Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corruption and influence fiction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Glasgow 5 March 1971 by Edwin Morgan
‘Glasgow 5 March 1971’ is a poem by Edwin Morgan which creates a
picture of a corrupt figure, but in a way the corrupt figure can be
seen as a hero if we look at the poem in the corrupt figures point of
view, but generally no one would classify the corrupt figures of being
heroes.
The poem ‘Glasgow 5 March 1971’ is an instamatic poem, where the poet
approaches to give an insight into the violent reality of the inner
city life. From the title we see that it is informal and conveys the
image of a headline report, to give a prosaic note of time and place.
But not only has the headline given us this feeling, as it seems like
a written report of the incident the way the poet has not involved
himself in the poem, but conveys the idea of someone standing back
watching the incident or someone that knows the young couple, besides
that the present tense is used to give immediacy.
The poem can be split into three parts, as there are three couples
involved. The beginning of the poem shows us the young couple are
passing by maybe looking at diamond engagement rings, when suddenly
they are used as human bricks by two young attackers, and fall
backwards into the shop window, suffering the start to bad pain and
injuries. While the two attackers continue to go ahead and snatch what
they can from this shop. At the meantime the two drivers passing by,
focusing on the road ahead trying to avoid the situation, and don’t
bother helping. This shows two corrupt figures, the drivers and the
attackers.
Firstly, the attackers can be classified as corrupt figures due to the
way they have treated the young couple as it disgusts us:
“The two youths who have pushed them
are about to c...
... middle of paper ...
...ves why are they? But the incident was
caused by the attackers.
The poet makes use of irony throughout the poem which gives us a
clearer image of the poem as it shows how fast the poem is going with
the violence and the pictures are moving about in our mind.
In conclusion the poet has created the attackers to be corrupt as they
stand out and we do have a reaction towards them. But throughout the
poem the poet shows us all kinds of techniques but at the very last
line of the poem Edwin Morgan reveals the message across to us. It
makes us wonder about the society we live in, where things happen and
are ignored and gives us a brief insight to the violence in the inner
city and such ignorance people have. In fact, the last line is very
much thought provoking, as why are the drivers so ignorant as well as
that it makes us think about the world around us.
This stanza feels dream like, the organization of thought is loose, and word choice seems almost erratic, almost unrehearsed. The first stanza ends with a twist. The faster boy is killed by a mine and his friend, just seconds behind, witnesses the whole thing.
Opposed to that of common thought, superman is not the only type of character that fits the heroic persona. Although “superheroes” typically come to mind when one thinks of a hero, there are many other ordinary people capable of extraordinary things. A hero is a person who takes the initiative to set out on a journey of internal growth. During this symbolic journey, one truly finds himself and betters the lives of other mentally and physically. In Homer’s epic poem The Odyssey, Odysseus takes the path of heroism, resulting in the reborn spirit of a selfless, modest hero. During the process, Odysseus is faced with many challenges that he must overcome in order to earn the noble title. Odysseus proves himself to be a well-deserving hero because he is intelligent with his decisions, he displays cleverness, and he rids himself of hubris.
In many works of Literature, a character comes forth as a hero, only to die because of a character trait known as a tragic flaw; Hamlet from Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Okonkwo from Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, and Winston Smith from Orwell’s 1984 all exhibit that single trait, which leads, in one way or another, to their deaths. These three tragic heroes are both similar and different in many ways: the way they die, their tragic flaws, and what they learn. All three characters strongly exhibit the traits needed to be classified as a tragic hero.
Heroes in literature and history, more often than not, meet tragic ends, unless they were created by Walt Disney. These particular people are often seen as someone who is apart from the masses in morals and attempt to accomplish a higher calling for the common good. The problem with this type of hero is that they are destined for suffering.Two such characters exist in classic literature, Winston Smith of George Orwell’s 1984 and Hamlet of William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.” Hamlet is the true classic tragic hero, though, because he is of noble birth, possesses high moral standards, completes the task he is given to better the world, and causes tragedy in both his life and the lives of others.
Hatto, A. T., gen. ed. "Heroes and Heroines." Traditions of Heroic and Epic Poetry. Volume Two: Characteristics and Techniques. London: The Modern Humanities Research Association, 1989.
In other words, he is not a tragic hero, but rather a misfortuned hero that
When tales of heroes are so grandiosely told through poems and stories often too wild to be real, the emphasis of heroism is shown through their journeys rather than their characteristics. They are in terms heroes without any real humane flaw; through the analysis of these two tales it’s, apparent that they share many similarities in the themes, but the traits of the protagonists and the reasonings behind the choices they made until their demise were entirely different. In these pieces of literature the villains are also in a limelight of their own, making one question, “Who was actually in the right all along? Who’s really to blame?” The antagonists are as infamous as the protagonist themselves are famous like a balancing act; only one of equal prowess can take down another. Items of value, recognition, and the art of gifting are shared through these epic poems but are the heroes in accepting them, the same?
The poem begins by explaining the sluggishness of time and sets the mood for the rest of the piece. The repetition of the word “slow” was employed by the author in order to emphasize that changes in life occur very slowly and may even pass unnoticed. However, it is still important to recognize that time is progressing, but it takes so long that it’s hard to realize so. The last sentence expands on this idea by introducing “palsied apples”, comparing time’s speed of movement with that of a paralyzed being. It is also important to highlight the relevance of the syntax present in the first lines of the poem, as its analysis will lead to an interesting contrast with the last stanza. Nevertheless, in the first stanza, the author describes a “copper-coated hill”, and in fact, the author continues to describe the setting of his poem by employing a variety of warm colors to capture the true essence of autumn.
...his not a tragic hero because he not outstanding and virtuous, and he does not achieve insightful recognition or redemption.
...y did not create a typical hero in his protagonist; one who wins a certain battle and is recognized as victorious. Instead, he created one who succeeds by being defeated, or by dying. However, because many people did not understand what he did, that he "died for life", it was not necessarily considered noble. He was defeated personally, but the reason he died was worth far more than his personal gain.
...s suffering. Royalty, goodness, and flaws are his full persona: no other intense personality traits shine through the shelled example of Oedipus. Well-constructed and complex, he has lasted the tests of time. Tragic heroes are wholly present in all famous literature. From Romeo and Juliet to Oedipus Rex, to Gatsby to Victor Frankenstein to Spiderman, tragic heroes are constantly found throughout human creation. They thrive on the idea that we control little beyond our own actions, which is a topic that humans have related to for millennia. Without these tragedies for humans to relate back to and reassure themselves, media as an entity would not be as popular today. Tragic heroes are morbidly fascinating, relatable, and provoking, lasting through years and connecting to an inner part within the entire human race. All of us have an inner tragedy, a tragic hero or not.
...of gentle and kindness shows that Odysseus is not a hero. His way of supporting ideas that favor him most portrays him as non-heroic and his true picture is also revealed by his selfishness and mercilessness.
Insistence upon the rank of the tragic hero, or the so-called nobility of his character, is re...
Cleverly , Rachael . "A Hero Among Men, A Man Among Heroes." Critical Analysis of Tennyson's Ulysses
...ctions do not have to be moral, in order to see him as a character that shows immense strife, great power and apparent flaws. His immorality is a disturbing aspect and makes it difficult to use the word, Hero, but it can also be argued that without his presence the story would hold no value. He is the main attraction and his journey becomes man’s journey. Writer William Blake shares: