Globalization Of The National Border In The United States

Most people might have seen some stories in news through various media about illegal immigrants and refugees trying to get into several European conuries due to the terror of ISIS. Nowadays the nations throughout the world tend to become much more polarized in terms of the policy about national border. One claims a wider range of engagement policy focusing on globalization, and in contrast, the other insists to pursue their own interests emphasizing on regionalization. The former links to Chanceller of Germany, Angela Merkel, who is a presentative person insisting globalization, while the latter leads to Donald Trump, the U.S. presidential candidate, who advocates regionalization and nationalism. The most essential factor contributing to polarization of politics is the very national border. The national border is defined as the boundary controlling production, flow, and

etc.

about not only people and supplies but also various information in a broad sense. The issue is whether the national border should open or it should control due to the reasons such like competition and threat of terrorism. Modern society has accomplished technological advance in almost all fields, and especially the development of communication network and public transportation is already enough to eliminate the national border. Also, it is impossible for these flow to be blocked or stopped. The national border is obsolete when it comes to economic and moral reasons.

Many people, regardless of their will, are born in under economically poor conditions, or they are born in a place where there is a civil war going on. For them, the regionalization by the national border is like a huge prison. A few nations have a vested interest haave imprisoned them there by building walls, barriers and sending back people with machine guns. There are no any politician earnestly

suggest the dissolution of the national border, and it seems impossible to do so right now. However, there are some historical precedent for such an idea. In the 1850s, some people crowded into Australia due to Gold Rush, and in the 1900s, some people came the United States to avoid the economic recession in Europe and to find new chances. In these two cases, the border completely open for everyone. Anyone from anywhere in the world could come, and they make a new home here. At the time, the US and Australia government was trying to encourage settler to move to its vast territories, and they also needed to develop their counturies more workforce. Actually, they accomplished economic fundamentals by many immigrants. In the developed countries still can offer newcomers with new chances. It is of mutual benefit to be satisfactory. Now, in the developed counturies, graying population is one of serious societal issues. Conditions have been set fair for stable economic development. However, the young workforce is definitely lacking. It can call to open the national border “kill two birs with one stone.” As technology breaks down barriers between communication and commerce, it is time to fundamentally consider the nation-state. People in the world communicate with others whom we have never met in face throughout the world via the Internet. Ideas and money flow freely throughout the entire world, but the only thing countering these flows is labor.