Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of globalization in life
Effects of globalization on modern societies
Negative impact of globalization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of globalization in life
Globalization, both as an ideology and process, has become the dominant political, economical and cultural force in the 21st century (Steger, 2002, 6). As a social and economic concept, globalization has its roots in neoliberalism which advocates: the primacy of economic growth, free trade to stimulate growth, a free market, individual choice, reduction of government regulation, and global social development based on a western model (Steger, 2002, 9). Although globalization is not a new concept, technological advancements in the last few decades have, for the first time in human history, allowed for real global production, transport and communication. Nowadays, transnational corporations can “produce anything anywhere on the planet and sell anything anywhere on the planet” (Keeling, 2002). While the benefits of human social and economic interactions are hard to ignore, globalization and its agencies also contribute to: the depolarization of society, the undermining of democracy, and the denationalization of the globe. This paper will assess the various political and economic factors of globalization from a socialist perspective. Globalization creates and amplifies depolarization on a regional, national and global level. First, the main criticism of globalization is its role in creating and increasing the gap between classes in society. This “developmental gap” is characterized by and increased concentration of national income in the hands of fewer people (Keeling, 2002). When such social hierarchy exists, a small percentage of individuals or groups have total control over production, finances and information. Thus, the labor force is not only exploited for the economic benefit of a country and a select few modern-day oligarchs, ... ... middle of paper ... ...n Ltd., 2009. Falk, Richard. Predatory Globalization: A Critique. Polity Press, 1999. Keeling, David J. Latin American Development and the Globalization Imperative: New Directions, Familiar Crisis. 2002. 12 November 2011 . Mujtaba, Syed Ali. "Nationalism In An Age Of Globalization – An Indian Experience." 21 January 2008. Indian Muslims. 12 November 2011 . Steger, Manfred D. Globalism: The New Market Ideology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002. Saul, Michael. Many Americans Prefer Socialism to Capitalism, New Poll Finds. 9 April 2009. 12 November 2011 . Von Camp, Christian. "Globalisation and Its Effects on Nationalism." 2008.
...a of Latin America: The Age of Globalization 3 (2010). Modern World History Online. Web. 11 May 2014.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Clayton, Lawrence A. & Michael L. Conniff. A History of Modern Latin America. Harcourt Brace College Publishers. 1999.
Mercedes Gonzalez de la Rocha and Barbara B. Gantt Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 22, No.
5 (1993): 387-95. Accessed October 6, 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1576033. Hirono, Ryokichi "Globalization in the 21st Century: Blessing or Threat to Developing Countries.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
Many historians and sociologists have identified a transformation in the economic processes of the world and society in recent times. There has been an extensive increase in developments in technology and the economy as a whole in the twentieth century. Globalization has been recognized as a new age in which the world has developed into what Giddens identifies to be a “single social system” (Anthony Giddens: 1993 ‘Sociology’ pg 528), due to the rise of interdependence of various countries on one another, therefore affecting practically everyone within society.
Throughout history there have always been gaping partitions between populations of differing social statuses. These splits continue to be blatantly conspicuous in today’s society, despite many efforts over time to repair them. The source presents globalization as a negative influence upon society. Nelson Mandela argues that globalization only serves to further enhance the already existing divide between the “rich and powerful” and the “poorer and weaker”. He insists that we are responsible to protest against globalization in an effort to ensure freedom for all. Globalization as a whole is more destructive than it is beneficial, seeing as it is only advantageous to those who are already well-off. While it can be rewarding in some aspects, I
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.
Globalization can be used to describe a number of events or changes that occur around the world. Different economists have tried to define globalization in different ways but no definition is precisely accepted. Mittelman (2000) refers to globalization as a variety of activities and processes and not a unified and single phenomenon. This activities and processes refer to the way barriers are reduced between different nations. With this, the globe can be referred to as a global village whereby the space and distance disappear, and whereby there exists a common pool of resources and single community. The globalization process encourages social, economic and political interaction. This therefore activates the multiple analysis levels in the field of economic, culture and society, and politics. These fields play a vital role in placing a new meaning to globalization. The World ...
Just imagine waking up in squalor, a once prominent society, now a desolate wasteland. All because foreign interest has raped your land of its natural resources and you seen not a cent in profit. Although, globalization is unifying the worlds developed nations and is bringing commerce to nations that have struggle in past years. True, globalization has many positive effects but do the pros outweigh the cons. In this essay I will discuss Globalization ruining the integrity of many countries and also is forcing many undeveloped nations into a bind, and is causing economic distress on some developed nations. Also, due to economic globalization the nations of the world are diluting their culture, sovereignty, natural resources, safety and political system. My goal is not to change your way of thought, but only to enlighten you of the negatives of global economic expansion.
Globalization is the process through which organizations tends to develop transnational influence in the international market. In this concern, the theory of Marxism will be appraised as it gives an idea regarding the relation of globalization with the cost
Colonialism was a concept of superiority of one territory over another; it was a concept that originated centuries ago. Colonialism had been put into action throughout a long line of history and did not end after World War II in 1945. Even with resistance and efforts from independent states after the war, colonialism did not disappear and continued as a dominant system. It remained and changed its form, resulted in the process of globalization, which continued to control over newly independent states following World War II. Globalization, a form of colonialism, maintained power for the system over states or regions through economic terms with the development of the World Bank, and its derivation of structural adjustments. This financial institution was formed and contributed to colonialism; it assisted in the economic affairs of colonized nation(s). Along with class, professor Manfred B. Steger's book, Globalization: A Very Short Introduction, and I.B. Logan and Kidane Mengisteab's article, "IMF – World Bank Adjustment and Structural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa," discussed the indirect rule of colonial powers through globalization.
Frank, Barney (1999), “The Correct Approach to Globalization,” Congressional Record, [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 17 May 2012.