Ghost Movies Analysis

787 Words2 Pages

My claim is that the 13 ghost revolutionize the ghost movies on plots.Now we should compare the 1960’s 13 ghost to the 2001 version of the 13 ghost, the 1960’s version was just pretty much like a scooby-doo episode that is not child friendly so there will be deaths, the ghost looks wakie but still scary for its time. After that the ghost was a bit more friendly. But on the 2001 version it made everything scary with brutal deaths.Furthermore the ghost was always lethal to any human beings. Also there was a huge story behind the movie for example cyrus died so the family got the mansion and the money.After that the humans die in ways that will scare you for example getting your body get chopped off horizontally with all your body parts still …show more content…

Sometimes just one time can be enough.Therefore, i think what she is saying that the killer should kill none or kill one. Eyes without a face was a scary movie but not as good as 13 ghost.Doctor Genessier. The future, Madame, is something we needed to get a head start on.After that. The girl without a face is going to get a head start and take a face for her own.Louise She trusts you this time. I trust you Therefore. Everybody trusted the girl including Louise Doctor Genessier Smile. Not too much. After that. The girl can't smile without a face. It matters because it revolutionize scary movies After that. The reason why these movies are revolutionizing is because it was scary for its time and some was revolutionizing for example: the 13 ghost was a classic on story.These movies made the horror movie genre interesting back in the days making the reputation high.Finally, What makes you think these movies are scary, cool, revolutionizing, or even

More about Ghost Movies Analysis

Open Document