Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gentrification introduction
Gentrification introduction
Positive and negative consequences of gentrification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gentrification is a process that flips poor, deteriorated urban communities into luxurious, hip, and expensive residences. This process displaces lower-income people or families by increasing expenses such as rent or property values and brings in wealthier individuals, which buys them out of their homes. Gentrification remolds a neighborhood that is deemed to be “ghetto” into one that is more “livable” or “safe” and creates a better atmosphere for the wealthy. Though, there are many advantages to gentrification as well such as a reduce crime rate, renovated buildings/homes/parks, and overall increase in economic activity. Despite these benefits, gentrification seems to cause more harm than good. It is evident that the rapid expansion of gentrification …show more content…
is spreading throughout Philadelphia in such neighborhoods, like South Philadelphia and North Philadelphia. Once you see one of those tacky, colorful looking apartments or homes, you know that this neighborhood will soon be gentrified. There are many advantages and disadvantages of gentrification.
To start off, gentrification keeps the street clean and brings to light new shops, which brings jobs and upscale houses. Gentrification also improves public safety and reduces crime rate. But, with every advantage, there is a disadvantage. For one, it forces families out of their homes due to increasing taxes and resident expenses, which was mentioned before. This pushes families into other undesirable neighborhoods that these wealthy individuals do not bat an eye at creating an unsafe, dirty, and overpopulation neighborhood. Local businesses that have been located in such area that have been there for years will be bought out, forced to sell their stores. Newcomers into the neighborhood do not plan to bind with the existing neighborhood and therefore, making a whole new community. Rather than wanting to merge, they want to get rid of the old and in with the new. The care for existing community is pretty much non-existent. As noted, I still believe that gentrification do more harm than good. There may be an increase in security and comfort, but money always play an important role in …show more content…
society. The city of Philadelphia claims that its goal is to encourage the growth and development in such deteriorated neighborhoods by making it economically and racially diverse, all while protecting long-time homeowners.
But, is this goal met? Will this goal be kept in place? Gentrification in Philadelphia is spreading to neighborhoods in lower North Philly, South Philly, University City, Fairmount, Point Breeze, Kensington, and more. Taxes are rising and it is hard to keep rent or property expensive the same. Alda Ballard, a woman who lived in Center City West for nearly 70 years, owns a seven-bedroom brownstone. She is trying her best to maintain rent for her tendants below $850. Though, she is not too worried, but she is aware that longtime homeowners are being bought out of their homes and forced to move out into somewhere else. Homeowners are not the only targets, urban gardens in vacant lots are also being seized. Since land values are increasing, a growing number of community gardens are being lost to “sheriff’s sale or private sale.” Volunteers put all their hard work and effort into creating these gardens, which reduced violent crime rate, into these neighborhoods, only for it to be taken away from them. These gardens are accessible to low-income communities that lack grocery stores and parks. Urban gardeners are fighting to permanently preserve these neighborhood gardens. These gardens are a safe haven for youth and creates a better atmosphere to those living in these
low-income communities, which can further improving these neighborhoods without the need of gentrification. Civic engagement can impact gentrification. We can either take the route of stopping gentrification completely or changing the ways of gentrification. To change this way, we can reach out to communities and teach them how to maintain their homes or clean up streets so they won’t be a target. Many of us students who volunteer at community gardens, schools, nonprofit organizations, etc. can come together and improve a neighborhood. Together, not only will this bring us together, it will also give us a sense of security and the great feeling of helping another person. There will always be homes or properties for sale and these wealthy individuals can look elswhere for these residencies. They should be seeking other neighborhoods. By participating in civic engagement, you can promote such goals and bring groups together to fight for what is important- to stop forcing people out of their homes by increasing expenses. Gentrification is truly a realtive merit or in other words, a double edge sword. Many neighborhoods are severely impacted all throughout the world, especially in congested cities such as Philadephia and New York. It is evident that we need to focus on building our own communities from top to bottom to prevent the expansion of gentrification. We, as a community, need to come together and find a solution that will better us and low-income persons or families as well as local business owners. This way, we can end gentrification once and for all, all while maintaining the advantages gentrification brings such as reduce crime rate, cleaner streets, and more.
“Gentrification is a general term for the arrival of wealthier people in an existing urban district, a related increase in rents and property values, and changes in the district's character and culture.” (Grant) In layman’s terms, gentrification is when white people move to a black neighborhood for the sake of cheaper living, and in turn, raise up property values and force black neighbors to leave because of a higher price of living. Commonly, the government supports gentrification with the demolition of public housing in areas that are developing with more white neighbors. This is causing a decreasing amount of African Americans to be able to afford to live in the neighborhood as their homes are taken away from them, forcing them to relocate. Whilst gentrification normally has negative connotations, there are several people who believe gentrification brings about “an upward trend in property values in previously neglected neighborhoods.” (Jerzyk) On the other hand, this new trend in property value and business causes those...
Another noteworthy urban sociologist that’s invested significant research and time into gentrification is Saskia Sassen, among other topical analysis including globalization. “Gentrification was initially understood as the rehabilitation of decaying and low-income housing by middle-class outsiders in central cities. In the late 1970s a broader conceptualization of the process began to emerge, and by the early 1980s new scholarship had developed a far broader meaning of gentrification, linking it with processes of spatial, economic and social restructuring.” (Sassen 1991: 255). This account is an extract from an influential book that extended beyond the field of gentrification and summarizes its basis proficiently. In more recent and localized media, the release the documentary-film ‘In Jackson Heights’ portrayed the devastation that gentrification is causing as it plagues through Jackson Heights, Queens. One of the local businessmen interviewed is shop owner Don Tobon, stating "We live in a
There are many examples of cities reforming itself over time, one significant example is Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. More than a hundred years after the discovery of gold that drew thousands of migrants to Vancouver, the city has changed a lot, and so does one of its oldest community: Downtown Eastside. Began as a small town for workers that migrants frequently, after these workers moved away with all the money they have made, Downtown Eastside faced many hardships and changes. As a city, Vancouver gave much support to improve the area’s living quality and economics, known as a process called gentrification. But is this process really benefiting everyone living in Downtown Eastside? The answer is no. Gentrification towards DTES(Downtown Eastside) did not benefit the all the inhabitants of the area. Reasons are the new rent price of the area is much higher than before the gentrification, new businesses are not community-minded, and the old culture and lifestyle of the DTES is getting erased by the new residents.
Older gentrification is issued onto poor black communities to increase white supremacy in the area and improve living conditions in the so called “hood.” After Older proposed his thoughts on Gentrification being an issue in colored low-income neighborhoods, he then turns to criticizing another writer with a different point of view on the issue. The author of “Is Gentrification All Bad?” in an article in the New York Times explains his views on gentrification. Older places emphasis on one of Davidson’s claim on “sweet spots” in the community saying “Davidson talks of a “sweet spot”: some mythical moment of racial, economic harmony where the neighborhood stays perfectly diverse and balanced.” (Older 358) The author does not support this claim as to being logical in his sense. Older’s views represents an opposite approach on the same issue of gentrification. In another quote “The gears are all already in place, the mechanisms of white supremacy and capitalism poised to make their moves.” (Older 358) the author speaks on how white people are over taking the poor colored communities to improve their lives, but not thinking about the consequences of the affected
Gentrification makes way for safe neighborhoods that were once considered to be unsafe because of crime. Areas such as Echo Park, East LA, and Bed-Stuy, once notorious for being some of the most dangerous places in the United States are now safer than ever because of the changes brought by gentrification. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, “…gentrification can cause an initial increase in crime because neighborhood change causes destabilization, although in the long run gentrification leads to a decline in crime as neighborhood cohesion increases.” (2016, HUD USER). The arrival of new members of the community and the changes they bring creates unrest in the form of crime.
Every neighborhood has both positive and negative situations. It is whom every choice to decide on where to live. Gentilly is a family neighborhood. Memories have been built here for centuries. It is one of the most historical places. It wouldn’t get any better than to live in a neighborhood that has great food, universities, and has tons of history.
“The Deeper Problems We Miss When We Attack ‘Gentrification’”exhibit their opinion on the positives of gentrification and the potential of “revitalization” in low-income urban communities. Badger argues that gentrification brings nothing more than further opportunities for urban communities while integrating citizens of different social classes.Furthermore , she continues to question if gentrification is in fact the monster that brings the prior expressions against gentrification where she says “If poor neighborhoods have historically suffered from dire disinvestment, how can the remedy to that evil — outside money finally flowing in — be the problem, too?”(Badger) Stating that the funds generated from sources external that are brought into these communities can’t be problematic. This concept is further elaborated in the article “Does Gentrification Harm the Poor” where Vigdoor list the potential positive enhancements gentrification can have on an urban area in America ,stating that gentrification can
... motivation for wealthy individuals to return to the inner-city core but it also provides impetus for commercial and retail mixed-use to follow, increasing local revenue for cities (Duany, 2001). Proponents of gentrification profess that this increase in municipal revenue from sales and property taxes allows for the funding of city improvements, in the form of job opportunities, improved schools and parks, retail markets and increased sense of security and safety ((Davidson (2009), Ellen & O’Reagan (2007), Formoso et. al (2010)). Due to the increase in housing and private rental prices and the general decrease of the affordable housing stock in gentrifying areas, financially-precarious communities such as the elderly, female-headed households, and blue-collar workers can no longer afford to live in newly developed spaces ((Schill & Nathan (1983), Atkinson, (2000)).
Gentrification is defined as the process by which the wealthy or upper middle class uproot poorer individuals through the renovation and rebuilding of poor neighborhoods. Many long-term residents find themselves no longer able to afford to live in an area, where the rent and property values are increasing. Gentrification is a very controversial topic, revealing both the positive and negative aspects of the process. Some of the more desirable outcomes include reduced crime rate, increased economic activity, and the building of new infrastructures. However, it is debated whether the negatives overwhelm the positive. An increase in the number of evictions of low-income families, often racial minorities can lead to a decline of diversity
In discussions of Gentrification, one controversial issue has been with displacement. Gentrification is the process of renovating and repairing a house or district so that it complies to wealthier residents (Biro, 2007, p. 42). Displacement is a result of gentrification, and is a major issue for lower income families. Gentrification is causing lower-income residents to move out of their apartments because they’re being displaced by upper class residents who can afford high rent prices and more successful businesses. Throughout out the essay, I will discuss how gentrification affects lower income residents and how it results in displacement. Then I will follow on by discussing some positive and negative effects that take place because of Gentrification.
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention defines gentrification as “the transformation of neighborhoods from low value to high value…gentrification is a housing, economic, and health issue that affects a community’s history and culture and reduces social capital often by shifting a neighborhood’s characteristics by adding new stores and resources in previously run-down neighborhoods.” Gentrification disproportionately affects special populations, including but not limited to the poor, women, children, the elderly and a vast majority of minority groups.
Gentrification is described as the renovation of certain neighborhoods in order to accommodate to young workers and the middle-class. For an area to be considered gentrified, a neighborhood must meet a certain median home value and hold a percentage of adults earning Bachelor’s degree. Philadelphia’s gentrification rate is among the top in the nation; different neighborhoods have pushed for gentrification and have seen immense changes as a result. However, deciding on whether or not gentrification is a beneficial process can become complicated. Various groups of people believe that cities should implementing policy on advancing gentrification, and others believe that this process shouldn’t executed. Both sides are impacted by the decision to progress gentrification; it is unclear of the true implications of completely renovating impoverished urban areas; gentrification surely doesn’t solve all of a community’s issues. I personally believe that gentrification is not necessarily a good or bad process; gentrification should occur as a natural progression of innovative economies and novel lifestyles collide within certain areas. Policy involving gentrification should not support the removal of people out of their neighborhood for the sake of advancement.
When their neighborhood starts changing and all these luxury homes are being built for the wealthier residents, you can have a lot of racial tension. Although the Upper class residents do occupy these newly renovated places, they are not to blame for it. Policy makers encourage gentrification more than they oppose it. To the Government it increases property taxes, and boost the economy. Ronnie Flores states; “[…] Success is measured not by how well people are accommodated, but how much profit can be made’’. It can be discouraging when Policy makers seem to be on the opposite side of what these longtime residents want to prevent or at least co-exist with. Investors and developers are always on the lookout for areas where they can buy cheap and reap the profits. Not once keeping in the mind the effects it can have on the current residents who built this city life that draws so much attention to it.
Lance Freeman tackles the issue of gentrification from the perspectives of residents in the gentrified neighborhood. He criticizes the literature for overlooking the experiences of the victims of gentrification. The author argues that people’s conceptions on the issue are somewhat misinformed in that most people consider it as completely deplorable, whereas in reality, it benefits the community by promoting businesses, different types of stores, and cleaner streets. These benefits are even acknowledged by many residents in the gentrified neighborhood. However, the author admits that gentrification indeed does harm. Although gentrification does not equate to displacement per se, it serves to benefit primarily homeowners and harm the poor. Additionally,
Gentrification is the keystone for the progression of the basic standards of living in urban environments. A prerequisite for the advancement of urban areas is an improvement of housing, dining, and general social services. One of the most revered and illustrious examples of gentrification in an urban setting is New York City. New York City’s gentrification projects are seen as a model for gentrification for not only America, but also the rest of the world. Gentrification in an urban setting is much more complex and has deeper ramifications than seen at face value. With changes in housing, modifications to the quality of life in the surrounding area must be considered as well. Constant lifestyle changes in a community can push out life-time