Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary on moral dilemmas
A moral dilemma occurs when
Ethical dilemmas and decisions chapter 5 and 6
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary on moral dilemmas
Gilkey’s “strange dilemma” is a significant paradox in human life. In his setting, him and his peers are placed in a significantly stressful environment. People from many different backgrounds, economic statuses, religions, and ages are forced to live together in an uncomfortable, cramped, and dirty camp. In this new environment, a person’s primary goal is survival, followed by survival and success for themselves and their families. Within this raises the large moral dilemma that Gilkey’s references. In a community like the one Gilkey’s lives in, basic human needs are attempted to be covered. Food, healthcare, and shelter are provided for all the residents. This is a majorly different life setting for most of these people. Jobs roles are assigned, as at the end of the day the camp needs all parts working …show more content…
Many people are placed into cramped living experiences. Some rooms house up to 11 men. An example of this dilemma is when Gilkey’s requests that a room with nine mine takes in an additional man to make the living situation “fair.” Logically this idea makes complete sense. The living situation would provide more space for that group of men, which could reduce stress and provide better wellbeing among the people in the camp. One could argue that adding an additional man would harm the welfare of the other room, but having equality amongst the camp would provide consistency. The men in this situation referenced however, do not agree with Gilkey’s logic. They want what’s best for them and they don’t really care if the other room is struggling, because they’re struggling too. In this situation Gilkey’s has to defer to force to instill fairness among the residents. The moral dilemma is broken up here by Gilkey’s by the use of force. In this situation, the men chose the welfare of themselves over the welfare of the camp as a whole, and this may become a detriment in the
Comparative Analysis The power of blind obedience taints individuals’ ability to clearly distinguish between right and wrong in terms of obedience, or disobedience, to an unjust superior. In the article “The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism,” Marianne Szegedy-Maszak discusses the unwarranted murder of innocent individuals due to vague orders that did not survive with certainty. Szegedy-Maszak utilizes the tactics of authorization, routinization, and dehumanization, respectively, to attempt to justify the soldiers’ heinous actions (Szegedy-Maszak 76-77). In addition, “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” by Theodore Dalrymple distinguishes between blind disobedience and blind obedience to authority and stating that neither is superior;
...ahlquist’s sacrifice highlights Heinlein’s belief, that the same self-sacrificing impulse that Winston had, might facilitate positive social change. Contrastingly, Le Guin highlights the continued anomalies in human morality where society willingly sacrifices its morals to meet selfish needs. Overall, people’s capacity to effect social change is relative to the prevailing social conditions, their ability to impact critical aspects of the prevailing conflict and their capacity to accept self-sacrifice as morally justifiable. Consequently, moral ambiguity prevails.
Others weep for the ones lost. They then got prison clothes that were ridiculously fitted. They made exchanges and went to a new barracks in the “gypsies’ camp.” They waited in the mud for a long time. They were permitted to another barracks, with a gypsy in charge of them.
“Sunday in the Park” by Bel Kaufman, is a short story that illustrates the contrast and conflict of human behavior through a typical family's encounter with a barbaric man. Contrast is emphasized by conflicting pairs of opposing behaviors: civility, rationality, and harmony against barbaric, instinct, and turmoil. The author continuously develops a positive atmosphere, promptly to shatter the image. Through the story, Kaufman implies that humans conflict between their two sides of contrast, either it is the viewer, between characters, or within oneself.
...test, it is hard not to draw some parallels. Milgram noticed that if people did not have direct contact with the people they were inflicting pain on, two-thirds of the subjects inflicted what was considered extreme pain. If they had visual and voice feedback, only forty percent obeyed orders. The number fell to thirty percent if they were in direct contact with the person they were shocking. Browning also points out that the social pressures of conformity were quite apparent. "Within virtually every social collective, the peer group exerts tremendous pressures on behavior and sets the moral norms. If the men of Reserve Police Battalion 101 could become killers under such circumstances, what group of men cannot?" (Browning, 189) In closing, these men, who appeared to be quite ordinary, became extraordinary in their brutality and killing, no matter what the reason. Decidedly, their contribution to the genocide was quite significant. It is a shame that many received little, or no punishment for the slaughter they participated in.
In his book This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen, Tadeusz Borowski shows how the conditions and situations that the prisoners were put through made them make a choice that most humans never face. The choice of compassion and concern for ones fellow man or only loving and caring for one’s self. This may sound harsh people, but after seeing, hearing, smelling and feeling the things they did in camp, it was the only way to survive physically and mentally. The narrator in the book makes the decision numerous times and suffers from these choices as he
We see that the author’s purpose is to allow the readers to understand that the prisoners were not treated humanly, and allows us to see the negative attitudes the authority had towards the prisoners.
As the story begins, the men discuss giving the baby to neighboring camp, Red Dog. Females are located in Red Dog, which is why the men discuss this option. The men being “unanimous” disagree with this idea because they believe Red Dog “would swap it.” (12) Very subtly, the men believe they are the only protection for the young boy. However, this could, also, be directly related to the possibility that any of the men could be his father. The men express their protection for the upbringing of Tommy, which is generally a female gender norm of this era. The idea of making a hotel for family’s to stay in is discussed because it is believed that Tommy might “profit by female compassion.” (16) The plan is a mild form of protection to Tommy’s interest because they believe some female compassion will be beneficial. The men, however, do their best in order for Tommy to feel a sense of motherhood. As Kentuck tries to save Tommy in the last scene, he is described as “still holding the Luck” as an effort to protect Tommy from the elements. Unfortunately, Tommy dies and so does
In the novel Night, one of the guards told the Jews, "I am responsible for keeping order here. Anyone with a complaint may come to see me. That is all. Go to sleep. Two people to a bunk. Good night" (Wiesel). Elie responded with, "Those were the first human words" (Wiesel). The guard made the choice to treat the Jews with kindness even though the other guards did not. One’s circumstances can sometimes influence the choices that they make. For example, in the novel it says, "He was assisted by two prisoners. In exchange for two bowls of soup" (Wiesel). The prisoners offered to help hang the condemned prisoners because they were offered soup in exchange. The prisoners were hungry and in desperate circumstances and therefore made the decision to do it. The choices that one makes may have consequences, be it positive or
Ethical dilemmas create a challenge between two or more equally alternative problems requiring moral judgment. This creates both an obligation and dilemma for those involved. Living in such a globalized world with cross-cultural borders, races, and ideas; negotiating what is considered morally “right” can sometimes be very difficult. Both religion and laws have a major impact in ethical duties. What an individual may presume as right cannot be guaranteed by the government or political party. The Overcrowded Lifeboat is just one example in which all the ideas above come to play in ethical decisions.
What lengths should one go to in order to survive? This is a question which has challenged the human race for generations and to which no satisfactory answer exists. In the modern world, this issue is examined theoretically, but rarely confronts individuals, with the exception of the most destitute. However, in harsh environments and forbidding territories, this matter becomes very real and pressing. Nature pays no attention to the arbitrary emotions of man, demanding only the forfeiture of the sorrowfully short life granted to him. Many would argue that in order to delay the inevitable conclusion awaiting every man, humans must act upon their primal intuition rather than their emotions. Jack London’s “The Law of Life” includes this naturalistic viewpoint that human survival instinct drives individuals more than feelings or compassion. London shows this through his protagonist Old Koshkoosh’s past experiences and tribal upbringing, his view on life, and the actions of his family members.
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
The holocaust attested that morality is adaptable in severe conditions. Traditional morality stopped to be contained by the barbed wires of the concentration camps. Inside the camps, prisoners were not dealt like humans and thus adapted animal-like behavior needed to survive. The “ordinary moral world” (86) Primo Levi refers in his autobiographical novel Se questo è un uomo (If This Is a Man or Survival in Auschwitz), stops to exist; the meanings and applications of words such as “good,” “evil,” “just,” and “unjust” begin to merge and the differences between these opposites turn vague. Continued existence in Auschwitz demanded abolition of one’s self-respect and human dignity. Vulnerability to unending dehumanization certainly directs one to be dehumanized, thrusting one to resort on mental, physical, and social adaptation to be able to preserve one’s life and personality. It is in this adaptation that the line distinguishing right and wrong starts to deform.
(p.149). I do not think this is right because rich people do have a place to stay, and poor people might not have a place to sleep. I feel like we should not make it harder on the poor people by punishing them when we should be helping them find a warm and safe place to sleep.
We have been taught that we should always follow our priorities, whether it is dealing with jobs, families, education, or faith. Ethical egoism teaches us that if our interests are any one these or something else, we should put it first because these are our values. But how far should we go in protecting our values? Is there a limit of how they should be protected? Am I doing what’s best for my priorities or for me? Although we should protect our values, there needs to be a limit and a focus of how I should protect my values with the best intentions. The film, Prisoners, presents this moral dilemma of torture through the characters’ decisions and emotions.