African myth, “The Quarrelsomeness of Man and How the Earth was Peopled” (PM 47) and the Near Eastern myth, “The Enuma Elish” (PM 91) that the existence of the female is the pure reason why earth consists of evil, as well as what a female is capable of that man is not. However, within these two myths, this process is executed differently. In “The Quarrelsomeness of Man and How the Earth was Peopled” (PM 47) a woman unintentionally allows evil to be summoned over mankind; while in “The Enuma Elish” (PM 91) where it is the female who makes the decision to create evil and command it over mankind.
The society in which classical myths took place, the Greco-Roman society was a very patriarchal one. By taking a careful gander at female characters in Greco-Roman mythology one can see that the roles women played differ greatly from the roles they play today. The light that is cast upon females in classical myths shows us the views that society had about women at the time. In classical mythology women almost always play a certain type of character, that is to say the usual type of role that was always traditionally played by women in the past, the role of the domestic housewife who is in need of a man’s protection, women in myth also tended to have some unpleasant character traits such as vanity, a tendency to be deceitful, and a volatile personality. If one compares the type of roles that ladies played in the myths with the ones they play in today’s society the differences become glaringly obvious whilst the similarities seem to dwindle down. Clearly, and certainly fortunately, society’s views on women today have greatly changed.
Joshua Ryan Butler introduces his book, The Skeletons in God’s Closet, with the actuality that many people, including Christians, fear that God has skeletons in his closet. A person having skeletons in their closet means that they have a measure of hidden secrets that they do not want people to know about, fearing that if anyone found out it would completely change the way we think or feel about them (xvii). Hell, Judgement, and Holy war are the skeletons in God’s closet that he says that many people are too afraid to study very closely, fearing that if they do it would change the way they feel about God. “We all thought Father God was so kind and good…until one day we learned he had slaughtered millions in his holy wars, damned those at judgement
Despite the patriarchal society from the biblical days, God is taught as being just as much a Mother as God is a Father (102). The willful ignorance of religious scholars of the time just show that they were making a conscious effort of trying to keep women from retaining any power that they had. This relegation of religious roles in an effort to keep Men in power is a poor example of how Christianity is a religion which promotes for the love and care of all people, no matter their status. The interpretation of God from these times clash severely with my notions of what is now considered to be an all-loving entity. Women of these times were obviously not equal to their male counterparts. In modern days however, women are thought of as equals in society. The problem is that they are still not being treated as equals in a religious aspect as well as many other aspects.
In Book IX of Milton’s Paradise Lost, Eve makes a very important and revealing speech to the tree of knowledge. In it, she demonstrates the effect that the forbidden fruit has had on her. Eve’s language becomes as shameful as the nakedness that Adam and Eve would later try to cover up with fig leaves. After eating the forbidden apple, Eve’s speech is riddled with blasphemy, self-exaltation, and egocentrism.
The crux of Emile Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life lies in the concept of collective effervescence, or the feelings of mutually shared emotions. Through a hermeneutical approach, Durkheim investigates the reflexiveness of social organization, the balance between form and content, and the immense cooperation in collective representations. In his work, society is the framework of humanity and gives it meaning, whereas religion acts as the tool to explain it. Since society existed prior to the individual, the collective mind must be understood before the concept of the individual can be grasped. However, one component seems missing from his social theory – what underlies society in terms of rituals and rites? Only when this element is fleshed out can the individual be comprehended with respect to the collective conscience. One, out of many, possibilities is the often-overlooked influence of emotions. What is the connection between social functions and emotions? Perhaps emotions reify social solidarity by means of a collective conscience. Durkheim posits the notion that society shares a bilateral relationship with emotional experiences, for the emotions of collective effervescence derive from society but also produce and maintain the social construct.
The book “The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion”, written by Mircea Eliade, investigates four aspects of the sacred universe: space, time, nature, and self. Eliade splits each aspect into two forms of perception, the sacred and profane. Religious men, specifically the ancient, traditional men, view the universe as sacred. In other words, they acknowledge a distinct qualitative difference between a sacred and profane (non-sacred) universe; whereas, nonreligious, specifically modern men, are unable to understand such differences in the world. This claim rests on the on the concept of heirophanies or manifestations of the sacred. A hierophany is the religious man’s source of absolute reality and it illuminates the glory and power of God. This manifestation of divine glory charges a site with special significance, thereby losing a sense of homogeneity throughout the universe. Eliade’s underlying thesis is that due to the human experience of both the sacred and profane in day to day life, the transitional zones between the two are exceptionally illuminated and charged with the divine glory of the sacred.
“Dream not of other worlds,” the angel Raphael warns Adam in Miltons’s Paradise Lost (VIII.175). Eve, however, dreams of another world in which she will gain knowledge and power, a wish that is superficially fulfilled when she succumbs to Satan’s temptation and eats from the Tree of Knowledge. Awakening in the Garden of Eden as though from a dream, Eve searches for her identity and her place in Paradise. Satan provides Eve with a chance to gain knowledge and to become god-like. As Eve is not an equal companion for Adam, she seeks independence from her husband. Shifting her loyalty away from God and Adam and towards Satan and the Tree of Knowledge, Eve strives to find her identity in the Garden of Eden, gain knowledge and godliness, and obtain independence from her unequal partnership with Adam.