Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Novel vs film
Novel vs film
The difference between novel and movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Novel vs film
In the story of Ghost World, by Daniel Clowes, two recent High School graduates—Enid and Becky—see their friendship crumble as they continue to live life beyond High School. Enid considers college and Becky, who has no extravagant plans, is disappointed by the fact that her best friend may be leaving her without consulting. Both girls are outsiders looking in and their adolescent journey to realizing who they are and who they want to be is is filled with comical antics including constant nagging, sarcasm, and romance. Film theorist Brian McFarlane explains that there are four areas of exploration called the “Adaptation Proper.” These areas are called, “Two signifying systems,” “The novel’s linearity and the film’s spatiality,” “Codes,” and “Stories told and stories presented.” I will reference each of these aspects to the adaptation of Ghost World. McFarlane’s idea of Two …show more content…
This involves contrast of the two language systems: Novels, which uses symbols to portray meaning, and films, which use codes to portray meaning. “The film’s story does not have to be told because it is presented” (29). The cinema is also unable to portray past tense in the ways that novels can. McFarlane also explains in “Stories told and presented” that the film is spatial, contrary to the novel’s linearity, resulting in different ways of presentation. McFarlane’s four significant areas of Adaptation Proper allows audiences to see different lenses between novel and film adaptations. Clowes’ novel and the film adaptation portray each of these four significant areas successfully. Clowes’ graphic novel is unique in that the reader has to sometimes assume what happened or has happened, making the reader interpret what happens. The visual and verbal codes were both prevalent in this
The only real way to truly understand a story is to understand all aspects of a story and their meanings. The same goes for movies, as they are all just stories being acted out. In Thomas Foster's book, “How to Read Literature Like a Professor”, Foster explains in detail the numerous ingredients of a story. He discusses almost everything that can be found in any given piece of literature. The devices discussed in Foster's book can be found in most movies as well, including in Quentin Tarantino’s cult classic, “Pulp Fiction”. This movie is a complicated tale that follows numerous characters involved in intertwining stories. Tarantino utilizes many devices to make “Pulp Fiction” into an excellent film. In this essay, I will demonstrate how several literary devices described in Foster's book are put to use in Tarantino’s film, “Pulp Fiction”, including quests, archetypes, food, and violence.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Many time in our lives, we have seen the transformation of novels into movies. Some of them are equal to the novel, few are superior, and most are inferior. Why is this? Why is it that a story that was surely to be one of the best written stories ever, could turn out to be Hollywood flops? One reason is that in many transformations, the main characters are changed, some the way they look, others the way they act. On top of this, scenes are cut out and plot is even changed. In this essay, I will discuss some of the changes made to the characters of the Maltese Falcon as they make their transformation to the ?big screen.?
This is done so the character development is clearly shown, the duration of the film can be limited and so the film can be kept interesting and engaging for the audience. The plot in the film is changed slightly from the novel it is based on to show the development of characters. Some settings are excluded or changed to limit the time of the movie. The character’s characteristics are slightly altered so the movie is kept interesting and engaging for the audience. By modifying these aspects of the film the producer is able to keep the audience engaged whilst showing character
Phillips, Gene D. Conrad and Cinema: The Art of Adaptation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 1995.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Whenever books are adapted for film, changes inevitably have to be made. The medium of film offers several advantages and disadvantages over the book: it is not as adept at exploring the inner workings of people - it cannot explore their minds so easily; however, the added visual and audio capabilities of film open whole new areas of the imagination which, in the hands of a competent writer-director, can more than compensate.
Films of this era are criticized for substituting violence and special effects for "substance". Many believe that creating a movie script is a juvenile form of writing, a shrub to the oak of a novel. Upon reading both the novel The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne and viewing the film produced by Roland Joffe, one notices the tremendous effort put into both. This essay will explore the many differences and similarities between the book and movie.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Another example is when Chance watches television. In the book, the narrator explains that when Chance changes the channel, he feels like he is changing himself. As he changes the channel, he gets caught up in all the different images he sees. In the movie, all you see is a man watching television, which doesn't explain too much. In the movie, the only time we find out what Chance thinks of television is when he is talking to someone else.
Picture books unlike novels have a very limited amount of words to inform the reader about the characters and the plot (Scott )(ou dvd no7). The use of a picture to complement and enhance the story is paramount, combining with the experience of the reader to disassemble meaning from the picture (Nodelman, 1999). Moebius quantifies this inherent ability into the elements of colour, perspective, position and size with finally line and capillary to create a code. It is possible to use this code to explore and evaluate some invisible and intangible concepts in Voices in the Park and The Tale of Peter Rabbit.
As stated numerous times throughout this essay, movies must stay true to their book predecessor for full effect. Books are normally beautifully described and written, and help the reader visualize a completely new world. Most movies, not just The Book Thief, normally omit several
Identity is important to everyone. It affects how others see you, as well as alters their judgement of you. In the novel Anil’s Ghost by Michael Ondaatje, identity and the character’s search for it both play a major role in the development of key characters and the plot. The identity of Sailor, the skeleton being studied throughout the novel by Anil and Sarath, plays a significant role in advancing the plot. The theme of identity is also apparent in Anil. She defies the identity that both her family and society attempt to place upon her. Her actions, both in the past and throughout the novel, display Anil’s distaste for roles and identities placed upon people, especially herself. Additionally, Anil’s decision to take her brother’s unused name,
Adaptation of any kind has been a debate for many years. The debate on cinematic adaptations of literary works was for many years dominated by the questions of fidelity to the source and by the tendencies to prioritize the literary originals over their film versions (Whelehan, 2006). In the transference of a story from one form to another, there is the basic question of adherence to the source, of what can be lost (Stibetiu, 2001). There is also the question of what the filmmakers are being faithful to or is it the novel’s plot in every detail or the spirit of the original (Smith, 2016). These are only few query on the issue of fidelity in the film adaptation.
The Dilemma of a Ghost is a short play written by the Ghanaian writer, Ama Ata Aidoo. The story is about a young Ghanaian man, Ato, currently studying in America. Here, he meets and falls in love with Eulalie; an African-American girl who lives in America. When he returns home with his new bride, Ato is torn between his family’s traditional custom against his wife’s western culture. His marriage and his wife’s behaviour become sources of great criticism from both family members and the Ghanaian community at large. The writer uses various scenarios to point out the difference between the African traditional culture and the modern western culture.